Abstract
Rubber clones’ evaluation involves assessment of latex yield and performance stability across multiple locations. Clones with high yield and stability have the potential for wide planting across country, while unstable clones with high yield can be exploited in certain localities. Forty-five rubber clones were evaluated in five locations across Malaysia in the period between 2000 and 2011. There was a significant genotype by environment interaction effect on rubber yield, accounting 26.67% of total variation. Assessment of locations suitability for clone trial led to discovery of two mega-environments, which we predicted to form due to the level of agronomic inputs. Using the data from nine clones, PB 260 was shown to give the best performance compared to other clones in a low input environment. Two methods of stability analyses were used viz. linear regression and mean and coefficient of variation. The former method gave more confidence in the classification of stable clones due to its more systematic and stringent approach. Six clones were classified as stable, i.e., PB 374, PB 371, RRIM 2004, PB 260, RRIM 2001, and RRIM 2002, while three clones render more evaluation to confirm their stability, namely, RRIM 2007, RRIM 3001 and RRIM 2024. Four clones that were shown unstable but high yielding have the potential for planting in targeted region and these are RRIM 2005, PB 373, RRIM 2023 and PB 369.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data available on request from the authors.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Priyadarshan PM, Clément-Demange A (2004) Breeding hevea rubber: formal and molecular genetics. Adv Genet 52:51–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(04)52003-5
Baulkwill WJ (1989) The history of natural rubber production. In: Webster CC, Baulkwill WJ (eds) Rubber. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK, pp 1–56
MRB (2020) Malaysian Rubber Review vol 23. Malaysian Rubber Board, Kuala Lumpur
MRB (2012) Laporan bancian projek pangkalan data pekebun kecil getah individu vol Jilid 1. Malaysian Rubber Board, Kuala Lumpur
Arshad A, Armanto M, Adzemi A (2013) Evaluation of climate suitability for rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) cultivation in Peninsular Malaysia. J Environ Sci Eng A 2:293–298
Hazir MHM, Kadir RA, Gloor E, Galbraith D (2020) Effect of agroclimatic variability on land suitability for cultivating rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) and growth performance assessment in the tropical rainforest climate of Peninsular Malaysia. Clim Risk Manag 27:100203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2019.100203
Velásquez AC, Castroverde CDM, He SY (2018) Plant-pathogen warfare under changing climate conditions. Curr Biol 28(10):R619–R634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.054
Damiri N (2011) Climate Change, Environment and Plant Diseases Development. Proceeding of the International Seminar, Palembang
MRB (2009) Rubber Plantation & Processing Technologies. Malaysian Rubber Board, Kuala Lumpur
Yan W, Tinker N (2006) Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci 86:623–645. https://doi.org/10.4141/P05-169
Yan W (2001) GGEbiplot—a windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agron J 93:1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351111x
Neisse AC, Kirch JL, Hongyu K (2018) AMMI and GGE Biplot for genotype × environment interaction: a medoid–based hierarchical cluster analysis approach for high–dimensional data. Biometrical Lett 55:97–121. https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2018-0008
Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M, Sabaghni N, Roustami B, Sayyedi F, Akbari F (2013) GGE Biplot Analysis of Yield Stability in Multi-environment Trials of Lentil Genotypes under Rainfed Condition. Not Sci Biol 5:256–262. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb.5.2.9067
Tena E, Goshu F, Mohamad H, Tesfa M, Tesfaye D, Seife A (2019) Genotype × environment interaction by AMMI and GGE-biplot analysis for sugar yield in three crop cycles of sugarcane (Saccharum officinirum L.) clones in Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture 5:1651925. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1651925
Oliveira TRAd, Carvalho HWLd, Oliveira GHF, Costa EFN, Gravina GdA, Santos RDd, Carvalho Filho JLSd (2019) Hybrid maize selection through GGE biplot analysis. Bragantia 78:166–174. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20170438
Ermiyas T (2018) GGE biplot phenotypic stability analysis of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merril] genotypes. J Plant Breeding Crop Sci 10:324–335. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS2018.0754
Tolessa T, Keneni G, Gela TS, Jarso M, Bekele Y (2013) Genotype × environment interaction and performance stability for grain yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes. Int J Plant Breeding 7:116–123
