Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of an Earth-Air Heat Exchanger in a Commercial Greenhouse to Improve Energy Efficiency

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Greenhouses in colder northern climates typically require significant supplemental heating for year-round operation, usually provided by natural gas combustion. One potential method of reducing greenhouse energy use is to incorporate an earth-air heat exchanger (EAHE) for seasonal heat storage; however, there is little guidance in the literature on the feasibility of this technology in cold-climate greenhouses.

Methods

This study uses simulations to examine the potential energy savings that could be achieved in cold-climate greenhouses by incorporating an EAHE system. A lumped parameter greenhouse energy model previously developed and tested against experimental data from several commercial and passive greenhouses was modified to simulate the addition of an EAHE in a commercial-scale lettuce greenhouse. The operation and energy use of this greenhouse was simulated at several locations across Canada. Crop evapotranspiration was included in the energy balance, and the greenhouse was assumed to deploy a thermal curtain at night.

Results

The EAHE sub-model was validated against experimental results available in the literature and was found to accurately predict the outlet air temperature of an EAHE. The predicted change in required supplemental heating with an operating EAHE varied from a 100% reduction in Victoria, BC, to a 13.3% reduction in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Conclusions

EAHE use could reduce, or in a few locations with milder winters, even remove the need for supplemental heating at commercial-scale Canadian greenhouses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The typical meteorolgoical data used in this paper is publicly available. Inquiries about software code or other data used in this student should be directed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

A GH :

Surface area of greenhouse (m2)

A pipe :

Area of pipe surface for EAHE (m2)

c i :

Specific heat capacity of material (J·kg−1·kg−1)

COP :

Coefficient of performance

dAH :

Absolute humidity change at each time step of layer i (kg·m−3)

D i :

Inner diameter of EAHE pipe (m)

dt :

Time step (s)

dT i :

Temperature change at each time step of i (°C)

dx :

Vertical layer thickness (m)

\( {\dot{E}}_{blower} \) :

EAHE fan blower power (W)

f :

Friction factor

\( {\dot{F}}_{blower} \) :

EAHE fan volume flow (m3·s−1)

h :

Convective heat transfer coefficient (W·m−2·K−1)

k i :

Thermal conductivity of i (W·m−1·K−1)

\( \dot{L} \) :

Latent transfer from EAHE operation (W·m−2)

L pipe :

Length of EAHE pipe (m)

\( {\dot{m}}_{air} \) :

Mass flow rate of air through EAHE (kg·s−1)

\( {\dot{m}}_{conv} \) :

Mass exchange coefficient (kg·s−1)

MM air :

Molar mass of air (kg·mol−1)

MM water :

Molar mass of water (kg·mol−1)

\( {\dot{m}}_{phase} \) :

Rate of condensation/evaporation from pipe surface (kg·s−1)

m water :

Free condensed water in EAHE pipes (kg)

N p :

Number of parallel pipes in EAHE

Nu :

Nusselt number

Pr :

Prandtl number

P sas :

Saturated vapor pressure (Pa)

\( {\dot{Q}}_{conduction} \) :

Conductive heat transfer (W)

\( {\dot{Q}}_{conv} \) :

Convective heat transfer (W)

\( {\dot{Q}}_{EAHE} \) :

Useful thermal energy from EAHE (W)

\( {\dot{Q}}_{latent} \) :

Latent heat transfer from evaporation/condensation (W)

\( {\dot{Q}}_s \) :

Sensible heat transfer (W)

R :

Thermal resistance (°C·W−1)

Re :

Reynolds number

RH :

Relative humidity (%)

T :

Temperature (°C)

v :

Air velocity through EAHE pipes (m·s−1)

V GH :

Volume of greenhouse (m3)

V pipe :

Volume of EAHE pipe (m3)

ΔP :

Pressure drop along pipe length (Pa)

η blower :

Fan blower efficiency

λ :

Latent heat of condensation (J·kg−1)

μ :

Dynamic viscosity of air (kg·m−1·s−1)

ρ i :

Density of material i (kg·m−3)

χ :

Absolute humidity of air (kg·m−3)

ω :

Humidity ratio of air (kg·kg−1)

References

  • Abu-Hamdeh, M. (2003). Thermal properties of soils as affected by density and water content. Biosystems Engineering., 86(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00112-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, F., Bellia, L., & Minichiello, F. (2011). Earth-to-air heat exchangers for Italian climates. Renewable Energy, 36(8), 2177–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, B., Misra, R., Agrawal, G. D., & Mathur, J. (2010). Performance analysis of earth-pipe-air heat exchanger for summer cooling. Energy and Buildings., 42(5), 645–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisoniya, T. (2015). Design of earth-air heat exchanger system,". Geothermal Energy., 3(18), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-015-0036-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisoniya, T., Kumar, A., & Baredar, P. (2013). Experimental and analytical studies of earth–air heat exchanger (EAHE) systems in India: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews., 19, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulard, T., Razafinjohany, E., & Baille, A. (1989a). Heat and water vapour transfer in a greenhouse with an underground heat storage system part I. Experimental Results. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 45, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(89)90042-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulard, T., Razafinjohany, E., & Baille, A. (1989b). Heat and water vapour transfer in a greenhouse with an underground heat storage system part II. Model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 45, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(89)90043-9

  • Threefold Farm. (2019, January 4). Climate battery greenhouse. Retrieved August 12, 2022, from https://threefold.farm/climate-battery-greenhouse.

  • Government of Canada. (2021). Engineering climate datasets. Retreived November 25, 2021 from https://climate.weather.gc.ca/prods_servs/engineering_e.html

  • Hamdhan, I., & Clarke, B. (2010). Determination of thermal conductivity of coarse and fine sand soils. In Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress (pp. 1–7). Bali, Indonesia. April 25–29, 2010

  • Khabbaz, M., Benhamou, B., Limam, K., Hollmuller, P., Hamdi, H., & Bennouna, A. (2016). Experimental and numerical study of an earth-to-air heat exchanger for air cooling in a residential building in hot semi-arid climate. Energy and Buildings., 125, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khabbaz, M., Benhamou, B., Limam, K., Hamdi, H., Hollmuller, P., & Bennouna, A. (2015). Experimental and numerical study of an earth-to-air heat exchanger for buildings air refreshment in Marrakech. In Proc. of 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference, Building Simulation BS’2015 (pp. 1–7). Hyderabad, India. December 7–9, 2015

  • Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B., & Rubel, F. (2006). World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift., 15(3), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehdid, C., Benchabane, A., Rouag, A., Moummi, N., Melhegueg, M., Moummi, A., Benabdi, M., & Brima, A. (2018). Thermal design of Earth-to-air heat exchanger. Part II a new transient semi-analytical model and experimental validation for estimating air temperature. Journal of Cleaner Production., 198, 1536–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalakakou, G., Lewis, J., & Santamouris, M. (1996). The influence of different ground covers on the heating potential of earth-to-air heat exchangers. Renewable Energy, 7(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1481(95)00114-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, A., Lubitz, W.D., Tasnim, S., & Han, J. (2021a). Development and evaluation of a new greenhouse energy model with data from four Ontario greenhouses. In: Canadian Greenhouse Conference, Niagra Falls, Canada (Virtual). Oct. 6–7, 2021a. Retreived from https://www.canadiangreenhouseconference.com/attendee-information/research-poster-session/Nauta_Alex_CGC_09_28_2021a.pdf

  • Nauta, A., Lubitz, W.D., Tasnim, S., & Mahmud, S. (2021b). Thermal modelling of greenhouse using 1D lumped capacitance model. In 5th International Conference of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (pp. 1–12). Quebec City, Canada (Virtual). May 11–14, 2021b

