Skip to main content
Log in

Effective IoT Based Analysis of Photoplethysmography Waveforms for Investigating Arterial Stiffness and Pulse Rate Variability

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to detect variations in blood volume in the peripheral arterial pulse, photoplethysmography (PPG) can be used as an electro-optical method. Recognized as a straightforward, non-invasive, and reasonably priced method for diagnosing cardiovascular issues, PPG pulse characterization has attracted a lot of attention in recent years. IoT based analysis of PPG contours can shed light on cardiac characteristics at various points in the cardiac cycle. Loss of pulsatility associated with age and Cardio Vascular Disease (CVD) is the primary limitation of contour analysis The e waves are classified through optimistic discrete wavelet and CNN based approach. As a result, IoT based accurate delineation of the PPG pulse is necessary for accurate detection of heart illness. In addition, resampling the SDPPG signal ensures the occurrence of particular facts when it comes to the process of building slabs of attention, in which the undesired slabs are primarily removed by means of onset criteria. Research provides a comparison of the performance of the proposed method to that of other machine learning based techniques. In terms of classification accuracy (Normal, P1, and P2 pulses: 95.9%, 93.4%, and 90.08% respectively), wavelet-based CNN with PPG signal outperforms CNN with PPG and ABP signals. Correct classification is aided by CNN's ability to extract many features associated with premature pulses. To ensure that no pulses are missed, our method estimates the wavelet transform at one-second intervals over the whole signal's duration. CNN's incremental fine tuning also aids in improving both sensitivity and specificity. The wavelet-based CNN outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity when classifying waves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Resit A, Kavsaoglu K, Polat MR. An innovative peak detection algorithm for photoplethysmography signals: an adaptive segmentation method. Turkish J Electr Eng Comp Sci. 2016;24:1782–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrozaq A, Hamdan F, Rhandy A, Hasballah Z. Early detection of cardiovascular disease with photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensor, Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI). 2015

  3. Elgendi M. Detection of c, d, and e waves in the acceleration Photoplethysmogram. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;117:125–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Narayana D, Shruthi, S Digital processing of ECG and PPG signals for study of arterial parameters for cardiovascular risk assessment, Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing, 2015, 1506–1510

  5. Parasnis R, Pawar A, Manivannan, M. Multiscale entropy and poincare plot-based analysis of pulse rate variability and heart rate variability of ICU patients, Proceedings of the International Conference on Inelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences, 2015, pp. 290–295.

  6. Shukla S, Roy V, Prakash A. Wavelet based empirical approach to mitigate the effect of motion artifacts from EEG Signal, 2020 IEEE 9th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), 2020, pp. 323–326, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT48778.2020.9115761.

  7. Kudo S, Chen Z, Zhou X, Izu L, Chen-Izu Y, Zhu X, Tamura T, Kanaya S, Huang M. A training pipeline of an arrhythmia classifier for atrial fibrillation detection using Photoplethysmography signal. Front Physiol. 2023;14:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sengthipphany, T, Tretriluxana, S, Chitsakul, K. Comparison of Heart Rate statistical parameters from Photoplethysmographic signal in resting and exercise conditions, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/ Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology, 2015, pp. 766–770.

  9. Shadi, SC, Belhage B, Hoppe K, Branebjerg J, Thomsen EV. Sternal pulse rate variability compared with heart rate variability on healthy subjects, Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2014, pp. 3394–3397.

  10. Kuntamalla S, Ram Gopal Reddy L. An efficient and automatic systolic peak detection algorithm for photoplethysmographic signals. Int J Comp Appl. 2014;97(19):18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talukdar D, Deus L, Sehgal N. Evaluation of atrial fibrillation detection in short-term photoplethysmography (PPG) signals using artificial intelligence. MedRxiv. 2023;2023:23286847.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen C, Hua Z, Zhang R, Liu G, Wen W. Automated arrhythmia classification based on a combination network of CNN and LSTM. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;57: 101819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Emma W, Östling G, Nilsson PM, Olofsson P. Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roy V, Shukla S. Designing efficient blind source separation methods for EEG motion artifact removal based on statistical evaluation. Wireless Pers Commun. 2019;108:1311–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06470-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Panwar M, Gautam A, Biswas D, Acharyya A. PP-Net: A deep learning framework for PPG-based blood pressure and heart rate estimation. IEEE Sens J. 2020;20:10000–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aschbacher K, Yilmaz D, Kerem Y, Crawford S, Benaron D, Liu J, Eaton M, Tison G, Olgin J, Li Y, et al. Atrial fibrillation detection from raw photoplethysmography waveforms: a deep learning application. Heart Rhythm. 2020;O2(1):3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghosal P., Rajarshi G. Classification of photoplethysmogram signal using self organizing map, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, 2015, pp. 114–118.

  18. Ivrea D, Veiga C, Rodríguez-Andina J, Farña J, Garcxixa E. Using support vector machines for atrial fibrillation screening. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Edinburgh, UK, 19–21 June 2017; pp. 2056–2060.

  19. Roy V, Shukla S. Effective EEG motion artifacts elimination based on comparative interpolation analysis. Wireless Pers Commun. 2017;97:6441–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4846-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohamed E, Ian N, Matt B, Derek A, Dale S. Detection of a and b waves in the acceleration photoplethysmogram. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:139–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elgendi M, Norton I, Brearley M. Systolic peak detection in acceleration photoplethysmograms measured from emergency responders in tropical conditions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Hajj C, Kyriacou P. A review of machine learning techniques in photoplethysmography for the non-invasive cuff-less measurement of blood pressure. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2020;58: 101870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blazek R, Lee C. Multi-resolution linear model comparison for detection of dicrotic notch and peak in blood volume pulse signals, Proceedings of the International Biosignal Processing Conference: Biosignal, 2010, pp. 378–386.

  24. Khandoker AH, Karmakar CK, Palaniswami M. Comparison of pulse rate variability with heart rate variability during obstructive sleep apnea. J Med Eng Phys. 2011;33(2):204–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shukla S, Roy V, Prakash A. Wavelet based empirical approach to mitigate the effect of motion artifacts from EEG signal, 2020 IEEE 9th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), Gwalior, India, 2020, pp. 323–326, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT48778.2020.9115761.

  26. Loh H, Xu S, Faust O, Ooi C, Barua P, Chakraborty S, Tan R, Molinari F, Acharya U. Application of photoplethysmography signals for healthcare systems: An in-depth review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;216: 106677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Soundararajan M, Arunagiri S, Alagala S. An adaptive delineator for photoplethysmography waveforms. Biomed Eng. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2015-0190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Siddiqui S, Kos A. Non-invasive blood-glucose estimation using smartphone PPG signals and subspace kNN classifier. Elektrotehniski Vestn. 2019;86:68–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Bhagyalakshmi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Machine Intelligence and Smart Systems” guest edited by Manish Gupta and Shikha Agrawal.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sankranti, S.R., Basha, S.M., Kantha, B.L. et al. Effective IoT Based Analysis of Photoplethysmography Waveforms for Investigating Arterial Stiffness and Pulse Rate Variability. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 474 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02777-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-02777-6

Keywords

Navigation