Abstract
As a bioproduct from the thermal decomposition of biomass, biochar has various applications in diversified field. In this study, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to visualize the current research status and trends of biochar research. A total of 5535 documents were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection and subjected to visualization analysis for the biochar field's development in 2021 with CiteSpace software. The visual analysis results demonstrate that the number of publications expanded dramatically in 2021, and the growth trend would continue. China and USA were the most contributing countries in biochar research in terms of the number of publications. Based on the keyword co-occurrence analyses, “Biochar for toxic metal immobilization”, “Biochar-based catalyst for biofuel production”, “Biochar for global climate change mitigation”, “Biochar for salinity and drought stress amelioration”, “Biochar amendment in composting”, and “Biochar as additives in anaerobic digestion” were the main research trends and hotspots in this field in 2021. This indicates that the biochar research was multidisciplinary. Regarding the research hotspots, the employment of biochar as heterogeneous catalysts for biofuel production gained great attention in 2021. On the contrary, bioremediation using functional bacteria immobilized on biochar and biochar-assisted advanced oxidation process were well-studied but with less frequency than other topics in 2021. Furthermore, the future research was proposed for green and sustainable applications of biochar. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the research frontiers, the evolution of research hotspots, and potential future research directions in the biochar field.
Graphical Abstract
Highlights
-
A total of 5535 publications were retrieved and evaluated by bibliometric analysis in 2021.
-
Research frontiers and the evolution of research hotspots of biochar were identified.
-
Future research outlooks were suggested for sustainable applications of biochar.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Biochar is a pyrogenic carbon-rich material formed through the thermal decomposition of biomass feedstock under an oxygen-limited condition (Hagemann et al. 2017; Inyang et al. 2015; Woolf et al. 2021). It has been established that different biomass materials have been utilized to produce biochar which entails agricultural waste, forestry waste, garden waste, food waste, livestock manure, sewage sludge, and aquatic organisms (Woolf et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2021a). Many processes can be used to produce biochar such as slow and fast pyrolysis, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, hydrothermal carbonization, gasification, flash carbonization, and torrefaction (Kostas et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2021a; Xiao et al. 2018) (Fig. 1). Slow pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization are the most frequently used methods for the preparation of biochar (Dutta et al. 2021; Lian and Xing 2017). Biochar is a heterogeneous mixture containing both amorphous less-carbonized fractions and microcrystalline graphite-like aromatic structures. It has special properties, such as highly developed porosity, high specific surface area (SSA), abundant surface functional groups, and high content of mineral components. Biochar properties are mainly regulated by feedstock composition and preparation procedures (Ahmad et al. 2014; Cha et al. 2016; Lian and Xing 2017).
Biochar has received increasing attention for its potential benefits in carbon sequestration, climate change mitigation, waste management, bioenergy production, soil improvement, and pollution control due to its unique properties (Nidheesh et al. 2021; Xiao et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2021e). Biochar has a high recalcitrant carbon (C) content and the strong adsorption capacity to carbon dioxide (CO2). Its sustainable production and field applications enable its great potential for long-term carbon storage and carbon emission reduction, thereby mitigating climate change (Feng et al. 2021b; Yang et al. 2021e; Zhang et al. 2022). The conversion of biowaste, especially sewage sludge, into biochar through pyrolysis provides an alternative and promising way of managing waste biomass (Chen et al. 2020). The produced biochar can act as a catalyst for bioenergy production (Malyan et al. 2021). Again, biochar positively affects plant productivity and crop yields by improving soil quality and fertility levels (Farkas et al. 2020).
Meanwhile, the improvement in soil functions after biochar application is beneficial to alleviate the salinity and drought stress on plants (Mansoor et al. 2021; Zhu et al. 2020). Finally, the multifunctional characteristic of biochar makes it an effective material for environmental pollution (Ahmad et al. 2014; Nidheesh et al. 2021). The biochar’s multiple functions are connected to its physicochemical properties (Manya 2012; Zhang et al. 2021g). Considering the striking heterogeneity in physicochemical properties of biochar, an in-depth understanding of the developments of biochar regarding its multifunctional applications is urgently required.
Although several meta-analyses and review studies have been carried out to evaluate biochar’s multifunctional applications systematically, very few have investigated current trends and scientific developments in this field. A conclusive study was performed here and could help us to identify the main subject fields, the current research frontiers, and hotspots of biochar research (Wu et al. 2019; Wu et al. 2021a). Because new biochar applications emerge, the main signs of progress and insights associated with this field will change over time. Additionally, the unintended consequences of biochar application are likely to emerge after long-term biochar application. Therefore, it is necessary to provide an analytical overview of the main signs of progress and insights into biochar research in 2021.
Bibliometric analysis proceeded by Citespace software has gained rising interest in many fields due to its mathematical statistics and visual analytic functions (Chen 2004, 2017; Ren et al. 2021). It is believed to be an effective tool for quantitatively evaluating a given field's current situation and emerging trends (Kamali et al. 2020). In this study, a combined bibliometric analysis and critical appraisal of the related documents were utilized to quantitatively identify the research status and trend of biochar in 2021. The aims of this review are to: (1) analyze the primary authors, countries, and keyword frequency and hotspot trend of the publications; (2) identify the current trends and hot topics in the biochar field; (3) provide perspectives on full-scale applications of biochar.
2 Methods
2.1 Literature search
A systematic literature search was conducted from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database using the keyword of "Biochar" in the title, keywords, and abstract (Ren et al. 2021). A total of 5533 documents were collected from the database in 2021. To guarantee the validity of data collected, the synonyms associated with biochar research, such as “Cadmium” and “Cd”, “carbon dioxide” and “CO2”, “anaerobic digestion” and “AD”, “nanoscale zero-valent iron” and “nZVI”, and “polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon” and “PAHs” were manually merged.
2.2 Scientometrics analysis tools
Cite-space is a new statistical analysis tool widely used for bibliometric analysis and visualization (Li et al. 2020; Ren et al. 2021). It is a Java-based software first developed by Professor Chaomei Chen and his team in 2004 (Chen 2004). Relevant documents were exported from the “marked list” (with “plain text” format) of WoS Core Collection and then inserted in Cite-space (5.3.R4) to analyze their specific characteristics. The visual analysis of cooperation networks of authors, contributing countries, institutions, categories, and keywords helps to reveal the clustering, knowledge structure, and emerging trends of biochar research. In the co-occurrence network maps, each node corresponds to one item (e.g., author, institution, keyword), and lines link the nodes. The higher the node's frequency, the larger the node's size. The thickness of the line indicates the cooperation degree between the two nodes.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Publications about biochar research
A total of 5533 documents were extracted from WoS Core Collection in 2021 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). It can be seen that the annual number of publications increased sharply, and this growth trend will continue, which indicates the huge and increasing attention as well as the increased amount of scientific knowledge of biochar research.
3.2 Contributing country analysis
As can be realized from Additional file 1: Fig. S2 and Table S1, China is the highest contributing country, accounting for 43.99% of the total publications. This is most likely because China is a great agricultural country with a large population, where agriculture occupies a significant and strategic position in the national economy. China was followed by the USA, with 504 publications, accounting for 9.11%. Besides China and USA, India, Pakistan, South Korea, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and Germany also have many scientific documents. Many connections between countries indicate robust global cooperation and communication in this field.
3.3 Research institution analysis
The top 10 institutions with the most publications in the field of biochar research are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S2. Chinese Academy of Sciences published the largest number of papers in this field, followed by the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Zhejiang University. The Chinese Academy of Sciences is expected to be the leading institution in many fields. It can also be found that 8 institutions were from China among the top 10 productive institutions.
3.4 Keyword analysis
3.4.1 Biochar for toxic metal immobilization
Biochar utilized for immobilizing toxic metals has caused the interest of researchers in 2021 (Fig. 2). Keyword co-occurrence analysis suggested that the most studied toxic metal was Cd (Table 1). Such heightened research interest in Cd was due to its being highly toxic and carcinogenic even at low concentrations (Purkayastha et al. 2014; Rai et al. 2019).
The transformation of sewage sludge to biochar via pyrolysis provides a feasible approach for the safe disposal of the sludge (Buss 2021; Zhang et al. 2021f). The sewage sludge-derived biochar had a much lower leaching potential of heavy metals than the sewage sludge itself (Wang et al. 2021d; Xiong et al. 2021). Recently, co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and waste biomass (e.g., rice straw, rice husk, cotton stalk, and sawdust) has been proven to improve the porous structure and reduce the leaching toxicity of heavy metals in sewage sludge-derived biochar (Tong et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021d, 2021f, 2021g; Xiong et al. 2021). Another study also reported that co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and calcium sulfate was conducive to immobilizing heavy metals in sewage sludge-derived biochar (Liu et al. 2021a). The application of sewage sludge-derived biochar as a sorbent for toxic metal removal has shown promising results. The abundant mineral constituents in sewage sludge-derived biochar, such as Si, Al, Fe, and Ca, greatly participated in cationic metal removal via cation exchange, complexation, and precipitation (Gopinath et al. 2021; Islam et al. 2021; Jellali et al. 2021).