  • Nauta, A., Lubitz, W.D., Tasnim, S., & Han, J. (2022). Methodology and validation of a new climate prediction model for commercial and small-scale greenhouses. In D.S.-K. Ting, A. Vasel-Be-Hagh (Eds.) Proceedings of Responsible Engineering and Living 2022 Symposium and Industry Summit (REAL2022), (pp. 129–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20506-4

  • Oyj, V. (2013). Humidity conversion formulas. Retrieved August 10, 2022 from https://www.hatchability.com/Vaisala.pdf

  • Ozgener, O., Ozgener, L., & Goswami, D. (2011). Experimental prediction of total thermal resistance of a closed loop EAHE for greenhouse cooling system. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer., 38, 711–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2011.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretti, C., Zarrella, A., De Carli, M., & Zecchin, R. (2013). The design and environmental evaluation of earth-to-air heat exchangers (EAHE). A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews., 28, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piche, P., Haillot, D., Gibout, S., Arrabie, C., Lamontagne, M.-A., Gilbert, V., & Bedecarrats, J.-P. (2020). Design, construction and analysis of a thermal energy storage system adapted to greenhouse cultivation in isolated northern communities. Solar Energy., 204, 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schild, P., & Mysen, M. (2009). Recommendations on specific fan power and fan system efficiency. International Energy Agency, Oslo, Norway. Technical Note AIVC 65. Dec. 2009

  • Semple, L., Carriveau, R., & Ting, D. (2018). Potential for large-scale solar collector system to offset carbon-based heating in the Ontario greenhouse sector. International Journal of Sustainable Energy., 37(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2016.1270946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Li, Y., Wang, R., & Liu, W. (2014). Performance investigation of a solar heating system with underground seasonal energy storage for greenhouse application. Energy, 67, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Wang, J., Li, L., Wang, F., & Gang, W. (2020). Utilization of earth-to-air heat exchanger to pre-cool/heat ventilation air and its annual energy performance evaluation: A case study. Sustainability., 12(20), 8330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, M., & Remund, S. (2001). IEA-ECBCS Annex 28 Subtask 2 Report 2, Chapter F Ground Coupled Air Systems. In N. Barnard, & D. Jaunzens (Eds.), Low energy cooling-technology selection and early design guidance. (pp. 95–109). Construction Research Communications Ltd, 2001

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was completed as part of a larger project investigating the energy use, and potential for energy savings, in commercial horticultural greenhouses funded by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) Alliance – Tier 1 program (grant UG-T1-2020-100103 “Heat Storage to Save Energy in Ontario Greenhouses”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William David Lubitz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Convergence Test

The number of discrete pipe segments required for accurate EAHE modelling was examined using a convergence test. For this test, pipe length was assumed to be 72 m, with a 15 cm diameter of 15 cm, a 2.7 m depth and a 4 m·s−1 air speed. The inlet air temperature was assumed constant at 25 °C and the undisturbed soil temperature was set to 12 °C. Table 12 gives the soil and material properties. The simulation duration was set to 72 h, with a time step of dt = 10 s.

Table 12 Properties used in convergence test

The simulated outlet air temperature was used to evaluate the convergence, based on the absolute relative approximate error between successive segment lengths (Table 13). An absolute relative approximate error of less than 0.5% was used as the stopping criterion. The absolute RAE was found iteratively by comparing the predicted outlet temperatures between cases. For example, the absolute RAE between 1 and 2 discretized segments was found using the formula,

$$RAE\left(\%\right)=\left|\frac{Outlet\;temperature\;\left(1segment\right)-Outlet\;temperature\;(2\;segments)}{Outlet\;temperature\;(2\;segments)}\right|\bullet100\%=6.59\%$$
(26)

As can be seen below, a minimum of 16 segments should be used when discretizing the EAHE model.

