Skip to main content
Log in

A Second Case Study of Field Test Results for Comparison of Roof Bolter Dry Collection System with Wet Collection System

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Silicosis is an occupational respiratory disease that roof bolter operators are susceptible. It is caused by overexposure to respirable quartz dust (RCS) and has no cure and may ultimately be fatal. The only method of prevention of silicosis is by preventing exposure to RCS. The wet box collection system is a newly developed dust collection system for roof bolting machines, a modification of the existing dry box collection system utilizing water to saturate the material that is collected by the dust collection system. Testing was conducted for 3 days on a dual boom roof bolter with the wet box installed on the left side and the dry box installed on the right side. Sampling, using the coal mine dust personal sampling unit (CMDPSU), during cleaning of the collector boxes demonstrated that using the wet box dust collection system instead of the dry box dust collection system can reduce RCS exposures during cleaning of the collector boxes by 71% (day 1), 82% (day 2), and 88% (day 3). In addition, the quartz content of samples collected during cleaning of the wet box was 0.0%, while the quartz content of the samples collected when cleaning the dry box was 4.6%, 10.3%, and 7.4%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. MRE is the UK Mining Research Establishment which used a sampler designed specifically to match the UK British Medical Research Council (BMRC) criterion (Page et al., 2008).

References 

  1. ACGIH (2007) Appendix C: Particle size-selective sampling criteria for airborne particulate matter. In: 2007 TLVs and BEIs Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Cincinnati, OH

  2. Lara AR (2020) “Black lung” The Merck manual, consumer version. (Kenilworth NJ: Merck & Co. Inc.) Website: https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/lung-and-airway-disorders/environmental-lung-diseases/coal-workers-pneumoconiosis. Accessed May 2022

  3. Lara AR (2020) “Silicosis” The Merck manual, consumer version. (Kenilworth NJ: Merck & Co. Inc.) Website: https://www.merckmanuals.com/home/lung-and-airway-disorders/environmental-lung-diseases/silicosis. Accessed May 2022

  4. NIOSH (2002) NIOSH hazard review: health effects of occupational exposure to respirable crysta11ine silica. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2002–129. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2002-129/default.html

  5. U.S. Bureau of Mines (1992) Crystalline silica primer. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Branch of Industrial Minerals, Special Publication (SP) 05–92. NTIS No. PB97–120976

  6. U.S. Bureau of Mines (1992) Crystalline silica overview: occurrence and analysis. Information Circular 9317 By Ampian SG, Virta RL. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, IC 9317. NTIS No. PB92–200997

  7. NIOSH (2021) Best practices for dust control in coal mining, second edition. Information Circular 9532, By Colinet JF, Halldin CN, Schall J. Pittsburgh PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2021–119, IC 9532. https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB2021119

  8. U.S. Department of Labor (2019) “Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, Public Law 91–173, 91st Congress, S. 2917 December 30, 1969.” U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). https://arlweb.msha.gov/SOLICITOR/COALACT/69act.htm. Accessed May 2022

  9. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 70.100 (2017) “Code of Federal Regulations, 70.100 Respirable dust standards.” Code of Federal Regulations Title 30, Chapter I, Subchapter O, Part 70, Subpart B, 70.100., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration

  10. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, CFR 70.101 (2017) “Code of Federal Regulations, 70.101 Respirable dust standards when quartz is present.” Code of Federal Regulations Title 30, Chapter I, Subchapter O, Part 70, Subpart B, 70.101., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration

  11. Goodman GVR, Organiscak JA (2003) Assessment of respirable quartz dust exposures at roof bolters in underground coal mining. Journal of the Mine Ventilation Society of South Africa 56(2):50–54

    Google Scholar 

  12. Listak JM, Goodman GVR, Beck TW (2010) Evaluation of the wet head continuous miner to reduce respirable dust. Min Eng 62(9):60–64

    Google Scholar 

  13. NIOSH (2013) Impact on respirable dust levels when operating a flooded-bed scrubber in 20-foot cuts. Report of Investigations 9693, By Colinet JF, Reed WR, Potts JD. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 2014–105, RI 9693. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/Works/coversheet1872.html

