Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Subsequent Pregnancy Outcome in Women with Prior Complete Uterine Rupture: A Single Tertiary Care Centre Experience

  • Maternal Fetal Medicine/Biology: Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limited data is available to assess the burden of maternal morbidity, mortality, and perinatal outcome after subsequent pregnancy in women with prior uterine rupture. Therefore, this retrospective descriptive study was conducted to determine subsequent pregnancy outcomes in a larger series of women with prior complete uterine rupture. All pregnant women who had complete uterine rupture were managed according to the standard Institute protocol. The women who conceived following a uterine repair from July 2011 to June 2020 were recruited into the study. Outcome measures included severe maternal morbidities and perinatal outcomes. Fifty-three women with prior complete uterine rupture were conceived subsequently. Two women had an abortion in the first and second trimester, respectively. None of the women developed recurrence of uterine rupture. However, three women developed uterine dehiscence in a total of 16 women who went into spontaneous labour before elective cesarean delivery at 32, 36, and 37 weeks, respectively. None of the women had placenta previa, placenta accreta, bowel injury, bladder injury and none required a hysterectomy. However, 16.7% of women needed a blood transfusion. None of the women required mechanical ventilation, inotropic support, and intensive care unit stay. Seventeen babies required neonatal intensive care admission, and prematurity (90%) was the most common reason, followed by low APGAR scores. In conclusion, subsequent pregnancy outcomes in women with prior uterine rupture appear acceptable in institutionalized care. Timing of cesarean delivery may have to be weighed against the risk of prematurity-associated neonatal morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data available with corresponding author and can be provided upon reasonable request.

Code Availability

None.

References

  1. Murphy DJ. Uterine rupture. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;18(2):135–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Turner MJ. Uterine rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16:6979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanos V, Toney ZA. Uterine scar rupture - Prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:115–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:25819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eze JN, Anozie OB, Lawani OL, Ndukwe EO, Agwu UM, Obuna JA. Evaluation of obstetricians' surgical decision making in the management of uterine rupture. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Walsh C, Baxi L. Rupture of the primigravid uterus: A review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(5):327–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Usta IM, Hamdi MA, Musa AA, Nassar AH. Pregnancy outcome in patients with previous uterine rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:172–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox NS, Gerber RS, Mourad M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with prior uterine rupture or dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:785–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peker N, Aydın E, Evsen MS, et al. Unscarred uterine rupture, and subsequent pregnancy outcome - a tertiary centre experience. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(2):95–0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox NS, Gerber RS, Mourad M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with prior uterine rupture or dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4):785–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al Qahtani NH, Al HF. Pregnancy outcome and fertility after complete uterine rupture: a report of 20 pregnancies and a review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(5):1123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chibber R, El-Saleh E, Al Fadhli R, Al Jassar W, Al Harmi J. Uterine rupture, and subsequent pregnancy outcome--how safe is it? A 25-year study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(5):421-424.

  13. Delecour L, Rudigoz RC, Dubernard G, Huissoud C. Pregnancy, and delivery after complete uterine rupture. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(1):23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qureshi B, Inafuku K, Oshima K, Masamoto H, Kanazawa K. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment to predict the integrity and quality of cesarean scar during pregnancy: a prospective study. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1997;183(1):55–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim AC, Kwee A, Bruinse HW. Pregnancy after uterine rupture: a report of 5 cases and a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:613–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Connor RA, Gaughan B. Pregnancy following simple repair of the ruptured gravid uterus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96:9424.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N Jha: Helped in conceptualization, design, execution, extraction of data, interpretation, statistical analysis and preparation of final draft of manuscript.

MS Madhuri: Helped in conceptualization, design, execution, extraction of data, interpretation of result and preparation of final draft of manuscript.

AK Jha: Helped in conceptualization, design, execution, extraction of data, interpretation of result and preparation of final draft of manuscript.

NS Kubera: Helped in conceptualization, design, execution, extraction of data and preparation of final draft of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nivedita Jha.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by Institute Ethics Committee JIPMER, Puducherry, India (JIP/IEC/2020/255 dated 02/11/2020).

Consent to Participate

The patients provided written informed consent for participation in the study.

Consent to Publication

The patients provided written informed consent for publication of anonymized data.

Conflicts of Interest

None of authors reported any conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jha, N., Madhuri, M.S., Jha, A.K. et al. Subsequent Pregnancy Outcome in Women with Prior Complete Uterine Rupture: A Single Tertiary Care Centre Experience. Reprod. Sci. 29, 1506–1512 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00906-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-00906-1

Key words

Navigation