Skip to main content
Log in

Field screening of different genotypes of bitter gourd for infestation with the melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) in two agro-climatic zones of West Bengal, India

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) also known as bitter melon being rich in folate and vitamin C is one of the most popular cucurbitaceous vegetables grown extensively in the tropics and subtropics especially in India. Besides its numerous culinary preparations, it has immense medicinal properties as well as ornamental uses. The fast growing vines and creepers of bitter gourd attract a number of insect pests of which fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coq.) is the most destructive due to difficulties associated with its chemical control as the maggots remain and feed inside the fruits, protected from direct contact with insecticides. Therefore, exploration of alternative control measures for this pest is crucial and identification of promising resistance genotypes could be the effective option. Considering the above aspects in view, twenty five genotypes of bitter gourd (M. charantia L.) were preliminary screened under field condition to study their susceptibility against the infestation of melon fruit fly, B. cucurbitae (Coq.) in two agro-climatic zones of West Bengal, India. Based on the performance of preliminary screening, nine genotypes were selected for final screening. The experiment on preliminary screening was conducted at Kalyani, Nadia (Gangetic Alluvial zone) and Sekhampur, Birbhum (Red and Laterite zone) during spring-summer season of 2016 and 2017 while the final screening was done in 2018. Results of the study revealed that percent fruit infestation and larval density per fruit varied significantly in all the tested genotypes and none of the genotypes were free of infestation with B. cucurbitae. During preliminary screening, the pooled data of mean percent fruit infestation of two years at two locations showed that infestation of melon fruit fly was significantly lower in the genotype US-6214 (14.50%) with larval density of 3.63 larvae per fruit followed by Meghnad-2 (16.50% and 4.08 larvae per fruit). Highest mean percent fruit infestation was recorded in the genotype Pusa Do Mausami (69.67%) with larval density of 10.77 larvae per fruit followed by Diamond Bolder (60.67% and 8.13 larvae per fruit) and were categorized as susceptible. Out of the twenty five genotypes of bitter gourd tested, six genotypes were classified as resistant, eleven genotypes as moderately resistant and eight genotypes as susceptible against melon fruit fly infestation. The mean data of the final screening at two locations revealed that US-6214 and Meghnad-2 recorded significantly low percent fruit infestation (14.35% and 16.33%) with 3.85 and 4.37 larvae per fruit while Pusa Do Mausami had the highest infestation and larval density (63.67% and 10.36 larvae per fruit). These findings suggest that US-6214 and Meghnad-2 may be utilized in resistance breeding programmes against melon fruit fly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allwood AJ, Chinajariyawong A, Drew RAI et al (1999) Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South-East Asia. Raff Bull Zool 7:1–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadiya AM, Bhut JB, Variya MV (2018) Eco-friendly modules for management of fruit fly, B. cucurbitae infesting sponge gourd. Int J Chem Stud 6:3522–3526

    Google Scholar 

  • Boller EF, Prokopy RJ (1976) Bionomics and management of Rhagoletis. Annu Rev Entomol 21:511–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinajariyawong A, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Drew RAI (2003) Efficacy of protein bait sprays in controlling fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting angled luffa and bitter-gourd in Thailand. Raff Bull Zool 51:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal MS (2017) Cucurbits. In: Handbook of vegetable crops, 3rd edn. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, pp 77–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon MK, Singh R, Naresh JS, Sharma NK (2005a) Influence of physico-chemical traits of bitter gourd, Momordica charantia L. on larval density and resistance to melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). J Appl Entomol 129:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon MK, Singh R, Naresh JS, Sharma HC (2005b) The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: a review of its biology and management. J Insect Sci 5:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon MK, Singh R, Naresh JS, Sharma NK (2005c) Reaction of different bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) genotypes to melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). Indian J Pl Prot 33:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckey-Kaltenbach H, Ernst D, Heller W, Sandermann HJ (1994) Cross-induction of defensive phenylpropanoid pathways in parsley plants by ozone. Acta Hort 381:192–198

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Batran SAES, El-Gengaihi SE, El-Shabrawya OA (2006) Some toxicological studies of Momordica charantia L. on albino rats in normal and alloxan diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol 108:236–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazmer R, Laskar N, Mandal S (2017) Physico-chemical characters of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) ex poir genotype against the melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) reveals resistance traits in the Terai region of West Bengal, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6:2023–2031

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogi MD, Ashfaq M, Arif MJ, Khan MA (2009) Screening of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) germplasm for sources of resistance against melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) in Pakistan. Int J Agric Biol 11:746–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogi MD, Ashfaq M, Arif MJ, Khan MA (2010a) Bio-physical bases of antixenotic mechanism of resistance in bitter-gourd (Momordica charantia L., Cucurbitacae) against melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pak J Bot 42:1251–1266

    Google Scholar 

  • Gogi MD, Ashfaq M, Arif MJ, Sarfraz RM, Nawab NN (2010b) Investigating phenotypic structures and allelochemical compounds of the fruits of Momordica charantia L. genotypes as sources of resistance against Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Crop Prot 29:884–890

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goncalves-Alvim SJ, Collevatti RG, Fernandes GW (2004) Effects of genetic variability and habitat of Qualea parviflora (Vochysiaceae) on herbivory by free-feeding and gall-forming insects. Ann Botany 94:259–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D, Verma AK (1995) Host-specific demographic studies of the melon fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Sci 8:87–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldhar SM, Bhargava R, Choudhary BR, Pal G, Kumar S (2013) Allelochemical resistance traits of muskmelon (Cucumis melo) against the fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae) in a hot arid region of India. Phytoparasitica 41:473–481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haldhar SM, Choudhary BR, Bhargava R, Meena SR (2015) Antixenotic and allelochemical resistance traits of watermelon against Bactrocera cucurbitae in a hot arid region of India. Fla Entomol 98:827–834. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth R, Vagalo M, Tsatsia F (1997) Biology of melon fly, with special reference to the Solomon Islands. In: Allwood AJ, Drew RAI (eds) Management of Fruit Flies in the Pacific, Proc Australian country Industr Agric res, vol 76, pp 140–144

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0. https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27021825#relnotes__description. Accessed 17 Sept 2015

  • Jeremy T, Szentesi A (2003) Evolutionary aspects of host plant specialisation - a study on bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Oikos 101:196–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar MK, Singh S, Panday AK, Shrivastava JP (2014) Susceptibility of different genotypes of bitter gourd against the infestation of melon fruit fly. J Exp Zool 17:809–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Koul VK, Bhagat KC (1994) Biology of melon fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) on bottle gourd. Pest Manag Econ Zool 2:123–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee LW, Hwang YYB, Cheng CC, Chang JC (1992) Population fluctuation of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae, in northeastern Taiwan. Chinese J Entomol 12:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Maharjan R, Regmi R, Poudel K (2015) Monitoring and varietal screening of cucurbit fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) on cucumber in Bhaktapur and Kathmandu, Nepal. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnol 3:714–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Misirli A, Kuden A, Demir G, Gulcan R (2000) Determination of phenolic compounds in some almond hybrids varying in resistance to Pseudomonas amygdala. Report of project TOGTAG-1433:71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath P (1966) Varietal resistance of gourds to the fruit fly. Indian J Hortic 23:69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath P, Bhushan S (2006) Screening of cucurbit crops against fruit fly. Ann Plant Pro Sci 14:472–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath P, Panday AK, Kumar A, Rai AB, Palanivel H (2017) Biochemical resistance traits of bitter gourd against fruit fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) infestation. J Agric Sci 9:217–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda N, Khush GS (1995) Host plant resistance to insects. Wallingford, UK: C.a.B. International, p 431

  • Panday AK, Nath P, Rai AB, Kumar A (2009) Screening of some bitter gourd varieties/germplasms on the basis of some biological and biometrical parameters of melon fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett). Veg Sci 36:399–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Panday AK, Nath P, Kumar A, Rai AB (2012) Reaction of different bitter gourd genotypes against infestation of fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett.). Prog Hortic 44:304–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Patra S, Ganguly P, Barik SR, Samanta A (2018) Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of chlorfenapyr on tomato and cabbage. Environ Monit Assess 190:71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6457-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pedigo LP (1996) Plant resistance to insects. In: Entomology and Pest management. New Delhi, India, Prentice Hall India Private Ltd, pp 413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Sultana T, Uddin MM, Shahjahan M (2015) Impacts of temperature, relative humidity and total number of fruits on cucurbit fruit fly infestations under field condition. Progress Agric 26:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq M, Ghaffar A, Arshad M (2008) Population dynamics of whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) on cultivated crop hosts and their role in regulating its carry-over to cotton. Int J Agric Biol 10:493–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai AB, Halder J, Kodandaram MH (2014) Emerging insect pest problems in vegetable crops and their management in India: an appraisal. Pest Manag Hort Ecosyst 20:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana K, Kanwar HS (2014) Evaluation of eco-friendly techniques for management of melon fruit flies (Bactrocera spp.) in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Pest Manag Hort Ecosyst 20:100–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Samanta A, Sen K, Basu I (2017) Incidence study of yellow mite and thrips and their natural enemies in relation to weather parameters on chilli. J Entomol Zool Stud 5:1213–1216

