Abstract
Measurement errors may significantly impact the accuracy of estimates in sample surveys. Even a small presence of such errors may raise doubts among the stakeholders, especially when dealing with sensitive characteristics. In this paper, we have introduced improved ratio, product, and exponential type estimators of the population mean in ranked set sampling. We have examined the properties of the proposed estimators, such as bias and mean square error, and demonstrated their dominance over some contemporary estimators using real and simulated datasets. Finally, recommendations have been made to practitioners.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akdeniz S, Yildiz TO (2023) The effects of ranking error models on mean estimators based on ranked set sampling. REVSTAT-Stat J 21(3):347–366
Aldrabseh MZ, Ismail MT (2023) New modification of ranked set sampling for estimating population mean. J Stat Comput Simul 16:1–13
Alomair AM, Shahzad U (2023) Optimizing mean estimators with calibrated minimum covariance determinant in median ranked set sampling. Symmetry 15(8):1581
Al-Omari AI, Bouza CN (2015) Ratio estimators of the population mean with missing values using ranked set sampling. Environmetrics 26(2):67–76
Al-Saleh MF, Al-Omari AI (2002) Multistage ranked set sampling. J Stat Plan Inference 102(2):273–286
Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, Nagaraja HN (1992) A first course in order statistics, vol 54. SIAM, Philadelphia
Bhushan S, Kumar A, Shukla S (2023) On classes of robust estimators in presence of correlated measurement errors. Measurement 220:113383
Bhushan S, Kumar A (2022) Predictive estimation approach using difference and ratio type estimators in ranked set sampling. J Comput Appl Math 410:114214
Bouza CN (2008) Ranked set sampling for the product estimator. Rev Investig Oper 29.3:201–206
Dell TR, Clutter JL (1972) Ranked set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 28(3):545–555
Dua D, Graff C (2019) UCI machine learning repository. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine
Ghashghaei R, Bashiri M, Amiri A, Maleki MR (2016) Effect of measurement error on joint monitoring of process mean and variability under ranked set sampling. Qual Reliab Eng Int 32(8):3035–3050
Haq A, Brown J, Moltchanova E, Al-Omari AI (2015) Effect of measurement error on exponentially weighted moving average control charts under ranked set sampling schemes. J Stat Comput Simul 85(6):1224–1246
Kaur A, Patil GP, Sinha AK, Taillie C (1995) Ranked set sampling: an annotated bibliography. Environ Ecol Stat 2(1):25–54
Khalid R, Koçyiğit EG, Ünal C (2022) New exponential ratio estimator in Ranked set sampling. Pak J Stat Oper Res 18:403–409
Khan I, Noor-ul-Amin M, Khan DM, AlQahtani SA, Dahshan M, Khalil U (2023) Monitoring of location parameters with a measurement error under the Bayesian approach using ranked-based sampling designs with applications in industrial engineering. Sustainability 15.8:6675
Khan L, Shabbir J, Khan SA (2019) Efficient estimators of population mean in ranked set sampling scheme using two concomitant variables. J Stat Manag Syst 22(8):1467–1480
Khan Z, Ismail M, Samawi H (2020) Mixture ranked set sampling for estimation of population mean and median. J Stat Comput Simul 90(4):573–585
Mandowara VL, Mehta N (2013) Efficient generalized ratio-product type estimators for finite population mean with ranked set sampling. Austrian J Stat 42.3:137–148
McIntyre GA (1952) A method for unbiased selective sampling, using ranked sets. Aust J Agric Res 3(4):385–390
Rehman SA, Shabbir J (2022) An efficient class of estimators for finite population mean in the presence of non-response under ranked set sampling (RSS). PLoS ONE 17.12:e0277232
Samawi HM, Muttlak HA (1996) Estimation of ratio using rank set sampling. Biom J 38.6:753–764
Shalabh S (1997) Ratio method of estimation in the presence of measurement errors. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 50:150–155
Singh HP, Tailor R, Singh S (2014) General procedure for estimating the population mean using ranked set sampling. J Stat Comput Simul 84.5:931–945
Stokes SL (1977) Ranked set sampling with concomitant variables. Commun Stat Theory Methods 6(12):1207–1211
Stokes SL (1980) Estimation of variance using judgment ordered ranked set samples. Biometrics 36:35–42
Takahasi K, Wakimoto K (1968) On unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering. Ann Inst Stat Math 20(1):1–31
Vishwakarma GK, Singh A (2022) Computing the effect of measurement errors on ranked set sampling estimators of the population mean. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 34.27:e7333
Wolfe DA (2006) Ranked set sampling: an approach to more efficient data collection. Qual Control Appl Stat 51.2:149–154
Zamanzade E, Al-Omari AI (2016) New ranked set sampling for estimating the population mean and variance. Hacet J Math Stat 45(6):1891–1905
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the IIT (ISM) Dhanbad for providing the financial and infrastructural support to accomplish the present work. Additionally, we would also like to thank the reviewers for their insightful and helpful comments, which have made significant improvements and brought the paper into its current form.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, M.K., Singh, G.N. Estimation of Population Mean Using Exponential Ratio and Product Type Estimators Under Ranked Set Sampling in Presence of Measurement Error. J Stat Theory Pract 18, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-024-00378-3
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-024-00378-3