Abstract
The high cost of commercial cellulases still hampers the economic competitiveness of the production of fuels and chemicals from lignocellulosic biomasses. This cost may be decreased by the on-site production of cellulases with the integrated use of the lignocellulosic biomass as carbon source. This integrated approach was evaluated in the present study whereby steam-pretreated sugarcane bagasse (SPSB) was used as carbon source for the production of cellulases by Trichoderma reesei Rut C30. The use of SPSB resulted in an enzyme preparation with a cellulase activity of 1.93 FPU/mL. Additionally, a significant β-glucosidase activity, of 0.37 BGU/mL, was achieved in buffered media, which is not a common feature of T. reesei culture supernatants, indicating the importance of pH control during enzyme production. The hydrolysis of SPSB with the laboratory-made mixture resulted in a glucose yield of 80%, which was equivalent to those observed for control experiments using commercial enzymes. It was shown that SPSB is a promising carbon source for the production of cellulases and β-glucosidases by T. reesei Rut C30 and that the enzyme preparation obtained is effective for the hydrolysis of SPSB without the need for β-glucosidases supplementation, supporting the on-site integrated approach to decrease the cost of the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
CONAB (2018) Boletim Cana 4 Levantamento. pp 17–18. https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/cana
da Delabona PS, Farinas CS, da Silva MR et al (2012) Use of a new Trichoderma harzianum strain isolated from the Amazon rainforest with pretreated sugar cane bagasse for on-site cellulase production. Bioresour Technol 107:517–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.048
de Porciuncula JO, Furukawa T, Shida Y et al (2013) Identification of major facilitator transporters involved in cellulase production during lactose culture of Trichoderma reesei PC-3-7. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77:1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.120992
Ellilä S, Fonseca L, Uchima C et al (2017) Development of a low-cost cellulase production process using Trichoderma reesei for Brazilian biorefineries. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0717-0
Ferreira-Leitão V, Gottschalk LMF, Ferrara MA et al (2010a) Biomass residues in Brazil: availability and potential uses. Waste Biomass Valorization 1:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-010-9008-8
Ferreira-Leitão V, Perrone C, Rodrigues J et al (2010b) An approach to the utilisation of CO2 as impregnating agent in steam pretreatment of sugar cane bagasse and leaves for ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-7
Fockink DH, Sánchez JH, Ramos LP (2018) Comprehensive analysis of sugarcane bagasse steam explosion using autocatalysis and dilute acid hydrolysis (H3PO4 and H2SO4) at equivalent combined severity factors. Ind Crops Prod 123:563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.017
Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198759020257
Gottschalk LMF, Oliveira RA, da Bon EPS (2010) Cellulases, xylanases, β-glucosidase and ferulic acid esterase produced by Trichoderma and Aspergillus act synergistically in the hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Biochem Eng J 51:72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2010.05.003
Gruno M, Väljamäe P, Pettersson G, Johansson G (2004) Inhibition of the Trichoderma reesei cellulases by cellobiose is strongly dependent on the nature of the substrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 86:503–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10838
Häkkinen M, Sivasiddarthan D, Aro N et al (2015) The effects of extracellular pH and of the transcriptional regulator PACI on the transcriptome of Trichoderma reesei. Microb Cell Fact 14:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0247-z
Johnson E (2016) Integrated enzyme production lowers the cost of cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 10:164–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1634
Jørgensen H, Olsson L (2006) Production of cellulases by Penicillium brasilianum IBT 20888—effect of substrate on hydrolytic performance. Enzyme Microb Technol 38:381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.06.018
Juhász T, Egyházi A, Réczey K (2005a) β-Glucosidase production by Trichoderma reesei. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121:0243–0254. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:121:1-3:0243
Juhász T, Szengyel Z, Réczey K et al (2005b) Characterization of cellulases and hemicellulases produced by Trichoderma reesei on various carbon sources. Process Biochem 40:3519–3525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.057
Kamal-Eldin A, Lærke HN, Knudsen K-EB et al (2009) Physical, microscopic and chemical characterisation of industrial rye and wheat brans from the Nordic countries. Food Nutr Res 53:1912. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v53i0.1912
Klein-Marcuschamer D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons BA, Blanch HW (2012) The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1083–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24370
Kovács K, Szakacs G, Zacchi G (2009) Comparative enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated spruce by supernatants, whole fermentation broths and washed mycelia of Trichoderma reesei and Trichoderma atroviride. Bioresour Technol 100:1350–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.006
Li C, Yang Z, He Can Zhang R et al (2013) Effect of pH on cellulase production and morphology of Trichoderma reesei and the application in cellulosic material hydrolysis. J Biotechnol 168:470–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.10.003
Lian X, Chao H, Wan feng P, et al (2013) Efficient cellulase production from low-cost substrates by Trichoderma reesei and its application on the enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:5018–5024. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.1761
Liu G, Zhang J, Bao J (2016) Cost evaluation of cellulase enzyme for industrial-scale cellulosic ethanol production based on rigorous Aspen Plus modeling. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39:133–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1497-1
Longati AA, Lino ARA, Giordano RC et al (2018) Defining research and development process targets through retro-techno-economic analysis: the sugarcane biorefinery case. Bioresour Technol 263:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.102
Lynd LR, Liang X, Biddy MJ et al (2017) Cellulosic ethanol: status and innovation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 45:202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.03.008
Macrelli S, Mogensen J, Zacchi G (2012) Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-22
Mandels M, Weber J (1969) The production of cellulases. pp 391–414
Martins LF, Kolling D, Camassola M et al (2008) Comparison of Penicillium echinulatum and Trichoderma reesei cellulases in relation to their activity against various cellulosic substrates. Bioresour Technol 99:1417–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.060
Montenecourt BS, Eveleigh DE (1979) Selective screening methods for the isolation of high yielding cellulase mutants of Trichoderma reesei. pp 289–301
NEDO (2017) NEDO Demonstrates the effectiveness of a bioethanol production technology that utilizes bagasse as a feedstock in Thailand. http://www.nedo.go.jp/english/news/AA5en_100238.html. Accessed 7 Sep 2020
Pallapolu VR, Lee YY, Garlock RJ et al (2011) Effects of enzyme loading and β-glucosidase supplementation on enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass processed by leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 102:11115–11120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.085
Paloheimo M, Haarmann T, Mäkinen S, Vehmaanperä J (2016) Production of industrial enzymes in Trichoderma reesei. In: Dattenböck C, Schmoll M (eds) Gene expression systems in fungi advancements and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–57
Peterson R, Nevalainen H (2012) Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30—thirty years of strain improvement. Microbiology 158:58–68. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.054031-0
Pryor SW, Nahar N (2015) β-glucosidase supplementation during biomass hydrolysis: how low can we go? Biomass Bioenerg 80:298–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.005
Ryu DDY, Mandels M (1980) Cellulases: biosynthesis and applications. Enzyme Microb Technol 2:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(80)90063-0
Salles-Filho S, Bin A, Castro PFD et al (2016) Innovation in the Brazilian bioethanol sector: questioning leadership. In: Global bioethanol. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp 122–141
Seiboth B, Pakdaman BS, Hartl L, Kubicek CP (2007) Lactose metabolism in filamentous fungi: how to deal with an unknown substrate. Fungal Biol Rev 21:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2007.02.006
Silva DF, Hergesel LM, Campioni TS et al (2018) Evaluation of different biological and chemical treatments in agroindustrial residues for the production of fungal glucanases and xylanases. Process Biochem 67:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.02.008
Singhania RR, Adsul M, Pandey A, Patel AK (2017) Cellulases. In: Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp 73–101
Sipos B, Benkő Z, Dienes D et al (2010) Characterisation of specific activities and hydrolytic properties of cell-wall-degrading enzymes produced by Trichoderma reesei Rut C30 on different carbon sources. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161:347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8824-4
Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, et al (2012) NREL/TP-510–42618 analytical procedure—determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in Biomass. Lab Anal Proced 17. NREL/TP-510-42618
van den Brink J, Maitan-Alfenas GP, Zou G et al (2014) Synergistic effect of Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma reesei enzyme sets on the saccharification of wheat straw and sugarcane bagasse. Biotechnol J 9:1329–1338. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400317
Yu X-B, Yun HS, Koo Y-M (1998) Production of cellulase by Trichoderma reesei Rut C30 in wheat bran-containing media. J Microbiol Biotechnol 8:208–213
Zhang L, Liu Y, Niu X et al (2012) Effects of acid and alkali treated lignocellulosic materials on cellulase/xylanase production by Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 and corresponding enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass Bioenerg 37:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.044
Zhao C, Deng L, Fang H (2018) Mixed culture of recombinant Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger for cellulase production to increase the cellulose degrading capability. Biomass Bioenerg 112:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.03.001
Zheng W, Chen X, Xue Y et al (2017) The influence of soluble polysaccharides derived from rice straw upon cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei. Process Biochem 61:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.06.007
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Clarissa Perrone for providing the samples of steam-pretreated sugarcane bagasse.
Funding
The present work was conducted without any specific funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Marcella Fernandes de Souza contributed through the analysis and interpretation of data and the drafting of the manuscript. Elba Pinto da Silva Bon contributed with the critical revision of the manuscript regarding its coherence and scientific contribution. Ayla Sant’Ana da Silva contributed through the conception and design of the experiments, the collection, assembly, analysis and interpretation of data and the final revision of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.
Consent for publication
All authors have consented to publish the present work.
Dta availability
Data will be made available upon request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Souza, M.F., da Silva Bon, E.P. & da Silva, A.S. Production of cellulases and β-glucosidases by Trichoderma reesei Rut C30 using steam-pretreated sugarcane bagasse: an integrated approach for onsite enzyme production. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 38, 435–442 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-021-00114-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-021-00114-5