Abstract
The present work reviews the various mineral admixtures used in concrete which modifies the concrete properties. In this study, cement is partially or completely replaced by different mineral admixtures such as fly ash, silica fume, rice husk ash, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, palm oil fuel ash and metakaolin. The strength obtained is different for different mineral admixtures by adding these to concrete. Various concrete characteristics like split tensile, compressive and flexural strength, durability, workability are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
In developing countries, demand for Portland cement is growing significantly [1]. By using additional materials i.e. mineral admixtures, compressive strength of concrete increases [2]. Waste materials which are produced from industries can be used in concrete by replacing either aggregates or cement [1]. In some studies, aggregates are replaced by palm oil shells which are waste product in agriculture industry and this is used as light weight aggregate [3]. In some studies, different mineral admixtures are used as replacement of cement [4].
Quality of concrete can be improved by adding different mineral admixtures: metakaolin, GGBS, Fly Ash, Rice Husk Ash, Palm Oil Fuel Ash and Silica Fume. Mineral admixtures influence the hardened properties of concrete [5]. By incorporating these admixtures cement content get reduced which minimize environment impact and the properties of concrete also increases [6]. Also problems with disposal may reduce because these admixtures are industrial by-products [7]. Effect on fresh concrete due to mineral admixtures shows variation in mechanical and durability properties compared to conventional concrete [8]. Usage of supplementary cementitious materials in the preparation of concrete can leads to significant energy savings, cost savings and environmental pollution reduction [9].
2 Background study
Firstly, silica fume used in 1969 in Norway but was employed in North America and Europe in early’s 1980 [9].The usage of silica fume has been increased worldwide over recent years which can enhance the permeability, strength and durability [10]. Silica Fume used as a partly or complete substitute of cement which increases the concrete properties [11].
Silica fume is used as an artificial pozzolonic admixture which is also called as micro silica or condensed silica fume [12]. Silica fume is obtained from coal with quartz reduction in an electric arc furnace and is waste bi-product of manufacturing silicon or Ferro silicon alloys [13]. The particle size is which is < 1 micron [14] and has an avg. diameter of 0.1 microns. Its chemical composition consists of > 90% of SiO2 and other constituents are Sulphur, Carbon and aluminium oxides, potassium, Fe, Ca [15]. Adding of silica fume decreases the permeability of concrete to the chloride ions [16]. These protect the steel from corrosion in coastal region. In Tables 1 and 2 physical and chemical properties of silica fume are tabulated.
Metakaolin is a white powder of Al2O3.2SiO2 [17] and obtained from the calcinating of pure kaolinite clay at an ambient temperature of 6500 850 °C [18]. It is high quality pozzolonic material which is effective in increasing strength and reduces the sulphate attack.particle size of metakoalin is smaller compared to cement particles [19].
It is a non-crystalline amorphous and cementitious material. For maintaining the consistency of concrete and to produce high strength concrete, Metakaolin is used as an admixture [20]. In concrete, metakaolin is used as replacement material. For every production of one ton of metakaolin leads to 175 kgs of CO2 emission, which is very less when compared to Portland clinkers [21]. In Tables 1 and 2 physical and chemical properties of metakaolin are tabulated.
From agro-waste of palm oil, POFA is obtained [22] [23]. Fiber waste and shells of palm kernel are burned in chimneys to produce heat at a temperature of 450 °C [24]. It is estimated that approximately 4 kgs of dry biomass is produced to produce one kg of palm oil [25].The obtained ash is collected, pulverized and passed through IS 90 mm sieve [26]. POFA are used in super structures and long span bridges mainly for precast, pre stressed girders and high raised skyscrapers. In Landfills, the disposal of palm oil fuel is being as a waste, these many cause environmental problems [27]. In Tables 1 and 2 physical and chemical properties of POFA are tabulated.
Fly ash is obtained from electricity generation in thermal power plants coal is combusted, during this process a byproduct fly ash is formed. Fly ash contains majorly calcium oxide, silica, and alumina. Fly ash is categorized into two types C-type, F-type. C-type consists of pozzolonic and cementations properties and it has high calcium content. F-type consists only pozzolonic properties and it has low calcium content [28]. In Tables 1 and 2 physical and chemical properties of fly ash are tabulated.
