Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization Study of Shaft System Vibration and Broken Tooth Fault Under the Influence of 3D Mixed Lubrication of Marine Diesel Engine Timing Gear System

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The timing gear drive mechanism serves as the fundamental transmission component of a diesel engine, encompassing a sophisticated elastic mechanical system comprising gears, multi-branch drive shafts, and various loads. The increasing demand for reduced vibration in modern diesel engines poses greater challenges to timing gear systems which must now withstand more extreme loads and operating conditions. This paper presents a coupled analytical model that integrates three-dimensional mixed lubrication and multi-branch shaft system vibration for the timing gear system of marine diesel engines. Additionally, it investigates broken tooth failure occurrence using an improved method and proposes an optimization scheme.

Methods

This paper focuses on the marine 20 V diesel engine timing gear and conducts research on the vibration characteristics of its shaft system, as well as optimization of broken teeth failure while considering the influence of three-dimensional mixed lubrication. Firstly, a 3D mixed lubrication analytical model is established and the validation of lubricant film stiffness and friction excitation is conducted. Based on this, the gear train is modeled with lumped-parameterized bending-torsion coupling dynamics, incorporating time-varying oil film stiffness and friction excitation. The vibration characteristics of the shaft system are analyzed by establishing an analytical model, which takes into account the comprehensive excitation from both internal and external factors in the multi-branch transmission shaft system. The accuracy of this model is then verified through actual diesel engine testing experiments. The conventional tooth root bending stress load spectrum is finally corrected, and the faulty gear is calibrated. Furthermore, a vibration optimization design scheme is proposed based on practical engineering experience.

Results

The accuracy of the coupled lubrication model developed in this study has been validated through comparisons with literature results and equivalent simulation tests. Furthermore, the precision of the vibration model has been confirmed through real-machine testing for both free and forced vibrations. Notably, during both calculation and experimentation, it was observed that the peak vibration energy at the oil pump shaft exceeded that at the flywheel end by a factor of 5.2; these poor vibration characteristics were identified as a primary cause of frequent tooth breakage in timing gears located near the oil pump shaft position. By improving the bending stress algorithm, we conducted a calibration of the bending fatigue strength for the timing gear that frequently experiences tooth breakage faults during diesel engine durability tests. The resulting minimum safety coefficient of 1.31 falls within the range of general reliability; however, it does indicate a susceptibility to tooth breakage faults. To address this issue in practical engineering applications, we propose an optimization scheme involving the addition of a vibration damper. This scheme increases the minimum safety factor to 1.64, effectively preventing occurrences of tooth breakage.

Conclusion

The study results unveil the failure mechanism of broken teeth in timing gears from a dynamics perspective, offering theoretical guidance for accurate prediction of tooth root bending stress and performance optimization as well as providing theoretical support for vibration response analysis of diesel gear shaft systems and vibration and noise reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All relevant data are provided in the paper. Data may be obtained from the corresponding author upon other reasonable requests.

References

  1. Li S, Kahraman A (2010) A transient mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication model for spur gear pairs. J Tribol 132(1):011501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou C, Hu B, Qian X et al (2018) A novel prediction method for gear friction coefficients based on a computational inverse technique. Tribol Int 127:200–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou C, Xiao Z (2018) Stiffness and damping models for the oil film in line contact elastohydrodynamic lubrication and applications in the gear drive. Appl Math Model 61:634–649

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng L, Gao Z, Ban Z (2022) Dynamic tangential contact stiffness and damping model of the solid-liquid interface. Machines 10(9):804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mo S, Gong J, Jin G, Zhu S, Zhang T, Feng Z, Cao X (2020) Precise modeling of complex tooth surface microtopography and multi-degree-of-freedom nonlinear friction dynamics for high-performance face gear. Sci Prog 103(1):0036850419881078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li S, Kolivand A, Shi Z (2023) On the tribo-dynamics of lubricated point contacts: modeling and experiment. Nonlinear Dyn 111(11):10011–10023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ren N, Zhu D, Chen W, Liu Y, Wang Q (2009) A three-dimensional deterministic model for rough surface line-contact EHL problems. J Tribol 131(1):011501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu D, Ren N, Wang Q (2009) Pitting life prediction based on a 3D line contact mixed EHL analysis and subsurface von Mises stress calculation. J Tribol 131(4):041501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi X, Sun W, Lu X, Ma X, Zhu D, Zhao B, He T (2019) Three-dimensional mixed lubrication analysis of spur gears with machined roughness. Tribol Int 140:105864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tian X (2004) Dynamic simulation for system response of gearbox including localized gear faults. University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozguven H (1991) Assessment of some recently developed mathematical models in gear dynamics. In: Proceedings of the eighth world congress on the theory of machines and mechanisms, pp 26–31

  12. Wang X, Zhu Y, Li W, Hu D, Zhang X, Chen H (2021) Vibration characteristics of triple-gear-rotor system in compressed air energy storage under variable torque load. Sci Prog 104(1):0036850420987058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foltz A, Wasfy T, Ostergaard E, Piraner I (2016) Multibody dynamics model of a diesel engine and timing gear train with experimental validation. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol 50558, p V04BT05A003

  14. Yuan Y, Wang Z, Wang D, Dong L, Li W, Guo Y (2020) Failure investigation of a marine diesel engine timing gear. Eng Fail Anal 107:104203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wan Z, Zheng J, Li J, Man Z (2021) Fault feature analysis of gear tooth spalling based on dynamic simulation and experiments. Materials 14(20):6053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ur’ev E, Bochkarev E, Biyalt M, Kistoichev A, Kshesinskii D (2019) Study of torsional vibrations of turbomachine shafts: Part 2. Results of the first phase experimental study of shafting torsional vibrations of a T-175/210–12.75 Turbo Unit. Therm Eng 66:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagci C (1973) Computer method for computing torsional nature frequencies of nonuniform shafts geared system, and curved assemblies. In: Proceedings of the 3rd OSU mechanical conference, vol 40, pp 1–15

  18. Peng T, Yan Q (2022) Torsional vibration analysis of shaft with multi inertias. Sci Rep 12(1):7333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu Z (2009) Investigations on detection model of large scale rotation shaft torsional vibration in precision heavy machinery. In: 2009 international Asia conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics. IEEE, pp 459–463

  20. Shi Y, Zhou J, Huang J, Xv Y, Liu B (2022) A vibration fault identification framework for shafting systems of hydropower units: nonlinear modeling, signal processing, and holographic identification. Sensors 22(11):4266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y, Li H, Tong J, Yang P (2004) Transient thermoelastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of an involute spur gear. Tribol Int 37(10):773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roelands C (1966) Correlation aspects of viscosity-temperature-pressure relationship of lubricating oils. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dowson D, Higginson G (1977) Elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bair S, Winer W (1979) A rheological model for elastohydrodynamic contacts based on primary laboratory data. J Tribol 101:258–264

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martini A, Zhu D, Wang Q (2007) Friction reduction in mixed lubrication. Tribol Lett 28(2):139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. He T, Zhu D, Wang J, Wang Q (2017) Experimental and numerical investigations of the stribeck curves for lubricated counterformal contacts. J Tribol 139(2):021505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang X, Yang B, Wang Y (2019) A nano lubrication solution for high-speed heavy-loaded spur gears and stiffness modeling. Appl Math Model 5(6):262–272

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jian G, Wang Y, Zhang P (2020) Analysis of lubricating performance for involute spur gear under vibration. Lubr Sci 32(7):344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang X, Zuo MJ, Patel T (2014) Evaluating the time-varying mesh stiffness of a planetary gear set using the potential energy method. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 228(3):535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chaari F, Fakhfakh T, Haddar M (2009) Analytical modelling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gearmesh stiffness. Eur J Mech ASolids 28(3):461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bartelmus W (2001) Mathematical modelling and computer simulations as an aid to gearbox diagnostics. Mech Syst Signal Process 15(5):855–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. International Organization for Standardization (2019) Calculation of load capacity of spur and helical gears-part2: calculation of surface durability (pitting): ISO/FDIS 6336–2019(E). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Q, Zhu D (2019) Interfacial mechanics: theories and methods for contact and lubrication. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu D, Hu Y (1999) The study of transition from elastohydrodynamic to mixed and boundary lubrication. The advancing frontier of engineering tribology. In: Proceedings of the 1999 STLE/ASME HS Cheng tribology surveillance, pp 150–156

