Abstract
The adverse impact of the outbreak of COVID-19 has reduced ports’ operational efficiency. In addition, ports and inland logistics providers are generally independent of each other and difficult to work together, which leads to time loss. Thus, as the core player, ports can integrate with inland logistics providers to improve the efficiency and resilience of maritime supply chains. This study examines the strategic options of two competing maritime supply chains consisting of ports and inland logistics providers. We investigate the impact of cooperation between ports and inland logistics providers and government regulation on the maritime supply chain by comparing members’ optimal pricing and overall social welfare under centralized, decentralized, and hybrid scenarios. Results indicate that the hybrid scenario is an equilibrium strategy for maritime supply chain, although this strategy is not optimal for governments seeking to improve supply chain resilience and maximize social welfare. Furthermore, observations show that through government economic intervention, both seaborne supplies can be incentivized to adopt an integrated strategy, and business and society can achieve a win–win situation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ali A, Mahfouz A, Arisha A (2017). Analysing supply chain resilience: Integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management, 22(1): 16–39
Álvarez-SanJaime Ó, Cantos-Sánchez P, Moner-Colonques R, Sempere-Monerris J J (2015). The impact on port competition of the integration of port and inland transport services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 80: 291–302
Ambulkar S, Blackhurst J, Grawe S (2015). Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34(1): 111–122
Asgari N, Farahani R Z, Goh M (2013). Network design approach for hub ports-shipping companies competition and cooperation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48: 1–18
Aslam H, Khan A Q, Rashid K, Rehman S (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6): 1185–1204
Bhamra R, Dani S, Burnard K (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18): 5375–5393
Brandon-Jones E, Squire B, Autry C, Petersen K J (2014). A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(3): 55–73
Cao M, Vonderembse M A, Zhang Q, Ragu-Nathan T S (2010). Supply chain collaboration: Conceptualisation and instrument development. International Journal of Production Research, 48(22): 6613–6635
Chen J, Bian W, Wan Z, Yang Z, Zheng H, Wang P (2019a). Identifying factors influencing total-loss marine accidents in the world: Analysis and evaluation based on ship types and sea regions. Ocean Engineering, 191: 106495
Chen J, Di Z, Shi J, Shu Y, Wan Z, Song L, Zhang W (2020a). Marine oil spill pollution causes and governance: A case study of Sanchi tanker collision and explosion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273: 122978
Chen J, Fei Y, Lee P T W, Tao X (2019b). Overseas port investment policy for China’s central and local governments in the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Contemporary China, 28(116): 196–215
Chen J, Fei Y, Wan Z (2019c). The relationship between the development of global maritime fleets and GHG emission from shipping. Journal of Environmental Management, 242: 31–39
Chen J, Fei Y, Wan Z, Yang Z, Li H, Choi K S, Xie X (2020b). Allometric relationship and development potential comparison of ports in a regional cluster: A case study of ports in the Pearl River Delta in China. Transport Policy, 85: 80–90
Chen J, Zhang W, Wan Z, Li S, Huang T, Fei Y (2019d). Oil spills from global tankers: Status review and future governance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227: 20–32
Chen J, Zheng H, Wei L, Wan Z, Ren R, Li J, Li H, Bian W, Gao M, Bai Y (2020c). Factor diagnosis and future governance of dangerous goods accidents in China’s ports. Environmental Pollution, 257: 113582
Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M (2017). Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 188: 185–204
Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M, Agarwal R (2019). Supply chain resilience for performance: Role of relational practices and network complexities. Supply Chain Management, 24(5): 659–676
Cui H, Notteboom T (2017). Modelling emission control taxes in port areas and port privatization levels in port competition and co-operation sub-games. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 56: 110–128
Daugherty P J, Richey R G, Roath A S, Min S, Chen H, Arndt A D, Genchev S E (2006). Is collaboration paying off for firms? Business Horizons, 49(1): 61–70
de Borger B, Proost S, van Dender K (2008). Private port pricing and public investment in port and hinterland capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42(3): 527–561
