Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study of thoracoscopic and open tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia repair as first single center experience in Turkey

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The focus of esophageal atresia treatment is now on reducing hospitalization and common morbidities and to prevent complications such as anastomotic leak and esophageal stricture formation. The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative and postoperative outcome measures such as operation times, anastomotic leak and stricture formation in children who underwent thoracoscopic and open repair of esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula as newborns in a single institution.

Methods

Children who underwent surgery for esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula between 2014 and 2020 were enrolled to the study. Charts of patients were reviewed retrospectively for demographic and perioperative data. Postoperative outcome endpoints such as stricture formation rates, anastomotic leak more than 1 week, and of the chest tube were compared.

Results

There were 22 children in the study, of which 14 underwent thoracoscopic repair and 8 underwent open repair. Both groups were similar in terms of gestational age, birth weight and associated major anomalies. Operative times were similar (thoracoscopic repair: 169 and open repair: 175 min). Stricture formation was observed in three children in thoracoscopic group (21%) and four children in open group (50%). Anastomotic leak persisted for more than a week in three children in thoracoscopic group (25%) and two in open group (25%). Stricture rates and anastomotic leak for more than one week rates were statistically similar between groups. The azygous veins were preserved in 11 of 14 children in thoracoscopic group while none in the eight children that were operated in open group.

Conclusion

Thoracoscopic repair is comparative to open repair regarding operative time and postoperative outcome endpoints such as esophageal stricture formation and anastomotic leak more than 1 week in the study. Thoracoscopic repairs are as feasible as open repairs with the advantage of preserving the azygos vein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woo S, Lau S, Yoo E, Shaul D, Sydorak R (2015) Thoracoscopic versus open repair of tracheoesophageal fistulas and rates of vocal cord paresis. J Pediatr Surg 50:2016–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Spoel M, Meeussen CJ, Gischler SJ, Hop WC, Bax NM, Wijnen RM, Tibboel D, de Jongste JC, Ijsselstijn H (2012) Respiratory morbidity and growth after open thoracotomy or thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 47:1975–1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.07.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ricard PM, Vezina N (1949) Congenital atresia of the esophagus with tracheoesophageal fistula; extrapleural ligation of the fistula, and end-to-end anastomosis of the esophageal segments. Union Med Can 78:804–808

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenberg S (2014) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheo-esophageal fistula in neonates: the current state of the art. Pediatr Surg Int 30:979–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3586-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holcomb GW 3rd (2017) Thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 33:475–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-016-4049-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teague WJ, Karpelowsky J (2016) Surgical management of oesophageal atresia. Paediatr Respir Rev 19:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2016.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma L, Liu YZ, Ma YQ, Zhang SS, Pan NL (2012) Comparison of neonatal tolerance to thoracoscopic and open repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:3492–3495

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang YF, Dong R, Zheng C et al (2016) Outcomes of thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula repair: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e4428. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okuyama H, Saka R, Takama Y, Nomura M, Ueno T, Tazuke Y (2020) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia. Surg Today 50:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01884-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borruto FA, Impellizzeri P, Montalto AS et al (2012) Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula repair: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 22:415–419. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamoto M, Urusihara N, Fukumoto K et al (2014) Thoracoscopic versus open repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula at a single institution. Pediatr Surg Int 30:883–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3554-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kawahara H, Okuyama H, Mitani Y et al (2009) Influence of thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair on esophageal motor function and gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Surg 44:2282–2286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.07.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tainaka T, Uchida H, Tanano A et al (2017) Two-stage thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction is safe and feasible. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone MM, Fonkalsrud EW, Mahour GH, Weitzman JJ, Takiff H (1986) Esophageal replacement with colon interposition in children. Ann Surg 203:346–351. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198604000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Spitz L (1984) Gastric transposition via the mediastinal route for infants with long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 19:149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(84)80435-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kimura K, Nishijima E, Tsugawa C et al (2001) Multistaged extrathoracic esophageal elongation procedure for long gap esophageal atresia: experience with 12 patients. J Pediatr Surg 36:1725–1727. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.27976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holcomb GW 3rd, Rothenberg SS, Bax KM et al (2005) Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg 242:422–430. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000179649.15576.db

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lugo B, Malhotra A, Guner Y, Nguyen T, Ford H, Nguyen NX (2008) Thoracoscopic versus open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:753–756. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2007.0220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laberge JM, Blair GK (2013) Thoracotomy for repair of esophageal atresia: not as bad as they want you to think! Dis Esophagus 26:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/dote.12053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyano G, Seo S, Nakamura H et al (2017) Changes in quality of life from infancy to school age after esophagoesophagostomy for tracheoesophageal fistula: thoracotomy versus thoracoscopy. Pediatr Surg Int 33:1087–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4141-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu Y, Kuang H, Lv T, Wu C (2017) Comparison of clinical outcomes between open and thoracoscopic repair for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int 33:1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4153-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patkowski D, Rysiakiewicz K, Jaworski W et al (2009) Thoracoscopic repair of tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0139.supp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Durning RP, Scoles PV, Fox OD (1980) Scoliosis after thoracotomy in tracheoesophageal fistula patients. A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1156–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sistonen SJ, Pakarinen MP, Rintala RJ (2011) Long-term results of esophageal atresia: Helsinki experience and review of literature. Pediatr Surg Int 27:1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2980-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chetcuti P, Myers NA, Phelan PD, Beasley SW, Dickens DR (1989) Chest wall deformity in patients with repaired esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 24:244–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(89)80003-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang H, Du L, Du Z, Jiang H, Han D, Li Q (2015) Association between childhood exposure to single general anesthesia and neurodevelopment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort study. J Anesth 29:749–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2030-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bishay M, Giacomello L, Retrosi G et al (2013) Hypercapnia and acidosis during open and thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 258:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fab55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Koga H, Yamoto M, Okazaki T et al (2014) Factors affecting postoperative respiratory tract function in type-C esophageal atresia. Thoracoscopic versus open repair. Pediatr Surg Int 30:1273–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3618-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    Ergun Ergün, Sümeyye Sözduyar, Ufuk Ateş, Aynur Gurbanova, Ege Evin, Gülnur Göllü Bahadır, Meltem Bingöl Koloğlu, Ahmet Murat Çakmak & Emin Aydın Yağmurlu

  2. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

    Özlem Can Selvi

Authors
  1. Ergun Ergün
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sümeyye Sözduyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ufuk Ateş
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aynur Gurbanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ege Evin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Özlem Can Selvi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gülnur Göllü Bahadır
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Meltem Bingöl Koloğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ahmet Murat Çakmak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Emin Aydın Yağmurlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ufuk Ateş.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Financial disclosure

There were no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval obtained.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ergün, E., Sözduyar, S., Ateş, U. et al. A comparative study of thoracoscopic and open tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia repair as first single center experience in Turkey. J Ped Endosc Surg 4, 69–74 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-022-00139-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-022-00139-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation