Skip to main content
Log in

Random Response of Nonlinear System with Inerter-based Dynamic Vibration Absorber

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Inerter-based dynamic vibration absorber (IDVA) has been widely used to reduce the responses of vibration systems. Its application to the nonlinear system is underexamined and will be explored.

Methods

In the present investigation, an IDVA is applied to a randomly excited nonlinear system which is of concern. The random response of the nonlinear system is analyzed by introducing a generalized harmonic transformation and establishing the relationships between the responses of the nonlinear main system and the IDVA secondary system.

Results

Numerical results are given to illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed method. The influences of the parameters of the IDVA, the main nonlinear system, and the excitation on the mean-square displacement response of the nonlinear system are investigated. Furthermore, the suppression effectiveness of the IDVA is discussed in detail.

Conclusion

Comparison of the approximate analytical results and simulation results shows that the proposed method is accurate and effective in quite large parameter ranges. Moreover, it is found that the response suppression effectiveness of the IDVA is robust to the main system nonlinearity and to the intensity of the random excitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith MC (2002) Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. Proc IEEE Conf Decis Control 2(10):1657–1662. https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2002.1184758

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Schönfeld JC (1954) Analogy of hydraulic, mechanical, acoustic and electric systems. Appl Sci Res 3(1):417–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02123920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith MC, Gb G (2005) Force-controlling mechanical device, Patent, Pub. No.: US 2005/0034943 A1

  4. Wang FC, Hong MF, Lin TC (2011) Designing and testing a hydraulic inerter. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 225(1):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544062JMES2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li C, Liang M (2012) Characterization and modeling of a novel electro-hydraulic variable two-terminal mass device. Smart Mater Struct 21(2):025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/2/025004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Evangelou S, Limebeer DJN, Sharp RS, Smith MC (2006) Control of motorcycle steering instabilities: passive mechanical compensators incorporating inerters. IEEE Control Syst 26(5):78–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2006.1700046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen MZQ, Papageorgiou C, Scheibe F, Wang FC, Smith MC (2009) The missing mechanical circuit element. IEEE Circ Syst Mag 9:10–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCAS.2008.931738

  8. Hu Y, Chen MZQ (2015) Performance evaluation for inerter-based dynamic vibration absorbers. Int J Mech Sci 99:297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu Y, Chen MZQ, Shu Z, Huang L (2015) Analysis and optimisation for inerter-based isolators via fixed-point theory and algebraic solution. J Sound Vib 346(1):17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang X, He T, Shen Y, Shan Y, Liu X (2019) Parameters optimization and performance evaluation for the novel inerter-based dynamic vibration absorbers with negative stiffness. J Sound Vib 463:114941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith MC, Wang FUC (2004) Performance benefits in passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters. Veh Syst Dyn 42(4):235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110412331289871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Y, Chen MZQ, Shu Z (2014) Passive vehicle suspensions employing inerters with multiple performance requirements. J Sound Vib 333(8):2212–2225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu Y, Chen MZQ, Shu Z (2017) Comfort-oriented vehicle suspension design with skyhook inerter configuration. J Sound Vib 405:34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazar IF, Neild SA, Wagg DJ (2014) Using an inerter-based device for structural vibration suppression. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(8):1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marian L, Giaralis A (2014) Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems. Probabilistic Eng Mech 38:156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Petrini F, Giaralis A, Wang Z (2020) Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design in wind-excited tall buildings for occupants’ comfort serviceability performance and energy harvesting. Eng Struct 204:109904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De DD, Ricciardi G (2018) An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47(5):1169–1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. De AM, Giaralis A, Petrini F, Pietrosanti D (2019) Optimal tuning and assessment of inertial dampers with grounded inerter for vibration control of seismically excited base-isolated systems. Eng Struct 196:109250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Masnata C, Di MA, Adam C, Pirrotta A (2020) Smart structures through nontraditional design of tuned mass damper inerter for higher control of base isolated systems. Mech Res Commun 105:103513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Javidialesaadi A, Wierschem NE (2018) Three-element vibration absorber-inerter for passive control of single-degree-of freedom structures. J Vib Acoust Trans ASME 140(6):061007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alotta G, Failla G (2020) Improved inerter-based vibration absorbers. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shi X, Zhu S (2018) Dynamic characteristics of stay cables with inerter dampers. J Sound Vib 423:287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.02.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin X, Chen MZQ, Huang Z (2016) Minimization of the beam response using inerter-based passive vibration control configurations. Int J Mech Sci 119:80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jin X, Chen MZQ, Huang Z (2019) Suppressing random response of a regular structure by an inerter-based dynamic vibration absorber. J Vib Acoust Trans ASME 141(4):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez-Buelga A, Lazar IF, Jiang JZ, Neild SA, Inman DJ (2017) Assessing the effect of nonlinearities on the performance of a tuned inerter damper. Struct Control Heal Monit 24(3):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. De DD, Ricciardi G (2018) Optimal design and seismic performance of tuned-mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) for structures with nonlinear base isolation systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 47(12):2539–2560. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lei XF, Wu CJ (2018) Investigating the optimal damping performance of a composite dynamic vibration absorber with particle damping. J Vib Eng Technol 6(6):503–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0067-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Faal RT, Crawford B, Sourki R, Milani AS (2021) Experimental, numerical and analytical investigation of the torsional vibration suppression of a shaft with multiple optimal undamped absorbers. J Vib Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-021-00295-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cai GQ, Lin YK (2001) Effect of secondary systems on response of nonlinear primary system to random excitation. In: Corotis RB, Schueller GI, Shinozuka M (eds) Proceedungs of 8th international conference on structral safety and reliability ICOSSAR'01. Swets & Zetitinger, California

  30. Luan XL, Wang Y, Jin XL, Huang ZL (2019) Response evaluation and optimal control for stochastically excited vibro-impact system with Hertzdamp contact. J Vib Eng Technol 7(1):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00080-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11672262, 11972317, and 11532011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoling Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, W., Jin, X., Huang, Z. et al. Random Response of Nonlinear System with Inerter-based Dynamic Vibration Absorber. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 9, 1903–1909 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-021-00334-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-021-00334-6

Keywords

Navigation