Abstract
Over the past four decades, the nature of Chinese–American military relations has fluctuated from warm and genuinely cooperative to contentious and fraught with real difficulties. At times, the relationship has been relatively stable, with open dialogue and workable crisis management. This paper provides a brief overview of the evolution of Sino-American military relations starting in the early 1970s, when the two countries came together to face a common threat. It traces the relationship through the bumpy, crisis-ridden 1990s and the first decade of the new millennium and examines its gradual steadying toward stability. The paper discusses some of the major issues that hindered positive interaction between the two militaries, including the Taiwan issue; diverging interests in the South China Sea; military developments and regional force postures; U.S. alliances and accommodation of China into the regional security architecture; competition in emerging strategic capabilities and domains; and more profound geostrategic competition. Converging security interests and potential for cooperation are discussed as well. The analysis concludes with suggestions about how to better reduce misperceptions, prevent and manage crisis, refocus from bilateral competition to multilateral cooperation, and create a security architecture in which the world’s two biggest militaries can work together for global public good.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Much of the discussions in this section are based on Xin Yi’s three papers (Xin 2016a, b, 2018). His studies of China–US defense and military relations during the Nixon, Carter, and Reagan administrations provide an interesting and detailed description of how defense and military issues between the two countries were perceived, discussed, decided, and implemented by leading figures on both sides during the China–US rapprochement in the 1970 s and 1980 s. His more recent article (2017) on the role Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski played in initiating U.S. arms sales to China reveals the strategic thinking behind U.S. arms sales policy toward China. For a more general account of the military relations, see Liu (1997), Xie and Chen (2010), and Liu and Ma (2015). Shirley Kan’s CRS Reports on “US-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress” (May 2005, March 2009, April 2009, August 2009, June 2012, July 2010, October 2012, November 2012, March 2013, July 2013, November 2013, June 2014, and July 2014) provide both historical overviews and detailed records of all the military-to-military contacts since the Cold War.
The National Security Strategy Reports released by each administration since the 1990s give detailed security threat perceptions and prioritizations of threats.
The six states are China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei. They make overlapping territorial claims over land features, territorial waters, EEZs, and rights over living and non-living resources in the South China Sea.
In anticipation of the passage of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the US government initiated a Freedom of Navigation (FON) Operations Program in 1979, which tasked its military to carry out FON operations (FONOPs) to challenge the “excessive maritime claims” by coastal states all over the world. DOD Annual FON Reports gives detailed accounts of these operations. The latest annual report shows that during the period of October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, the United States challenged the excessive maritime claims of 26 countries. Many excessive claims were challenged multiple times.
In military terminology, battlefield or battlespace preparation refers to activities of surveying, measuring, and mapping the terrain of future battlefields, and collecting data relevant to military operations against an enemy.
China’s 2018 defense budget grew 8.1% to $ 174.8 billion, and the 2019 budget will grow 7.5%, amounting to $ 177.5 billion, which is still less than one quarter of the FY 2019 US budget of $ 716.3 billion.
Both the Obama and Trump administrations have repeatedly stated that the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan applies to the Diaoyu (Senkoku in Japanese) Islands.
The nuclear policy as stated in the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review stresses possible use of nuclear weapons in conventional conflict, and deployment of low-yield nuclear weapons. These are apparent deviations from the Obama Administration’s nuclear policy.
The U.S. military put forward the Concept of AirSea Battle in 2009 to counter China’s anti-access and area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities. In 2016, the concept was officially renamed the Joint Concept for Access and Maneuver in the Global Commons (JAM-GC). Although Pentagon repeatedly claims that these concepts do not aim at China, “A2/AD” was a tailor-made term to refer to PLA’s capabilities and operational doctrines for force projection and denial operations in the Western Pacific.
References
Allison, Graham. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’ Trap?. Boston-New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Chinese State Council Information Office. 2019. The Fight Against Terrorism and Extremism and Human Rights Protection in Xinjiang. Xinhuanet. http://www.xinhuanet.com//2019-03/18/c_1124247196.htm.
