Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of Mechanical Performance of Seismic Isolation Bearings for Continuous Beam Bridges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In order to promote the seismic performance of bridges and the design of isolation bearings, this paper studies the influence of isolation bearing parameters on the seismic performance of bridges, and proposes an optimization framework for isolation bearing parameters of isolated continuous beam bridges.

Methods

In this paper, Matlab is used for independent programming, and non-parametric regression analysis method is used to build the optimization objective function relationship of lead rubber bearing, and combined with NSGA2 (nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II) algorithm for optimization. Finally, we take the seismic vulnerability after optimization as an evaluation index to analyze the optimization effect of the lead rubber bearing.

Results

By comparing the seismic vulnerability curve results of the lead rubber bearing before and after optimization, it is found that when the bearing parameters K1, K2, and Q are 21.65, 1.7, and 267.2 respectively, the seismic vulnerability of the whole bridge is reduced by 3–4% and the corresponding pier damage probability is reduced by 20–30% under the action of rare earthquakes. The probability of support damage only increased by 48%. Therefore, the selection of appropriate supporting parameters can help reduce pier damage and ensure the future repair of the bridge.

Conclusion

For bridges that only use isolation devices, it is found that when the characteristic strength Q = 267.21 kN, the post-yield stiffness K2 = 1.7 kN/mm, and K1 = 22.1 kN/mm, the probability of pier damage can be minimized.

It is also proved that the optimization frame is effective to optimize the parameters of the seismic isolation mounts of continuous beam bridges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The part of data that support the findings of this study is available in American Pacific website at Home, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (berkeley.edu).

Code availability

Personal guarantee above codes are true and effective.

References

  1. Kunde M, Jangid R (2006) Effects of pier and deck flexibility on the seismic response of isolated bridges. J Bridge Eng 11:109–121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:1(109)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang-dong Z, Yue Y, Zhen-hao W (2022) The application of genetic algorithm in seismic performance optimization of Y-shape eccentrically braced composite frame. Eng Mech 39:1–11. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2021.11.0934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jia Y, Zhao R, Liao P et al (2018) Study on parameter optimization and damping effect of hypoid friction pendulum support of continuous girder bridge under rare earthquake. China Railw Sci 39:31–40

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Y, Zhang J, Tang Y et al (2009) Analysis on optimum arrangement of seismic isolation supports in area E of guangdong science center. Seism Eng Eng Vib 29:183–191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xie Y, Zhang J (2017) Optimal design of seismic protective devices for highway bridges using performance-based methodology and multiobjective genetic optimization. J Bridge Eng 22:04016129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie Y, Zhang J (2018) Design and optimization of seismic isolation and damping devices for highway bridges based on probabilistic repair cost ratio. J Struct Eng 144:04018125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu C, Ouyang M, Mao Z, Xu X (2022) A multi-perspective framework for seismic retrofit optimization of urban infrastructure systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 51:2771–2790. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang T, Wang Y, Xie X et al (2014) Seismic vulnerability of steel damping support of railway isolation bridges with unequal piers. J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Ed) 48:1909–1916

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ye K, Luo J, Zhu H (2018) Optimum design and analysis of base-isolated structure of lead-core rubber mount for multi-level performance fortification. J Archit Struct 39:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tipu RK, Panchal VR, Pandya KS (2023) Multi-objective optimized high-strength concrete mix design using a hybrid machine learning and metaheuristic algorithm. Asian J Civ Eng 24:849–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00535-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang J, Huo Y (2009) Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method. Eng Struct 31:1648–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang C, Zhong T, Gu Z et al (2012) Optimum design of lead rubber bearing for railway continuous girder bridge. J Railw 34:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang F, Zhong T, Xiahe, (2006) Optimum study on design parameters of damping and isolation bearings for railway simple-supported girder bridge. J Railw 3:128–132

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong J, Xu W, Dang X, Wei K (2022) Effect of near-fault vertical ground motions on failure mode of long-span sea-crossing cable-stayed bridges. Ocean Eng 266:113005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xiu Z, Zhong X, Zhi Z, Cheng L (2022) Collapse mode of concrete reinforced square pier under vehicle collision. J Theor Appl Mech 60:375–384. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl/150077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sui S, Cheng Z, Cheng L, Zu L (2022) Free vibration of FG plate in axial motion on elastic foundation. J Bridge Eng 27:04022040

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bandini PAC, Siqueira GH, Padgett JE, Paultre P (2022) Seismic performance assessment of a retrofitted bridge with natural rubber isolators in cold weather environments using fragility surfaces. J Bridge Eng 27:04022040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao D, Bi P, Liu Y (2022) Comparison of seismic wave selection methods in time history analysis by national codes. Build Struct 52:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aerospace (2021) Preliminary study on seismic vulnerability analysis method of bridges. Chongqing Jiaotong University, China

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu W, Li L, Hu S et al (2017) Research summary and Prospect of seismic vulnerability analysis of highway bridges. Seism Eng Eng Vib 37:85–96

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kou M, Li N (2021) Post-earthquake resilience analysis and optimization of urban bridge system based on NSGA-II. Eng Mech 38:148–158+180

    Google Scholar 

  22. Party E, Brother ZG, Tian H (2022) Two-stage optimization method for bearing arrangement of seismic isolation structure. J Lanzhou Univ Technol 48:125–132

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao R, Cui L, Liao P (2017) Effect of parameters of lead-core rubber mounts on seismic response of continuous beam bridges. Railw Build 7:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cornell C, Jalayer F, Hamburger R, Foutch D (2002) Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng ASCE 128:526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Editorial Department of this magazine (2006) Application of rubber bearing part II (GB20688.4-2007) in bridge construction. Sci Technol Outlook 26:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  26. Editorial Department of this magazine (2006) Application of rubber bearing part III (GB20688.2-2006) in bridge construction. Sci Technol Outlook 26:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  27. Editorial Department of this magazine (2007) Application of rubber bearing part IV (GB20688.3-2006) in bridge construction. Sci Technol Outlook 26:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jangid RS (2007) Optimum lead–rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions. Eng Struct 29:2503–2513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Su Q (2019) Research on jacking application of steel clamp in bridge support replacement construction. China-Foreign Highw 39:172–175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Students—ZHY: performed the data analysis, performed the formal analysis, and wrote the manuscript. Postgraduate tutor—YY: review & editing, writing, and funding acquisition. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China: (NSFC) (GrantNo.0.11962009). All the help and support are greatly appreciated.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Yu Zhang or Yang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All authors disclosed no relevant relationships.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H.Y., Yang, Y. Optimization of Mechanical Performance of Seismic Isolation Bearings for Continuous Beam Bridges. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 12, 3653–3665 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-01076-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-01076-3

Keywords

Navigation