Table 13 Convergence test for EAHE with respect to outlet air temperature

Appendix 2: Equations for Temperature and Absolute Humidity Changes

In the equations below, dTi represents the temperature change of layer i over time step dt, with ci representing the layer-specific heat capacity (J·kg−1·K−1), ρi is the layer density (kg·m−3), and dxi is layer vertical thickness (m). The heat transfer pathways between layers are a combination of convection (conv), conduction (cond), evapotranspiration (trans), and infrared radiation (IR), while the heat resulting from solar input (sol rad), EAHEs (EAHE), and ventilation (vent) are also included. Refer to Fig. 4 for the assignment of layer number subscripts (i.e., layer 1 is the glazing layer). The following equations are used when the energy curtain is not deployed. When the energy curtain is deployed, the equations are slightly modified to include an additional curtain layer. Details of this can be found in Nauta et al. (2022).

$${dT}_1=\frac{dt\;(Q_{solrad_1}+{Q_{solref}}_1-Q_{conv_{1\rightarrow amb}}-Q_{IR_{1\rightarrow sky}}+Q_{conv_{2\rightarrow1}}+Q_{IR_{5\rightarrow1}}+Q_{IR_{6\rightarrow1}})}{c_1\;\rho_1\;{dx}_1}$$
(27)
$${dT}_2=\frac{dt\;(-Q_{conv_{2\rightarrow1}}+Q_{solrad_2}-{Q_{vent}}_2)}{c_2\;\rho_2{\;dx}_2}$$
(28)
$${dT}_4=\frac{dt\;(Q_{solrad_4}+Q_{conv_{5\rightarrow4}}+Q_{{conv}_{6\rightarrow4}}-{0.5Q}_{t{rans}_{5\rightarrow4}}-Q_{{vent}_4}-Q_{EAHE\rightarrow air})}{c_4\;\rho_4{\;dx}_4}$$
(29)
$${dT}_5=\frac{dt\;(Q_{solrad_5}+Q_{solra{d_{ref}}_5}-Q_{conv_{5\rightarrow4}}-Q_{IR_{5\rightarrow1}}-{0.5Q}_{tr{ans}_{5\rightarrow4}}-Q_{IR_{5\rightarrow sky}})}{c_5\;\rho_5{\;dx}_5}$$
(30)
$${dT}_6=\frac{dt\;(Q_{solrad_6}-Q_{conv_{6\rightarrow4}}+Q_{{cond}_{7\rightarrow6}}-Q_{IR_{6\rightarrow1}}-Q_{IR_{6\rightarrow sky}})}{c_6\;\rho_6{\;dx}_6}$$
(31)

*Note that Equation 12 is used for layers i = 7 through 12 with only the layer subscripts changing

$${dT}_i=\frac{dt\;(Q_{cond_{i+1\rightarrow i}}-Q_{cond_{i\rightarrow i-1}})}{c_{i\;}\rho_i{\;dx}_i}$$
(32)
$${dT}_{13}=\frac{dt\;({-Q}_{cond_{13\rightarrow12}})}{c_{13\;}\rho_{13}\;{dx}_{13}}$$
(33)

The change in absolute humidity of the greenhouse air over time step dt is dAH. The change is a result of crop transpiration (trans), latent heat transfer from ventilation (latent), and latent heat transfer from the EAHE. Here, λ is the latent heat of condensation for water (2250 J·kg−1).

$$dAH\left(\frac{kg}{m^3}\right)=\frac{dt\;({\dot{Q}}_{trans}-{\dot{Q}}_{latent}-{\dot{L}}_{EAHE\rightarrow air})}{\lambda\;{dx}_{air\;layer}}$$
(34)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nauta, A., Tasnim, S.H. & Lubitz, W.D. Simulation of an Earth-Air Heat Exchanger in a Commercial Greenhouse to Improve Energy Efficiency. J. Biosyst. Eng. 48, 291–308 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-023-00188-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-023-00188-8

Keywords

Navigation