Skip to main content
Log in

Transmission Expansion Planning Considering Storage and Intraday Time Constraints to Integrate Wind Power

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy storage systems (ESS) can be considered non-wire alternatives in power systems, since they can smooth out the intermittency of wind power production and reduce transmission requirements. This work presents a new methodology to represent the daily cycle charge and discharge of ESS and its interaction with wind farms under intraday time constraints. The transmission expansion planning (TEP) problem is formulated as a mixed nonlinear integer programming using a DC model and solved with a specialized genetic algorithm. The modified Garver’s test system and the Colombian 93-bus system are used to validate the proposed methodology and solution technique. The results denote that storage systems are profitable, reduce the overall investment and transmission requirement, and allow the efficient integration of wind power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaqsi AZ, Sopian K, Al-Hinai A (2020) Review of energy storage services, applications, limitations, and benefits. Energy Reports 6:288–306

  2. Mahdavi M, Antunez C, Ajalli M, Romero R (2018) Transmission expansion planning: literature review and classification. IEEE Syst J 13(3):3129–3140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu Z, Du X, Gu W, Zhang P, Li J (2018) Automatic selection method for candidate lines in transmission expansion planning. IEEE Access 6:11605–11613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leeprechanon N, Limsakul P, Pothiya S (2010) Optimal transmission expansion planning using ant colony optimization. J Sust Energy Environ 1(2):71–76

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eyer, James M, Butler, Paul Charles, Iannucci Jr, Joseph J (2005) Estimating electricity storage power rating and discharge duration for utility transmission and distribution deferral: a study for the DOE energy storage program, United States

  6. Yan G, Liu D, Li J et al (2018) A cost accounting method of the Li-ion battery energy storage system for frequency regulation considering the effect of life degradation. Prot Control Mod Power Syst 3:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai L, Jiang T, Li F, Chen H, Li X (2018) Distributed energy storage planning in soft open point based active distribution networks incorporating network reconfiguration and DG reactive power capability. Appl Energy 1082–91

  8. Rodrigo M, Roberto M, Goran S (2015) A MILP model for optimising multi-service portfolios of distributed energy storage. Appl Energy 137:554–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grisales-Noreña LF, Cortés-Caicedo B, Montoya OD, Hernandéz JC, Alcalá G (2023) A battery energy management system to improve the financial, technical, and environmental indicators of Colombian urban and rural networks. J Energy Storage 65:107199, ISSN 2352-152X

  10. Grisales-Noreña LF, Ocampo-Toro JA, Montoya-Giraldo OD, Montano J, Hernandéz JC (2023) Optimal operation of battery storage systems in standalone and grid-connected DC microgrids using parallel metaheuristic optimization algorithms. J Energy Storage 65:107240, ISSN 2352-152X

  11. Hu Z, Zhang F, Li B (2012) Transmission expansion planning considering the deployment of energy storage systems. In: 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE (pp 1–6)

  12. Zhang F, Hu Z, Song Y (2013) Mixed-integer linear model for transmission expansion planning with line losses and energy storage systems. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 7(8):919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Venkat Krishnan, Trishna Das (2015) Optimal allocation of energy storage in a co-optimized electricity market: benefits assessment and deriving indicators for economic storage ventures, Energy 81:175–188, ISSN 0360-5442

  14. Mazaheri H, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Farzin H, Moeini-Aghtaie M (2017) Investigating the impacts of energy storage systems on transmission expansion planning. In: 2017 Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), IEEE pp 1199–1203

  15. Bustos C, Sauma E, De la Torre S, Aguado JA, Contreras J, Pozo D (2018) Energy storage and transmission expansion planning: substitutes or complements? IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 12(8):1738–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonzalez-Romero IC, Wogrin S, Gomez T (2019) Proactive transmission expansion planning with storage considerations. Energy Strategy Reviews 24:154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ansari MR, Pirouzi S, Kazemi M, Naderipour A, Benbouzid M (2021) Renewable generation and transmission expansion planning coordination with energy storage system: a flexibility point of view. Appl Sci 11(8):3303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conejo A, Cheng Y, Zhang N, Kang C (2017) Long-term coordination of transmission and storage to integrate wind power. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 3(1):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacRae C, Ozlen M, Ernst A (2014) Transmission expansion planning considering energy storage. 2014 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power. Electronics and Computing (ROPEC), IEEE, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacRae C, Ernst A, Ozlen M (2016) A Benders decomposition approach to transmission expansion planning considering energy storage. Energy 112:795–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mora C, Montoya D, Trujillo E (2020) Mixed-integer programming model for transmission network expansion planning with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS). Energies 13(17):4386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luburić Z, Pandžić H, Carrión M (2020) Transmission expansion planning model considering battery energy storage, TCSC and lines using AC OPF. IEEE Access 8:203429–203439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aguado J, de La Torre S, Triviño A (2017) Battery energy storage systems in transmission network expansion planning. Electric Power Syst Res 145:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kazemi M, Ansari M (2022) An integrated transmission expansion planning and battery storage systems placement-A security and reliability perspective. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 134:107329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gallego A, Garcés L, Rahmani M, Romero R (2017) High-performance hybrid genetic algorithm to solve transmission network expansion planning. IET Gen Transm Distrib 11(5):1111–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huamannahui D, Gallego P (2021) Chu and Beasley genetic algorithm to solve the transmission network expansion planning problem considering active power losses. In: IEEE Latin America Trans 19(11):1967–1975

  27. Domínguez H, Escobar A, Gallego R (2014) Transmission expansion planning considering conductor proposals with different wire size and technology. In: 2014 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exposition-Latin America (PES T &D-LA), IEEE, pp 1–6

  28. Florez C, Ocampo A, Zuluaga A (2014) Multi-objective transmission expansion planning considering multiple generation scenarios. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 62:398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Soares A, Perez R, Thome F (2019) Optimal generation and transmission expansion planning addressing short-term constraints with co-optimization of energy and reserves. arXiv:1910.00446

  30. Chu P, Beasley E (1997) A genetic algorithm for the generalised assignment problem. Comput Oper Res 24(1):17–23

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Holland J H (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT press

  32. Silva I, Rider M, Romero R, Murari C (2006) Genetic algorithm of Chu and Beasley for static and multistage transmission expansion planning. IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Silva J, Rider M, Romero R, Murari C (2006) Transmission network expansion planning considering uncertainty in demand. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(4):1565–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Romero R, Monticelli A, Garcia A, Haffner S (2002) Test systems and mathematical models for transmission network expansion planning. IEE Proceedings-Generation, Transmission and Distribution 149(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sivanandam SN, Deepa SN (2007) Principles of soft computing (with CD). Wiley India Pvt, Limited

    Google Scholar 

  36. Villasana R, Garver L, Salon J (1985) Transmission network planning using linear programming. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 2:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huanca H, Gallego L, López-Lezama J (2022) Transmission network expansion planning considering optimal allocation of series capacitive compensation and active power losses. Appl Sci 12(1):388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Subcommittee PM (1979) IEEE reliability test system. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 6:2047–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Conejo AJ, Baringo L, Kazempour SJ, Siddiqui AS (2016) Investment in Electricity Generation and Transmission. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) under Grant 001, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientçfico (CNPq) under the grants 04068/2020-0, Fundação de Amparo á Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) under the grant APG-03609-17, and Instituto Nacional de Energia Elétrica (INERGE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dany H. Huanca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huanca, D.H., Falcão, D.M. Transmission Expansion Planning Considering Storage and Intraday Time Constraints to Integrate Wind Power. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-024-01882-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-024-01882-z

Keywords

Navigation