Dong, Daliang. 2014. A Tentative Study of the US Plan to Provide China with Nuclear War Command and Control Systems [美国向中国提供核战争指挥控制系统计划初探]. Military History Research [军事历史研究] 3: 153–159.
Hu, Bo. 2018. No One Lost the South China Sea (And No One Will Win). The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/no-one-lost-south-china-sea-and-no-one-will-win-29337.
Kan, Shirley A. U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report Series (May 2005, March 2009, April 2009, August 2009, June 2012, July 2010, October 2012, November 2012, March 2013, July 2013, November 2013, June 2014, and July 2014). https://china.usc.edu/congressional-research-service-us-china-military-contacts-issues-congress-march-19-2009.
Lendon, Brad. 2018. Photos Show How Close Chinese Warship Came to Colliding With US Destroyer. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/02/politics/us-china-destroyers-confrontation-south-china-sea-intl/index.html.
Liu, Jinsong. 1997. China-US Military Relations: History, Issues and Prospect [中美军事关系的历史演变、问题和前景]. Strategy and Management [战略与管理] 5: 105–113.
Liu, Lei, and Xiaoyun Ma. 2015. The Preliminary Development of US-China Military and Security Cooperation in the Late 1970s [中美建交初期两国军事与安全合作的初步发展]. Journal of Chinese Communist Party History Studies [中共党史研究] 4: 63–72.
MDR [Missile Defense Review]. 2019. https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/17/2002080666/-1/-1/1/2019-MISSILE-DEFENSE-REVIEW.PDF.
Memorandum of Conversation. 1971. In Historical Documents: Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, Volume XVII, China, 1969–1972, 363–364. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17/d139.
Memorandum of Conversation. 1972. In Historical Documents: Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969–1976, Volume XVII, China, 1969–1972, 916–917. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v17/d231.
NDS [National Defense Strategy]. 2018. Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf.
NPR [Nuclear Posture Review]. 2018. https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF.
NSS [National Security Strategy]. 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905-2.pdf.
Pence, Mike. 2018. Remarks on the Administration’s Policy Toward China. Washington D.C.: Hudson Institute. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-vice-president-pence-administrations-policy-toward-china/.
Shanahan, Patrick M. 2019. Next Big War May Be Won or Lost in Space. Speech delivered at 35th Space Symposium, Colorado Springs, Colorado. https://dod.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1810100/shanahan-next-big-war-may-be-won-or-lost-in-space/.
U.S. Department of Defense. Annual Freedom of Navigation (FON) Reports. http://policy.defense.gov/OUSDPOffices/FON.aspx.
Work, Robert. 2015. The Third U.S. Offset Strategy and its Implications for Partners and Allies. Speech delivered at Willard Hotel, Washington, D.C. https://dod.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech-View/Article/606641/.
Xie, Feng, and Zhou Chen. 2010. A Review of Sino-American Military Relation [中美军事关系的回顾]. Military History [军事历史] 2: 32–37.
Xin, Yi. 2016a. The Preliminary Development of the Defense Relationship Between the U.S. and the PRC in the Nixon Administration [尼克松政府时期美中防务关系的初步发展]. Journal of Chinese Communist Party History Studies [中共党史研究] 2: 41–51.
Xin, Yi. 2016b. Technology Transfer and Arms Sales Policy toward China during Carter Administration [卡特政府的对华技术转让与军售政策]. The Chinese Journal of American Studies [美国研究] 5: 126–146.
Xin, Yi. 2017. Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Beginning of Arms Sales to China [布热津斯基与美国对华军售的开启]. The Paper. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1695975.
Xin, Yi. 2018. Technology Transfer and Arms Sales to China during the Reagan Administration [论里根政府时期美国对华技术转让与军售]. Contemporary China History Studies [当代中国史研究] 1: 91–98.
Xinhua. 2018. Presdient Xi Jinping met with U.S. President Donald Trump [习近平同美国总统特朗普举行会晤]. Xinhuanet. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2018-12/02/c_1123796067.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yao, Y. Sino-American military relations: from quasi-allies to potential adversaries?. China Int Strategy Rev. 1, 85–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-019-00016-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-019-00016-9