Do T M H, Park G K, Choi K, Kang K, Baik O (2015). Application of game theory and uncertainty theory in port competition between Hong Kong Port and Shenzhen Port. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2: 12–23
Dong G, Huang R B, Ng P (2016). Tacit collusion between two terminals of a port. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 93: 199–211
Franc P, van der Horst M (2010). Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4): 557–566
Frémont A, Franc P (2010). Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4): 548–556
Gonzalez Aregall M, Bergqvist R, Monios J (2018). A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59: 23–34
Homsombat W, Yip T L, Yang H J, Fu X W (2013). Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(5): 451–466
Hotelling H (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39(153): 41–57
Hua C, Chen J, Wan Z, Xu L, Bai Y, Zheng T, Fei Y (2020). Evaluation and governance of green development practice of port: A sea port case of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249: 119434
Ishii M, Lee P T, Tezuka K, Chang Y T D (2013). A game theoretical analysis of port competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 49(1): 92–106
Jüttner U, Maklan S (2011). Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management, 16(4): 246–259
Kaselimi E N, Notteboom T E, de Borger B (2011). A game theoretical approach to competition between multi-user terminals: The impact of dedicated terminals. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(4): 395–414
King D A, Gordon C E, Peters J R (2014). Does road pricing affect port freight activity: Recent evidence from the port of New York and New Jersey. Research in Transportation Economics, 44: 2–11
Li J, Oh Y (2010). A research on competition and cooperation between Shanghai Port and Ningbo-Zhoushan Port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 26(1): 67–91
Li L, Negenborn R R, de Schutter B (2015). Intermodal freight transport planning: A receding horizon control approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 60: 77–95
Liu F, Wang J, Liu J, Kong Y (2020). Coordination of port service chain with an integrated contract. Soft Computing, 24(9): 6245–6258
Liu J, Wang J (2019a). Carrier alliance incentive analysis and coordination in a maritime transport chain based on service competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 128: 333–355
Liu P, Liu C, Du J, Mu D (2019b). A system dynamics model for emissions projection of hinterland transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218: 591–600
Luo M, Liu L, Gao F (2012). Post-entry container port capacity expansion. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(1): 120–138
Luo T, Chang D F (2019). Empty container repositioning strategy in intermodal transport with demand switching. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 40: 1–13
Meersman H, Sys C, van de Voorde E, Vanelslander T (2016). Road pricing and port hinterland competitiveness: An application to the Hamburg-Le Havre range. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(3): 170–179
Merkel A (2017). Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 61: 40–47
Monios J, Wilmsmeier G (2012). Giving a direction to port regionalisation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(10): 1551–1561
Monios J, Wilmsmeier G (2013). The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation. Transport Policy, 30: 161–172
Peng Q, Wang C, Xu L (2020). Emission abatement and procurement strategies in a low-carbon supply chain with option contracts under stochastic demand. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 144: 106502
Peng Y, Li X, Wang W, Wei Z, Bing X, Song X (2019). A method for determining the allocation strategy of on-shore power supply from a green container terminal perspective. Ocean and Coastal Management, 167: 158–175
Ponomarov S Y, Holcomb M C (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1): 124–143
Randrianarisoa L M, Zhang A (2019). Adaptation to climate change effects and competition between ports: Invest now or later? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 123: 279–322
Sahebjamnia N, Torabi S A, Mansouri S A (2018). Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics, 197: 63–83
Scholten K, Schilder S (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management, 20(4): 471–484
Scholten K, Sharkey Scott P, Fynes B (2014). Mitigation processes: Antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management, 19(2): 211–228
Sheng D, Li Z C, Fu X, Gillen D (2017). Modeling the effects of unilateral and uniform emission regulations under shipping company and port competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 101: 99–114
Song D P, Lyons A, Li D, Sharifi H (2016). Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 87: 75–96
Song D W (2002). Regional container port competition and co-operation: The case of Hong Kong and South China. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(2): 99–110
Stoll J S, Pinto da Silva P, Olson J, Benjamin S (2015). Expanding the “geography” of resilience in fisheries by bringing focus to seafood distribution systems. Ocean and Coastal Management, 116: 185–192
Sugawara J (2017). Port and hinterland network: A case study of the Crescent Corridor intermodal freight program in the US. Transportation Research Procedia, 25: 916–927
Tae-Woo Lee P, Flynn M (2011). Charting a new paradigm of container hub port development policy: The Asian doctrine. Transport Reviews, 31(6): 791–806
Tan Z, Meng Q, Wang F, Kuang H (2018). Strategic integration of the inland port and shipping service for the ocean carrier. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 110: 90–109
Tian X, Liu L, Wang S (2015). Evolving competition between Hong Kong and Shenzhen ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(8): 729–745
Tukamuhabwa B, Stevenson M, Busby J (2017). Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain Management, 22(6): 486–505
Wagner S M, Bode C (2008). An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1): 307–325
Wang F, Zhuo X, Niu B, He J (2017). Who canvasses for cargos? Incentive analysis and channel structure in a shipping supply chain. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 97: 78–101
Wang J, Liu J (2019). Vertical contract selection under chain-to-chain service competition in shipping supply chain. Transport Policy, 81: 184–196
Wieland A, Wallenburg C M (2013). The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: A relational view. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(4): 300–320
Witkowski J, Kiba-Janiak M (2014). The role of local governments in the development of city logistics. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125: 373–385
Witte P, Wiegmans B, Rodrigue J P (2017). Competition or complementarity in Dutch inland port development: A case of overproximity? Journal of Transport Geography, 60: 80–88
Woodburn A (2017). An analysis of rail freight operational efficiency and mode share in the British port-hinterland container market. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51: 190–202
Xie F, Wang C, Xu L (2021). Whether to invest in terminal efficiency: A perspective considering customer preference and capital constraint in competitive environment? Ocean and Coastal Management, 205: 105563
Xu F, Lu H, Ding N, Liu J (2015). Game theory analysis of container port alliance. Journal of Coastal Research, 73: 635–640
Xu L (2020). Analysis for waste collection and management of closed-loop supply chain with dual-channel forward logistics. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 27(1): 124–139
Xu L, Shi J, Chen J, Li L (2021). Estimating the effect of COVID-19 epidemic on shipping trade: An empirical analysis using panel data. Marine Policy, 133: 104768
Xu X L, Zhang Q, Wang W Y, Peng Y, Song X Q, Jiang Y (2018). Modelling port competition for intermodal network design with environmental concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202: 720–735
Yang Z, Guo L, Lian F (2019). Port integration in a region with multiport gateways in the context of industrial transformation and upgrading of the port. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 122: 231–246
Yin C, Ke Y, Chen J, Liu M (2021). Interrelations between sea hub ports and inland hinterlands: Perspectives of multimodal freight transport organization and low carbon emissions. Ocean and Coastal Management, 214: 105919
Zhang Q, Wang W, Peng Y, Guo Z (2017). Impact of rail transport services on port competition based on a spatial duopoly model. Ocean and Coastal Management, 148: 113–130
Zhang Q, Wang W, Peng Y, Zhang J, Guo Z (2018). A game-theoretical model of port competition on intermodal network and pricing strategy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 114: 19–39
Zhou X (2015). Competition or cooperation: A simulation of the price strategy of ports. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 14(3): 463–474
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research is supported by the major projects of National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 20&ZD130).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, J., Chen, J., Xu, L. et al. Improving the resilience of maritime supply chains: The integration of ports and inland transporters in duopoly markets. Front. Eng. Manag. 10, 51–66 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0231-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-022-0231-3