Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stability and Sealing of Abandoned Roadways Under High Internal Pressure

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abandoned coal mines have many underground space resources, such as roadways, shafts, and gobs. Among them, abandoned roadways are the best gas storage space for underground compressed air energy storage (CAES). However, CAES caverns have high air pressure and strict sealing requirements. Therefore, the stability and sealing of abandoned roadways under high internal pressure must be analyzed. Afterward, the suitability of abandoned roadways used for CAES caverns should be evaluated. In this study, the numerical simulation software FLAC3D was used to calculate the stress, deformation, plastic zone volume, and pore pressure of surrounding rock in an abandoned roadway under 10 MPa internal pressure. The influence of buried depth, surrounding rock grade, and in situ stress state on roadway stability and the effect of surrounding rock permeability on roadway sealing were analyzed. Results showed that the stress, displacement, and plastic zone volume of surrounding rock were affected by high internal pressure when the buried depth was less than 300 m, but high internal pressure had little effect on them when the buried depth was more than 300 m. The suitable range of buried depth was more than 300 m. The optimal choice of surrounding rock grade was I and II, followed by grades III, IV, and V. The optimal choice of in situ stress state was σH > σh > σv, followed by σH > σv > σh and σv > σH > σh. The sensitivity of the stability evaluation parameters was ranked in descending order as follows: buried depth, surrounding rock grade, and in situ stress state. When the surrounding rock permeability was less than 1 × 1014m2, the 24-h air leakage rate of the roadway was less than 1%. The suitable range of surrounding rock permeability was less than 1 × 1014m2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Giramonti AJ, Lessard RD, Blecher WA, Smith EB (1978) Conceptual design of compressed air energy storage electric power system. Appl Energy 4(4):231–3249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rouabhi A, Hévin G, Soubeyran A, Labaune P, Louvet F (2017) A multiphase multicomponent modeling approach of underground salt cavern storage. Geomech Energy Environ 12:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koohi-Fayegh S, Rosen MA (2020) A review of energy storage types, applications and recent developments. J Energy Storage 27:101047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Courtois N, Najafiyazdi M, Lotfalian R, Boudreault R, Picard M (2021) Analytical expression for the evaluation of multi-stage adiabatic-compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) systems cycle efficiency. Appl Energy 288:116592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu H, He Q, Song J, Shi X, Liu W (2021) Thermodynamic of a novel advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system with variable pressure ratio coupled organic rankine cycle. Energy 227:120411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang K, Zhang Y, Li XM, Xu JZ (2014) Theoretical evaluation on the impact of heat exchanger in advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manage 86:1031–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mousavi SB, Adib M, Soltani M, Razmi A, Nathwani J (2021) Transient thermodynamic modeling and economic analysis of adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) based on cascade packed bed thermal energy storage with encapsulated phase change materials. Energy Convers Manage 243:114379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bai J, Liu F, Xue X, Wei W, Chen L, Wang G, Mei S (2021) Modelling and control of advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage under power tracking mode considering off-design generating conditions. Energy 218:119525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Razmi AR, Afshar HH, Pourahmadiyan A, Torabi M (2021) Investigation of a combined heat and power (CHP) system based on biomass and compressed air energy storage (CAES). Sustain Energy Technol Assess 46:101253

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alirahmi SM, Razmi AR, Arabkoohsar A (2021) Comprehensive assessment and multi-objective optimization of a green concept based on a combination of hydrogen and compressed air energy storage (CAES) system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 142:110850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Razmi AR, Soltani M, Ardehali A, Gharali K, Dusseault MB, Nathwani J (2021) Design, thermodynamic, and wind assessment of a compressed air energy (CAES) integrated with two adjacent wind farms: a case study at Abhar and Kahak sites. Iran Energy 221:119902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khanmohammadi S, Rahmani M, Musharavati F, Khanmohammadi S, Bach QV (2021) Thermal modeling and triple objective optimization of a new compressed air energy storage system integrated with Rankine cycle, PEM fuel cell, and thermoelectric unit. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 43:100810

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vergara F, Barthelemy G, Aizpurúa O, Ortega MF, Llamas B (2021) Design of a compression process to improve the operational flexibility of compressed air energy storage: FlexiCAES. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 46:101251

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang YJ, Feng GR, Zhang M, Ren HJ, Bai JW, Guo YX, Jiang HN, Kang LX (2016) Residual coal exploitation and its impact on sustainable development of the coal industry in China. Energy Policy 96:534–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan L, Jiang YD, Wang K, Zhao YX, Hao XJ, Xu C (2018) Precision exploitation and utilization of closed/abandoned mine resources in China. J Chin Coal Soc 43(1):14–20

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan L, Yang K (2021) Further discussion on the scientific problems and countermeasures in the utilization of abandoned mines. J Chin Coal Soc 46(1):16–24

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan L (2017) Strategies of high efficient recovery and energy saving for coal resources in China. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xie HP, Gao MZ, Gao F, Zhang R, Ju Y, Xu H, Wang YW (2017) Strategic conceptualization and key technology for the transformation and upgrading of shut-down coal mines. J Chin Coal Soc 42(6):1355–1365

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cui CQ, Wang B, Zhao YX, Xue LM (2020) Waste mine to emerging wealth: innovation solutions for abandoned underground coal mine reutilization on a waste management level. J Cleaner Pro 252:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xia CC, Zhou Y, Zhou SW, Zhang PY, Wang F (2015) A simplified and unified analytical solution for temperature and pressure variations in compressed air energy storage caverns. Renew Energy 74:718–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou SW, Xia CC, Du SG (2015) An analytical solution for mechanical responses induced by temperature and air pressure in a lined rock cavern for underground compressed air energy storage. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:749–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou Y, Xia CC, Zhao HB, Mei SH, Zhou SW (2018) An iterative method for evaluating air leakage from unlined compressed air energy storage (CAES) caverns. Renew Energy 120:434–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kushnir R, Dayan A, Ullmann A (2012) Temperature and pressure variations within compressed air energy storage caverns. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 55(21–22):5616–5630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Raju M, Khaitan SK (2012) Modeling and simulation of compressed air storage in caverns: a case study of the Huntorf plant. Appl Energy 89:474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tunsakul J, Jongpradist P, Kongkitkul W, Wonglert A, Youwai S (2013) Investigation of failure behavior of continuous rock mass around cavern under high internal pressure. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 34:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Staudmeister K, Rokahr RB (1997) Rock mechanical design of storage caverns for natural gas in rock salt mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(3–4):300

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zimmels Y, Kirzhner F, Krasovitski B (2002) Design criteria for compressed air storage in hard rock. Energy Environ 13(6):851–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim HM, Park D, Ryu DW, Song WK (2012) Parametric sensitivity analysis of ground uplift above pressurized underground rock caverns. Eng Geol 135–136:60–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xia CC, Zhang PY, Zhou SW, Zhou Y, Wang R (2014) Stability and tangential strain analysis of large-scale compressed air energy storage cavern. Rock Soil Mech 35(5):1391–1398

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang GM, Li YP, Daemen JJK, Yang CH, Wu Y, Zhang K, Chen YL (2015) Geotechnical feasibility analysis of compressed air energy storage (CAES) in bedded salt formations: a case study in Huai’an city, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(5):2111–2127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rutqvist J, Kim HM, Ryu DW, Synn JH, Song WK (2012) Modeling of coupled thermodynamic and geomechanical performance of underground compressed air energy storage in lined rock caverns. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 52:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Park D, Kim HM, Ryu DW, Choi BH, Han KC (2013) Probability-based structural design of lined rock caverns to resist high internal gas pressure. Eng Geol 153:144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim HM, Rutqvist J, Jeong JH, Choi BH, Ryu DW, Song WK (2013) Characterizing excavation damaged zone and stability of pressurized lined rock caverns for underground compressed air energy storage. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:1113–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim HM, Rutqvist J, Kim H, Park D, Ryu DW, Park ES (2016) Failure monitoring and leakage detection for underground storage of compressed air energy in lined rock caverns. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim HM, Rutqvist J, Ryu DW, Choi BH, Sunwoo C (2012) Exploring the concept of compressed air energy storage (CAES) in lined rock caverns at shallow depth: a modeling study of air tightness and energy balance. Appl Energy 92:653–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim HM, Lettry Y, Park D, Ryu DW, Choi BH, Song WK (2012) Field evaluation of permeability of concrete linings and rock mass around underground lined rock caverns by a novel in-situ measurement system. Eng Geol 137–138:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Liang J, Lindblom U (1994) Critical pressure for gas storage in unlined rock caverns. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 31(4):377–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liang J, Lindblom U (1994) Analyses of gas storage capacity in unlined rock caverns. Rock Mech Rock Eng 27(3):115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tunsakul J, Jongpradist P, Soparat P, Kongkitkul W, Nanakorn P (2014) Analysis of fracture propagation in a rock mass surrounding a tunnel under high internal pressure by the element-free Galerkin method. Comput Geotech 55:78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tunsakul J, Jongpradist P, Kim HM, Nanakorn P (2018) Evaluation of rock fracture patterns based on the element-free Galerkin method for stability assessment of a highly pressuried gas storage cavern. Acta Geotech 13:817–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mitchell JK, Green RA (2017) Some induced seismicity considerations in geo-energy resources development. Geomech Energy Environ 197:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmidt F, Menéndez J, Konietzky H, Pascual-Muñoz P, Castro J, Loredo J, Sánchez AB (2020) Converting closed mines into giant batteries: effects of cyclic loading on the geomechanical performance of underground compressed air energy storage systems. J Energy Storage 32:101882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Prado LÁD, Menéndez J, Bernardo-Sánchez A, Galdo M, Loredo J, Fernández-Oro JM (2021) Thermodynamic analysis of compressed air energy storage reservoirs in abandoned mines using different sealing layers. Appl Sci 11:2573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu Y, Zhou S, Xia C, Zhao H, Xue X (2021) Three-dimensional thermo-mechanical analysis of abandoned mine drifts for underground compressed air energy storage: a comparative study of two construction and plugging schemes. J Energy Storage 39:102696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hoke E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yuan L, Xue JH, Liu QS, Liu B (2011) Surrounding rock stability control theory and support technique in deep rock roadway for coal mine. J Chin Coal Soc 36(4):535–543

    Google Scholar 

  47. Meng Z, Zhang J, Wang R (2011) In-situ stress, pore pressure and stress-dependent permeability in the Southern Qinshui Basin. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu HH, Sang SX, Xue JH, Wang GX, Xu HJ, Ren B, Liu CJ, Liu SQ (2016) Characteristics of an in situ stress field and its control on coal fractures and coal permeability in the Gucheng block, southern Qinshui Basin, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 36(B):1130–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Huang QX (2002) Ground pressure behavior and definition of shallow seams. J Rock Mech Eng 21:1174–1177

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kang Y, Liu Q, Gong G, Wang H (2014) Application of a combined support system to the weak floor reinforcement in deep underground coal mine. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 71:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ministry of Land and Resources of the Prople’s Republic of China: DZ/T 0217–2005 (2005) Regulation of petroleum reserves estimation, Beijing

  52. Zhao JL, Tang DZ, Xu H, Li Y, Li S, Tao S, Lin W, Liu Z (2016) Characteristic of in situ stress and its control on the coalbed methane reservoir permeability in the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin, China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(8):3307–3322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang CL, Zhang XD (2018) Distribution rule of the in situ stress state and its influence on the permeability of a coal reservoir in the southern Qinshui Basin, China. Arab J Geosci 74:586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kong XY (2020) Advanced seepage mechanics. University of Science and Technology of China Press, Hefei

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kim HM, Lettry Y, Ryu DW, Song WK (2014) Mock-up experiments on permeability measurement of concrete and construction joints for air tightness assessment. Mater Struct 47:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this work was provided by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2020402042 and E2020402041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guodong Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all author, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Li, G., Yu, Z. et al. Stability and Sealing of Abandoned Roadways Under High Internal Pressure. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 40, 871–884 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00778-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-023-00778-2

Keywords

Navigation