Engineered biochar has gained much attention in terms of immobilizing toxic metals in 2021. Modification may improve the carbon content, SSA, porous structure, functional groups, and stability of biochar. Recently, metal oxides and salts have been widely used for biochar modification. Magnetic or metal-based biochar synthesized by using the transition metals (e.g., Fe, Co, Ni) and their oxides (e.g., Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) with waste biomass exhibits advantages over pristine biochar in heavy metal immobilization. For instance, a novel functional colloid-like magnetic biochar with high dispersibility synthesized via impregnation of Fe(II)/Fe(III)/artificial humic acid onto corn stalk-derived biochar followed by torrefaction activation exhibited superior removal performance for Cd (the maximum adsorption capacity of 170 mg g−1) (Yang et al. 2021c). The removal mechanisms included ion exchange, Cd–π interaction, complexation, and precipitation (Fig. 3a). Hierarchically porous magnetic biochar produced from K2FeO4 pre-treated wheat straw at 700 °C effectively removed Cd by 80 mg g−1 (Fu et al. 2021b). The pre- and post-heat treatment modification with Fe could produce Fe-loaded biochar with different properties. Generally, the Fe pre-modification loaded greater Fe3O4 micro-/nanoparticles on biochar and achieved greater surface area, while the Fe post-modification enriched oxygen-containing functional groups on biochar (Reynel-Ávila et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2021b). Hsu et al. (2021) synthesized sulfurized magnetic biochar via a single heating step. The product had high adsorption for Hg(II) (the maximum adsorption capacity of 8.93 mg g−1), and C-S functional groups were the vital adsorptive sites for Hg(II) (Fig. 3b).
For metal anions (mainly As and Cr), biochar-based composites are effective sorbents for Cr and As. An active MnO2-biochar composite was prepared to enhance As(III) removal from the aqueous solution. The removal mechanisms involved partial As(III) adsorption and the oxidation of As(III) to As(V) by MnO2. The generated As(V) could be removed by forming MnHAsO4⋅H2O precipitation with Mn(II), complexation with Mn-OH groups on the MnO2 surface, and O-containing functional groups on the biochar surface (Fig. 3c) (Cuong et al. 2021). Nano zero-valent iron (nZVI) modified biochar has been proven to be a promising remediation material for Cr removal (Zhou et al. 2021b; Zhuang et al. 2021). For instance, Zhuang et al. (2021) synthesized sulfidated nZVI-supported biochar for Cr(VI) removal. The porous structure of biochar and sulfidated nZVI dispersed on biochar surface could provide adsorption sites for Cr(VI). Then, Fe0 and generated Fe(II) acted as electron donors to reduce Cr(VI). The generated Cr(III) would form co-precipitation with Fe(III) and be removed from the aqueous solution.
The employment of biochar in reducing the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of toxic metals in soil has attracted growing interest. However, pristine biochar has a limited effect on the remediation of toxic metal-contaminated soils (Arabi et al. 2021; El-Naggar et al. 2021). It was found that biochar, especially rice straw-derived biochar application contributed to the reduction of As(V) to As(III), which increased the potential mobility of As in soils (El-Naggar et al. 2021). Heat treatment temperature (HTT) is a predominant parameter influencing As mobility in soil. A meta-analysis indicated that biochar produced under low HTT (≤ 450 °C) did not affect As mobility in soil, but high-temperature biochar (> 450 °C) exhibited high As mobilization in soil (Arabi et al. 2021). Fe-modified biochar exhibited efficient removal of As from soil and reduced its mobility in paddy soil (Wen et al. 2021). Similarly, Fe/Al/Zn (hydr)oxides modified biochar significantly reduced As uptake by arugula (Sun et al. 2021b). More importantly, Fe-modified biochar could be considered an efficient remediation material for moderately and highly Cd- and As-co-contaminated farmland (Wen et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021a, b).
Although most of the positive results are achieved for acidic heavy metal-contaminated soil amended with biochar, there needs to be more research on the remediation effect of biochar on alkaline heavy metal-contaminated soil. Previous studies showed that conventional biochar showed no significant remediation effect in alkaline soil. Meanwhile, biochar amendment might reduce soil fertility and cause soil alkalization. Fe- and Fe/Zn-modified biochar application promoted the transformation of exchangeable Cd into oxidizable and residual Cd (Sun et al. 2021c; Yang et al. 2021g). Moreover, Fe-modified biochar increased the richness and diversity of bacterial communities in the alkaline contaminated soil (Sun et al. 2021c). The combination of biochar with ferrous sulfate and pig manure is also reported to effectively immobilize Cd and reduce Cd uptake by wheat in the alkaline contaminated soil (Chen et al. 2021b).
3.4.2 Biochar-based catalyst for biofuel production
The employment of biochar as heterogeneous catalysts for biofuel production gained much attention in 2021. Biochar-based catalyst possesses sustainable feedstock availability, abundant surface functional groups and inorganic species, a hierarchical and well-developed porous structure, and tunable surface functionality (Chi et al. 2021; Low and Yee 2021).
Using biochar-based heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production is still a great research hotspot in 2021. The presence of biochar-based catalyst promoted the transesterification or esterification of waste cooking oil, vegetable oil, animal oil, or fats (Chi et al. 2021; Cho et al. 2021; Low and Yee 2021). Swine manure-derived biochar could act as an alkaline catalyst for the transesterification lipid fraction extracted from the swine manure (Fig. 4a). A high yield of biodiesel (≥ 94%) was achieved with the application of the catalyst (Cho et al. 2021). A maximum biodiesel yield of 96.4% was obtained with methanol: oil ratio of 9:1 at 70 °C for 2 h using K2CO3 + Cu(NO3)2-treated hydrochar-derived catalyst (Fig. 4b) (Abdullah et al. 2021). Likewise, Nazir et al. (2021) obtained a biodiesel yield of 89.19% at 60 °C for 15 min in the transesterification of oil with methanol at a molar ratio of 1:18, catalyzed by H2SO4-modified biochar. Moreover, the biochar-based catalyst exhibited high reusability and stability with a minor loss in its activity after being reused for six cycles. Microwave-assisted biofuel production has recently gained great attention due to the advantages of microwave heating (i.e., quick heating rate and energy efficiency) (Nazir et al. 2021; Zailan et al. 2021).
Syngas, produced through biomass gasification, usually consists of H2, CO, CH4, CO2, and other hydrocarbons such as bio-oil or tar (Low and Yee 2021; Sun et al. 2021a). The addition of biochar as a catalyst for syngas production and upgrading has been largely reported recently. Biochar-based catalysts have several advantages in tar reforming and syngas cleaning: (1) the highly porous structure and large SSA are conducive to prolonging the retention time of the reactants and improving their conversion efficiency; (2) the abundant functional groups favor the reforming of volatiles from biomass heat treatment; and (3) the alkali and alkali earth metals and other inorganic species present in biochar can provide a catalytic effect on tar removal (Feng et al. 2021a; Hu et al. 2021a; Liu et al. 2021c). By using walnut shell biochar with high contents of K2O and CaO as a catalyst, the conversion efficiency of tar and H2-rich gas production increased (Mazhkoo et al. 2021). Anniwaer et al. (2021) reported that biochar derived from Japanese cedarwood possessed a highly porous structure and contained high contents of alkali and alkaline earth metals, which might provide high catalytic activity for tar reforming. In this study, 99% of the remaining tar was cracked/reformed, yielding H2-rich syngas. Metal-supported biochar exhibited excellent catalytic activity in syngas upgrading. Hu et al. (2021a) loaded Fe–Ni on pine wood biochar as a catalyst for syngas production; their results indicated that Fe–Ni-supported biochar significantly increased H2/CO ratio to 1.97 in syngas. In addition, Fe–Ni-supported biochar still exhibited excellent catalytic activity after five times of reuse. Similarly, an H2 concentration of 67.35% in syngas and a gasification efficiency of 96.93% could achieve by using Fe/Ca/Al-loaded biochar as a catalyst (Hu et al. 2021b). In short, engineered biochar has tremendous promise as a catalyst in syngas upgrading.
3.4.3 Biochar for global climate change mitigation
Biochar production and amendment have been increasingly adopted to mitigate global climate change (Woolf et al. 2021). China's rising influence on global climate change mitigation advances biochar’s role in climate governance. The functionality of biochar to achieve carbon–neutral goals is mainly through carbon sequestration and emission reduction (Cao et al. 2021; Nan et al. 2021). The high content of aromatic carbon within biochar is the basis of its carbon sequestration benefits (Xu et al. 2021). Biochar storage in soil via agricultural soil management can also realize carbon sequestration (Guenet et al. 2021). Therefore, converting biomass waste into biochar and storing the produced biochar in soil has excellent potential for carbon sequestration. Yang et al. (2021d) used a life cycle assessment at the country level to evaluate the carbon sequestration potential of biochar produced from various crop residues. It was found that over 920 kg CO2e t-1 (CO2-equivalent) sequestration could be achieved in China, demonstrating great carbon sequestration potential through biochar that was incorporated into soil (Fig. 5a). Similarly, Leppäkoski et al. (2021) calculated the carbon footprint of willow biochar production and application in marginal lands by conducting a cradle-to-grave LCA. Their results found that the carbon footprint of willow biochar was − 1875 kg CO2e t−1, in which carbon sequestration (− 1704 kg CO2e t−1) dominated the carbon footprint. It is estimated that 63 − 82% of initial carbon in biochar was stably sequestered in soil after 100 years of using a greenhouse gas inventory model (Woolf et al. 2021). These results indicate the long-term sequestration of carbon by biochar storage in soil.
Biochar also has a high potential for CO2 capture and storage (Shafawi et al. 2021). It has been reported that a large surface area, high micro-porosity, and abundant mineral contents of biochar contributed to CO2 capture (Feng et al. 2021b; Shafawi et al. 2021). To highlight, N-doped biochar showed a superior CO2 uptake capacity. The N-doped biochar prepared by urea phosphate impregnation-pyrolysis had a superior CO2 adsorption capacity of 1.34 mmol g−1 (Ma et al. 2021). The excellent adsorption property of CO2 was attributed to the enhanced microporous structure and various N-containing functional groups on the biochar (Fig. 5b). A related study by Feng et al. (2021b) showed that NH3·H2O activation was beneficial to forming micropores and introducing N-containing functional groups on biochar surfaces. The N-containing functional groups dominated the adsorption of CO2 (Fig. 5c).
