Skip to main content
Log in

Investigations of Rubbing Phenomenon During Coast-Up Operation of a Cryogenic Engine Turbopump

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A turbopump is an important and critical component in the liquid rocket engine assembly where a small deviation in the system parameters such as unbalance level, dimensional tolerances, rotor–stator clearance, etc. can have significant influence on its dynamic behavior and may lead to various faults such as rub. Hence, a detailed rotordynamic study is essential for the entire operating speed range.

Purpose

Most of the earlier studies on rotor-stator rub were carried out for simplified rotor models and its implementation on a rotor assembly such as turbopump will be of immense practical relevance for researchers and engineers. Contact mechanics-based Lagrange multiplier method is used to enforce the contact constraints that incorporate compliant stator model which respond to the axial and lateral forces during contact.

Methods

A full-scale cryogenic engine turbopump rotor system consisting of turbines, impellers, inducer, bearings and seals is modelled using FE framework to investigate the rotor–stator contact interaction during coast-up. The stator model the a circumferentially positioned beams around rotor disc and investigated using more realistic contact mechanics-based Lagrange multiplier method.

Results

The eigenvalue analysis on the FE model gives the rotor critical speeds and the corresponding vibration modes. The constraints imposed by the stator beams and tangential friction due to rub cause a continuous phase shift in the rotor vibration during contact. The physical insights into the distinct rotor vibration features in the two lateral directions are discussed in detail. The influence of clearance level on the observed backward whirl nature of the turbine is established through a full-spectrum analysis.

Conclusion

The tighter clearance between rotor and stator gives rise to dominating presence of backward whirl components that may be detrimental to the fatigue life of the shaft due to stress reversal. Duration of the contact interaction is found to decrease significantly with increase in rotor–stator clearance and decrease in friction coefficient. With tighter clearances, the influence of stator stiffness becomes more significant and the rotor response during contact exhibits nonlinear and complex vibration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

B1:

Bearing no. 1

CFD:

Computational fluid dynamics

CL1:

Clearance line for stator beam 1

SSME:

Space shuttle main engine

HPOTP:

High pressure oxygen turbopump

HPFTP:

High-pressure fuel turbopump

HHS:

Hilbert–Huang spectrum

c g :

= g/Xcr, clearance ratio

Cr, C :

Effective damping matrices: rotor, combined system

d s :

Ratio of chosen stator beam diameter to reference stator beam diameter

f :

Global force vector of body forces and surface traction

g :

Gap or clearance between contacting bodies

\(g_{\text{N}} ,\,\,{\mathbf{g}}_{\text{N}}\) :

Normal gap function and the array of all the normal gap functions

\(\dot{g}_{\text{T}} \text{,}\,\,{\dot{\mathbf{g}}}_{\text{T}}\) :

Time derivative of tangential gap function and the array of all the \(\dot{g}_{\text{T}}\)

GN, GT :

Global contact matrix for normal and tangential direction

G NT :

= GN + µGT, global normal-tangential contact matrix

Kr, K :

Stiffness matrices: rotor, combined system

Mr, M :

Mass matrices: rotor, combined system

q :

Number of active nodal contact pair

r d :

Radius of the disc

u * :

Displacement update without contact

u c :

Corrective displacement vector

u, , ü :

Displacement, velocity, and acceleration vectors for the system

X 0 :

Vector defining the initial gap between contacting nodal pairs

X cr :

Peak-response amplitude at critical speed

\(\lambda_{\text{N}} ,\,\,\lambda_{\text{T}}\) :

Normal and tangential contact force

\({\varvec{\uplambda}}_{\text{N}} ,\,\,{\varvec{\uplambda}}_{\text{T}}\) :

Normal and tangential contact force vectors

µ :

Friction coefficient

References

  1. Beatty RF (1985) Differentiating rotor response due to radial rubbing. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 107:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Behzad M, Alvandi M, Mba D, Jamali J (2013) A finite element-based algorithm for rubbing induced vibration prediction in rotors. J Sound Vib 332:5523–5542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Black HF (1974) Calculation of forced whirling and stability of centrifugal pump rotor systems. J Eng Ind 96(3):1076–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Childs DW (1974) Transient rotordynamic analysis for the space-shuttle main engine high-pressure oxygen turbopump. In: AIAA/SAE 10th propulsion conference, San Diego, California

  5. Childs DW (1975) Two Jeffcott-based modal simulation models for flexible rotating equipment. J Eng Ind 97(3):1000–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Childs DW (1978) The space shuttle main engine high-pressure fuel turbopump rotordynamic instability problem. J Eng Power 100:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Childs DW, Moyer DS (1985) Vibration characteristics of the HPOTP (high-pressure oxygen turbopump) of the SSME (space shuttle main engine). J Eng Gas Turbines Power 107:152–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi CH, Noh JG, Kim JS, Hong SS, Kim J (2006) Effects of a bearing strut on the performance of a turbopump inducer. J Propul Power. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleming DP (1980) Rotor-bearing dynamics of modern turbomachinery. Tribol Int 13(5):221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldman P, Muszynska A (1999) Application of full spectrum to rotating machinery diagnostics. Orbit First Quart 17–21

  11. Gupta NK (2006) Challenges in cryogenic development present and the future. In: 20th national conference, New Delhi, April 10-11, 2006. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=36389.0;attach=1359988. Accessed 4 Apr 2017

  12. Jeon SM, Kwak HD, Yoon SH, Kim J (2008) Rotordynamic analysis of a turbopump with the casing structural flexibility. J Propul Power 24(3):433–436. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.33551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeon SM, Kwak HD, Yoon SH, Kim J (2013) Rotordynamic analysis of a high thrust liquid rocket engine fuel (Kerosene) turbopump. Aerosp Sci Technol 26:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2012.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim J, Hong S, Jeong E, Choi C, Jeon S. (2007) Development of a turbopump for a 30 ton class engine. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, 8–11 July 2007, pp 1–6

  15. Ma H, Shi C, Han Q, Wen B (2013) Fixed-point rubbing fault characteristic analysis of a rotor system based on contact theory. Mech Syst Signal Process 38:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma H, Zhao Q, Zhao X, Han Q, Wen B (2015) Dynamic characteristics analysis of a rotor–stator system under different rubbing forms. Appl Math Model 39:2392–2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.11.009

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma H, Wu Z, Tai X, Wen B (2014) Dynamic characteristics analysis of a rotor system with two types of limiters. Int J Mech Sci 88:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mokhtar MA, Darpe AK, Gupta K (2017) Investigations on bending-torsional vibrations of rotor during rotor–stator rub using Lagrange multiplier method. J Sound Vib 401:94–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mokhtar MA, Darpe AK, Gupta K (2018) Analysis of stator vibration response for the diagnosis of rub in a coupled rotor–stator system. Int J Mech Sci 144:392–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.05.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel TH, Darpe AK (2009) Study of coast-up vibration response for rub detection. Mech Mach Theory 44:1570–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.12.008

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Roques S, Legrand M, Cartraud P, Stoisser C, Pierre C (2010) Modeling of a rotor speed transient response with radial rubbing. J Sound Vib 329:527–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77298-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Aeronautics Research and Development Board, Defence Research and Development Organization, Government of India (Project ref. no. DARO/08/1041661/M/I). The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Asjad Mokhtar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mokhtar, M.A., Darpe, A.K. & Gupta, K. Investigations of Rubbing Phenomenon During Coast-Up Operation of a Cryogenic Engine Turbopump. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 8, 737–749 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00181-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00181-6

Keywords

Navigation