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Das S, Kamal MM, Islam KS, Jahan M (2017) Efficacy of management approaches against cucurbit fruit fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett) of bitter gourd. Bangladesh J Agril Res 42:757–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfraz M, Dosdall LM, Keddie BA (2006) Diamondback moth–host plant interactions: implications for pest management. Crop Prot 25:625–639

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shivalingaswamy TMS, Satpathy S, Banerjee MK (2002) Estimation of crop losses due to insect pests in vegetables. In: Sarat Babu B, Vara Prasad KS, Anita K, Rao RD, Chakraborty SK, Chandukar PS (eds) Resource management in plant protection, Vol-I. Plant Projection association of India, Hyderabad, pp 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens DH, Garner SH, Mitchell-Olds T, Callaway RM (2002) Cost of defense in the context of plant competition: Brassica rapa may grow and defend. Ecol 83:505–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SV, Mishra A, Bisen RS, Malik YP (2000) Host preference of red pumpkin beetle, Aulacophora foveicollis and melon fruit fly, Dacus cucurbitae. Indian J Entomol 62:64–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha SR, Sharma RK (2014) Evaluation of insecticides and mixtures against Bactrocera cucurbitae of bitter gourd. Ann Pl Protec Sci 22:190–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse J (2001) An overview of fruit fly research knowledge and needs in the Indian Ocean region. In. Proceedings on second National Symposium on integrated Pest management (IPM) in horticultural crops: new molecules, biopesticides and environment, Bangalore, pp. 21-23

  • Su CY (1986) Seasonal population fluctuations of Dacus cucurbitae in southern Taiwan. Plant Prot Bull Taiwan 28:171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Theis N, Lerdau M (2003) The evolution of function in plant secondary metabolites. Int J Plant Sci 164:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingey WM (1986) Techniques for evaluating plant resistance to insects. In: Miller JR, Miller TA, Berenbaum M (eds) Insect-plant interactions, Springer-Verlag, vol 9. NewYork, USA, pp 251–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Thronsteinson AJ (1953) The role of host selection in the ecology of phytophagous insects. Canadian Entomol 85:276–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulger TG, Songur AN, Cirak O, Cakiroglu FP (2018) Role of vegetables in human nutrition and disease prevention, vegetables - importance of quality vegetables to human health, md. Asaduzzaman and Toshiki Asao, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77038

    Google Scholar 

  • Weems HV, Heppner JB (2001) Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, division of plant industry and T.R. Fasulo, University of Florida, University of Florida Publication EENY- 199

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present investigation is a part of Ph.D. research work of Mr. Koushik Sen, Registration Number ENT/D-1407/2014, Department of Agricultural Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India. The authors highly acknowledge the University Grants Commission and Government of India for research fellowship (vide sanction no.- F./2016-17/NFO-2015-17-OBC-WES-31099/(SAIII/ Website) required to conduct the field investigations. The authors are also thankful to Dr. Shantanu Jha, Professor and Head, Department of Agricultural Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia for providing necessary facilities to carry out the present investigations.

Funding

This study was funded by the University Grants Commission, Government of India as a research fellowship (vide sanction no.- F./2016–17/NFO-2015-17-OBC-WES-31099/(SAIII/ Website).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koushik Sen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sen, K., Dhar, P.P. & Samanta, A. Field screening of different genotypes of bitter gourd for infestation with the melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) in two agro-climatic zones of West Bengal, India. Int J Trop Insect Sci 39, 273–282 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-019-00035-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-019-00035-4

Keywords

Navigation