Priyadarshan PM, Dey S, Nazeer MA, Varghese YA, Kang M (2008) Adaptability analysis of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis Muell.-Arg.) clones via GGE biplot. J Rubber Res 11:237–244
Sterling A, Martínez-Viuche EJ, Pimentel-Parra GA, Suárez-Córdoba YD, Fonseca-Restrepo JA, Virguez-Díaz YR (2019) Dynamics of adaptive responses in growth and resistance of rubber tree clones under South American leaf blight non-escape conditions in the Colombian Amazon. Ind Crops Prod 141:111811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111811
Becker HC, Léon J (1988) Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x
Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9630742
Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Shukla GK (1972) Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237–245. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1972.87
Francis TR, Kannenberg LW (1978) Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Can J Plant Sci 58:1029–1034
RRIM (1973) Planting recommendations 1973–1974. Planters’ Bulletin 125:33–56
RRIM (1975) Enviromax planting recommendations 1975–1976. Planters’ Bull 137:27–50
RRIM (1977) Enviromax planting recommendations 1977–1979. Planters’ Bull 153:163–182
RRIM (1980) RRIM planting recommendations 1980–1982. Planters’ Bull 162:4–22
RRIM (1983) RRIM planting recommendations 1983–1985. Planters’ Bulletin 175:37–55
RRIM (1986) RRIM planting recommendations 1986–1988. Planters’ Bull 186:4–22
RRIM (1989) RRIM planting recommendations 1989–1991. Planters’ Bull 198:3–23
RRIM (1992) RRIM planting recommendations 1992–1994. Planters’ Bull 211:31–50
Tan H (1995) Genotype x environment interaction studies in rubber (Hevea) clones. J Nat Rubber Res 10:63–76
Ali MF, Abdul Aziz A, Williams A (2020) Assessing yield and yield stability of Hevea clones in the southern and central regions of Malaysia. Agronomy 10:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050643
Frutos E, Galindo MP, Leiva V (2014) An interactive biplot implementation in R for modeling genotype-by-environment interaction. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 28:1629–1641
Team R (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio. PBC, Boston, MA
Singh RK, Chaudhary BD (1977) Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalayni Publishers, New Delhi
Abd Karim Y (2008) Static modelling approaches to predict growth (Girth) of Hevea Brasiliensis as tools for extension activities in malaysia. J Ruber Res 11(3):171–186
Comstock RE, Moll RH (1963) Genotype-environment interactions. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC, Washington DC, pp 164–196
Costa RBd, Resende MDVd, Araujo AJd, Gonçalves PdS, Martins ALM (2000) Genotype-environment interaction and the number of test sites for the genetic improvement of rubber trees (Hevea) in São Paulo State, Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 23:179–187
Gonçalves PDS, Gallo PB, Junior IS, Ortolani AA, Brioschi AP, Landell MG, De Souza SR (1997) Components of variance and interaction between genotype and environment for annual girth increment in rubber tree. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Gonçalves PS, Bortoletto N, Martins ALM, Costa RB, Gallo PB (2003) Genotype-environment interaction and phenotypic stability for girth growth and rubber yield of Hevea clones in São Paulo State, Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 26:441–448
Gonçalves PS, Moraes MLT, Silva MA, Gouvêa LRL, Eira Aguiar AT, Costa RB (2009) Prediction of Hevea progeny performance in the presence of genotype-environment interaction. Braz Arch Biol Technol 52:25–33
Thanh T, Tuy LM, Lam LV (2016) Genotype × environment interaction of Hevea clones in traditional and non-traditional rubber growing regions of Vietnam. J Plant Interactions 11:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2015.1134684
MRB (2019) MRB Clone Recommendation 2019. MRB Monograph No. 26. Malaysian Rubber Board, Kuala Lumpur
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Malaysian Rubber Board for research funding and permission to publish this paper. Special appreciation goes to the support staff in rubber breeding group for their assistance during field experiment and data collection.
Funding
The research was fully supported by the Malaysian Rubber Board.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RMR analysed the data and wrote the manuscript; NRAH collected the data and performed preliminary analysis; ZAG established the field experiments and collected the data.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Razar, R.M., Hamid, N.R.A. & Ghani, Z.A. GxE effect and stability analyses of selected rubber clones (Hevea brasiliensis) in Malaysia. J Rubber Res 24, 475–487 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-021-00115-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-021-00115-6