Ground granulated blast furnace is extracted when a molten slag is quenched in water or by steam which is obtained from blast furnace, it produces a glassy granular product which is dried and ground into a fine powder known as GGBS. Types of GGBS are granulated slag, pelletized slag, expanded or foamed slag, and air cooled slag. Among these most commonly granulated slag is used as mineral admixture.
GGBS consists of pozzolonic and cementations properties. To hydrate the slag activator is needed. GGBS has characteristics like corrosion resistivity, sulphate attack and water impermeability [29]. GGBS increases heat of hydration, drying shrinkage and reducing creep, reducing bleeding and raising the ultimate compressive strength [30]. In Tables 1 and 2 physical and chemical properties of GGBS are tabulated.
Rice Husk Ash is formed during milling of the paddy and this is used as a fuel and it is formed by burning rice husk. RHA consists of major amount of silica. RHA reduces permeability and improves strength of concrete. RHA also resist sulphate and chloride attacks [31]. In Tables 1 and 2 physical and chemical properties of RHA are tabulated.
3 Properties of mineral admixtures
The properties like physical and chemical are extracted from previous studies and are presented in tables below. The Chemical properties of different mineral admixtures are shown in Table 1 and The physical properties of different mineral admixtures are shown in Table 2. The mineral admixtures are shown in Fig. 1.
4 Workability studies
FRC with steel fibers has maximum compressive strength at 0.3% for 3 days, 28 days and at 0.2% for 7 days. Strength and workability decreases due to partial replacement of fly ash [32]. Compressive strength decreases at 7 days compared to 28 days if fly ash content increases in concrete. Augment in fly ash, improves consistency and workability of cement [33]. Workability decreases when the percentage of GGBS increases. If GGBS is in higher percentage then SCGB beams shows higher ductility [34]. Workability of OPC with partial replacement of GGBS increases depending on the replacement level. Hence, the optimum replacement is 40% for structural purposes [35]. Slump has increased on 20% & 40% replacement of GGBS in cement & marble slurry in fine aggregate respectively. Also Split tensile, Compressive & Flexural potency increases when compare to control concrete at same substitute levels for M25 grade [36]. Addition of GGBS reduces water demand and increases workability. For M25 SCC grade strength obtained is maximum at 50% replacement of GGBS to cement and 50% replacement of CRF to river sand [37].
RHA is replaced in OPC at 25% has no effect on workability and strength. 10% replacement of RHA was good for structural concrete [38]. RHA is highly porous material due to this concrete requires increase in water cement ratio. Workability of concrete gets decreased when RHA content is increased [15]. Maximum compressive strength was obtained 10% SF + 30% QD. Workability has decreased by adding quarry dust and silica fume. An RCPT value shows that permeability of ions reduces with addition of Silica Fume [39]. Max. strength was obtained at 15% of replacement with Silica fume. Workability decreases with increment of silica fume percentage [40]. He justifies that slump decreases as the percentage of metakaolin content increases. The maximum strength obtained by both combination of metakaolin and silica fume at 6% and 15% at 7 and 28 days of curing [41]. Highest Compressive strength obtained at 15% of replacement at 28 days of curing. Workability decreases with increase in cement replacement [42].
5 Strength studies
W/C ratio played a important role in determination flexural and compressive strength. At 35, 45, 55% replacements, compressive strength of concrete is maximum for 0.4 W/C ratio [43]. The optimum percent replacement is 15% fly ash and 15% metakaolin in cement increases compressiveness & split tensile strength [8]. It has observed that 10% replacement increases strength and 30% replacement decreases concrete strength on comparision with control concrete [13]. Increase in fly ash content in concrete decreases compressive strength in ECC mixes but for FA/C = 1 strength of 25 MPa was achieved. Tensile properties get increased at 1% addition of fibers for FA/C ratio of 0.25 [44]. For M40 grade compressive strength of concrete is less at 50% replacement and more at 60% replacement compared to plain concrete. For M40 and M30 grades at 60% replacement resistance to chloride ion penetration is more. [45]. Fly ash fiber reinforced concrete has highest compressive strength at 20% replacement. It has observed on adding fly ash in cement with steel fibers increases the strength [46]. At 20% and 4% replacement level of GGBS and Nano Silica increases concrete compressive strength. Increase in compressive strength is 37% when compared to conventional mix [47].
The strength is 10 to 20% of cement content in concrete of M30 to M40 grade concrete for 80 to 90% replacement of cement with GGBS. It is found that 40% of replacement will yield better results for split tensile strength [48]. It was found that at 0% GGBS replacement with cement and 30% steel slag with fine aggregate, concrete achieves highest compressive strength. concrete has optimum strength at 15% GGBS replacement with cement and 30% steel slag with fine aggregate [26]. Cement is replaced by 5% GGBs and 15% fly ash which increase flexural, split tensile & compressiveness of concrete. Durability of concrete also increased at 5%, 15% GGBS, fly ash respectively. [49]. RHA in cement increases Compressive strength of pervious concrete beyond that, it get decreased.RHA is replaced by 10% in cement which improves Flexural strength of Pervious concrete beyond that, it get decreased [50].
If replacement is increased above 10% compressive strength get decreased with increased exposure conditions. Hence 10% replacement is optimum for concrete to resist sulfate environment [8]. At 28 days modified mixture is prepared by replacement of cement with 10% RHA and 100% replacement of aggregates with recycled aggregates gave 2.11% more compressive strength, 3.88% more tensile strength compared to conventional concrete [51]. Concrete has higher compressive strength at OPC + 0.25%CF + 10%RHA compared to all other systems. At 0.25% replacement of coir fiber highest compressive strength has achieved [22]. At 10% replacement of RHA, 0.25% glass fibers shows a optimum compressive, sp;lit tensile and flexural potency of M40 grade concrete at the age of 7 days [52]. RHA is replace by cement results in showing the graph increasing compressive strength at 7.5% and decreasing at 10%, hence the optimum percent of RHA is to be replaced with cement is 7.5% [53]. Cement was replaced by silica fume with percentages of 0, 5, 7.5, and 10%. Compressive, flexural and split tensile potency obtained maximum at 10% substitute of cement with silica fume when compare to normal concrete [54]. Partially replaced silica fume in concrete which has durability, strength characteristics for mixes with partial replacement of 5, 10, 15% of silica fume. Results show that compressive strength and split tensile strength of cube gains max. at 10% of replacement of silica fume for 7,14 and 28 days [55].
Substitution of M30 grade with 0,25,30,40 and 50% silica fume. The Compressive strength and split tensile strength increased at 25% of replacement with cement [56]. He has replaced silica fume by 0%,2.5%,5%7.5%,10%12.5%,15%,20%,25%,30% with M20,M25 and M30 grade of concrete.. Strength obtained maximum at 10% of replacement [10]. Compressive strength was obtained maximum at 7.5% of replacement of cement. Percentage increment in silica fume decrease tensile and shear potency [57]. CSA was replaced at 5%,10% and 15% and silica fume at 5% and 10% of substitute by cement of M50 grade of concrete. Maximum strength was obtained at (10% + 10%) SF + CSA [58]. Here, Cement replace by SF and fly ash with a percentages of 5, 10,15%. The result obtained has very low Split tensile and compressive strength, so it can’t be used for structural applications [59]. Cement replaced by metakaolin with percentages of 5, 10, 15, 20% of M30 grade. Flexural, compressive and split tensile strength obtained maximum at 15% of replacement [60]. The mix shows the maximum compressive strength gained at 10% partial replacement. With increase in replacement dosage, the strength found to be decreasing [61]. Here, cement replaced by fly ash with 20% of replacement and metakaolin with percentages of 5, 10, 15% at 7, 28, 90 days. Maximum Flexural, compressive and split tensile potency gained at 10% of substitute with cement in comparison with normal concrete [62]. Tensile and compressive strength was obtained maximum at 15% of replacement. Flexural strength gained max. at 10% of replacement when compared to conventional concrete [25].