Nitrous oxide (N2O) has a global warming potential of 298 times that of CO2, which plays an essential role in global warming (Zhang et al. 2021g). Excessive application of N fertilization and low N use efficiency are the primary sources of soil N2O emissions (Reay et al. 2012; Tian et al. 2019). Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of biochar in mitigating N2O emissions (Deng et al. 2021a; Jiang et al. 2021; Shin et al. 2021). Lower N2O emissions involved several mechanisms, which included abiotic N retention mechanisms and microbial N immobilization mechanisms (Guenet et al. 2021; Lehmann et al. 2021; Liao et al. 2021). The promoted microbial reduction of N2O to N2 by biochar amendment was believed to be a permanent mitigation benefit as the transformation could not be reversed, and N had left the soil system. The microbial reduction of N2O to N2 could result from an increased expression of denitrification-associated functional genes (e.g., nosZ, nirK, nirK, and narG) (Deng et al. 2021a; Liao et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2021b). Additionally, biochar could act as an electron shuttle to facilitate electron transfer and N2O reduction through biochar’s O-containing functional groups and carbon matrices (Yuan et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2021c). It is important to note that the positive effects of biochar on denitrification metabolism could be elucidated at the cellular level by integrating physiological and multi-omics (proteomic and metabolomics) analyses (Zhang et al. 2021g). It was observed that biochar could directly modulate carbon metabolism and allocate the produced reducing power, thereby promoting N2O reduction (Fig. 5d). 15N stable isotope tracing techniques have been widely used to gain insight into N2O emissions in biochar-amended soils (Craswell et al. 2021). Zhang et al. (2021c) utilized a dual isotope (15 N–18O) labeling technique to differentiate the contribution of nitrifier nitrification, nitrifier denitrification, nitrification-coupled denitrification, and heterotrophic denitrification to soil N2O emissions amended with biochar. Their results indicated that biochar reduced N2O emissions derived from nitrifier denitrification by 45–94%, nitrification-coupled denitrification by 30–64%, and heterotrophic denitrification by 35–46%. Biochar application for N2O emission mitigation was due to the decrease of nitrite concentration while increasing N2O reduction (Zhang et al. 2021c). A long-term field study also used a dual isotope (15 N–18O) labeling technique to measure the effects of biochar on N2O emissions; the results showed that biochar decreased N2O emissions by 48% and 22% in acidic and alkaline soils, respectively. Lower N2O emissions resulted from the decrease in nitrifier denitrification (by 74%) and heterotrophic denitrification (by 58%) (Zhang et al. 2021e). The 15N stable isotope tracing techniques may help to fully understand N2O emission mitigation mechanisms by biochar.
Biochar has been well-reported to mitigate CH4 emissions from paddy soil (Dong et al. 2021; Jiang et al. 2021; Qi et al. 2021b). The mechanisms of CH4 emission mitigation by biochar mainly included: (i) biochar inhibited the activity and abundance of methanogens but stimulated those of methanotrophs (Nan et al. 2021); (ii) biochar increased the adsorption of CH4 in soil (Zhao et al. 2021a). Contrastingly, other studies have found that biochar amendment increased CH4 emissions from paddy soils (Cao et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021h). The unintended consequence of an increase in CH4 emissions may result from the improved aeration condition after biochar application (Cao et al. 2021). Moreover, biochar’s geoconductor function could directly transfer electrons to methanogens, stimulating CH4 production (Yang et al. 2021h). The contradictory studies could be due to the differences in biochar and soil properties (Malyan et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021h). Based on the discussions, biochar has great potential in mitigating CH4 emissions from paddy soils. However, scientific soil management and proper biochar are necessary to avoid the unintended consequence of increased CH4 production.
3.4.4 Biochar for salinity and drought stress amelioration
Biochar has the potential to enhance salinity tolerance to plants by improving soil physical (porosity, water holding capacity, hydraulic conductivity, pH, SOC), chemical (Na+ bioavailability, cation–anion exchange capacity, nutrients, enzymatic activities), and biological (microbial activities, symbiotic N2-fixation) properties (Farhangi-Abriz and Ghassemi-Golezani 2021; Singh et al. 2021). Incorporating biochar in salt-affected soil improved soluble cation (Ca2+, Mg2+) contents but decreased Na+ concentration through its high sorption capacity. The higher Ca2+ concentration and lower Na+ concentration facilitated K and P uptake by plants and thus promoted plant productivity (Zhou et al. 2021d). It was also found that biochar amendment in saline soil increased photosynthetic rate, leaf water content, stomatal conductance, pigment contents, nutrient uptake, and root and shoot growth (Cui et al. 2021a; Farhangi-Abriz and Ghassemi-Golezani 2021; Liang et al. 2021c; Singh et al. 2021). In some cases, toxic metal contamination and soil salinity may cause a more serious environmental concern. Soil salinity may aggravate the stress caused by toxic metals on plants (Azadi and Raiesi 2021; Shabbir et al. 2021). Biochar has been reported to mitigate the potential pressures of the co-occurrence of toxic metal contamination and salinity (Azadi and Raiesi 2021; Shabbir et al. 2021). The salt stress could also be alleviated by supplementing biochar with other additives. In addition, combining biochar with compost has increased plant productivity (Liang et al. 2021b).
Drought stress has been considered a major challenge for sustainable agricultural productivity (Mansoor et al. 2021). It has been discovered that biochar amendment improved the retention and availability of soil water, which led to enhanced stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and productivity under drought stress (Fu et al. 2021a; Kim et al. 2021; Safahani Langeroodi et al. 2021). Biochar played a positive role in nutrient supply and improved plant performance in the clay soil under drought conditions (Mannan et al. 2021). The biochar amendment could also alleviate the oxidative damage of plants induced by drought stress (Khan et al. 2021; Safahani Langeroodi et al. 2021). Overall, biochar is an efficient soil amendment to ameliorate soil salinity/drought stress, improve soil functions, and promote plant productivity in salt/drought-affected soil.
3.4.5 Biochar amendment in composting
Composting is a promising technology to convert organic waste into stable and humus-like products for use as organic fertilizer (Lu et al. 2021; Shan et al. 2021; Yin et al. 2021). Composting is a cost-effective way to manage agricultural and breeding industry waste in China. However, some issues such as greenhouse gases (CH4, CO2, and N2O) and odorous emissions (NH3 and H2S), and nitrogen loss during composting impede the development of these practices (Yin et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2021c). The functionality of biochar as a bulking agent for composting has been proven to be a promising strategy for solving the environmental trade-offs of composting. Biochar as additives could enhance the aeration rate and provide main shelters for microorganisms to enhance their activity, thus improving the humification process and composting performance as well as minimizing GHGs and odor emissions. These capabilities are mainly attributed to its unique properties, including porous structure, large SSA, and abundant functional groups (Awasthi et al. 2021; Guo et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021c). HHT is a critical parameter in assessing biochar’s function in mitigating GHGs emissions during composting (Yin et al. 2021). It is concluded that biochar pyrolyzed at high temperatures (500–900 °C) is more effective in mitigating CH4 and N2O emissions; in comparison, biochar produced at low temperatures (< 500 °C) has a greater effect on reducing NH3 emissions (Yin et al. 2021).
Toxic metals and antibiotics/antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are the main contaminants in composting products (Lu et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2021a). It has been reported that biochar amendment aerobic composting is an efficient technology for reducing ARGs abundance in livestock manure and sewage sludge (Fu et al. 2021c; Zhou et al. 2021a). Qiu et al. (2021) found that biochar reduced the total abundance of ARGs by 17.6% during sewage sludge composting. The analysis revealed that biochar reduced the abundance of bacterial pathogens such as Bacteroides and Pseudomonas. It is suggested that change in the bacterial community by biochar amendment dominated the reduction in the risk of ARGs in manure/sludge composting (Mazhar et al. 2021; Qiu et al. 2021). Composting livestock manure or sewage sludge with biochar has also been reported to reduce the mobility and bioavailability of toxic metals. In sheep manure composting, 10% biochar dose passivated copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) by 46.95% and 56.27%, respectively.
Additionally, microbial diversity was improved, and Firmicutes was the dominant bacterial phylum in biochar-based composting (Duan et al. 2021). In similar studies, biochar amendment had a positive impact on the diversity of toxic metal-resistant bacteria and toxic metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni, Cr, As) passivation during livestock manure/sewage sludge composting (Liu et al. 2021b; Song et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2021a). More importantly, reducing the bioavailability of toxic metals was responsible for lowering ARGs abundance (Qiu et al. 2021).
No more than 10% biochar dose was recommended because excess biochar addition could cause severe water loss and heat dissipation, thus negatively affecting the composting process (Wang et al. 2021c). Moreover, the cost of biochar may also be a limiting factor (Wang et al. 2021e).
3.4.6 Biochar as additives in anaerobic digestion
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a biological treatment method to convert organic wastes into renewable biogas and biofertilizer and to sustain waste management (Ambaye et al. 2021; Su et al. 2021). Particularly, organic wet wastes, including livestock manure, food waste, and sewage sludge, are the most commonly used wastes for AD. However, several key challenges persisted thoroughly, including low methane efficiency, operational instability, unsatisfactory substrate degradation, and generation of toxic metabolic intermediates and gaseous pollutants (Zhang and Wang 2021).
Biochar has been identified as an effective additive to boost and improve AD performance (Qi et al. 2021c; Shi et al. 2021b; Sugiarto et al. 2021a). It could significantly assist in shortening the lag phase of organic biodegradation, improving the production of methane (CH4) and hydrogen (H2). Such improvement in AD process efficiency with biochar amendment could be attributed to buffering capacity, adsorption of inhibitory substances (e.g., ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) and volatile fatty acids)), and accelerated direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) (Ambaye et al. 2021; Bu et al. 2021; Qi et al. 2021c). Bu et al. (2021) reported that biochar significantly boosted H2 production from pretreated sugarcane bagasse by implementing efficient enrichment and colonization of functional bacteria and activating extracellular electron transfer between functional bacteria (Fig. 6a). Moreover, biochar amendment could also advance the removal of key contaminants during the AD treatment of organic wet wastes, such as heavy metals, antibiotics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and microplastics (MPs). Biochar has been considered a passivator to reduce the bioavailability of heavy metals by electrostatic adsorption, physical adsorption, complexation, precipitation, and redox effect in AD (Qi et al. 2021a). Adsorption and promotion of biodegradation are critical pathways for removing antibiotics with biochar amendment in AD (Cheng et al. 2021). Biochar has high-effective performance in promoting the biodegradation of PAHs in AD. The enhancement was attributed to the increased DIET between syntrophic microorganisms and the activity of microorganisms (Qi et al. 2021a). Biochar could advance MPs removal in AD through direct adsorption. In addition, biochar amendment could promote microbial activity in AD, thus enhancing the biodegradation of MPs (Qi et al. 2021d). Table 2 summarizes the effects of biochar on AD performance.
The mineral contents (e.g., Fe, Ca, K, Na) present in biochar play a crucial role in promoting CH4 and hydrogen production. It was reported that the addition of leached biochar in the AD system resulted in lower CH4 and hydrogen production compared to unleached biochar treatment (Sugiarto et al. 2021b). The role of iron (Fe) within biochar in boosting CH4 production in the AD system was largely reported in 2021. Wang et al. (2021b) showed that magnetite-contained biochar prepared from Fenton sludge pyrolyzed at 400 °C significantly improved AD performance due to magnetite's high conductivity. Fe-modified biochar could act as a catalytic medium for substrate hydrolysis and accelerating methanogenesis. The generated Fe oxides on the biochar surface contributed to the interspecies electron transfer in syntrophic metabolism (Deng et al. 2021b). Therefore, introducing Fe oxides into biochar has great potential to improve AD performance.
Hydrochar has also been demonstrated to enhance AD performance. He et al. (2021) showed that hydrochar promoted methane production rates by 36.4–237% in AD of organic wastes via DIET mediated through surface oxygen-containing functional groups. Hydrochar prepared at lower temperatures had greater surface oxygen-containing functional groups, which were related to the facilitated DIET. Similarly, Shi et al. (2021a) found that hydrochar increased the methane yield and production rate by 31.4% and 30.8%, respectively. Genome-centric metatranscriptomics analysis revealed that hydrochar behaved as an electron shuttle to promote DIET between Syntrophomonas sp. FDU0164 and Methanosarcina sp. FDU0106. It should be noted that hydrochar exhibited a superior ability to promote methane yield and production rate than biochar. Hydrochar had greater surface oxygen-containing functional groups, which were related to facilitated DIET and enhanced methane yield and production rate. The metabolomic analysis also showed that the alterations of metabolites associated with fatty acids and amino acids metabolism induced by hydrochar were stronger than those of biochar (Fig. 6b) (Shi et al. 2021b).
The addition of biochar in the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste or livestock manure with sewage sludge has recently aroused considerable attention. It has highly synergistic effects on hydrolysis acidification and methane production compared with digestion alone (Johnravindar et al. 2021; Liang et al. 2021a; Zhang et al. 2021d). A recent study indicated that the anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with municipal sludge enhanced methane yield by 83.0–136.5% and 31.3–68.0% at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures, respectively (Zhang et al. 2021d). Notably, certain disadvantages of incompatible inoculum-to-substrate ratio, excessive acidification, and organic overloading may lead to the inhibition of biogas production (Liang et al. 2021a).
It is noted that biochar/hydrochar addition, exceeding a certain amount, could negatively affect AD performance. In some cases, the negative effect was due to the high sorption capacities of biochar, which might reduce the contact between microbes and substrates. Another potential explanation is that a high dose of biochar accelerated the hydrolysis and acidogenesis-acetogenesis, resulting in the accumulation of toxic metabolic intermediates that could delay methane production (Ambaye et al. 2021).
4 Conclusions and perspectives
CiteSpace-based scientometric analysis was used to analyze the research trends and hotspots in the biochar field based on 5535 publications collected from WoS core collection in 2021. The number of publications has expanded dramatically in 2021 and the growth trend may continue. China and USA were pioneers in this field. The keyword clustering analysis indicated that “Biochar for toxic metal immobilization”, “Biochar-based catalyst for biofuel production”, “Biochar for global climate change mitigation”, “Biochar for salinity and drought stress amelioration”, “Biochar amendment in composting”, and “Biochar as additives in anaerobic digestion” were the main research trends and hotspots in biochar research in 2021. The employment of biochar as heterogeneous catalysts for biofuel production became the focus of biochar research in 2021. Biochar’s applications for heavy metal immobilization, global climate mitigation, salinity and drought stress amelioration, biofuel production, and anaerobic digestion promotion represent sustainable growing topics in 2021. However, bioremediation using functional bacteria immobilized on biochar and biochar-assisted advanced oxidation process were well-studied but with less frequency in 2021 than in 2020. In short, the present review provides a comprehensive overview of the research and the evolution of research hotspots in biochar research.
Although biochar has multifunctional applications in agriculture, environment, and energy, its potential ecological risks, and long-term safety and implications are of great concern. Previous studies have confirmed that biochar contained several toxic components, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), persistent free radicals (PFRs), toxic metals, and water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) (Brtnicky et al. 2021; Godlewska et al. 2021). The detrimental effects of these harmful substances were correlated with their bioavailable fraction, which depended on the feedstock and preparation methods (Godlewska et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2019). PAHs are mostly formed during the incomplete combustion of biowaste (Wang et al. 2017). It is suggested that biochar produced by slow pyrolysis had lower PAHs than by fast pyrolysis (Wang et al. 2017). Biochar produced under medium temperatures (400–600 °C) often contained higher contents of bioavailable PAHs. In general, the majority of biochars contained a low bioavailable fraction of PAHs (Tomczyk et al. 2020). PCDD/Fs are mainly formed on the surface of biochar during the thermal treatment of feedstock, especially food waste (El-Naggar et al. 2019). It is reported that low temperatures (200–400 °C) and short residence time favored the formation of PCDDs on biochar surface (Lyu et al. 2016). It is accepted that PCDDs always existed in low quantities in biochar and posed a relatively marginal risk to organisms (Godlewska et al. 2021; Weidemann et al. 2018). VOCs are mainly formed on biochar surfaces or/and inside biochar pores by the thermal decomposition of biomass. The contents of VOCs in biochar decreased with increasing HTTs (Buss et al. 2015). Numerous studies have reported the stable and large molecular PFRs in biochar during the biomass carbonization process (Liao et al. 2014; Lieke et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2016; Zhen et al. 2021). It was found that the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals in lignin-derived biochar were higher than those in cellulose-derived biochar. The EPR signals increased with increasing HTT for the majority of biochar (Liao et al. 2014). Besides organic compounds, heavy metals (e.g., Cd, Cu, and Pb) in biochar are highly concerned with their toxicity. Heavy metal contaminants are mainly originated from feedstock rich in heavy metals, especially sewage sludge, animal manure, and plants grown on heavy metal-contaminated soils. The conversion of biomass abundant with heavy metals to biochar is considered a promising method for safely disposing of biomass and significantly reducing the bioavailability and leaching of heavy metals (Devi and Saroha 2014; Wang et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2020). The contents of certain heavy metals increased with increasing HTTs, which may be attributed mainly to the ‘concentration effect’ resulting from a decrease in biochar yield (Zhang et al. 2020). The bioavailability of heavy metals depends on heavy metal contents in raw biomass and the transformation and dissolution of heavy metals in biochar (Godlewska et al. 2021). The release of water-soluble organic compounds (WSOCs) from hydrochar was higher than from biochar. With the increase in HTT, the contents of phenols and organic acids in WSOCs increased (Hao et al. 2018).
Despite the ecologically acceptable levels of these harmful substances for most biochar, it may pose an ecological risk to soil biota (Fig. 7). For example, it is revealed that the attendance of some contaminants (e.g., PAHs, cresols, methylated phenols) in biochar might cause direct toxicity to soil microorganisms (Oleszczuk and Koltowski 2018; Yang et al. 2019), for example, significant germination inhibition, plasma membrane disruption, and plant growth retardation (Liao et al. 2014). When incorporated into agricultural soils, dust emissions from biochar may cause a health hazard for farmers (Li et al. 2018). The nano biochar after ball milling had a higher potential ecological risk than pristine biochar due to its unique nanotoxicity (Huang et al. 2021). Moreover, soil physicochemical changes caused by biochar amendment may indirectly induce ecotoxicity to soil organisms. The increase in soil pH after biochar addition may negatively affect earthworm reproductions (Van Zwieten et al. 2009). The strong adsorption of nutrients by biochar would reduce the bioavailability of nutrients, thus inhibiting plant growth. Similarly, the accessibility of water to plants would decrease due to biochar's strong water retention capacity (Brtnicky et al. 2021). It has to be noted that an appropriate biochar application rate may not have unintended adverse effects on soil organisms. Still, excess biochar addition is likely to generate unintended consequences.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abdullah RF, Rashid U, Ibrahim ML, NolHakim MAHL, Moser BR, Alharthi FA (2021) Bifunctional biomass-based catalyst for biodiesel production via hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) pretreatment—synthesis, characterization and optimization. Process Saf Environ 156:219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.10.007
Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071
Ambaye TG, Rene ER, Nizami AS, Dupont C, Vaccari M, van Hullebusch ED (2021) Beneficial role of biochar addition on the anaerobic digestion of food waste: a systematic and critical review of the operational parameters and mechanisms. J Environ Manage 290:112537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112537
Anniwaer A, Chaihad N, Zahra ACA, Yu T, Kasai Y, Kongparakul S, Samart C, Abudula A, Guan G (2021) Steam co-gasification of Japanese cedarwood and its commercial biochar for hydrogen-rich gas production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 46:34587–34598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.032
Arabi Z, Rinklebe J, El-Naggar A, Hou D, Sarmah AK, Moreno-Jimenez E (2021) (Im)mobilization of arsenic, chromium, and nickel in soils via biochar: a meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 286:117199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117199
Awasthi SK, Duan Y, Liu T, Zhou Y, Qin S, Liu H, Varjani S, Awasthi MK, Zhang Z, Pandey A, Taherzadeh MJ (2021) Sequential presence of heavy metal resistant fungal communities influenced by biochar amendment in the poultry manure composting process. J Clean Prod 291:125947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125947
Azadi N, Raiesi F (2021) Salinity-induced changes in cadmium availability affect soil microbial and biochemical functions: mitigating role of biochar. Chemosphere 274:129924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129924
Brtnicky M, Datta R, Holatko J, Bielska L, Gusiatin ZM, Kucerik J, Hammerschmiedt T, Danish S, Radziemska M, Mravcova L, Fahad S, Kintl A, Sudoma M, Ahmed N et al (2021) A critical review of the possible adverse effects of biochar in the soil environment. Sci Total Environ 796:148756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148756
Bu J, Wei HL, Wang YT, Cheng JR, Zhu MJ (2021) Biochar boosts dark fermentative H2 production from sugarcane bagasse by selective enrichment/colonization of functional bacteria and enhancing extracellular electron transfer. Water Res 202:117440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117440
Buss W (2021) Pyrolysis solves the issue of organic contaminants in sewage sludge while retaining carbon—making the case for sewage sludge treatment via pyrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:10048–10053. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03651
Buss W, Masek O, Graham M, Wust D (2015) Inherent organic compounds in biochar—their content, composition and potential toxic effects. J Environ Manage 156:150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.035
Cao Y, Shan Y, Wu P, Zhang P, Zhang Z, Zhao F, Zhu T (2021) Mitigating the global warming potential of rice paddy fields by straw and straw-derived biochar amendments. Geoderma 396:115081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115081
Cha JS, Park SH, Jung S-C, Ryu C, Jeon J-K, Shin M-C, Park Y-K (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002
Chen C (2004) Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(Suppl_1):5303–5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100
Chen C (2017) Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. J Data Info Sci 2:1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Chen YD, Wang R, Duan X, Wang S, Ren NQ, Ho SH (2020) Production, properties, and catalytic applications of sludge derived biochar for environmental remediation. Water Res 187:116390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116390
Chen M, Liu S, Yuan X, Li QX, Wang F, Xin F, Wen B (2021) Methane production and characteristics of the microbial community in the co-digestion of potato pulp waste and dairy manure amended with biochar. Renew Energ 163:357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.006
Chen Z, Lu Z, Zhang Y, Li B, Chen C, Shen K (2021b) Effects of biochars combined with ferrous sulfate and pig manure on the bioavailability of Cd and potential phytotoxicity for wheat in an alkaline contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 753:141832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141832
Cheng D, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, Nguyen QA, Zhang J, Liang S (2021) Improving sulfonamide antibiotics removal from swine wastewater by supplying a new pomelo peel derived biochar in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technol 319:124160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124160
Chi NTL, Anto S, Ahamed TS, Kumar SS, Shanmugam S, Samuel MS, Mathimani T, Brindhadevi K, Pugazhendhi A (2021) A review on biochar production techniques and biochar based catalyst for biofuel production from algae. Fuel 287:119411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119411
Cho S-H, Jung S, Park Y-K, Lin K-YA, Chen W-H, Tsang YF, Kwon EE (2021) Biofuel production as an example of virtuous valorization of swine manure. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:13761–13772. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04382
Craswell ET, Chalk PM, Kaudal BB (2021) Role of 15N in tracing biologically driven nitrogen dynamics in soils amended with biochar: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 162:108416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108416
Cui Q, Xia J, Yang H, Liu J, Shao P (2021a) Biochar and effective microorganisms promote Sesbania cannabina growth and soil quality in the coastal saline-alkali soil of the Yellow River Delta, China. Sci Total Environ 756:143801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143801
Cui Y, Mao F, Zhang J, He Y, Tong YW, Peng Y (2021b) Biochar enhanced high-solid mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: cell viability and methanogenic pathways. Chemosphere 272:129863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129863
Cuong DV, Wu PC, Chen LI, Hou CH (2021) Active MnO2/biochar composite for efficient As(III) removal: insight into the mechanisms of redox transformation and adsorption. Water Res 188:116495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116495
Deng B, Yuan X, Siemann E, Wang S, Fang H, Wang B, Gao Y, Shad N, Liu X, Zhang W, Guo X, Zhang L (2021) Feedstock particle size and pyrolysis temperature regulate effects of biochar on soil nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions. Waste Manag 120:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.015
Deng Y, Xia J, Zhao R, Liu X, Xu J (2021b) Modified biochar promotes the direct interspecies electron transfer between iron-reducing bacteria and methanogens in high organic loading co-digestion. Bioresour Technol 342:126030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126030
Devi P, Saroha AK (2014) Risk analysis of pyrolyzed biochar made from paper mill effluent treatment plant sludge for bioavailability and eco-toxicity of heavy metals. Bioresour Technol 162:308–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.093
Dong D, Li J, Ying S, Wu J, Han X, Teng Y, Zhou M, Ren Y, Jiang P (2021) Mitigation of methane emission in a rice paddy field amended with biochar-based slow-release fertilizer. Sci Total Environ 792:148460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148460
Duan Y, Yang J, Guo Y, Wu X, Tian Y, Li H, Awasthi MK (2021) Pollution control in biochar-driven clean composting: emphasize on heavy metal passivation and gaseous emissions mitigation. J Hazard Mater 420:126635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126635
Dutta S, He M, Xiong X, Tsang DCW (2021) Sustainable management and recycling of food waste anaerobic digestate: a review. Bioresour Technol 341:125915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125915
El-Naggar A, El-Naggar AH, Shaheen SM, Sarkar B, Chang SX, Tsang DCW, Rinklebe J, Ok YS (2019) Biochar composition-dependent impacts on soil nutrient release, carbon mineralization, and potential environmental risk: a review. J Environ Manage 241:458–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.044
El-Naggar A, Chang SX, Cai Y, Lee YH, Wang J, Wang SL, Ryu C, Rinklebe J, Sik Ok Y (2021) Mechanistic insights into the (im)mobilization of arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc in a multi-contaminated soil treated with different biochars. Environ Int 156:106638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106638
Farhangi-Abriz S, Ghassemi-Golezani K (2021) Changes in soil properties and salt tolerance of safflower in response to biochar-based metal oxide nanocomposites of magnesium and manganese. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 211:111904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111904
Farkas E, Feigl V, Gruiz K, Vaszita E, Fekete-Kertesz I, Tolner M, Kerekes I, Pusztai E, Kari A, Uzinger N, Rekasi M, Kirchkeszner C, Molnar M (2020) Long-term effects of grain husk and paper fibre sludge biochar on acidic and calcareous sandy soils—a scale-up field experiment applying a complex monitoring toolkit. Sci Total Environ 731:138988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138988
Feng D, Guo D, Shang Q, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Guo X, Cheng J, Chang G, Guo Q, Sun S (2021a) Mechanism of biochar-gas-tar-soot formation during pyrolysis of different biomass feedstocks: effect of inherent metal species. Fuel 293:120409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120409
Feng D, Guo D, Zhang Y, Sun S, Zhao Y, Chang G, Guo Q, Qin Y (2021b) Adsorption-enrichment characterization of CO2 and dynamic retention of free NH3 in functionalized biochar with H2O/NH3·H2O activation for promotion of new ammonia-based carbon capture. Chem Eng J 409:128193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128193
Fu G, Qiu X, Xu X, Zhang W, Zang F, Zhao C (2021a) The role of biochar particle size and application rate in promoting the hydraulic and physical properties of sandy desert soil. CATENA 207:105607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105607
Fu H, Ma S, Xu S, Duan R, Cheng G, Zhao P (2021b) Hierarchically porous magnetic biochar as an efficient amendment for cadmium in water and soil: performance and mechanism. Chemosphere 281:130990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130990
Fu Y, Zhang A, Guo T, Zhu Y, Shao Y (2021c) Biochar and hyperthermophiles as additives accelerate the removal of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements during composting. Materials (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185428
Gao B, Wang Y, Huang L, Liu S (2021) Study on the performance of HNO3-modified biochar for enhanced medium temperature anaerobic digestion of food waste. Waste Manag 135:338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.020
Godlewska P, Ok YS, Oleszczuk P (2021) The dark side of black gold: ecotoxicological aspects of biochar and biochar-amended soils. J Hazard Mater 403:123833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123833
Gopinath A, Divyapriya G, Srivastava V, Laiju AR, Nidheesh PV, Kumar MS (2021) Conversion of sewage sludge into biochar: a potential resource in water and wastewater treatment. Environ Res 194:110656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110656
Guenet B, Gabrielle B, Chenu C, Arrouays D, Balesdent J, Bernoux M, Bruni E, Caliman JP, Cardinael R, Chen S, Ciais P, Desbois D, Fouche J, Frank S et al (2021) Can N2O emissions offset the benefits from soil organic carbon storage? Glob Chang Biol 27:237–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15342
Guo X-x, Wu S-b, Wang X-q, Liu H-t (2021) Impact of biochar addition on three-dimensional structural changes in aggregates associated with humus during swine manure composting. J Clean Prod 280:124380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124380
Hagemann N, Joseph S, Schmidt HP, Kammann CI, Harter J, Borch T, Young RB, Varga K, Taherymoosavi S, Elliott KW, McKenna A, Albu M, Mayrhofer C, Obst M et al (2017) Organic coating on biochar explains its nutrient retention and stimulation of soil fertility. Nat Commun 8:1089. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01123-0
Hao S, Zhu X, Liu Y, Qian F, Fang Z, Shi Q, Zhang S, Chen J, Ren ZJ (2018) Production temperature effects on the structure of hydrochar-derived dissolved organic matter and associated toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 52:7486–7495. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04983
He J, Ren S, Zhang S, Luo G (2021) Modification of hydrochar increased the capacity to promote anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol 341:125856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125856
Hsu CJ, Cheng YH, Huang YP, Atkinson JD, Hsi HC (2021) A novel synthesis of sulfurized magnetic biochar for aqueous Hg(II) capture as a potential method for environmental remediation in water. Sci Total Environ 784:147240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147240
Hu Z, Miao Z, Chen H, Wu J, Wu W, Ren Y, Jiang E (2021) Chemical looping gasification of biochar to produce hydrogen-rich syngas using Fe/Ca-based oxygen carrier prepared by coprecipitation. J Energy Inst 94:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2020.12.006
Hu J, Jia Z, Zhao S, Wang W, Zhang Q, Liu R, Huang Z (2021a) Activated char supported Fe–Ni catalyst for syngas production from catalytic gasification of pine wood. Bioresour Technol 340:125600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125600
Huang XC, Zhu SS, Zhang HL, Huang YC, Wang XD, Wang Y, Chen D (2021) Biochar nanoparticles induced distinct biological effects on freshwater algae via oxidative stress, membrane damage, and nutrient depletion. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:10761–10770. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01814
Inyang MI, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman A, Mosa A, Pullammanappallil P, Ok YS, Cao X (2015) A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 46:406–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1096880
Islam MS, Kwak JH, Nzediegwu C, Wang S, Palansuriya K, Kwon EE, Naeth MA, El-Din MG, Ok YS, Chang SX (2021) Biochar heavy metal removal in aqueous solution depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis purging gas. Environ Pollut 281:117094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117094
Jellali S, Khiari B, Usman M, Hamdi H, Charabi Y, Jeguirim M (2021) Sludge-derived biochars: a review on the influence of synthesis conditions on pollutants removal efficiency from wastewaters. Renew Sust Energ Rev 144:111068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111068
Jiang Z, Yang S, Pang Q, Xu Y, Chen X, Sun X, Qi S, Yu W (2021) Biochar improved soil health and mitigated greenhouse gas emission from controlled irrigation paddy field: insights into microbial diversity. J Clean Prod 318:128595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128595
Johnravindar D, Wong JWC, Chakraborty D, Bodedla G, Kaur G (2021) Food waste and sewage sludge co-digestion amended with different biochars: VFA kinetics, methane yield and digestate quality assessment. J Environ Manage 290:112457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112457
Kamali M, Jahaninafard D, Mostafaie A, Davarazar M, Gomes APD, Tarelho LAC, Dewil R, Aminabhavi TM (2020) Scientometric analysis and scientific trends on biochar application as soil amendment. Chem Eng J 395:125128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125128
Khan Z, Khan MN, Zhang K, Luo T, Zhu K, Hu L (2021) The application of biochar alleviated the adverse effects of drought on the growth, physiology, yield and quality of rapeseed through regulation of soil status and nutrients availability. Ind Crop Prod 171:113878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113878
Kim YJ, Hyun J, Yoo SY, Yoo G (2021) The role of biochar in alleviating soil drought stress in urban roadside greenery. Geoderma 404:115223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115223
Kostas ET, Durán-Jiménez G, Shepherd BJ, Meredith W, Stevens LA, Williams OSA, Lye GJ, Robinson JP (2020) Microwave pyrolysis of olive pomace for bio-oil and bio-char production. Chem Eng J 387:123404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123404
Lehmann J, Cowie A, Masiello CA, Kammann C, Woolf D, Amonette JE, Cayuela ML, Camps-Arbestain M, Whitman T (2021) Biochar in climate change mitigation. Nat Geosci 14:883–892. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00852-8
Leppäkoski L, Marttila MP, Uusitalo V, Levänen J, Halonen V, Mikkilä MH (2021) Assessing the carbon footprint of biochar from willow grown on marginal lands in Finland. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810097
Li C, Bair DA, Parikh SJ (2018) Estimating potential dust emissions from biochar amended soils under simulated tillage. Sci Total Environ 625:1093–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.249
Li Q, Long R, Chen H, Chen F, Wang J (2020) Visualized analysis of global green buildings: development, barriers and future directions. J Clean Prod 245:118775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118775
Lian F, Xing B (2017) Black carbon (Biochar) in water/soil environments: molecular structure, sorption, stability, and potential risk. Environ Sci Technol 51:13517–13532. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02528
Liang J, Luo L, Li D, Varjani S, Xu Y, Wong JWC (2021a) Promoting anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste with different types of conductive materials: performance, stability, and underlying mechanism. Bioresour Technol 337:125384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125384
Liang JF, Li QW, Gao JQ, Feng JG, Zhang XY, Hao YJ, Yu FH (2021b) Biochar-compost addition benefits Phragmites australis growth and soil property in coastal wetlands. Sci Total Environ 769:145166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145166
Liang JF, Li QW, Gao JQ, Feng JG, Zhang XY, Wu YQ, Yu FH (2021c) Biochar rhizosphere addition promoted Phragmites australis growth and changed soil properties in the Yellow River Delta. Sci Total Environ 761:143291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143291
Liao S, Pan B, Li H, Zhang D, Xing B (2014) Detecting free radicals in biochars and determining their ability to inhibit the germination and growth of corn, wheat and rice seedlings. Environ Sci Technol 48:8581–8587. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404250a
Liao J, Hu A, Zhao Z, Liu X, Jiang C, Zhang Z (2021) Biochar with large specific surface area recruits N2O-reducing microbes and mitigate N2O emission. Soil Biol Biochem 156:108212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108212
Lieke T, Zhang XC, Steinberg CEW, Pan B (2018) Overlooked risks of biochars: persistent free radicals trigger neurotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environ Sci Technol 52:7981–7987. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01338
Liu L, Huang L, Huang R, Lin H, Wang D (2021a) Immobilization of heavy metals in biochar derived from co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and calcium sulfate. J Hazard Mater 403:123648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123648
Liu L, Ye Q, Wu Q, Liu T, Peng S (2021b) Effect of biochar addition on sludge aerobic composting and greenbelt utilization. Environ Technol Inno 21:101279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101279
Liu Y, Paskevicius M, Wang H, Parkinson G, Wei J, Asif Akhtar M, Li C-Z (2021c) Insights into the mechanism of tar reforming using biochar as a catalyst. Fuel 296:120672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120672
Low YW, Yee KF (2021) A review on lignocellulosic biomass waste into biochar-derived catalyst: current conversion techniques, sustainable applications and challenges. Biomass Bioenerg 154:106245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106245
Lu H, Chen XH, Mo CH, Huang YH, He MY, Li YW, Feng NX, Katsoyiannis A, Cai QY (2021) Occurrence and dissipation mechanism of organic pollutants during the composting of sewage sludge: a critical review. Bioresour Technol 328:124847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124847
Lyu H, He Y, Tang J, Hecker M, Liu Q, Jones PD, Codling G, Giesy JP (2016) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on potential toxicity of biochar if applied to the environment. Environ Pollut 218:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.014
Ma Q, Chen W, Jin Z, Chen L, Zhou Q, Jiang X (2021) One-step synthesis of microporous nitrogen-doped biochar for efficient removal of CO2 and H2S. Fuel 289:119932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119932
Malyan SK, Kumar SS, Fagodiya RK, Ghosh P, Kumar A, Singh R, Singh L (2021) Biochar for environmental sustainability in the energy-water-agroecosystem nexus. Renew Sust Energ Rev 149:111379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111379
Mannan MA, Mia S, Halder E, Dijkstra FA (2021) Biochar application rate does not improve plant water availability in soybean under drought stress. Agr Water Manage 253:106940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106940
Mansoor S, Kour N, Manhas S, Zahid S, Wani OA, Sharma V, Wijaya L, Alyemeni MN, Alsahli AA, El-Serehy HA, Paray BA, Ahmad P (2021) Biochar as a tool for effective management of drought and heavy metal toxicity. Chemosphere 271:129458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129458
Manya JJ (2012) Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: a review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ Sci Technol 46:7939–7954. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301029g
Mazhar SH, Li X, Rashid A, Su J, Xu J, Brejnrod AD, Su JQ, Wu Y, Zhu YG, Zhou SG, Feng R, Rensing C (2021) Co-selection of antibiotic resistance genes, and mobile genetic elements in the presence of heavy metals in poultry farm environments. Sci Total Environ 755:142702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142702
Mazhkoo S, Dadfar H, HajiHashemi M, Pourali O (2021) A comprehensive experimental and modeling investigation of walnut shell gasification process in a pilot-scale downdraft gasifier integrated with an internal combustion engine. Energ Convers Manage 231:113836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113836
Nan Q, Xin L, Qin Y, Waqas M, Wu W (2021) Exploring long-term effects of biochar on mitigating methane emissions from paddy soil: a review. Biochar 3:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00096-0
Nazir MH, Ayoub M, Zahid I, Shamsuddin RB, Yusup S, Ameen M, Zulqarnain QMU (2021) Development of lignin based heterogeneous solid acid catalyst derived from sugarcane bagasse for microwave assisted-transesterification of waste cooking oil. Biomass Bioenerg 146:105978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.105978
Nidheesh PV, Gopinath A, Ranjith N, Praveen Akre A, Sreedharan V, Suresh Kumar M (2021) Potential role of biochar in advanced oxidation processes: a sustainable approach. Chem Eng J 405:126582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126582
Oleszczuk P, Koltowski M (2018) Changes of total and freely dissolved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and toxicity of biochars treated with various aging processes. Environ Pollut 237:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.073
Purkayastha D, Mishra U, Biswas S (2014) A comprehensive review on Cd(II) removal from aqueous solution. J Water Process Eng 2:105–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.05.009
Qi C, Wang R, Jia S, Chen J, Li Y, Zhang J, Li G, Luo W (2021a) Biochar amendment to advance contaminant removal in anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes: a review. Bioresource Technol 341:125827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125827
Qi L, Ma Z, Chang SX, Zhou P, Huang R, Wang Y, Wang Z, Gao M (2021b) Biochar decreases methanogenic archaea abundance and methane emissions in a flooded paddy soil. Sci Total Environ 752:141958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141958
Qi Q, Sun C, Zhang J, He Y, Wah Tong Y (2021c) Internal enhancement mechanism of biochar with graphene structure in anaerobic digestion: the bioavailability of trace elements and potential direct interspecies electron transfer. Chem Eng J 406:126833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126833
Qi QX, Sun C, Cristhian C, Zhang TY, Zhang JX, Tian HL, He YL, Tong YW (2021d) Enhancement of methanogenic performance by gasification biochar on anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technol 330:124993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124993
Qiu X, Zhou G, Wang H, Wu X (2021) The behavior of antibiotic-resistance genes and their relationships with the bacterial community and heavy metals during sewage sludge composting. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 216:112190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112190
Rai PK, Lee SS, Zhang M, Tsang YF, Kim KH (2019) Heavy metals in food crops: health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management. Environ Int 125:365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.067
Reay DS, Davidson EA, Smith KA, Smith P, Melillo JM, Dentener F, Crutzen PJ (2012) Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nat Clim Change 2:410–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1458
Ren MN, Yu XJ, Mujumdar AS, Yagoub AA, Chen L, Zhou CS (2021) Visualizing the knowledge domain of pulsed light technology in the food field: a scientometrics review. Innov Food Sci Emerg 74:102823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102823
Reynel-Ávila HE, Camacho-Aguilar KI, Bonilla-Petriciolet A, Mendoza-Castillo DI, González-Ponce HA, Trejo-Valencia R, Azevedo DCS (2021) Engineered magnetic carbon-based adsorbents for the removal of water priority pollutants: an overview. Adsorpt Sci Technol 2021:1–41. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9917444
SafahaniLangeroodi AR, Mancinelli R, Radicetti E (2021) Contribution of biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to sustainable cultivation of sunflower under semi-arid environment. Field Crop Res 273:108292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108292
Shabbir A, Saqib M, Murtaza G, Abbas G, Imran M, Rizwan M, Naeem MA, Ali S, Rashad Javeed HM (2021) Biochar mitigates arsenic-induced human health risks and phytotoxicity in quinoa under saline conditions by modulating ionic and oxidative stress responses. Environ Pollut 287:117348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117348
Shafawi AN, Mohamed AR, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M (2021) Recent advances in developing engineered biochar for CO2 capture: an insight into the biochar modification approaches. J Environ Chem Eng 9:106869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106869
Shan G, Li W, Gao Y, Tan W, Xi B (2021) Additives for reducing nitrogen loss during composting: a review. J Clean Prod 307:127308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127308
Shen Y, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Urgun-Demirtas M, Yuan H, Zhu N, Dai X (2021) Role of redox-active biochar with distinctive electrochemical properties to promote methane production in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. J Clean Prod 278:123212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123212
Shi Z, Campanaro S, Usman M, Treu L, Basile A, Angelidaki I, Zhang S, Luo G (2021) Genome-centric metatranscriptomics analysis reveals the role of hydrochar in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Environ Sci Technol 55:8351–8361. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01995
Shi Z, Usman M, He J, Chen H, Zhang S, Luo G (2021b) Combined microbial transcript and metabolic analysis reveals the different roles of hydrochar and biochar in promoting anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water Res 205:117679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117679
Shin J, Park D, Hong S, Jeong C, Kim H, Chung W (2021) Influence of activated biochar pellet fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration in rice (Oryza sativa L.) production. Environ Pollut 285:117457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117457
Singh G, Mavi MS, Choudhary OP, Gupta N, Singh Y (2021) Rice straw biochar application to soil irrigated with saline water in a cotton-wheat system improves crop performance and soil functionality in north-west India. J Environ Manage 295:113277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113277
Song C, Zhao Y, Pan D, Wang S, Wu D, Wang L, Hao J, Wei Z (2021) Heavy metals passivation driven by the interaction of organic fractions and functional bacteria during biochar/montmorillonite-amended composting. Bioresource Technol 329:124923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124923
Su C, Tao A, Zhao L, Wang P, Wang A, Huang X, Chen M (2021) Roles of modified biochar in the performance, sludge characteristics, and microbial community features of anaerobic reactor for treatment food waste. Sci Total Environ 770:144668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144668
Sugiarto Y, Sunyoto NMS, Zhu M, Jones I, Zhang D (2021) Effect of biochar in enhancing hydrogen production by mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food wastes: the role of minerals. Int J Hydrogen Energ 46:3695–3703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.256
Sugiarto Y, Sunyoto NMS, Zhu M, Jones I, Zhang D (2021a) Effect of biochar addition on microbial community and methane production during anaerobic digestion of food wastes: The role of minerals in biochar. Bioresour Technol 323:124585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124585
Sun R, Wang J, Peng Y, Wang H, Chen Q (2021) Mitigation of arsenic accumulation in arugula (Eruca sativa Mill.) using Fe/Al/Zn impregnated biochar composites. Environ Sci Pollut R 28:4136–4146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10476-x
Sun H, Sun S, Feng D, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Wu J, Qin Y (2021a) Mechanism of coke formation and corresponding gas fraction characteristics in biochar-catalyzed tar reforming during corn straw pyrolysis. Fuel Process Technol 221:106903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106903
Sun T, Xu Y, Sun Y, Wang L, Liang X, Zheng S (2021c) Cd immobilization and soil quality under Fe-modified biochar in weakly alkaline soil. Chemosphere 280:130606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130606
Tian H, Yang J, Xu R, Lu C, Canadell JG, Davidson EA, Jackson RB, Arneth A, Chang J, Ciais P, Gerber S, Ito A, Joos F, Lienert S et al (2019) Global soil nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: magnitude, attribution, and uncertainty. Glob Chang Biol 25:640–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14514
Tomczyk B, Siatecka A, Gao Y, Ok YS, Bogusz A, Oleszczuk P (2020) The convertion of sewage sludge to biochar as a sustainable tool of PAHs exposure reduction during agricultural utilization of sewage sludges. J Hazard Mater 392:122416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122416
Tong S, Zhang S, Yin H, Wang J, Chen M (2021) Study on co-hydrothermal treatment combined with pyrolysis of rice straw/sewage sludge: biochar properties and heavy metals behavior. J Anal Appl Pyrol 155:105074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105074
Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Morris S, Chan KY, Downie A, Rust J, Joseph S, Cowie A (2009) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x
Wang C, Wang Y, Herath HMSK (2017) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biochar—their formation, occurrence and analysis: a review. Org Geochem 114:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.09.001
Wang X, Li C, Li Z, Yu G, Wang Y (2019) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics, chemical speciation and risk evaluation of heavy metals in biochar derived from textile dyeing sludge. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 168:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.022
Wang J, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2021a) Enhancing anaerobic digestion of kitchen wastes with biochar: link between different properties and critical mechanisms of promoting interspecies electron transfer. Renew Energ 167:791–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.153
Wang M, Zhao Z, Zhang Y (2021b) Magnetite-contained biochar derived from fenton sludge modulated electron transfer of microorganisms in anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater 403:123972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123972
Wang SP, Wang L, Sun ZY, Wang ST, Shen CH, Tang YQ, Kida K (2021c) Biochar addition reduces nitrogen loss and accelerates composting process by affecting the core microbial community during distilled grain waste composting. Bioresour Technol 337:125492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125492
Wang X, Chang VW, Li Z, Chen Z, Wang Y (2021d) Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and organic fractions of municipal solid waste: synergistic effects on biochar properties and the environmental risk of heavy metals. J Hazard Mater 412:125200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125200
Wang Y, Akdeniz N, Yi S (2021e) Biochar-amended poultry mortality composting to increase compost temperatures, reduce ammonia emissions, and decrease leachate’s chemical oxygen demand. Agr Ecosyst Environ 315:107451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107451
Wang Z, Shen R, Ji S, Xie L, Zhang H (2021f) Effects of biochar derived from sewage sludge and sewage sludge/cotton stalks on the immobilization and phytoavailability of Pb, Cu, and Zn in sandy loam soil. J Hazard Mater 419:126468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126468
Wang Z, Tian Q, Guo J, Wu R, Zhu H, Zhang H (2021g) Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge/cotton stalks with K2CO3 for biochar production: improved biochar porosity and reduced heavy metal leaching. Waste Manag 135:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.08.042
Weidemann E, Buss W, Edo M, Masek O, Jansson S (2018) Influence of pyrolysis temperature and production unit on formation of selected PAHs, oxy-PAHs, N-PACs, PCDDs, and PCDFs in biochar—a screening study. Environ Sci Pollut R 25:3933–3940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0612-z
Wen E, Yang X, Chen H, Shaheen SM, Sarkar B, Xu S, Song H, Liang Y, Rinklebe J, Hou D, Li Y, Wu F, Pohorely M, Wong JWC et al (2021) Iron-modified biochar and water management regime-induced changes in plant growth, enzyme activities, and phytoavailability of arsenic, cadmium and lead in a paddy soil. J Hazard Mater 407:124344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124344
Woolf D, Amonette JE, Street-Perrott FA, Lehmann J, Joseph S (2010) Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053
Woolf D, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Kishimoto-Mo AW, McConkey B, Baldock J (2021) Greenhouse gas inventory model for biochar additions to soil. Environ Sci Technol 55:14795–14805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02425
Wu P, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Singh BP, Wang HL, Wu TL, Liu C, Fang GD, Zhou DM, Wang YJ, Chen WF (2019) A scientometric review of biochar research in the past 20 years (1998–2018). Biochar 1:23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-019-00002-9
Wu P, Wang Z, Wang H, Bolan NS, Wang Y, Chen W (2020) Visualizing the emerging trends of biochar research and applications in 2019: a scientometric analysis and review. Biochar 2:135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00055-1
Wu P, Wang ZY, Bolan NS, Wang HL, Wang YJ, Chen WF (2021) Visualizing the development trend and research frontiers of biochar in 2020: a scientometric perspective. Biochar 3:419–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00120-3
Wu Y, Liu J, Shaaban M, Hu R (2021b) Dynamics of soil N2O emissions and functional gene abundance in response to biochar application in the presence of earthworms. Environ Pollut 268:115670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115670
Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL (2018) Insight into multiple and multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental applications: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 52:5027–5047. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06487
Xiong Q, Wu X, Lv H, Liu S, Hou H, Wu X (2021) Influence of rice husk addition on phosphorus fractions and heavy metals risk of biochar derived from sewage sludge. Chemosphere 280:130566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130566
Xu Z, He M, Xu X, Cao X, Tsang DCW (2021) Impacts of different activation processes on the carbon stability of biochar for oxidation resistance. Bioresour Technol 338:125555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125555
Yang J, Pan B, Li H, Liao SH, Zhang D, Wu M, Xing BS (2016) Degradation of p-Nitrophenol on biochars: role of persistent free radicals. Environ Sci Technol 50:694–700. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04042
Yang X, Ng W, Wong BSE, Baeg GH, Wang CH, Ok YS (2019) Characterization and ecotoxicological investigation of biochar produced via slow pyrolysis: effect of feedstock composition and pyrolysis conditions. J Hazard Mater 365:178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.047
Yang Q, Zhou H, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F, Masek O, Agblevor FA, Wei Z, Yang H, Chen H, Lu X, Chen G, Zheng C, Nielsen CP, McElroy MB (2021) Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China’s 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals. Nat Commun 12:1698. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21868-z
Yang D, Yang S, Wang L, Xu J, Liu X (2021a) Performance of biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron for cadmium and arsenic co-contaminated soil remediation: insights on availability, bioaccumulation and health risk. Environ Pollut 290:118054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118054
Yang D, Yang S, Yuan H, Wang F, Wang H, Xu J, Liu X (2021b) Co-benefits of biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron in simultaneously stabilizing soil heavy metals and reducing their bioaccessibility. J Hazard Mater 418:126292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126292
Yang F, Du Q, Sui L, Cheng K (2021c) One-step fabrication of artificial humic acid-functionalized colloid-like magnetic biochar for rapid heavy metal removal. Bioresour Technol 328:124825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124825
Yang Q, Mašek O, Zhao L, Nan H, Yu S, Yin J, Li Z, Cao X (2021d) Country-level potential of carbon sequestration and environmental benefits by utilizing crop residues for biochar implementation. Appl Energ 282:116275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116275
Yang S, Chen Z, Wen Q (2021f) Impacts of biochar on anaerobic digestion of swine manure: methanogenesis and antibiotic resistance genes dissemination. Bioresour Technol 324:124679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124679
Yang T, Xu Y, Huang Q, Sun Y, Liang X, Wang L, Qin X, Zhao L (2021g) An efficient biochar synthesized by iron-zinc modified corn straw for simultaneously immobilization Cd in acidic and alkaline soils. Environ Pollut 291:118129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118129
Yang Z, Sun T, Kleindienst S, Straub D, Kretzschmar R, Angenent LT, Kappler A (2021h) A coupled function of biochar as geobattery and geoconductor leads to stimulation of microbial Fe(III) reduction and methanogenesis in a paddy soil enrichment culture. Soil Biol Biochem 163:108446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108446
Yin Y, Yang C, Li M, Zheng Y, Ge C, Gu J, Li H, Duan M, Wang X, Chen R (2021) Research progress and prospects for using biochar to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions during composting: a review. Sci Total Environ 798:149294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149294
Yu Q, Sun C, Liu R, Yellezuome D, Zhu X, Bai R, Liu M, Sun M (2021) Anaerobic co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure using continuous stirred tank reactor: the effect of biochar addition and urea pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 319:124197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124197
Yuan D, Yuan H, He X, Hu H, Qin S, Clough T, Wrage-Mönnig N, Luo J, He X, Chen M, Zhou S (2021) Identification and verification of key functional groups of biochar influencing soil N2O emission. Biol Fert Soils 57:447–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-021-01541-9
Zailan Z, Tahir M, Jusoh M, Zakaria ZY (2021) A review of sulfonic group bearing porous carbon catalyst for biodiesel production. Renew Energ 175:430–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.030
Zhang M, Wang Y (2021) Impact of biochar supported nano zero-valent iron on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste: methane production, performance stability and microbial community structure. Bioresour Technol 340:125715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125715
Zhang P, Zhang X, Li Y, Han L (2020) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on chemical speciation, leaching ability, and environmental risk of heavy metals in biochar derived from cow manure. Bioresour Technol 302:122850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122850
Zhang F, Wei Z, Wang JJ (2021a) Integrated application effects of biochar and plant residue on ammonia loss, heavy metal immobilization, and estrogen dissipation during the composting of poultry manure. Waste Manag 131:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.05.037
Zhang J, Cui Y, Zhang T, Hu Q, Wah Tong Y, He Y, Dai Y, Wang CH, Peng Y (2021b) Food waste treating by biochar-assisted high-solid anaerobic digestion coupled with steam gasification: enhanced bioenergy generation and porous biochar production. Bioresour Technol 331:125051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125051
Zhang Q, Wu Z, Zhang X, Duan P, Shen H, Gunina A, Yan X, Xiong Z (2021c) Biochar amendment mitigated N2O emissions from paddy field during the wheat growing season. Environ Pollut 281:117026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117026
Zhang Q, Zeng L, Fu X, Pan F, Shi X, Wang T (2021d) Comparison of anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and sludge at different mixing ratios at thermophilic and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 337:125425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125425
Zhang Q, Zhang X, Duan P, Jiang X, Shen H, Yan X, Xiong Z (2021e) The effect of long-term biochar amendment on N2O emissions: experiments with N(15)-O(18) isotopes combined with specific inhibition approaches. Sci Total Environ 769:144533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144533
Zhang X, Xie H, Liu X, Kong D, Zhang S, Wang C (2021f) A novel green substrate made by sludge digestate and its biochar: plant growth and greenhouse emission. Sci Total Environ 797:149194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149194
Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Chen Y (2021g) Biochar mitigates N2O emission of microbial denitrification through modulating carbon metabolism and allocation of reducing power. Environ Sci Technol 55:8068–8078. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01976
Zhang X, Yang X, Yuan X, Tian S, Wang X, Zhang H, Han L (2022) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on composition, carbon fraction and abiotic stability of straw biochars: correlation and quantitative analysis. Carbon Res 1:00017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-022-00017-1
Zhao Q, Wang Y, Xu Z, Yu Z (2021) How does biochar amendment affect soil methane oxidation? A review. J Soil Sediment 21:1575–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-021-02889-z
Zhao Q, Xu T, Song X, Nie S, Choi SE, Si C (2021b) Preparation and application in water treatment of magnetic biochar. Front Bioeng Biotech 9:769667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.769667
Zhao Z, Cao Y, Li S, Zhang Y (2021c) Effects of biowaste-derived biochar on the electron transport efficiency during anaerobic acid orange 7 removal. Bioresour Technol 320:124295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124295
Zhen Y, Zhu S, Sun Z, Tian Y, Li Z, Yang C, Ma J (2021) Identifying the persistent free radicals (PFRs) formed as crucial metastable intermediates during peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation by N-Doped carbonaceous materials. Environ Sci Technol 55:9293–9304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01974
Zhou G, Qiu X, Wu X, Lu S (2021a) Horizontal gene transfer is a key determinant of antibiotic resistance genes profiles during chicken manure composting with the addition of biochar and zeolite. J Hazard Mater 408:124883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124883
Zhou M, Yang X, Sun R, Wang X, Yin W, Wang S, Wang J (2021b) The contribution of lignocellulosic constituents to Cr(VI) reduction capacity of biochar-supported zerovalent iron. Chemosphere 263:127871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127871
Zhou S, Wen X, Cao Z, Cheng R, Qian Y, Mi J, Wang Y, Liao X, Ma B, Zou Y, Wu Y (2021c) Modified cornstalk biochar can reduce ammonia emissions from compost by increasing the number of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and decreasing urease activity. Bioresour Technol 319:124120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124120
Zhou Z, Li Z, Zhang Z, You L, Xu L, Huang H, Wang X, Gao Y, Cui X (2021d) Treatment of the saline-alkali soil with acidic corn stalk biochar and its effect on the sorghum yield in western Songnen Plain. Sci Total Environ 797:149190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149190
Zhu H, Yang J, Yao R, Wang X, Xie W, Zhu W, Liu X, Cao Y, Tao J (2020) Interactive effects of soil amendments (biochar and gypsum) and salinity on ammonia volatilization in coastal saline soil. CATENA 190:104527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104527
Zhuang M, Wang H, Qi L, Cui L, Quan G, Yan J (2021) Production of activated biochar via a self-blowing strategy-supported sulfidated nanoscale zerovalent iron with enhanced reactivity and stability for Cr(VI) reduction. J Clean Prod 315:128108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128108
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 42225701, 42007355).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PW: Investigation, writing-original draft and editing, funding acquisition; BS: Writing-review and editing; HW: Review and editing; ZJ: Investigation; YW: Investigation, review and editing, funding acquisition; WC: Investigation, review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
No applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1
. Table S1 The top 10 most productive countries in biochararea in 2021. Table S2 The top 10 institutions in the field of biocharresearch in 2021. Fig. S1 The number of published documents on biocharresearch. Fig. S2 Countries performing biochar research in 2021.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, P., Singh, B.P., Wang, H. et al. Bibliometric analysis of biochar research in 2021: a critical review for development, hotspots and trend directions. Biochar 5, 6 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-023-00204-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-023-00204-2