Abstract
Purpose
The improvement in transmission loss (TL) in the target frequency band is the primary goal of exhaust muffler design. The non-reflective boundary conditions are simulated, and the transmission loss is calculated using the finite element method.
Methods
By modifying structural elements such as the expansion diameter, expansion length, open area ratio, and baffle plate, the reactive muffler used in the farm tractor was given an improved TL using the finite element method (FEM). Improved mufflers’ noise emission was tested and compared to that of an existing reactive-type muffler. The tests were conducted in accordance with ISO 7216 and ISO 5131, the worldwide requirements for product noise emissions while considering different types of exhaust systems, location of the sound level meter, engine speed, and operating gear. The collected data was examined using a factorial test that was based on a fully randomized design.
Results
The modified muffler-2’s TL in the frequency range of 0–2000 Hz increased on average by 22.75 dB in comparison to the existing reactive-type muffler. According to the outcomes of a completely randomized design, the primary influences of engine speed, gear position, and exhaust type on the noise produced by tractors were found to be significant at a 5% level of significance. Modified muffler-2 decreased tractor sound pressure level for a range of 2.26–3.03 dBA in all treatments.
Conclusions
Structural modification in reactive muffler based on FEM helped in improving transmission loss which results in the reduced sound pressure level of the tractor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aybek, A., Kamer, H. A., & Arslan, S. (2010). Personal noise exposures of operators of agricultural tractors. Applied Ergonomics, 41(2), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.07.006
Barbieri, R., & Barbieri, N. (2013). Acoustic horns optimization using finite elements and genetic algorithm. Applied Acoustics, 74(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.09.007
Davis Jr, D. D., Stokes, G. M., Moore, D., & Stevens Jr, G. L. (1954). Theoretical and experimental investigation of mufflers with comments on engine-exhaust muffler design (No. NACA-TR-1192). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19930092208
Fan, W., & Guo, L. X. (2016). An investigation of acoustic attenuation performance of silencers with mean flow based on three-dimensional numerical simulation. Shock and Vibration, 2016, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6797593
Fu, J., Zheng, W., Xu, M., Wang, W., & Huang, Y. (2021). Study on the influence of structure factors of diesel engine exhaust purification muffler on transmission loss in different frequency bands. Applied Acoustics, 180, 108147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108147
Guan, D., Zhao, D., & Ren, Z. (2020). Aeroacoustic attenuation performance of a Helmholtz resonator with a rigid baffle implemented in the presence of a grazing flow. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1916239
ISO 5131 (1996). Acoustics: Tractor and machinery for agriculture and forestry measurement of noise at operator’s position.
ISO 7216 (1992). Acoustics: Agricultural and forestry wheeled tractors and self-propelled machines- Measurement of noise when in motion.
Jahanbakhshi, A., Ghamari, B., & Heidarbeigi, K. (2020). Vibrations analysis of combine harvester seat in time and frequency domain. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 14(1), 6251–6258. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.14.1.2020.04.0489
Jena, D. P., & Panigrahi, S. N. (2017). Numerically estimating acoustic transmission loss of a reactive muffler with and without mean flow. Measurement, 109, 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.065
Jun, F., ZengFeng, Z., Wei, C., Hong, M., & JianXing, L. (2018). Computational fluid dynamics simulations of the flow field characteristics in a novel exhaust purification muffler of diesel engine. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 37(4), 816–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348418790488
Kashikar, A., Suryawanshi, R., Sonone, N., Thorat, R., & Savant, S. (2021). Development of muffler design and its validation. Applied Acoustics, 180, 108132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108132
Kumar, N., & Pandey, K. P. (2015). A visual basic program for predicting optimum gear and throttle position for best fuel economy for 32 kW tractor. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 119, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.10.024
Kumar, N., & Tewari, V. K. (2022). Development of combined resistance muffler for reduced noise of farm tractor. Materials Today: Proceedings, 66, 3756–3761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.008
Kumar, N., Tewari, V. K., & Singh, G. (2017). Performance evaluation of tractor mufflers for human comfort. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 55(2), 1–12.
Lashgari, M., & Maleki, A. (2016). Evaluation of lawn tractor noise using acoustic and psychoacoustic descriptors. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 9(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2015.07.001
McBride, D. I., Firth, H. M., & Herbison, G. P. (2003). Noise exposure and hearing loss in agriculture: A survey of farmers and farm workers in the Southland region of New Zealand. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1281–1288. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44996929
Mohammad, R. G., Mohammad, R. M., Narges, K., Farshad, N., & Samaneh, M. B. F. (2013). Driver exposure and environmental noise emission of Massey Ferguson 285 tractor during operations with different engine speeds and gears. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(8), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.435
Montenegro, G., Onorati, A., & Della Torre, A. (2013). The prediction of silencer acoustical performances by 1D, 1D–3D and quasi-3D non-linear approaches. Computers & Fluids, 71, 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.10.016
Papadopoulos, C. I. (2003). Development of an optimised, standard-compliant procedure to calculate sound transmission loss: Numerical measurements. Applied Acoustics, 64(11), 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(03)00066-5
Shao, Y. L. (2011). A study on exhaust muffler using a mixture of counter-phase counteract and split-gas rushing. Procedia Engineering, 15, 4409–4413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.828
Shen, C., & Hou, L. (2017). Comparison of various algorithms for improving acoustic attenuation performance and flow characteristic of reactive mufflers. Applied Acoustics, 116, 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.034
Torregrosa, A. J., Gil, A., Garcia-Cuevas, L. M., Quintero, P., & Denia, F. D. (2018). Prediction of the transmission loss in a flexible chamber. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 82, 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.07.003
Upadhyay, G., Raheman, H., & Dubey, R. (2022). Novel draught resistance sensing elements for measurement of drawbar power of agricultural machinery. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 20(4), e0208–e0208. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022204-19171
Xiang, L., Zuo, S., Zhang, M., Hu, J., & Long, G. (2013). Study of micro-perforated tube mufflers with adjustable transmission loss. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 166ASA, 20(1), 030002. Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4887507
Xiang, L., Zuo, S., Wu, X., & Liu, J. (2017). Study of multi-chamber micro-perforated muffler with adjustable transmission loss. Applied Acoustics, 122, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.034
Xue, Y., Jin, G., Ye, T., Shi, K., Zhong, S., & Yang, C. (2020). Isogeometric analysis for geometric modelling and acoustic attenuation performances of reactive mufflers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 79(12), 3447–3461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.004
Yasuda, T., Wu, C., Nakagawa, N., & Nagamura, K. (2010). Predictions and experimental studies of the tail pipe noise of an automotive muffler using a one dimensional CFD model. Applied Acoustics, 71(8), 701–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.03.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, N., Tewari, V.K. Modification of Reactive Muffler in Farm Tractor to Reduce Noise Level Using Finite Element Method. J. Biosyst. Eng. 48, 165–177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-023-00181-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42853-023-00181-1