RHA was replaced by 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% and metakaolin was replaced by 2.5 and 5%. Split tensile and compressive strength of RHA was obtained at 10% and 5% of metakaolin. Combination of both achieved at 10% of RHA and 5% of metakaolin [19]. Cement was replaced by fly ash with 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30% and metakaolin by 5,10,15 and 20% with M40 grade of concrete for 7 and 28 days. Split tensile and compressive strength gives best results at 30% fly ash and 15% of metakaolin [21]. The concrete strength augment as the percentage of metakaolin content increase up to 15% of replacement with its cement weight.Metakaolin increases the strength of concrete in comparision with normal concrete [63]. Conventional mix with 15% of replacement with cement achieved maximum strength. Flexural, Compressive, Split tensile strength was obtained at 15% of metakaolin and 50% robo sand at all ages [12]. This paper involves the replacement of cement with POFA at percentages of 10%, 20% and 30% at the age of 7, 21, 28 days. The compressive strength seems to be increasing with increment in age of concrete and decreases with increment in POFA content [64]. Flexural, Compressive, Split tensile strength were studied at 7, 14 and 28 days and obtained max. strength at 20% of replacement when compare to conventional concrete [65]. Compressive potency obtained maximum at 12.5% replacement. Split tensile potency is highest at 7.5%. By usage of POFA cost of concrete will be reduced [66].
This work involves the partial replacement of cement in concrete by POFA with percentages of 5, 10, 15, 20% of M40 grade of concrete. Split tensile, compressive, flexural strength conducted on the blended concrete and achieved maximum strength at 10% of replacement [67]. Concrete mechanical properties are determined with a replacement of 5, 10% POFA for 3, 7, 28 days. Maximum split tensile and compressive strengths are obtained at 5% replacement [68]. Compressive strength was maximum and split tensile potency was highest at 2.5% of replacement with POFA. Later on potency decreases when POFA percentage increase [69]. POFA replaced with cement at 0, 10, 30 and 50% for 7 and 28 days. Compressive & Flexural potency obtained maximum at 30% replacement of POFA when compared to normal concrete [24]. Egg shell powder replaced by 10,8,6,4,2% and palm oil fuel ash by 0,2,4,6,8,10%. Results shows that 6% POFA and 4% egg shell powder has the highest strength of all mix percentages [70]. The replacement of coarse aggregates with Palm oil shells and the binding material with palm oil shells is up to 30% is recommended to achieve the light weight concrete [71]. Demand of construction materials are increased now days. In order to bring down this problem, we are searching for new alternate materials. In the present study, POFA , and Gypsum (SCC) has been used as an admixture to cement in concrete manufacturing and its collection and properties has been studied in phase I [72].
6 Durability studies
30% GGBS is replaced in cement then there will be maximum increase of load carrying capacity of compressive potency of concrete. Corrosion resistance of fiber content increase with 30% of GGBS where by increasing GGBS content, compressive strength decreases in acid attack. [73]. Cement gets maximum compressive strength of 55.82 N/mm2 at 50% replacement of GGBS. Static load showed an increase in 18% fatigueless in HPC compared with conventional concrete [74]. Activator ratio increases as 1:2, 1:2.5 and 1:3 split tensile, flexural & compressive strength also increases. Increase in strengths of flexural, split tensile and compression of concrete for ratios of 1:2, 1:2.5 and 1:3 [1]. HVFAHSSCC has high self compacting ability, better segregation resistance, and high fluidity. Due to added steel fibers for HVFASSCC flexural, compressive strengths increases [75].
This paper studies of M35 concrete mix with silica fume as a partial replacement of 0, 5,9,12 and 15% by cement weight. The values shows usage of silica fume increases durability and strength characteristics at all ages compared to conventional concrete [76]. This paper studies of silica fume considering the optimum replacement of cement i.e., 13% replacement with grades of M20, M25, M30, M35 and M40. Percentage increase of silica fume to concrete micro-structure as micro pores are filled. So, density of pore structure becomes higher [77]. At 28 days compressive strength shows better results at 15% replacement of metakaolin for 0.5% & 1% HCl and H2SO4 of potency. Effect of HCL is lesser than effect of H2SO4 on potency when metakaolin used as replacement in concrete [78]. Compressive strength decrease up to 20% and starts increase at 25% of replacement. Water absorption percentage decrease with increase in POFA at 30% of replacement [79].
7 Summary of the all mineral admixtures
All the mineral admixtures of optimum percentage of replacement with cement with desired conclusions/remarks and Grade of the concrete which is used in the research are listed in Table 3.
8 Conclusion
From the above literature Reviews, we have studied the different admixtures used in concrete are as a follows: (1) Silica fume (2) Metakaolin (3) POFA (4) RHA (5) GGBS (6) Fly Ash.
-
Every admixture is partially replaced with cement at different proportions on various grades of concrete. If the percentage limit is high, then it impacts on strength properties like compressive, split and flexural strength of concrete and durability properties
-
From the above literature reviews, it is shown that the optimal percentage of silica fume and RHA varies from 5 to 15%. Mostly, silica fume and metakaolin increases the heat of hydration and others decreases.
-
Metakaolin concrete effectively increases the strength properties when compared to normal concrete. Workability get decreased as percentage of metakaolin increased.
-
POFA used as a substitute for cement which enable the comprehensive waste product uses. Usage of POFA as concrete products in the construction industry would reduce the environmental problems associated with landfill disposal.
-
Replacement fly ash in cement increases characteristic properties of concrete and also it resist chemical attack on concrete when compared to conventional concrete.
-
GGBS replacement in cement increases concrete split tensile, flexural potency. When GGBS is partially replaced in cement, fine aggregate also partially replaced by other materials increases mechanical properties of concrete.
-
All the mineral admixtures minimize the bleeding in concrete by using the materials in acceptable proportion. Mineral admixtures of higher specific area and smaller size are mostly preferable to manufacture high dense and impervious concrete.
References
Singh G, Bansal RS (2017) Effect of partial replacement of cement by silica fume and sand by quarry dust on strength and durability of concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol 4(9):414–418
Mohamad ME, Mahmood AA, Min AYY, Nur Nadhira AR (2018) Palm oil fuel ash (POFA) and eggshell powder (esp) as partial replacement for cement in concrete. In: E3S web of conferences, 34, 01004
Khan SU (2014) Effects of different mineral admixtures on the properties of fresh concrete. Sci World J 2014:1–11
Geetha Bhargava M, Chaitanya Kumar JD (2015) State of art of usage of alternative materials in concrete. Int J Eng Sci Manag Res 2(12):33–37
Naveena SVD, Jagarapu DCK (2019) Experimental investigation on fibre reinforced beam column joint by partial replacement of cement with GGBS. Int J Recent Technol Eng 7(6):215–219
Dubey S, Chandak R, Yadav RK (2015) Experimental study of concrete with metakaolin as partial replacement of OPC. Int J AdvEng Res Sci 2(6):38–40
Suleman Ahamed V, Siddiraju S (2016) Study of strength of concrete with palm oil fuel ash as cement replacement. Int J Civil Eng Technol 7(3):337–341
Surendra BV, Rajendra TN (2016) An experimental investigation on strength properties of concrete with partial replacement of fly ash and metakaolin & with M.sand as fine aggregate. Int Res Eng Technol 3(7):2150–2153
Toutanji HA, El-Korchi T (1995) The influence of silica fume on the compressive strength of cement paste and mortar. Cem Concr Res 25(7):1591–1602
Sidek MNM, Hashim NH, Rosseli SR, Nor MRM, Ismail S, Saman HM, Arshad MF, Alisibramulisi A , Zainudin F (2018) Utilization of palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as cement replacement by using powder and liquidation technique. In: AIP Conference Proceedings
Sharma A, Seema (2012) Effect of partial replacement of cement with silica fume on compressive strength of concrete. Int J Res Technol Manag 1(1):34–36
Chouhan P, Jamle S, Verma MP (2017) Experimental investigation on silica fume as partial replacement of cement for M-25 grade concrete. Int J Sci Adv Res Technol 3(5):714–717
AkshayTandon CSJ (2017) Improving strength of concrete through partial usageof rice husk ash. Int Res J Eng Technol 04(07):52–54
Shalini A, Gurunarayanan G, Arun kumar R, Arun kumar R, Jaya prakash V, Sakthivel S (2016) Performance of rice husk ash in geopolymer concrete. Int J Innov Res Sci, Eng Technol 2(12):73–77
