Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a Non-linear Framework for the Prediction of the Particle Size Distribution of the Grinding Products

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of batch grinding modeling is the estimation of the product particle size distribution over time or specific energy input to the mill. So far, the developed analytical methods require often complicated calculations which are time-consuming. Thus, more simple approaches that allow the reliable prediction of the complete product size distribution need to be developed. In the present paper, an approach, based on the population balance model (PBM), that reliably predicts the product size distribution is proposed. In order to enable this, the simplified form of the fundamental batch grinding equation was transformed into the well-known Rosin–Rammler (R-R) distribution, thus allowing the determination of the breakage rate for each grinding period. A time-dependent breakage rate framework was developed where the traditional linear theory of the PBM is considered a partial case. This approach allows the deviations from the linear theory to be categorized and the degree of the acceleration-deceleration of the breakage rate to be predicted. Modeling results were validated by laboratory grinding studies using two homogeneous materials, quartz and marble, and one heterogeneous, a limonitic laterite. The experimental data revealed that grinding exhibits non-first-order behavior and the degree of deviation from the linear theory depends on the tested material. The reliability of the proposed model was validated with the use of the distribution modulus n, the a value of the breakage rate parameter, and the optimum n values that minimize the sum of the differences between the experimental and estimated particle size distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mystrioti C, Papassiopi N, Xernidis A, Komnitsas K (2018) Counter-current leaching of low-grade laterites with hydrochloric acid and proposed purification options of pregnant solution. Minerals 8(12):599

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gandhi SM, Sarkar BC (2016) Essentials of mineral exploration and evaluation. Elsevier, Alpharetta

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jeswiet J, Szekeres A (2016) Energy consumption in mining comminution. Procedia CIRP 48:140–145

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gharehgheshlagh HH, Ergun L, Chehreghani S (2017) Investigation of laboratory conditions effect on prediction accuracy of size distribution of industrial ball mill discharge by using a perfect mixing model. A case study: Ozdogu copper-molybdenum plant. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 53:1175–1187

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chimwani N, Mohale TM, Bwalya MM (2019) Tailoring ball mill feed size distribution for the production of a size-graded product. Miner Eng 141:105891

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuerstenau DW, Lutch JJ, De A (1999) The effect of ball size on the energy efficiency of hybrid high-pressure roll mill/ball mill grinding. Powder Technol 105:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katubilwa FM, Moys MH (2009) Effect of ball size distribution on milling rate. Miner Eng 22:1283–1288

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deniz V (2012) The effects of ball filling and ball diameter on kinetic breakage parameters of barite powder. Adv Powder Technol 23:640–646

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deniz V (2013) Effects of mill speed on kinetic breakage parameters of four different particulate pumices. Part Sci Technol 31:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carvalho RM, Tavares M (2013) Predicting the effect of operating and design variables on breakage rates using the mechanistic ball mill model. Miner Eng 43–44:91–101

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petrakis E, Stamboliadis E, Komnitsas K (2017) Identification of optimal mill operating parameters during grinding of quartz with the use of population balance modelling. Kona Powder Part J 34:213–223

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rittinger PR (1867) Lehrbuch der Aufbereitungskunde. Ernst and Korn, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kick F (1885) Das Gesetz der proportionalen Widerstände und seine Anwendungen. Felix, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bond FC (1952) The third theory of comminution. Trans Am Inst Min Metall Pet Eng 193:484–494

    Google Scholar 

  15. Walker WH, Lewis WK, McAdams WH, Gilliland ER (1937) Principles of chemical engineering, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Austin LG, Klimpel RR, Luckie PT (1984) Process engineering of size reduction: ball milling. SME/AIME, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kapur PC, Fuerstenau DW (1987) Energy-size reduction “Laws” revisited. Int J Miner Process 20:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stamboliadis E (2002) A contribution to the relationship of energy and particle size in the comminution of brittle particulate materials. Miner Eng 15:707–713

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta VK (2019) An appraisal of the energy-size reduction relationships for mill scale-up design. Adv Powder Technol 30:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  20. Charles RJ (1957) Energy–size reduction relationships in comminution. Trans AIME 208:80–88

    Google Scholar 

  21. Petrakis E, Stamboliadis E, Komnitsas K (2017) Evaluation of the relationship between energy input and particle size distribution in comminution with the use of piecewise regression analysis. Part Sci Technol 35:479–489

    Google Scholar 

  22. Papadopoulos DG, Ghadiri M (1996) Impact breakage of poly-methylmethacrylate (PMMA) extrudates: I. Chipping mechanism. Adv Powder Technol 7(3):183–197

    Google Scholar 

  23. Camalan M (2020) Correlating common breakage modes with impact breakage and ball milling of cement clinker and chromite. Int J Min Sci Technol 30:901–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manohar B, Sridhar BS (2001) Size and shape characterization of conventionally and cryogenically ground turmeric (Curcuma domestica) particles. Powder Technol 120:292–297

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yue J, Klein B (2005) Particle breakage kinetics in horizontal stirred mills. Miner Eng 18:325–331

    Google Scholar 

  26. Macías-García A, Cuerda-Correa EM, Díaz-Díez MA (2004) Application of the Rosin–Rammler and Gates–Gaudin–Schuhmann models to the particle size distribution analysis of agglomerated cork. Mater Charact 52:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  27. Taşdemir A, Taşdemir T (2009) A comparative study on PSD models for chromite ores comminuted by different devices. Part Part Syst Charact 26:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  28. Petrakis E, Karmali V, Bartzas G, Komnitsas K (2019) Grinding kinetics of slag and effect of final particle size on the compressive strength of alkali activated materials. Minerals 9:714

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hukki RT (1962) Proposal for a Solomonic settlement between the theories of Von Rittinger, kick and bond. Trans AIME 220:403–408

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morrell S (2004) An alternative energy-size relationship to that proposed by Bond for the design and optimization of grinding circuits. Int J Miner Process 74(1–4):133–141

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morrell S (2006) Rock characterisation for high pressure grinding rolls circuit design. In: Proceedings of autogenous and semi autogenous grinding technology (SAG) conference, Vancouver, Canada, pp 267–278

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kapur PC (1971) The energy-size reduction relationships in comminution of solids. Chem Eng Sci 26:11–16

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kapur PC (1972) Self-preserving size spectra of comminuted particles. Chem Eng Sci 27:425–431

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bilgili E (2007) On the consequences of non-first-order breakage kinetics in comminution processes: absence of self-similar size spectra. Part Part Syst Charact 24:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  35. Umucu Y, Deniz V, Bozkurt V, Çağlar MF (2016) The evaluation of grinding process using artificial neural network. Int J Miner Process 146:46–53

    Google Scholar 

  36. Singh V, Banerjee PK, Tripathy SK, Saxena VK, Venugopa R (2013) Artificial neural network modeling of ball mill grinding process. J Powder Metall Min 2:106

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cisternas LA, Lucay FA, Botero YL (2020) Trends in modeling, design, and optimization of multiphase systems in minerals processing. Minerals 10:22

    Google Scholar 

  38. Merma AG, Olivera CAC, Hacha RR, Torem ML, dos Santos BF (2019) Optimization of hematite and quartz bioflotation by an artificial neural network (ANN). J mater Technol 8:3076–3087

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wills BA, Finch J (2016) Will’s mineral processing technology. An introduction to the practical aspects of ore treatment and mineral recovery, 8th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lynch AJ (1977) Mineral crushing and grinding circuit—their simulation, optimisation, design and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  41. Epstein B (1948) Logaritmico-normal distributions in breakage of solids. Ind Eng Chem 40:2289–2291

    Google Scholar 

  42. Broadbent SR, Callcott TG (1956) A matrix analysis of processes involving particle assemblies. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 249:99–123

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Bilgili E, Scarlett B (2005) Population balance modeling of non-linear effects in milling processes. Powder Technol 153:59–71

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Deniz V, Onur T (2002) Investigation of the breakage kinetics of pumice samples as dependent on powder filling in a ball mill. Int J Miner Process 67:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fuerstenau DW, Kapur PC, De A (2003) Modelling breakage kinetics in various dry comminution systems. Kona Powder Part J 21:121–132

