Skip to main content
Log in

Fast antibiotic susceptibility testing of urine microflora using a microbiological analyzer based on coherent fluctuation nephelometry

  • Clinical Microbiology - Research Paper
  • Published:
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Traditional culture-based microbiological methods remain the most used for defining the etiology of urinary tract infections and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of isolated uropathogens. They are time-consuming and lead to delays of several days when obtaining the final results of microbiological tests.

Objectives

In this study, we validate the possibility of using a microbiological CFN analyzer combined with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) for fast conclusive urine testing (1 day) without obtaining pure cultures.

Materials and methods

The study included three stages: detection of urine microflora growth using the CFN analyzer to separate positive and negative samples within 2–4 h; fast MS identification of positive samples without isolating uropathogens; fast AST using CFN analyzer within 3–6 h. In parallel, all urine samples were tested by traditional culture-based microbiological methods.

Result

In total, 194 urine samples were tested, and 22 urine cultures were identified by MS, among them, 20 monocultures with bacterial counts ≥ 105 and 2 mixed cultures. The AST of these 22 urine cultures and additional 88 pure clinical cultures was performed using eight antibiotics. Overall, 276 tests were performed. The results of AST obtained using the CFN analyzer and traditional methods were in good agreement (98.2%). Although two mixed cultures were falsely identified as monocultures, their susceptibility determined by the CFN analyzer was correct.

Conclusions

The CFN analyzer is promising and effective for fast AST. Combined with MS identification, it allows to perform full urine analysis in 1 day without the lengthy isolation of pure cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Najar MS, Saldanha CL, Banday KA (2009) Approach to urinary tract infections. Indian J Nephrol 19:129–139. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-4065.59333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicolle LE (2014) Catheter associated urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 3:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-3-23

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadar M (1998) Turbidity Science, Technical Information Series, Booklet No. 11. Hach Company. https://www.hach.com/asset-get.download.jsa?id=7639984474. Accessed May 2003

  4. McFarland J (1907) The nephelometer: and instrument for estimating the number of bacteria in suspensions used for calculation of opsonic index and for vaccines. JAMA 14:1176–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davenport M, Mach KE, Dairiki Shortliffe LM, Banaei N, Wang TH, Liao JC (2017) New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Uro 14:296–310. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Athamna A, Zbriger A, Avadov S, Shapira M, Tal Y, Freimann S (2020) Rapid identification of uropathogens by combining Alfred 60 system with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry technology. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39(10):1855–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03919-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rastopov SF (2011) Coherent fluctuation nephelometry: a high-sensitivity method for detecting particles in liquids. Instrum Exp Tech 54:837–840. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441211060194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. EUCAST (2019) Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters Version 9.0. https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_9.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf. Accessed 1 January 2019

  9. Gurèv AS, Yudina IE, Lazareva AV, Ayu Volkov (2018) Coherent fluctuation nephelometry as a promising method for diagnosis of bacteriuria. Pract Lab Med 12:e00106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2018.e00106

  10. Roberts AL, Joneja U, Villatoro T, Andris E, Boyle JA, Bondi J (2017) Evaluation of the BacterioScan 216Dx for standalone preculture screen of preserved urine specimens in a clinical setting. Lab Med 49:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmx052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lahanas S, Stathopoulos G, Chan RC, van Hal SJ (2013) Evaluation of the Alfred 60/AST device as a screening test for urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 51:3406–3408. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01126-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gur’ev AS, Kuznetsova OYu, Kraeva LA, Rastopov SF, Verbov VN, Vasilenko IA, Rusanova EV, Volkov AYu (2018) Development of microbiological analyzer based on coherent fluctuation nephelometry. In: Hu Z, Petoukhov S, He M (eds) Advances in artificial systems for medicine and education. AIMEE 2017. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 658. Springer, Cham, pp 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67349-3_18

  13. EUCAST (2016) Expert Rules Version 3.1, Intrinsic resistance and exceptional phenotypes tables. https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Expert_Rules/Expert_rules_intrinsic_exceptional_V3.1.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2016

  14. Prasetyoputri A, Jarrad AM, Cooper MA, Blaskovich MAT (2019) The eagle effect and antibiotic-induced persistence: two sides of the same coin? Trends Microbiol 27:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2018.10.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eagle H, Musselman AD (1948) The rate of bactericidal action of penicillin in vitro as a function of its concentration, and its paradoxically reduced activity at high concentrations against certain organisms. J Exp Med 88:99–131. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.88.1.99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: AG, AB, MI, and AV; methodology: AG, MT, AB, MI, and AV; research performing: MT, AB, and MI; data analysis and interpretation: AG and MT; analyzer and reagents: OS and SR; writing — original draft preparation: AG; writing — review and editing: AG, MT, OS, SR, AB, MI, and AV; supervision: MI and AV. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander S Gur’ev.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of East-Tallinn Central Hospital.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests..

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nilton Lincopan

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gur’ev, A.S., Tigasson, M., Shalatova, O.Y. et al. Fast antibiotic susceptibility testing of urine microflora using a microbiological analyzer based on coherent fluctuation nephelometry. Braz J Microbiol 53, 195–204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00671-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-021-00671-4

Keywords

Navigation