  14. Organiscak JA, Noll J, Yantek D, Kendall B (2016) “Examination of a newly developed mobile dry scrubber (DS) for coal mine dust control applications.” Society for mining, metallurgy, and exploration preprint 16–010, society for mining, metallurgy, and exploration annual meeting, Feb. 21–24, 2016, Phoenix, AZ

  15. Listak J, Beck T (2012) Development of a canopy air curtain to reduce roof bolters’ dust exposure. Min Eng 64(7):72–79

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reed WR, Shahan M, Klima S, Ross G, Singh K, Cross R, Grounds T (2019) Field study results of a 3rd generation roof bolter canopy air curtain for respirable coal mine dust control. Int J Coal Sci Technol 7:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-019-00280-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reed WR, Shahan M, Gangrade V, Ross G, Singh K, Grounds T (2020) Field testing of roof bolter canopy air curtain operating downwind of the continuous miner. Min Metall Explor 38:581–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00319-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reed WR, Klima S, Shahan M, Ross GJH, Singh K, Cross R, Grounds T (2019) A field study of a roof bolter canopy air curtain (2nd generation) for respirable coal mine dust control. Int J Min Sci Technol 29:711–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang H, Luo Y, McQuerrey J (2018) Experimental study on effects of drilling parameters on respirable dust production during roof bolting operations. J Occup Environ Hyg 15(2):143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1395960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang H, Luo Y, Yang J (2018) The mechanics of bolt drilling and theoretical analysis of drilling parameter effects on respirable dust generation. J Occup Environ Hyg 15(9):700–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2018.1489136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodman GVR, Organiscak JA (2002) Evaluation methods for controlling silica dust exposures on roof bolters. Transactions 312:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  22. Listak JM, Beck TW (2008) Laboratory and field evaluation of dust collector bags for reducing dust exposure of roof bolter operators. Min Eng 60(7):57–63

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reed WR, Shahan M, Ross G, Blackwell D, Peters S. (2019). “Field comparison of roof bolter dry and wet dust collection systems for dust control,” Society or Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration Pre-print 19–019, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration Annual Meeting, Feb 24–27, 2019, Denver, CO

  24. Reed WR, Shahan M, Ross G, Blackwell D, Peters S (2020) Field comparison of a roof bolter dry dust collection system with an original designed wet collection system for dust control. Min Metall Explor 37:1885–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-020-00290-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams, K. and Timko, R. (1984). “Performance evaluation of a real­time aerosol monitor.” U.S. Bureau of Mines IC 8968, Pittsburgh PA: US Department of the Interior, US Bureau of Mines, lnformation Circular 8968

  26. NIOSH (2003) “NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM).” 4th ed. Silica, Crystalline, by XRD: Method 7500. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2003-154/ Accessed: May 2022, (Cincinnati, OH: DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 3rd Supplement 2003–154)

  27. Tomb TF, Treaftis HN, Mundell RL, Parobeck P. (1973). Comparison of respirable dust concentrations measured with mre and modified personal gravimetric sampling equipment. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations 7772, Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Pittsburgh Technical Support Center

  28. Page SJ, Volkwein JC, Vinson RP, Joy GJ, Mischler SE, Tuchman DP, McWilliams LJ (2008) Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler. J Environ Monitor JEM 10(1):96–101. https://doi.org/10.1039/b714381h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Volkwein JC, Vinson RP, Page SJ, McWilliams LJ, Joy GJ, Mischler SE, Tuchman DP. (2006). Laboratory and field performance of a continuously measuring personal respirable dust monitor. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2006–145, Report of Investigations 9669. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet349.html

  30. Cecala AB, Thimons ED 1986 Impact of background sources on dust exposure of bag machine operator. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Bureau of Mines Information Circular. IC 9089

  31. Joy GJ, Beck TW, Listak JM (2010) “Respirable quartz hazard associated with coal mine roof bolter dust.” Proceedings of the 13th U.S./North American Mine Ventilation Symposium, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, June 13–16, 2010. Hardcastle, S., McKinnon, D.L., Eds., Sudbury, Ontario, Canada: MIRARCO - Mining Innovation, 2010 Jun, pp. 59–64

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. R. Reed.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reed, W.R., Klima, S.S., Mazzella, A. et al. A Second Case Study of Field Test Results for Comparison of Roof Bolter Dry Collection System with Wet Collection System. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 39, 993–1006 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-022-00608-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-022-00608-x

Keywords

Navigation