Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Day-Ahead Optimization Method of Source–Load Coordination for Power System Using Demand Response and Stackelberg Game

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The continuous expansion of renewable energy sources and their ongoing integration into existing power networks, alongside the emergence of new types of loads, has led to significant new challenges emerging for power grid source–load coordination scheduling in recent years. To fully harness the demand response (DR) potential of the load side of such systems, this paper proposes an optimal scheduling method based on DR and the Stackelberg game. A Stackelberg game model is established to formulate day-ahead source–load coordinated scheduling problem, taking account of the stochastic dynamic characteristics of the load response process and user electricity consumption satisfaction with electricity consumption. The model is essentially a strongly nonlinear optimization problem, however; thus, to avoid several of the limitations seen in traditional optimization methods, a data-model fusion-driven method is proposed, with electricity prices formulated by the data-driven method used as input for a model-driven method whose output is then used in turn to guide a data-driven formulation of electricity prices. Case studies on IEEE test systems are used to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source–load coordination scheduling system

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu ZX, Li HB, Qiao Y (2017) Flexibility evaluation and supply/demand balance principle of power system with high-penetration renewable electricity. Proc CSEE 37(01):9–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xie L, Carvalho PMS, Ferreira LAFM, Liu JH, Krogh BH, Popli N, Ilićet MD (2011) Wind integration in power systems: operational challenges and possible solutions. Proc IEEE 99(1):214–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang XF, Xiao YP, Wang XL (2014) Study and analysis on supply-demand interaction of power system under new circumstances. Proceedings of the CSEE 34(29):5018–5028

    Google Scholar 

  4. Du P (2019) Ensemble machine learning-based wind forecasting to combine NWP output with data from weather station. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 10(4):2133–2141

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang S, Zhao X, Wang H, LI M (2020) Small-world neural network and its performance for wind power fore-casting. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 6(2):362–373

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tuohy A, Meibom P, Denny E, O’malley M (2009) Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):592–601

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Isuru M, Hotz M, Gooi HB, Utschickb W (2019) Network-constrained thermal unit commitment for hybrid AC/DC transmission grids under wind power uncertainty. Appl Energy 258:114031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang N, Wang B, Liu DC, Zhao J, Wang H (2013) An integrated supply-demand stochastic optimization method considering large-scale wind power and flexible load. Proc CSEE 33(16):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu H, Shahidehpour M, Al-abdulwahab A (2013) Hourly demand response in day-ahead scheduling for managing the variability of renewable energy. IET Gener Transm Distrib 7(3):226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bie CH, Hu GW, Xie HP, Li GF (2014) Optimal dispatch for wind power integrated systems considering demand response. Autom Electr Power Syst 38(13):115–120

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng D, Yao JG, Yang SC, Wang K, Zhou J, Li YP (2014) Optimization dispatch modeling for price-based demand response considering security constraints to accommodate the wind power. Proc CSEE 34(31):5571–5578

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng YG, Zhang X, Luo G, Bai Y, Tan ZF, Zhong HW (2019) Demand response mechanism and approach of electricity spot market in bidding mode without price on user side. Autom Electr Power Syst 43(09):179–186

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luo CJ, Li YW, Xu HP, Li LX, Hou TT, Miao SH (2017) Influence of demand response uncertainty on day-ahead optimization dispatching. Autom Electr Power Syst 41(05):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang BB, Liu XC, Li Y (2013) Day-ahead generation scheduling and operation simulation considering demand response in large-capacity wind power integrated systems. Proc CSEE 33(22):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang ML, Hu ZJ, Li Y, Xie SW (2018) A robust optimization method for unit commitment considering wind power and demand response based on feasibility testing. Proc CSEE 38(11):3184–3194

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu XC, Wang BB, Li Y, Wang K (2015) Stochastic unit commitment model for high wind power integration considering demand side resources. Proc CSEE 35(14):3714–3723

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu J, Cao HQ, Tang CH, Wei CY, Jiang HY, Liao SY (2018) Optimal dispatch of power system considering uncertainty of demand response based on extended sequence operation. Autom Electr Power Syst 42(13):152–160

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cui Y, Zhang JR, Wang Z, Wang T, Zhao YT (2020) Day-ahead scheduling strategy of Wind-PV-CSP hybrid power generation system by considering PDR. Proc CSEE 40(10):3103–3114

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ye YJ, Qiu DW, Sun MY, Papadaskalopoulos D, Strbac G (2020) Deep reinforcement learning for strategic bidding in electricity markets. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 11(2):1343–1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun Y, Liu D, Li B, Xu YH (2019) Application of deep reinforcement learning in demand response. Autom Electr Power Syst 43(5):183–191

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang YF, Ai Q, Li ZY (2020) Intelligent demand response resource trading using deep reinforcement learning. CSEE J Power Energy Syst. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.05540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang QZ, Dehghanpour K, Wang ZY, Huang QH (2020) A learning-based power management method for networked microgrids under incomplete information. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 11(2):1193–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Du Y, Li FX (2020) Intelligent multi-microgrid energy management based on deep neural network and model-free reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 11(2):1066–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lei L, Tan Y, Dahlenburg G, Xiang W, Zheng K (2020) Dynamic energy dispatch in isolated microgrids based on deep reinforcement learning. arXiv:2002.02581

  25. Li P, Wu DF, Li YW, Liu HT, Wang N, Zhou XC (2021) Optimal dispatch of multi-microgrids integrated energy system based on integrated demand response and stackelberg game. Proc CSEE 41(04):1307–1321

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gu J, Bai KF, Shi YJ (2019) Optimized operation of regional integrated energy system based on multi-agent master-slave game optimization interaction mechanism. Power Syst Technol 43(09):3119–3134

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu LL, Jing ZX, Wu QH, Deng S (2018) Equilibrium strategies for integrated energy systems based on stackelberg game model. Autom Electr Power Syst 42(04):142–150, 207

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang Z, Peng SC, Liao QF, Liu DC, Xu YY, Zhang YJ (2018) Noncooperative trading method for three market entities in integrated community energy system. Autom Electr Power Syst 42(14):32–39, 47

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rahi GE, Etesami SR, Saad W, Mandayam NB, Poor HV (2019) Managing price uncertainty in prosumer-centric energy trading: a prospect-theoretic stackelberg game approach. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(1):702–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu ZP, Wen FS, Xue YS, Xin JB (2011) Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generators considering plug in electric vehicles. Autom Electr Power Syst 35(18):11–16

    Google Scholar 

  31. Saaty TL (2004) Decision making-the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/Anp). J Syst Sci Syst Eng 13(1):1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Feng C, Wang Y, Zheng KD, Chen QX (2020) Smart meter data-driven customizing price design for retailers. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 11(3):2043–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, PR China (2108085UD01), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62273130).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui Province, China

    Xin Yuan, Hao Tang & Jinyu Guan

  2. State Grid Smart Grid Research Institute Co., Ltd., Changping District, Beijing, China

    Xin Yuan

  3. Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, Xicheng District, Beijing, China

    Xin Liu

  4. China Electric Power Research Institute, Haidian District, Beijing, China

    Xiang Zhou

Authors
  1. Xin Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hao Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinyu Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Tang or Jinyu Guan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, X., Tang, H., Liu, X. et al. A Day-Ahead Optimization Method of Source–Load Coordination for Power System Using Demand Response and Stackelberg Game. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 19, 1191–1203 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01651-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01651-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation