Abstract
Paintings experience chemical, mechanical and biological damage over time. Whereas chemical and biological alterations have been widely studied in the recent decades, the study of the mechanical behaviour of painted structures deserves more attention. Damage to paintings (such as cracks, flaking paints or delaminations) has been traditionally associated to humidity and temperature fluctuations. While such assumptions are not completely wrong, the environment is not always the reason behind the failure observed in paintings. A deeper insight into the interactions between pigment and medium, as well as between the different paint layers is crucial to interpret damage found in the painted surface, but also to take more informed conservation decisions to ensure paintings stability over time. The Failure Mechanisms in Picasso’s Paintings Topical Collection in the journal SN Applied Sciences brings together a series of papers aimed to understand this relationship between the composition of painting materials and mechanical damage. Results suggest that slight modifications introduced by the artist in his works can induce different vulnerabilities, whose effects can be seen over time.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
There are both mechanical and chemical factors that affect the durability of canvas paintings. The environment can adversely affect these factors. Both very high and low relative humidity (RH) can damage paintings based on the materials used. The absence of hide glue reduces low RH effects. Low temperatures will damage paintings no matter the construction if low enough. On the other hand, cool temperatures reduce chemical degradation and moisture diffusion. Other factors include prolonged exposure to high light levels, the choice of materials used, how the materials are used and in what layered combinations, as well as conservation treatments (and this includes cosmetic treatments such as cleaning as well as structural treatments such as linings).
Oil paint durability is largely affected by the pigments used in making the paints. Where lead, and copper compound pigments tend to result in durable paint, organic and earth color pigments often result in less durable paints. Mixing durable paints with less durable paints can enhance the durability of the mixture. Other factors that adversely affect durability of paintings can be the pigment volume concentration of the paints and mixing hide glues with the paints.
In this paper, an overview of the mechanical and dimensional properties of painting materials is presented. This approach to materials behavior started more than three decades ago and introduced a different way of looking at painting materials providing a thorough understanding of the chemical and mechanical aspects of failure mechanisms experienced by paintings, and laying the foundation for later research projects on the durability of paintings.
2 Mechanics
Over the years there has been considerable research into the chemical and mechanical deterioration of materials used in the making of cultural artifacts including paintings on canvas. In general, we are more familiar with some of the chemical aspects of deterioration, nevertheless the mechanical aspects are equally important.
The mechanical deterioration can be viewed as an assessment of the forces and deformations that paintings experience due to factors such as changes in temperature, relative humidity, impact and vibration. If it is possible to determine the magnitude and direction of those forces then it is possible to determine their effects.
Knowing how these factors affect the durability of canvas paintings makes it possible to compare these effects to the Picasso’s paintings under discussion in this special issue.
2.1 Relative humidity effects
For typical paintings constructed using linen canvas, hide glue size, oil ground, and oil design layers, the forces from relative humidity have been well established [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. For example, at low humidity very high forces are developed in the glue size or any other layer of the painting that is responsive to relative humidity. This can be a layer of paint that incorporates hide glue in the mixture. This is shown in Fig. 1. The typical damage caused by the environment is shown in Figs. 2 and 3.
For those typical paintings exposed to very high relative humidity the effect is to induce very high forces in the linen or cotton canvas. If the canvas is restrained, there is often no lasting damage. However, if the canvas is loose, the damage can be considerable because the canvas shrinks and the paint above is compressed. What frequently happens is that water condenses behind a hanging painting on a cold wall and gathers at its lower edge. This means that the painting has two entirely different environments, dry at the top and wet at the bottom. Figure 4 shows the movement of the canvas when there are two different environments. Figure 5 shows the damage to an actual painting when there is condensation behind it.
2.2 Vibration effects
In general vibrations due to transit causes no damage to paintings with the exception of the condition where the canvas is extremely loose and there is cracking along the inside stretcher bars due to impact [9, 10]. Impact due to dropping or toppling can cause severe damage. In general handling in museums is the source of most damage.
2.3 Temperature effects
In general, low temperature can have beneficial effects. It reduces chemical activity, mold growth, and slows moisture diffusion [11]. However, if low enough, it can pass below the glass transition temperature (Tg) of paints and can cause serious cracking. For acrylic paints Tg is 10ºC and for oil and alkyd paints it is around 0 °C [12]. On the other hand, high temperature is hazardous to paintings as it seriously increases chemical degradation (including hydrolysis), moisture diffusion, loss of unreacted fatty acids the oil, and -in combination with high humidity- it also promotes mold growth.
Oil paints become brittle and glass-like at low temperatures. Modeling a painting as if subjected to a drop in temperature from 22 °C to − 20 °C produced a high stress field over the entire painting as shown in Fig. 6. This analysis shows the entire painting develop tension in the design layer [12]. Figures 7 and 8 show the cracks predicted in canvas paintings by computer simulation and an actual painting exposed to low temperature (Fig. 8).
2.4 Other factors affecting the stability of paintings
Equally important are the paints used in the making of the painting. It is important to start with the drying oil alone. If one were to pour linseed oil onto a surface such as a polyester film and wait over time, it would never dry to a hard film. Figure 9 shows an eleven-year-old film of unpigmented cold pressed linseed oil. Even after eleven years the film is still very soft and tacky. There are therefore other factors that cause a paint film to dry to a hard durable film. These include the pigment volume concentration (PVC) of the paints used in constructing the painting. Low PVC can make the pain film brittle and weak. Picture Courtesy of the Author.
However, if that same oil is mixed with basic lead carbonate (white lead pigment), after 14 years of drying, the lead white paint gets stiffer (increasing modulus) and stronger as drying time increases. Research suggests that this increase in stiffness can continue for a century or more. Figure 10 shows the stress–strain plots of basic lead white ground in cold pressed linseed oil at different drying times. These paint samples were uniformly cast on polyester film and easily removed for testing at different stages of drying. The strength of the paint is the stress level reached at the end of the test. All mechanical tests described in this paper were conditioned and tested in an environment of 50% RH and 22C. Oil paints made with white lead are remarkably resistant to the adverse effects of moisture [13].
The question to ask here is: do oil paints made with different pigments result in firm durable paints? The answer to this question is no. For example, paints made with different lead compounds result in different strengths, most notably is the 17.5 year old Naples Yellow which develops no strength at all as shown in Fig. 11. Paints made with pigments that don’t develop into strong durable films are adversely affected by moisture and cleaning solvents [13].
Many other minerals sometimes used as pigments will make paints that will never develop any strength and will always be adversely affected by moisture [13]. These include silica, barium sulphate, and calcium carbonate. These might be considered as “inert pigments’ and the mechanical tests performed on paints using these pigment are shown in Fig. 12.
Due to toxicity levels of white lead paints alternative white pigments such and titanium dioxide and zinc white are often used as substitutes for the lead white. They can be found in paint used separately or as mixtures of the two pigments. Figure 13 shows separate paints made with titanium dioxide and zinc oxide in cold pressed linseed oil. They have completely different mechanical behavior. The titanium dioxide paint seems to initially dry properly but over time it starts to completely lose strength. The paint made with zinc white simply gets extremely stiff with time and ultimately gets quite brittle. Both these paints can have seriously adverse effects on the long term durability of paintings [14, 15]. This is shown in Fig. 14.
It might be useful to examine some combined effects of the environment and use of paint at this point. Figure 15 shows an image of a painting that was exposed to an extremely low wintertime temperature in Buffalo, New York. The cracking was almost immediate and covered the entire painting. The design layer was a mixture of oil and solvent based acrylics and the ground was a zinc white oil paint. The delamination started occurring soon after the painting cracked and was caused by the presence of the zinc white ground.
There are other pigments that form durable oil paints and these are in general the copper compound pigments such as azurite, malachite, and verdigris. Figure 16 shows the mechanical properties of paints made with copper compound pigments and cold pressed linseed oil at different times in their drying history. Like the lead white paint these paints get stiffer and stronger as time passes. The lead white and copper compound pigments have something in common. These pigments are partially dissolved in the drying oils and supply the paint with metallic ions that help polymerize and crosslink the paint [15,16,17]. There is further evidence that copper and lead ions accelerate the drying of linseed oil. Figure 17 shows the weight gain due to oxygen uptake over time of linseed oil when placed on different substrates. The substrates were clean copper foil, lead sheet, brass foil, aluminum sheet, tin sheet and polyester film. As can be seen in these plots, the oils on the polyester, aluminum and tin substrates are the slowest to start absorbing oxygen. The oils on the lead, copper, and brass start gaining weight very rapidly [18].(Fig. 18).
2.5 The hydrolysis of oil paint films
Hydrolysis, even in benign environments, causes the degradation of the mechanical properties and increases the vulnerability of paints to atmospheric moisture and cleaning solvents [16, 18, 19]. All paints hydrolyze to one degree or another but paints made with the earth colors and organic pigments tend to experience the most severe effects of hydrolysis. Fundamentally hydrolysis weaken the paint film and makes it more susceptible to damage from environmental moisture and cleaning solvents. Figure 19 shows the results of stress–strain testing of both raw and burnt Sienna ground in cold pressed linseed oil at different drying times. Initially, after only 1.25 years the paints seem to be developing nicely. But after 8 years of drying the both paints dramatically loose strength and after 14.25 years the raw Sienna has lost all strength. It is important to note that these paints were continuously maintained in a benign environment of 45–50% RH and 22 °C. Nevertheless they lost considerable strength.
An excellent example of a painting containing both a durable paint, white lead, and a weaker paint made from the earth colors is shown in Fig. 19. Relatively high levels of atmospheric moisture affects the paint made with the earth colors without affecting the white lead paint(Fig. 20).
Other paints ground in cold pressed linseed oil that loose strength over time include raw and burnt umber, yellow ochre, red iron oxide, lamp black, alizarin crimson, and Cadmium yellow [15].
2.6 Contaminants
The addition of driers and contaminants can cause problems in paint film formation. This even includes naturally occurring minerals such as Manganese dioxide often found in mined burnt umber. Figure 21 shows the increase in strength and brittleness as a function of time and percent manganese in burnt umber. Where on some paintings burnt umber paint may show signs of degradation due to moisture, in others it might show up as a brittle cracked and cupped paint [19]. The addition of even small amounts of zinc (for example in zinc oxide) causes similar problems.
2.7 Mixing different paints together
Research has shown that due to ion migration, all paints whether durable or not will develop considerably enhanced durability if they are applied over a white lead ground [13, 20].
In June 2007, three paints (yellow ochre, terre verte and alizarin madder lake, all in cold pressed linseed oil) were mixed with Grumbacher “Flake White” in alkali refined linseed oil. The pigments in the “Flake White” were lead carbonate and zinc oxide. The mixtures of the paints were 1 part white to 4 parts of the colored paints by volume. The paints were tested after 2.5 years of drying. Typical results are shown in Fig. 21. Figure 21 shows the stress–strain tests of several yellow ochre paints tested over time. The older paints were not mixed with any other paint and supplied by different manufactures. The youngest paint (2.5 years old) was the mixture and by far has developed the greatest strength even after drying for only a short time when compared to the much older paints. The terre verte and alizarin paints showed very similar results.
3 Conclusions
Departures to the extreme high and low RH levels can certainly cause damage to canvas paintings. But in reality most paintings can successfully sustain changes in RH in the range from 30 to 60% RH.
The primary support of canvas paintings with hide glue sizing is the hide glue and not the canvas. The hide glue’s active response to low RH level can cause damage. There is little support to the paint film from the canvas and paintings with no or very little glue sizing are resistant to damage at low RH but vulnerable to especially high RH levels.
Low temperatures can be beneficial to the paintings unless the temperatures goes below the Tg of the paints. High temperatures are always hazardous to painting.
Paints made from certain pigments such as the earth colors, organic colors and certain inorganic pigments will rarely dry to form durable films and are susceptible to hydrolysis. Other pigments such as zinc and umbers containing manganese dry to extremely brittle films. Mixing white lead in even small amounts will enhance paints made with poorly performing pigments.
It is the combination of the materials (especially the paints) and environmental conditions that induce damage either from mechanical or chemical processes or both.