  35. Liu S, Wang Q, Liu G (2000) A versatile method of discrete convolution and FFT (DC-FFT) for contact analyses. Wear 243(1–2):101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pu W, Wang J, Zhu D (2016) Progressive mesh densification method for numerical solution of mixed elastohydrodynamic lubrication. J Tribol 138(2):021502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomson W (2018) Theory of vibration with applications. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Guo J, Zhang W, Zou D (2011) Investigation of dynamic characteristics of a valve train system. Mech Mach Theory 46(12):1950–1969

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiujiang Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Tables 6 and 7.

Table 6 Support stiffness of the transmission system
Table 7 Simplified table of total shafting torsion lumped parameters of diesel engine

Appendix B

Cylinder Excitation Calculation

The excitation force of the cylinder is primarily composed of burst pressure and reciprocating inertia force. Figure 21 provides a force analysis of the crankshaft connecting rod mechanism.

In Fig. 21, A is the piston centroid; B is the crank centroid; L is the connecting rod; S is the piston stroke; OB is the radius; β is the swing angle; α is the angle.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Force diagram of crank connecting rod mechanism

The tangential torque generated by the tangential force of the crankshaft is

$$ M_{g} = \frac{\pi }{4}D^{2} RP_{{\text{T}}} , $$

where \(D\) is the cylinder diameter; \(R\) is the crank radius; \(P_{{\text{T}}}\) is the tangential force of gas.

The reciprocating inertia force of the moving parts in the cylinder of a diesel engine is concentrated on the crank pin. As the crankshaft rotates periodically, this reciprocating inertia moment is expressed as:

$$ M_{{\text{I}}} {\kern 1pt} = - mR^{2} \omega^{2} \left( {\frac{\lambda }{4}\sin \alpha - \frac{1}{2}\sin 2\alpha - \frac{3}{4}\lambda \sin 3\alpha - \frac{{\lambda^{2} }}{4}\sin 4\alpha } \right) $$

Camshaft Excitation Calculation

The camshaft excitation in this paper is primarily categorized into valve cam excitation and oil supply cam excitation [38]. The valve train must maintain the timeliness of its valve opening and closing while ensuring proper intake and exhaust functions. Figure 

Fig. 22
figure 22

Valve cam force diagram

22 illustrates the torque balance.

In the Fig. 22, P is the action point; O is the center of the circle; e is the distance between the center of the cam circle and the action point; R is the radius of the base circle; h is the lift; w is the angular velocity; T is torque; Fs is friction; Fz is the cam force. Its equilibrium formula is

$$ T - F_{z} \cdot e - F_{s} \cdot \left( {h + R} \right) = 0. $$

The fuel supply system of the diesel engine differs from the high pressure common rail system in that it employs an auxiliary pump injection structure, as illustrated in Fig. 

Fig. 23
figure 23

Oil supply cam force diagram

23.

In Fig. 23, F1 is the normal force between the roller and the cam; F2 is the plunger lateral force; r1 is the roller radius; r0 is the radius of cam base circle; h is the cam lift. The load torque of the cam is

$$ T = F_{1} \cdot l = F_{z} (r_{0} + r_{1} + h) \cdot \tan \alpha , $$

where \(r_{1}\) is the radius of the roller; \(\alpha\) is the angle between the force of the cam roller contact point and the normal force.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, W., Shi, X., Lu, X. et al. Optimization Study of Shaft System Vibration and Broken Tooth Fault Under the Influence of 3D Mixed Lubrication of Marine Diesel Engine Timing Gear System. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 12, 6053–6073 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-01237-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-01237-4

Keywords

Navigation