Biju B, Imran H (2016) Partial replacement of cement with metakaolin in high performance concrete. Int J Innov Res Sci, Eng Technol 5(14):133–139
Swathika R, Surya R, Mohana Ram M, RajendraPrasad S (2017) Experimental investigation on coir fibre reinforced concrete with partial replacement of cement by rice husk ash. Int J Sci Dev Res 2(6):397–406
Kumar R, Dhaka EJ (2016) Partial replacement of cement with silica fume and its effects on concrete properties. Int J Technol Res Eng 4(1):86–88
Subbamma V, Chandrasekhar Reddy K (2016) Experimental study on compressive strength of plain cement concrete with partial replacement of cement by flyash & metakaolin. Int J Civil Eng Technol 7(6):82–89
Harish BA, Hanumesh BM, Siddesh TM, Sanjay SJ (2016) An experimental study on the behavior of M20 grade cement concrete by partial replacement of cement by rice husk ash (RHA). Int J Sci Technol Eng 2(11):883–889
Devi GSL, Rao PS, Devi S (2015) Review on Blended Concretes. Int J Res Eng Technol 4(3):47–55
Sofri LA, Zulham M, Affendi MZ, Isa NF (2015) Performance of concrete by using palm oil fuel ash (POFA) as a cement replacement material. Appl Mech Mater 815:29–33
Raju OHR, Singam PSR, Raju OHR (2017) An experimental investigation on partial replacement of cement with metakaolin and fine aggregate with robo sand. Int Res J Eng Technol 4(4):1169–1173
Krishna Rao B, Anil Kumar M (2016) A study on partial replacement of cement with metakaolin and fine aggregate with waste foundry sand. Int J Eng Res Technol 5(12):402–407
Madhu K, Divya Bhavana T, Adil SE (2016) Study on partial replacement of cement with RHA and metakaolin. Int J Adv Res 4(12):300–305
Salot S, Sood H Effect of partial replacement of cement with metakaolin on properties of concrete using treated waste water
Nambirajan S, Satishbabu N (2017) An experimental study on effect of square slab using RHA and glass fiber on properties of cement with partial replacement of fine aggregate by quarry dust. Int Res J Eng Technol 4(5):2067–2070
Deepak TJ, Elsayed A, Hassan N, Chakravarthy N, Tong SY, Mithun BM (2014) Investigation on properties of concrete with palm oil fuel ash as cement replacement. Int J Sci Technol Res 3(1):138–142
Khoso S, Keerio MA, Ansari AA, khan JS, Bangwar KD (2017) Effects of rice husk ash and recycled aggregates on mechanical properties of concrete. Int J Sci Eng Res 8(3):1832–1836
Arivalagan S (2014) Sustainable studies on concrete with GGBS as a replacement material in cement. Jordan JCivil Eng 8(3):263–270
Jagtap SA, Shirsath MN, Karpe SambhajiL (2017) Effect of metakaolin on the properties of concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol 4(7):643–645
KrishnaTeja K, KameshwaraRao B (2018) Strength and durability of high volume flyash concrete. Int J Civil Eng Technol 9(6):109–116
Khedr SA, Abou-Zeid MN (1994) Characteristics of silica-fume concrete. member ASCE
Kumar JDC, Arunakanthi E (2018) The use of light weight aggregates for precast concrete structural members. Int J Appl Eng Res 13:7779–7787
Babu NV, Rahul BG, Kumar YH (2017) Experimental study on strength and durability properties of GPC with GGBS. Int J Civil Eng Technol (IJCIET) 8(4):39–50
Lokeshwaran N, Bhuvaneshwari M, Mirunalini V, Sakthivel M (2017) Flexural resistance of self compacted concrete beams by partial replacement of OPC with GGBS. Int J Civil Eng Technol 8(3):479–493
Mallesh M, Suresh R (2017) experimental study on concrete with partial replacement of cement with GGBS and fine aggrgate with steel slag. Int Res J Eng Technol 4(9):56–60
Rambabu PV, Rao GVR (2018) M60 Grade rice husk ash concretein sulfate milieu. Int J Civil Eng Technol 9(6):99–108
Godwin Akeke A, Ephraim ME, Akobo IZS, Ukpata JO (2013) Structural properties of rice husk ash concrete. Int J Eng Appl Sci 3(3):57–62
Abushad M, Sabri MD (2017) Comparative study of compressive strength of concrete with fly ash replacement by cement. Int Res J Eng Technol 4(7):2627–2630
Wishwesh KV, Anand KB (2017) PVA fiber- fly ash cementitious composite: assessment of mechanical properties. Int J Sci Eng Res 8(10):647–648
Srivastava V, Kumar R, Agarwal VC, Mehta PK (2012) Effect of silica fume and metakaolin combination on concrete. Int J Civil Struct Eng 2(3):893–900
Ahmad MH, Omar RC, Malek MA, Md Noor N, Thiruselvam S (2008) Compressive strength of palm oil fuel ash concrete. ICCBT - A - 27:297–306
Kumar S, Khan S, Pandey KK (2016) Impact of fly-ash on compressive and flexural strength in fly-ash concrete. Int J Res Eng IT Soc Sci 06(06):38–41
Bhavana RS, Raju PP, Asadi SS (2017) experimental study on bacterial concrete with partial replacement of cement by flly ash. Int J Civil Eng Technol 8(4):201–209
Suryavanshi A, Siddhartha Nigam SK, Mittal RB (2018) An experimental study on partial replacement of cement in concrete by using silica fume. Int Res J Eng Technol 5(2):1450–1454
Manjula V, Felixkala T (2018) Development of slag based lower strength self compacting concrete and experimental assessment on its strength and elastic properties. Int J Civil Eng Technol 9(2):56–62
Sesikumar A (2016) Experimental investigation on properties of silica fume as a partial replacement of cement. Int J InnovRes Sci 5(3):4392–4395
Rakesh Kumar PK, Mehta PRP, Muhammed Ashiq TP (2017) Relation among mechanical properties of GGBS concrete. Int J Civil Eng Technol 8(3):423–431
Anand VR, Pradeep Kumar AV, Bhat AV (2017) An experimental investigation on the of high volume GGBS concrete. Int J Civil Eng Technol 8(2):328–337
Talsania S, Pitroda Jk, vyas CM (2015) Effect of rice husk ash in properties of pervious concrete. Int J Adv Eng Res Stud 4:296–299
Mani Deep D, Jabez NA (2017) Study of strength and durability on high strength concrete by partially replacing cement with GGBS and fly ash over acid attacks. Int J Civil Eng Technol 8(4):441–449
Shyam A, Anwar A, Ahmad SA (2017) A literature review on study of silica fume as partial replacement of cement in concrete. Int J Adv Eng, Manag Sci 3(3):250–253
MohammdShahbuddin S, RangaRao V (2017) Experimental study on behaviour o fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol 8(1):575–582
Roy DS, Sil A (2012) Partial replacement of silica fume on hardened concrete. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2(8):472–475
Narmatha M, Felixkala T (2016) Meta kaolin –the best material for replacement of cement in concrete. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng 13(4):66–71
Khankhaje E, Hussin MW, JahangirMirza MR, Salim MR, Siong HC, Khankhaje MNMWE, Hussin MW, JahangirMirza MR, Salim MR, Siong HC, Warid MNM (2016) On blended cement and geopolymer concretes containing palm oil fuel ash. Mater Des 89:385–398
Mansor AM, Hamed AMM, Borg RP (2016) Effect of silica fume on high-performance concrete strength. In: Conference: SBE 16 Malta: Europe and the mediterranean towards a sustainable built environment, vol 1. Malta, pp 65–70
Paulson AJ, Melchizedek A, Prabhavathy RA (2018) Study of pore structure of silica fume concrete for optimum replacement. Int J Civil Eng Technol 9(3):920–931
Umamaheswari R, Vigneshkumar M (2018) Experimental study on partial replacement of cement with coconut shell ash and silica fume in concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol 5(7):2175–2179
John N (2013) Strength properties of metakaolin admixed concrete. Int J Sci Res Pub 3(6):1–7
Nagendra V, Sashidhar C, Prasanna Kumar SM, Venkata Ramana N (2016) GGBS and nano silica (NS) effect on concrete. Int J Civil Eng Technol 7(5):477–484
Anantha Lakshmi K, Anvesh Reddy IS, Sai Kumar AVS (2016) Strength characteristics of concrete with partial replacement of cement with fly-ash & metakaolin. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol 1(7):18–22
Aiswarya VS, Wilson B, Harsha VN, Preethi M (2017) Palm oil fuel ash as partial replacement of cement in concrete. Int J Eng Res Technol 6(03):544–546
Oyejobi DO, Abdulkadir TS, Ahmed AT (2015) A study of partial replacement of cement with palm oil fuel ash in concrete production. J Agric Technol 12(4):619–631
Dixit S, Rohit K (2016) Effect of metakaolin on wood flour polyester composite. In: 3rd international conference on multidisciplinary research & practice, 4 (1): 153–156
Subhashini L, Krishnamoorthi A (2016) Experimental investigation on partial replacement of cement by palm oil fuel ash in concrete. Int J Adv Res Trends Eng Technol 3(4):44–48
Reddy PS, Indhu B, Gangha G, Padmarekha A (2017) Determination of fatigue behaviour of concrete using GGBS and robosand. Int J Civil Eng Technol 8(4):244–251
Pone J, Ash A, Kamau J, Hyndman F (2018) Palm oil fuel ash as a cement replacement in concrete. lupine publishers, pp 2641-6921,volume 1, issue 1,
Kesharwani KC, Biswas AK, Chaurasiya A, Rabbani Ahsan (2017) Experimental study on use of fly ash in concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol 04(09):1527–1530
Prakash V, Chandrasekar K, Vinoth P (2018) Partial replacement of silica fume and fly ash in pervious concrete. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 05(05):1823–1825
Kumar JDC, Arunakanthi E (2019) Optimum mix design for light weight fiber reinforced concrete—by incorporating agriculture solid waste. Int J Manag, Technol Eng IX(VI):2721–2731
Ms RS, Mrs J, Umanambi J (2019) Experimental study on self compacting concretre by partial replacement of cement with palm oil fuel ash. Int Res J Eng Technol 06(04):1853–1859
Malagavelli V, Angadi S, Prasad JSR, Joshi S (2018) Influence of metakaolin in concrete as partial replacement of cement. Int J Civil Eng Technol 9(7):105–111
Gaur EAS, Kumar ES, Verma EKP (2017) To Experimental work on concrete properties utilization of marble slurry and ground granulated blast furnace slag by partial replacement of fine aggregate and cement OPC (43-grade). Int Res J Eng Technol 3(12):1196–1201
Vinay Kumar SR, Arer AM, Sangeetha BK, Pateela SU, Patil SC (2018) Cement concrete hollow blocks to replacing cement by fly ash. Int Res J Eng Technol 5(5):157–160
Singh L, Kumar A, Singh A (2016) Study of partial replacement of cement by silica fume. Int J Adv Res 4(7):104–120
Singh P, Shah ND (2018) An experimental investigation on sustainable concrete with flyash and steel fibers. Int J Civil Eng Technol 9(6):1131–1140
Nikhila CJ, Kumar JC (2015) Partial replacement of cement with metakaolin in high strength concrete. Int J Eng Res Sci Technol 4(4):336–349
Ofuyatan T, Olutoge F, Olowofoyeku A (2015) Durability properties of palm oil fuel ash self compacting concrete. Eng, Technol& Appl Sci Res 5(1):753–756
Singh P, Khan MA, Kumar A (2016) The effect on concrete by partial replacement of cement by silica fume: a review. Int Res J Eng Technol 03(03):118–120
Andalib R, Hussin MW, Majid MZ, Azrin M, Ismail HH (2014) Structural performance of sustainable waste palm oil fuel ash-fly ash geo-polymer concrete beams. J Environ Treat Tech 2(3):115–119
Alsadey S (2016) The effect of different mineral admixtures on characteristics of concrete. Concr Res Lett 7(3):98–103
Amonkar V, Gundakalle VD (2018) Experimental investigation on properties of high volume fly ash high strength self compacting concrete with steel fibers. Int Res J Eng Technol 5(8):531–534
Savita, Shwetha S, Malanbi, Shweta, Saksheshwari, Manjunath K (2018) Experimental study on strength parameters of steel fiber reinforced concrete using GI Wire & fly ash. Int Res J Eng Technol 5(5):3271–3277
Abdul Awal ASM, Warid Hussin M (2011) Effect of palm oil fuel ash in controlling heat of hydration of concrete. In: The twelfth east asia-pacific conference on structural engineering and construction. pp 2650–2657
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanamarlapudi, L., Jonalagadda, K.B., Jagarapu, D.C.K. et al. Different mineral admixtures in concrete: a review. SN Appl. Sci. 2, 760 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2533-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2533-6