References
Colville J, Kilpatrick W, Mecklenburg MM (1982) A finite element analysis of multi-layered orthotropic membranes with application to oil paintings on fabric. Stud Conserv 27(sup1):146–150
Mecklenburg MF (1982) Some aspects of the mechanical properties of fabric-supported paintings. Smithsonian Institution, Washington
Hedley G (1988) Relative humidity and the stress/strain response of canvas paintings: uniaxial measurements of naturally aged samples. Stud Conserv 33:133–148
Mecklenburg MF (2005) The structure of canvas supported paintings. In: Castell Agusti M (ed) Preprints Interim Meeting International Conference on Painting Conservation: Canvases: Behaviour, Deterioration & Treatment. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, pp 119–148
Mecklenburg MF, Fuster Lopez L (2006) Failure mechanisms in canvas supported paintings: approaches for developing consolidation protocols. In: the care of painted surfaces. Materials and methods for consolidation, and scientific methods to evaluate their effectiveness. Proceedings of the conference, Milan, November 10–11, 2006 (Third international conference: colour and conservation, materials a (pp. 49–58). Saonara: il prato
Mecklenburg MF, McCormick-Goodhart MH, Tumosa CS (1994) Investigation into the deterioration of paintings and photographs using computerized modeling of stress development. J Am Inst Conserv 33(2):153–170
Mecklenburg MF (2007a) Determining the acceptable ranges of relative humidity and temperature in Museums and galleries: part 1, structural response to relative humidity. Smithsonian Conservation Institute, Washington
Mecklenburg MF (2007b) determining the acceptable ranges of relative humidity and temperature in Museums and galleries: part 2 structural response to temperature. Smithsonian Conservation Institute, Washington
Mecklenburg MF, Tumosa CS (1991) An Introduction into the mechanical behavior of paintings under rapid loading conditions. In: Mecklenburg MF (ed) art in transit: studies in the transport of paintings. National Gallery of Art, Washington, pp 137–171
Green T (1991) Performance criteria for packing. In: Mecklenburg MF (ed) art in transit: studies in the transport of paintings. National Gallery of Art, Washington, pp 49–55
Rachwal B, (2012) Modelling of response of polychrome wood to climatic variations, Ph.D. Thesis, Krakow, Poland (p 70)
Mecklenburg MF (2007c) Determining the acceptable ranges of relative humidity and temperature in museums and galleries: part 2,structural response to temperature. smithsonian Conservation Institute, Washington
Maines CA, Rogala D, Lake S, Mecklenburg M (2011) Deterioration in abstract expressionist paintings: analysis of zinc oxide paint layers in works from the collection of the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Smithsonian Institution. In: Vandiver PB, Reedy CL, Li W, Sil JLR (eds) Materials issues in art and archaeology ix: symposium held November 29-December 3, 2010, Boston, Massachusetts, vol 1319. Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, pp 275–286
Rogala D (2012) Industrial Literature as a Resource in Modern Materials Conservation: Zinc Oxide House Paint as a Case Study, Paintings Specialty Group postprints, 39th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Conservation, held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on May 31–June 3, 2011. Electronic publication
Rogala D, Lake SFC, Maines C, Mecklenburg MF (2010) Condition problems related to zinc oxide underlayers: examination of selected abstract expressionist paintings from the collection of the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Smithsonian Institution. J Am Inst Conserv 49(2):96–113
Tumosa CS, Mecklenburg MF (2005) The influence of lead ions on the drying of oils. Rev Conserv 6:39–47
Fuster-López L, Mecklenburg MF (2017) A look into some factors influencing the film forming properties of oil paint films in copper paintings and the effects of environment in their structural behaviour. In: Fuster et al. (eds) Paintings on Copper and Other Metal Plates. Production, degradation and consevation issues. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia
Tumosa CS, Mecklenburg MF (2003) Weight changes on oxidation of drying and semi-drying oils. Collect Forum 18(1–2):116–123
Fuster-Lopez L, Izzo FC, Piovesan M, Yusà-Marco DJ, Sperni L, Zendri E (2016) Study of the chemical composition and the mechanical behaviour of 20th century commercial artists’ oil paints containing manganese-based pigments. Microchem J 124:962–973
Tumosa CS, Mecklenburg MF (2013) Oil paints: the chemistry of drying oils and the potential for solvent disruption. In: Mecklenburg MF, Charola AE, Koestler RJ (eds) New insights into the cleaning of paintings: proceedings from the cleaning 2010 international conference, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 51–58
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that thet have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mecklenburg, M. Methods and materials and the durability of canvas paintings: a preface to the topical collection Failure Mechanisms in Picasso’s Paintings. SN Appl. Sci. 2, 2182 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03832-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03832-6