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chimwani N, Glasser D, Hildebrandt D, Metzger MJ, Mulenga FK (2013) Determination of the milling parameters of a platinum group minerals ore to optimize product size distribution for flotation purposes. Miner Eng 43-44:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  47. Celik MS (1988) Acceleration of breakage rates of anthracite during grinding in a ball mill. Powder Technol 54:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rajamani RK, Guo D (1992) Acceleration and deceleration of breakage rates in wet ball mills. Int J Miner Process 34:103–118

    Google Scholar 

  49. Capece M, Davé RN, Bilgili E (2015) On the origin of non-linear breakage kinetics in dry milling. Powder Technol 272:189–203

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gupta VK (2017) Effect of size distribution of the particulate material on the specific breakage rate of particles in dry ball milling. Powder Technol 305:714–722

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reid KJ (1965) A solution to the batch grinding equation. Chem Eng Sci 20:953–963

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kapur PC (1970) Kinetics of batch grinding: part B. An approximate solution to the grinding equation. Trans AIME 247:309–313

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nakajima Y, Tanaka T (1973) Solution of batch grinding equation. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 12:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  54. Austin LG, Bagga P (1981) An analysis of fine dry grinding in ball mills. Powder Technol 28:83–90

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fuerstenau DW, Abouzeid A-ZM (1991) Effect of fine particles on the kinetics and energetics of grinding coarse particles. Int J Miner Process 31:151–162

    Google Scholar 

  56. Das PK, Khan AA, Pitchumani B (1995) Solution of the batch grinding equation. Powder Technol 85:189–192

    Google Scholar 

  57. Petrakis E, Karmali V, Komnitsas K (2018) Factors affecting nickel upgrade during selective grinding of low-grade limonitic laterites. Miner Process Ext Metall:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/25726641.2018.1521578

  58. Tong L, Klein B, Zanin M, Quast K, Skinner W, Addai-Mensah J, Robinson D (2013) Stirred milling kinetics of siliceous goethitic nickel laterite for selective comminution. Miner Eng 49:109–115

    Google Scholar 

  59. Austin LG, Luckie PT (1972) Methods for determination of breakage distribution parameters. Powder Technol 5:215–222

    Google Scholar 

  60. Klimpel RR, Austin LG (1977) The back-calculation of specific rates of breakage and non-normalized breakage distribution parameters from batch grinding data. Int J Miner Process 4:7–32

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gupta VK, Zouit H, Hodouin D (1985) The effect of ball and mill diameters on grinding rate parameters in dry grinding operation. Powder Technol 42:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ozkan A, Yekeler M, Calkaya M (2009) Kinetics of fine wet grinding of zeolite in a steel ball mill in comparison to dry grinding. Int J Miner Process 90:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  63. Samanli S, Cuhadaroglu D, Ipek H, Ucbas Y (2010) The investigation of grinding kinetics of power plant solid fossil fuel in ball mill. Fuel 89:703–707

    Google Scholar 

  64. Herbst JA, Fuerstenau DW (1980) Scale-up procedure for continuous grinding mill design using population balance models. Int J Miner Process 7:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gupta VK, Sharma S (2014) Analysis of ball mill grinding operation using mill power specific kinetic parameters. Adv Powder Technol 25:625–634

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ipek H, Göktepe F (2011) Determination of grindability characteristics of zeolite. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 47:183–192

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wang X, Gui W, Yang C, Wang Y (2011) Wet grindability of an industrial ore and its breakage parameters estimation using population balances. Int J Miner Process 98:113–117

    Google Scholar 

  68. Deniz V (2013) Comparisons of dry grinding kinetics of lignite, bituminous coal and petroleum coke. Energy Sources Part A 35:913–920

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. Petrakis E, Komnitsas K (2019) Effect of energy input in a ball mill on dimensional properties of grinding products. Mining Metall Explor 36(4):803–816

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100, Chania, Greece

    E. Petrakis & K. Komnitsas

Authors
  1. E. Petrakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Komnitsas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Petrakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrakis, E., Komnitsas, K. Development of a Non-linear Framework for the Prediction of the Particle Size Distribution of the Grinding Products. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 1253–1266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00388-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00388-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation