Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Compound Set and Traditional Set Resistance Training in Women: Changes in Muscle Strength, Endurance, Quantity, and Architecture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of using compound sets during a 12-week lower body resistance training program on muscle strength, endurance, hypertrophy, architecture, and soreness. Thirty-one recreationally active females were randomly assigned to one of three groups: traditional sets, compound sets, or control. The training groups performed Smith Machine squat and leg press at matched intensities, volumes, and cumulative rest per session. During compound sets, the squat was performed immediately prior to the leg press, while 1 min rest separated the exercises during traditional sets. A non-exercise control group did not perform resistance training. One-repetition maximum strength, muscle endurance, muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, pennation angle, training session time, and soreness were compared from pre- to post-training (α level < 0.05). Squat and leg press muscle strength and endurance were significantly increased following compound and traditional sets (P < 0.001). Compound and traditional sets were greater than the control group’s post-test 1-RM strength and muscle endurance on squat and leg press (P < 0.05). Cross-sectional area and muscle thickness increased after compound and traditional set training from pre- to post-training (P < 0.05). Neither training group had changes to pennation angle. There were no differences between training time per session, as well as subjective soreness at 12 (P > 0.80), 24 (P > 0.50), or 48 (P > 0.30) h post-workout. In conclusion, compound set training, with equated rest, is a method of resistance training that elicits gains similar to traditional sets in young females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander RM, Vernon A. The dimensions of knee and ankle muscles and the forces they exert. J Hum Mov Stud. 1975;1:115–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Hörnstedt P, Lindblom J, Karlsson J, Grimby G. Effect of pre-exhaustion exercise on lower-extremity muscle activation during a leg press exercise. J Strength Cond Research. 2003;17(2):411–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Bronks R, Newton RU. Training-specific muscle architecture adaptation after 5-wk training in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(12):2013–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Deans N, Zhou S. Lack of human muscle architectural adaptation after short-term strength training. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35(1):78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brentano MA, Umpierre D, Santos LP, Lopes AL, Radaelli R, Pinto RS, Kruel LFM. Muscle damage and muscle activity induced by strength training super-sets in physically active men. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(7):1847–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark BC, Collier SR, Manini TM, Ploutz-Snyder LL. Sex differences in muscle fatigability and activation patterns of the human quadriceps femoris. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94(1):196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Abingdon: Routledge; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Costill DL, Coyle EF, Fink WF, Lesmes GR, Witzmann FA. Adaptations in skeletal muscle following strength training. J Appl Physiol. 1979;46(1):96–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dankel SJ, Jessee MB, Mattocks KT, Mouser JG, Counts BR, Buckner SL, Loenneke JP. Training to fatigue: the answer for standardization when assessing muscle hypertrophy? Sports Medicine. 2017;47(6):1021–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farup J, Kjølhede T, Sørensen H, Dalgas U, Møller AB, Vestergaard PF, Ringgaard S, Bojsen-Møller J, Vissing K. Muscle morphological and strength adaptations to endurance vs. resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(2):398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Folland JP, Irish CS, Roberts JC, Tarr JE, Jones DA. Fatigue is not a necessary stimulus for strength gains during resistance training. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36(5):370–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Franchi MV, Longo S, Mallinson J, Quinlan JI, Taylor T, Greenhaff PL, Narici MV. Muscle thickness correlates to muscle cross-sectional area in the assessment of strength training-induced hypertrophy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(3):846–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallina A, Render JN, Santos J, Shah H, Taylor D, Tomlin T, Garland SJ. Influence of knee joint position and sex on vastus medialis regional architecture. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018;43(6):643–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill-Haas S, Bishop D, Dawson B, Goodman C, Edge J. Effects of rest interval during high-repetition resistance training on strength, aerobic fitness, and repeated-sprint ability. J Sports Sci. 2007;25(6):619–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawakami Y, Abe T, Fukunaga T. Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(6):2740–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kuno SY, Fukunaga T. Training-induced changes in muscle architecture and specific tension. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;72(1–2):37–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Krieger JW. Single vs. multiple sets of resistance exercise for muscle hypertrophy: a meta-analysis. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(4):1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCambridge TM, Stricker PR. Strength training by children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2008;121(4):835–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Merrigan JJ, White JB, Hu YE, Stone JD, Oliver JM, Jones MT. Differences in elbow extensor muscle characteristics between resistance-trained men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018;118(11):2359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Naclerio F, Naclerio F, Faigenbaum AD, Larumbe-Zabala E, Perez-Bibao T, Kang J, Ratamess NA, Triplett NT. Effects of different resistance training volumes on strength and power in team sport athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(7):1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nimphius S, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Changes in muscle architecture and performance during a competitive season in female softball players. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(10):2655–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nosaka K, Newton M. Concentric or eccentric training effect on eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(1):63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Puthucheary ZA, McNelly AS, Rawal J, Connolly B, Sidhu PS, Rowlerson A, Moxham J, Harridge SD, Hart N, Montgomery HE. Rectus femoris cross-sectional area and muscle layer thickness: comparative markers of muscle wasting and weakness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(1):136–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Paz GA, Robbins DW, de Oliveira CG, Bottaro M, Miranda H. Volume load and neuromuscular fatigue during an acute bout of agonist-antagonist paired-set vs. traditional-set training. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(10):2777–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rana SR, Chleboun GS, Gilders RM, Hagerman FC, Herman JR, Hikida RS, Kushnick MR, Staron RS, Toma K. Comparison of early phase adaptations for traditional strength and endurance, and low velocity resistance training programs in college-aged women. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(1):119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Robbins DW, Young WB, Behm DG, Payne WR. Agonist-antagonist paired set resistance training: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(10):2873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roman WJ, Fleckenstein J, Stray-Gundersen J, Alway SE, Peshock R, Gonyea WJ. Adaptations in the elbow flexors of elderly males after heavy-resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74(2):750–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rooney KJ, Herbert RD, Balnave RJ. Fatigue contributes to the strength training stimulus. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26(9):1160–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vickers AJ. Time course of muscle soreness following different types of exercise. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2001;2(1):5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1123–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wells AJ, Fukuda DH, Hoffman JR, Gonzalez AM, Jajtner AR, Townsend JR, et al. Vastus lateralis exhibits non-homogenous adaptation to resistance training. Muscle Nerve. 2014;50(5):785–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kinesiology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MS4D2, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA

    Justin J. Merrigan, Margaret T. Jones & Jason B. White

  2. Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Justin J. Merrigan, Margaret T. Jones & Jason B. White

Authors
  1. Justin J. Merrigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margaret T. Jones
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jason B. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret T. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Merrigan, J.J., Jones, M.T. & White, J.B. A Comparison of Compound Set and Traditional Set Resistance Training in Women: Changes in Muscle Strength, Endurance, Quantity, and Architecture. J. of SCI. IN SPORT AND EXERCISE 1, 264–272 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-00030-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-00030-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation