Abstract
This paper proposes a lack-of-fit test for a parametric specification of the conditional mean function in a Markovian multiplicative error time series model. The proposed test is based on a minimized distance obtained using an integral of the square of a certain marked residual process. The asymptotic null distribution of the proposed test is model dependent and is not free from the underlying nuisance parameters. We propose a bootstrap method to implement the test and establish that the proposed bootstrap method is asymptotically valid. A finite sample simulation study that evaluates the empirical level and power is included. It compares the finite sample performance of the proposed test with several competing tests from the literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balakrishna N, Koul HL, Sakhanenko L, Ossiander M (2019) Fitting a \(p\)th order parametric generalized linear autoregressive multiplicative error model. Sankhya Indian J Stat 81–B(Supplement 1):S103–S122
Bickel PJ, Freedman DA (1981) Some asymptotic theory for the bootstrap. Ann Stat 9:1196–21217
Cavaliere G, Perera I, Rahbek A (2021) Specification tests for GARCH processes. Working paper
Chen Y-T, Hsieh C-S (2010) Generalized moment tests for autoregressive conditional duration models. J Financ Econom 8:345–391
Chou RY (2005) Forecasting financial volatilities with extreme values: the conditional autoregressive range (CARR) model. J Money Credit Bank 37(3):561–582
Engle R (2002) New frontiers for ARCH models. J Appl Econom 17:425–446
Engle RF, Gallo GM (2006) A multiple indicators model for volatility using intra-daily data. J Econom 131:3–27
Engle RF, Russell JR (1998) Autoregressive conditional duration: a new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econom J Econom Soc 66:1127–1162
Freedman DA (1981) Bootstrapping regression models. Ann Stat 9:1218–1228
Giacomini R, Politis DN, White H (2013) A warp-speed method for conducting Monte Carlo experiments involving bootstrap estimators. Econom Theory 29:567–589
Grammig J, Maurer K-O (2000) Non-monotonic hazard functions and the autoregressive conditional duration model. Econom J 3(1):16–38
Guo B, Li S (2018) Diagnostic checking of Markov multiplicative error models. Econ Lett 170:139–142
Hall P, Heyde CC (1980) Martingale limit theory and its applications. Academic Press, New York
Hautsch N (2012) Econometrics of financial high-frequency data. Springer, Heidelberg
Koul Hira L (2002) Weighted empirical processes in dynamic nonlinear models. Lecture notes series in statistics, vol 166, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Koul Hira L (2019) A uniform convergence result for weighted residual empirical processes. RM#719, Department of Statistics and Probability, MSU
Koul HL, Stute W (1999) Nonparametric model checks for time series. Ann Stat 27:204–236
Koul HL, Perera I, Balakrishna N (2021) A class of minimum distance estimators in Markovian multiplicative error models. Working paper
Koul HL, Perera I, Silvaphulle MJ (2012) Lack-of-fit testing of the conditional mean function in a class of Markov multiplicative error models. Econom Theory 28:1283–1312
Ljung GM, Box GEP (1978) On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65:297–303
Lunde A (1999) A generalized gamma autoregressive conditional duration model. Aalborg University, Discussion paper
Manganelli S (2005) Duration, volume and volatility impact of trades. J Financ Mark 8(4):377–399
Meitz M, Teräsvirta T (2006) Evaluating models of autoregressive conditional duration. J Bus Econ Stat 24:104–124
Pacurar M (2008) Autoregressive conditional duration models in finance: a survey of the theoretical and empirical literature. J Econ Surv 22:711–751
Perera I, Koul HL (2017) Fitting a two phase threshold multiplicative error model. J Econom 197:348–367
Perera I, Silvapulle MJ (2020) Bootstrap based probability forecasting in multiplicative error models. J Econom 221:1–24
Stute W (1997) Nonparametric model checks for regression. Ann Stat 25(2):613–641
Stute W, Thies S, Zhu LX (1998) Model checks for regression: an innovation process approach. Ann Stat 26:1916–1934
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
No Conflict
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the topical collection “Celebrating the Centenary of Professor C. R. Rao” guest edited by , Ravi Khattree, Sreenivasa Rao Jammalamadaka, and M. B. Rao.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koul, H.L., Perera, I. A Minimum Distance Lack-of-Fit Test in a Markovian Multiplicative Error Model. J Stat Theory Pract 15, 34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-021-00168-1
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-021-00168-1