Abstract
Background
A turbopump is an important and critical component in the liquid rocket engine assembly where a small deviation in the system parameters such as unbalance level, dimensional tolerances, rotor–stator clearance, etc. can have significant influence on its dynamic behavior and may lead to various faults such as rub. Hence, a detailed rotordynamic study is essential for the entire operating speed range.
Purpose
Most of the earlier studies on rotor-stator rub were carried out for simplified rotor models and its implementation on a rotor assembly such as turbopump will be of immense practical relevance for researchers and engineers. Contact mechanics-based Lagrange multiplier method is used to enforce the contact constraints that incorporate compliant stator model which respond to the axial and lateral forces during contact.
Methods
A full-scale cryogenic engine turbopump rotor system consisting of turbines, impellers, inducer, bearings and seals is modelled using FE framework to investigate the rotor–stator contact interaction during coast-up. The stator model the a circumferentially positioned beams around rotor disc and investigated using more realistic contact mechanics-based Lagrange multiplier method.
Results
The eigenvalue analysis on the FE model gives the rotor critical speeds and the corresponding vibration modes. The constraints imposed by the stator beams and tangential friction due to rub cause a continuous phase shift in the rotor vibration during contact. The physical insights into the distinct rotor vibration features in the two lateral directions are discussed in detail. The influence of clearance level on the observed backward whirl nature of the turbine is established through a full-spectrum analysis.
Conclusion
The tighter clearance between rotor and stator gives rise to dominating presence of backward whirl components that may be detrimental to the fatigue life of the shaft due to stress reversal. Duration of the contact interaction is found to decrease significantly with increase in rotor–stator clearance and decrease in friction coefficient. With tighter clearances, the influence of stator stiffness becomes more significant and the rotor response during contact exhibits nonlinear and complex vibration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- B1:
-
Bearing no. 1
- CFD:
-
Computational fluid dynamics
- CL1:
-
Clearance line for stator beam 1
- SSME:
-
Space shuttle main engine
- HPOTP:
-
High pressure oxygen turbopump
- HPFTP:
-
High-pressure fuel turbopump
- HHS:
-
Hilbert–Huang spectrum
- c g :
-
= g/Xcr, clearance ratio
- Cr, C :
-
Effective damping matrices: rotor, combined system
- d s :
-
Ratio of chosen stator beam diameter to reference stator beam diameter
- f :
-
Global force vector of body forces and surface traction
- g :
-
Gap or clearance between contacting bodies
- \(g_{\text{N}} ,\,\,{\mathbf{g}}_{\text{N}}\) :
-
Normal gap function and the array of all the normal gap functions
- \(\dot{g}_{\text{T}} \text{,}\,\,{\dot{\mathbf{g}}}_{\text{T}}\) :
-
Time derivative of tangential gap function and the array of all the \(\dot{g}_{\text{T}}\)
- GN, GT :
-
Global contact matrix for normal and tangential direction
- G NT :
-
= GN + µGT, global normal-tangential contact matrix
- Kr, K :
-
Stiffness matrices: rotor, combined system
- Mr, M :
-
Mass matrices: rotor, combined system
- q :
-
Number of active nodal contact pair
- r d :
-
Radius of the disc
- u * :
-
Displacement update without contact
- u c :
-
Corrective displacement vector
- u, u̇, ü :
-
Displacement, velocity, and acceleration vectors for the system
- X 0 :
-
Vector defining the initial gap between contacting nodal pairs
- X cr :
-
Peak-response amplitude at critical speed
- \(\lambda_{\text{N}} ,\,\,\lambda_{\text{T}}\) :
-
Normal and tangential contact force
- \({\varvec{\uplambda}}_{\text{N}} ,\,\,{\varvec{\uplambda}}_{\text{T}}\) :
-
Normal and tangential contact force vectors
- µ :
-
Friction coefficient
References
Beatty RF (1985) Differentiating rotor response due to radial rubbing. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 107:151–160
Behzad M, Alvandi M, Mba D, Jamali J (2013) A finite element-based algorithm for rubbing induced vibration prediction in rotors. J Sound Vib 332:5523–5542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.05.016
Black HF (1974) Calculation of forced whirling and stability of centrifugal pump rotor systems. J Eng Ind 96(3):1076–1081
Childs DW (1974) Transient rotordynamic analysis for the space-shuttle main engine high-pressure oxygen turbopump. In: AIAA/SAE 10th propulsion conference, San Diego, California
Childs DW (1975) Two Jeffcott-based modal simulation models for flexible rotating equipment. J Eng Ind 97(3):1000–1014
Childs DW (1978) The space shuttle main engine high-pressure fuel turbopump rotordynamic instability problem. J Eng Power 100:48–57
Childs DW, Moyer DS (1985) Vibration characteristics of the HPOTP (high-pressure oxygen turbopump) of the SSME (space shuttle main engine). J Eng Gas Turbines Power 107:152–159
Choi CH, Noh JG, Kim JS, Hong SS, Kim J (2006) Effects of a bearing strut on the performance of a turbopump inducer. J Propul Power. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19753
Fleming DP (1980) Rotor-bearing dynamics of modern turbomachinery. Tribol Int 13(5):221–224
Goldman P, Muszynska A (1999) Application of full spectrum to rotating machinery diagnostics. Orbit First Quart 17–21
Gupta NK (2006) Challenges in cryogenic development present and the future. In: 20th national conference, New Delhi, April 10-11, 2006. https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=36389.0;attach=1359988. Accessed 4 Apr 2017
Jeon SM, Kwak HD, Yoon SH, Kim J (2008) Rotordynamic analysis of a turbopump with the casing structural flexibility. J Propul Power 24(3):433–436. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.33551
Jeon SM, Kwak HD, Yoon SH, Kim J (2013) Rotordynamic analysis of a high thrust liquid rocket engine fuel (Kerosene) turbopump. Aerosp Sci Technol 26:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2012.03.005
Kim J, Hong S, Jeong E, Choi C, Jeon S. (2007) Development of a turbopump for a 30 ton class engine. In: 43rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit, 8–11 July 2007, pp 1–6
Ma H, Shi C, Han Q, Wen B (2013) Fixed-point rubbing fault characteristic analysis of a rotor system based on contact theory. Mech Syst Signal Process 38:137–153
Ma H, Zhao Q, Zhao X, Han Q, Wen B (2015) Dynamic characteristics analysis of a rotor–stator system under different rubbing forms. Appl Math Model 39:2392–2408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.11.009
Ma H, Wu Z, Tai X, Wen B (2014) Dynamic characteristics analysis of a rotor system with two types of limiters. Int J Mech Sci 88:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.001
Mokhtar MA, Darpe AK, Gupta K (2017) Investigations on bending-torsional vibrations of rotor during rotor–stator rub using Lagrange multiplier method. J Sound Vib 401:94–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2017.03.026
Mokhtar MA, Darpe AK, Gupta K (2018) Analysis of stator vibration response for the diagnosis of rub in a coupled rotor–stator system. Int J Mech Sci 144:392–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.05.019
Patel TH, Darpe AK (2009) Study of coast-up vibration response for rub detection. Mech Mach Theory 44:1570–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2008.12.008
Roques S, Legrand M, Cartraud P, Stoisser C, Pierre C (2010) Modeling of a rotor speed transient response with radial rubbing. J Sound Vib 329:527–546
Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77298-0
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by Aeronautics Research and Development Board, Defence Research and Development Organization, Government of India (Project ref. no. DARO/08/1041661/M/I). The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mokhtar, M.A., Darpe, A.K. & Gupta, K. Investigations of Rubbing Phenomenon During Coast-Up Operation of a Cryogenic Engine Turbopump. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 8, 737–749 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00181-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-019-00181-6