Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Analysis of Unbalanced Three-Phase Grid Current Compensation Methods for the Scott Transformer Based Grid

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 04 April 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper proposes two control algorithms to solve the three-phase power unbalance problem in the Scott transformer based grid, and two algorithms are power-based and current-based compensation method. The power-based compensation method uses the active/reactive power at the load side for control, and the current-based compensation method utilizes the Scott transformer secondary current directly to eliminate an effect of active/reactive power loss through the power supply chain. In addition, voltage notch effect generated by the low switching frequency and weak grid condition caused by the Scott transformer is compensated by using an observer. Performance comparisons for the two compensation methods are carried out using a real-time simulator and a 3-level back-to-back converter prototype with a 5kVA load. From the experimental results, recorded 34.2% of unbalance rate of the three-phase grid current before compensation is reduced to 2.8% by the power-based compensation method, and 1.2% by the current-based compensation method. This study provides a new insight into developing the advanced algorithms which improves the unbalance of three-phase grid current in electric railway transportation system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Research data are not shared.

Change history

References

  1. Kim H, Jung H, Ko Y, Park J et al (2021) Cooperative operation schedules of energy storage system and demand response resources considering urban railway load characteristic under a time-of-use tariff. J Electr Eng Technol 16:1273–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaleybar H, Brenna M, Foiadelli F, Fazel S (2017) An active railway power quality compensator for 2×25kV high-speed railway lines. In: IEEE international conference on environment and electrical engineering, EEEIC / I&CPS, Europe

  3. Lao K, Wong M, Dai N, Wong C, Lam C (2015) A systematic approach to hybrid railway power conditioner design with harmonic compensation for high-speed railway. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62(2):930–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim SD, Choi KF (2010) Scott transformer modeling using PSIM on the AC substation in the electric railroad. Korean Soc Railw 1892–1897

  5. Lee J-H, Jo J-M, Shin C-H, Lee T-H, Cha H-J (2020) A study on a current control based on model prediction for ac electric railway inbalance compensation device. Trans Korean Inst Power Electron 25(6):490–495

    Google Scholar 

  6. IEEE 1159 (2009) IEEE recommended practice for monitoring electric power quality. IEEE

  7. Banerjee B (2000) Voltage unbalance: power quality issues, related standards and mitigation technique. EPRI Tech Rep

  8. ANSI/NEMA (2016) NEMA MG1 moter and generators standard. NEMA

  9. Oso H, Kaneko T, Suzuki A (2015) Railway static power conditioner for shin-kurobe substation of hokuriku shinkansen. Fuji Electric Rev 61(1):52–57

    Google Scholar 

  10. Song S, Lee J, Cha H (2021) Comparative analysis of imbalanced three-phase grid current compensation methods for the scott transformer based grid. In: 2021 24th international conference on electrical machines and systems (ICEMS), pp 798–801

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2021R1I1A3058123)

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanju Cha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The 1st author name is given erroneously. This has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, J., Cha, H. Comparative Analysis of Unbalanced Three-Phase Grid Current Compensation Methods for the Scott Transformer Based Grid. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 18, 383–391 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01270-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-022-01270-5

Keywords

Navigation