Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Curriculum-Based Course Timetabling with Student Flow, Soft Constraints, and Smoothing Objectives: an Application to a Real Case Study

  • Case Report
  • Published:
SN Operations Research Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with curriculum-based course timetabling. In particular, we describe the results of a real application at the University of Rome “Tor Vergata.” In this regard, we developed a multi-objective mixed-integer model which attempts to optimize (i) the flow produced by the students enrolled in the lectures, (ii) soft conflicts produced by the possible overlap among compulsory and non-compulsory courses, and (iii) the number of lecture hours per curriculum within the weekdays. The model has been implemented and solved by means of a commercial solver and experiments show that the model is able to provide satisfactory solutions as compared with the real scenario under consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Yakoob SM, Sherali HD (2007) A mixed-integer programming approach to a class timetabling problem: a case study with gender policies and traffic considerations. Eur J Oper Res 180(3):1028–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Badri MA (1996) A two-stage multi-objective scheduling model for faculty-course time assignments. Eur J Oper Res 94:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellio R, Ceschia S, Di Gaspero L, Schaerf A, Urli T (2013) A simulated annealing approach to the curriculum-based course timetabling problem. In: Proceedings of the 6th multidisciplinary international conference on scheduling: theory and applications, MISTA 2013, Belgium, pp 314–317

  4. Bellio R, Ceschia S, Di Gaspero L, Schaerf A, Urli T (2014) Feature-based tuning of simulated annealing applied to the curriculum-based course timetabling problem. arXiv:1409.7186

  5. Bettinelli A, Cacchiani V, Roberti R, Toth P (2015) An overview of curriculum-based course timetabling. TOP 23:313–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Birbas T, Daskalaki S, Housos E (1997) Timetabling for Greek high schools. J Oper Res Soc 48:1191–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonutti A, De Cesco F, Di Gaspero L, Schaerf A (2012) Benchmarking curriculum-based course timetabling: formulations, data formats, instances, validation, visualization, and results. Ann Oper Res 194(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cacchiani V, Caprara A, Roberti R, Toth P (2013) A new lower bound for curriculum-based course timetabling. Comput Oper Res 40(10):2466–2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cambazard H, Demazeau F, Jussien N, David P (2005) Interactively solving school timetabling problems using extensions of constraint programming. In: Burke E, Trick M (eds) LNCS, vol 3616, pp 190–207

  10. Carter MW (2001) A comprehensive course timetabling and student scheduling system at the University of Waterloo. In: Burke E, Erben W (eds) LNCS, vol 2079. Springer, Berlin, pp 64–82

  11. Costa D (1994) A tabu search algorithm for computing an operational timetable. Eur J Oper Res 76:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colorni A, Dorigo M, Maniezzo V (1992) A genetic algorithm to solve the timetable problem, Technical Report 90-060 revised, Politecnico di Milano Italy

  13. de Werra D (1985) An introduction to timetabling. Eur J Oper Res 19:151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Gaspero L, McCollum B, Schaerf A (2007) The second international timetabling competition (ITC-2007): curriculum-based course timetabling (track 3). Technical report, School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queens University, Belfast (UK), (site: http://www.cs.qub.ac.uk/itc2007/)

  15. Dimopoulou M, Miliotis P (2001) Implementation of a university course and examination timetabling system. Eur J Oper Res 130:202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geiger MJ (2009) Multi-criteria curriculum-based course timetabling—a comparison of a weighted sum and a reference point based approach. In: Ehrgott M, Fonseca CM, Gandibleux X, Hao JK, Sevaux M (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization, EMO 2009, LNCS, vol 5467. Springer, pp 290–304

  17. Geiger MJ (2012) Applying the threshold accepting metaheuristic to curriculum based course timetabling. Ann Oper Res 194(1):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunawan A, Ng KM, Poh KL (2006) A mathematical programming model for a timetabling problem. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Computing, Navade, USA

  19. Hao JK, Benlic U (2011) Lower bounds for the ITC-2007 curriculum-based course timetabling problem. Eur J Oper Res 212(3):464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hinkin R, Thompson MG (2002) Schedulexpert: scheduling courses in the Cornell University School of Hotel Administration. Interfaces 32(6):45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Junginger W (1986) Timetabling in Germany: a survey. Interfaces 16:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiefer A, Hartl R, Schnell A (2014) Adaptive large neighborhood search for the curriculum-based course timetabling problem. Technical report UNIVIE-PLIS-2014-001 University of Vienna

  23. Lach G, Lübbecke M (2012) Curriculum based course timetabling: new solutions to Udine benchmark instances. Ann Oper Res 194(1):255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lü Z, Hao JK, Glover F (2011) Neighborhood analysis: a case study on curriculum-based course timetabling. J Heuristics 17(2):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lübbecke M (2015) Comments on: an overview of curriculum-based course timetabling. TOP 23(2):359–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mushi AR (2004) Mathematical programming formulations for the examinations timetable problem, the case of the university of Dar es salaam. African Journal Science and Technology, Science and Engineering Series 5:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  27. Papoutsis K, Valouxis C, Housos E (2003) A column generation approach for the timetabling problem of Greek high schools. J Oper Res Soc 54:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rudová H, Murray K (2003) University course timetabling with soft constraints. In: Burke E, De Causmaecker P (eds) LNCS, vol 2740. Springer, Berlin, pp 310–328

  29. Schaerf A (1999) A survey of automated timetabling. Artif Intell Rev 13 (2):87–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schimmelpfeng K, Helber S (2007) Application of a real-world university-course timetabling model solved by integer programming. OR Spectr 29(4):783–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarawneh HY, Ayob M, Ahmad Z (2013) A hybrid simulated annealing with solutions memory for curriculum-based course timetabling problem. J Appl Sci 13:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tripathy A (1984) School timetabling, a case in large binary integer linear programming. Manag Sci 30:1473–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tripathy A (1992) Computerised decision aid for timetabling - a case analysis. Discret Appl Math 35(3):313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wren A (1996) Scheduling, timetabling and rostering, a special relationship?. LNCS 1153:46–75. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has been supported by the University of Rome “Tor Vergata” under grant TRAN.S.S.UM.: Transportation Sustainability and Students’ Urban Mobility: A Multicriteria Approach Through Class Timetabling Optimization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Impresa, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico, 1 - 00133, Rome, Italy

    Massimiliano Caramia & Stefano Giordani

Authors
  1. Massimiliano Caramia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefano Giordani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimiliano Caramia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caramia, M., Giordani, S. Curriculum-Based Course Timetabling with Student Flow, Soft Constraints, and Smoothing Objectives: an Application to a Real Case Study. SN Oper. Res. Forum 1, 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-020-0013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-020-0013-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation