Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective Well-Being in World Heritage Sites: Localization and Thematic Integration of the Happiness Index for Turkey

  • Case Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Community Well-Being Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The investigation of subjective well-being with the aim of steering tourism development towards improving host community well-being in World Heritage Sites is the principle behind Planet Happiness project. To complement the extant literature on the Happiness Index’s use in different national contexts, this research outlines a methodological approach of the translation and localization of Happiness Index to Turkish language and cultural characteristics. Subsequently, additional items derived from scholarly literature to capture residents’ perceptions of conservation efforts and tourism activity are proposed. Reinforcing these theoretical findings with insights of polling firms and through interviews with experts working in World Heritage Sites, this research suggests that well-being studies would benefit from a modular perspective that allows the reflection of contextual elements in the survey instrument and in the data collection process that are rooted in the geographical, legal, economic, and socio-cultural attributes of the region or city in question. This methodological approach is tested in Cappadocia World Heritage Site in Turkey with 178 respondents chosen via convenience sampling. The findings of descriptive statistical procedures indicate a contextual incompatibility of several items of the Happiness Index in Turkey and suggest that future inquiries into subjective well-being would benefit from context-specific modifications to the Happiness Index. By combining well-being with findings pertinent to additional tourism and conservation domains, the methodological implications for future well-being studies in Turkey’s World Heritage Sites are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Knopf, R. C., & Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 1056–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 21, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caner, A. (2014). Happiness, comparison effects, and expectations in Turkey. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(5), 1323–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corburn, J. (2003). Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making - improving urban planning for communities at risk. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 420–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J., & Huisman, M. (2003). Prevention and treatment of item nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 19(2), 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumludag, D., Gokdemir, O., & Giray, S. (2015). Income comparison, collectivism and life satisfaction in Turkey. Quality & Quantity, 50(3), 955–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekici, T., & Koydemir, S. (2013). Social capital, government and democracy satisfaction, and happiness in Turkey: A comparison of surveys in 1999 and 2008. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 1031–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eren, K. A., & Aşıcı, A. A. (2016). The determinants of happiness in Turkey: Evidence from city-level data. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(3), 647–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, T. M. (2011). Tourism as a means to industrial heritage conservation: Achilles heel or saving grace? Journal of Heritage Tourism, 6(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florek, M. (2011). No place like home: Perspectives on place attachment and impacts on city management. Journal of Town & City Management, 1(4), 346–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrill, R., & Potts, T. D. (2003). Tourism planning in historic districts: Attitudes toward tourism development in Charleston. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. D. (Eds.). (2019). World happiness report 2019. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human, H. (2015). Democratising world heritage: The policies and practices of community involvement in Turkey. Journal of Social Archaeology, 15(2), 160–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istanbul Site Directorate. (2018). İstanbul Tarihi Yarımada Yönetim Planı (Istanbul Historical Peninsula Management Plan). Istanbul: Istanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimura, T. (2011). The impact of world heritage site designation on local communities – A case study of Ogimachi, Shirakawa-mura, Japan. Tourism Management, 32(2), 288–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy, C. (2016). ‘Enchanting town of mud’: Djenné, a world heritage site in Mali. In F. De Jong & M. Rowlands (Eds.), Reclaiming heritage: Alternative imaginaries of memory in West Africa (pp. 145–159). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 197(38), 16489–16493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents? Tourism Management, 36, 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, S. V., & Howard, D. R. (1994). Developing a tourism impact attitude scale. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. W., Williams, J., Young, T., & Cossens, J. (1998). A comparison of residents’ attitudes towards tourism in 10 New Zealand destinations. Tourism Management, 19(3), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Liu, M., & Hu, M. (2017). Relationship between future time orientation and item nonresponse on subjective probability questions: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(5), 698–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milman, A., & Pizam, A. (1988). Social impacts of tourism on Central Florida. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Culture and Tourism (2019). Konaklama istatistitleri (Accommodation statistics). https://yigm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-201120/konaklama-istatistikleri.html. Accessed 10.01.2020.

  • Musikanski, L., Cloutier, S., Bejarano, E., Briggs, D., Colbert, J., Strasser, G., & Russell, S. (2017a). Happiness index methodology. Journal of Social Change, 9(1), 4–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musikanski, L., Polley, C., Cloutier, S., Berejnoi, E., & Colbert, J. (2017b). Happiness in communities: How neighborhoods, cities, and states use subjective well-being metrics. Journal of Social Change, 9(1), 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musikanski, L., Rogers, P., Smith, S., Koldowski, J., & Iriarte, L. (2019). Planet happiness: A proposition to address Overtourism and guide responsible tourism, happiness, well-being and sustainability in world heritage sites and beyond. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2(3–4), 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, J. C. (2009). Good governance and happiness in nations: Technical quality precedes democracy and quality beats size. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(3), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özel, Ç. H., & Kozak, N. (2017). An exploratory study of resident perceptions toward the tourism industry in Cappadocia: A social exchange theory approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(3), 284–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and methods: Integrating theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poria, Y., Reichel, A., & Cohen, R. (2013). Tourists perceptions of world heritage site and its designation. Tourism Management, 35, 272–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seraphin, H., Sheeran, P., & Pilato, M. (2018). Over-tourism and the fall of Venice as a destination. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 9, 374–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somuncu, M., & Yiğit, T. (2007). Türkiye’deki Dünya Mirası Alanları’nın Güncel Durumlarının Saptanması Raporu: Görme Milli Parkı ve Kapadokya Kayalık Sitleri (Report on Determining the Current Status of World Heritage Sites in Turkey: Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia). Ankara: UNESCO Turkey National Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H., & Phillips, R. G. (2018). Indicators and community well-being: Exploring a relational framework. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 1(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakol, M., & Dennic, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teye, V., Sönmez, S. F., & Sirakaya, E. (2002). Residents’ attitudes toward tourism development. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(3), 668–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, C. (1998). Roots of unsustainable tourism development at the local level: The case of Urgup in Turkey. Tourism Management, 19(6), 595–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSI. (2018). Yaşam Memnuniyeti Araştırması 2003–2018 (Life Satisfaction Research 2003–2018). Ankara: Turkish Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, H., & Emge, A. (2010). Managing a world heritage site: The case of Cappadocia. Anatolia — An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 21(1), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultral constructions of happiness: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. Paris: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2012). Göreme National Park and the rock sites of Cappadocia - maps. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/357/multiple=1&unique_number=410. Accessed 10.01.2020.

  • UNESCO (2014). Periodic reporting cycle 2 - section II - Göreme National Park and the rock sites of Cappadocia. https://whc.unesco.org/document/164430. Accessed 10.01.2020.

  • UNESCO (2018a). Turkey. http://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/tr. Accessed 02.02.2019.

  • UNESCO (2018b). Tentative lists. http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/state=tr. Accessed 02.02.2019.

  • Vareiro, L. M. D. C., Remoaldo, P. C., & Cadima Ribeiro, J. A. (2013). Residents' perceptions of tourism impacts in Guimarães (Portugal): A cluster analysis. Current Issues in Tourism, 16(6), 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Pfister, R. E. (2008). Residents’ attitudes toward tourism and perceived personal benefits in a rural community. Journal of Travel Research, 47, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuepper, D., & Patry, M. (2016). The world heritage list: Which sites promote the brand? A big data spatial econometrics approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • You, W.-B., He, D.-J., Hong, W., Liu, C., Wu, L.-Y., Ji, Z.-R., & Xiao, S.-H. (2014). Local people's perceptions of participating in conservation in a heritage site: A case study of the Wuyishan Scenery District cultural and natural heritage site in southeastern China. Natural Resources Forum, 38(4), 296–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to their colleagues Nevra Ersari and Kivanc Inelmen, as well as Bekir Agirdir and Ali Karakas of Konda for their insightful contributions to the survey localization process, and Yuksel Dincer for his guidance on survey administration in Cappadocia. The authors would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments on the earlier version of this article, and Laura Musikanski and Paul Rogers for their leadership in the Planet Happiness project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sina Kuzuoglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuzuoglu, S., Ata, S., Hatipoglu, B. et al. Subjective Well-Being in World Heritage Sites: Localization and Thematic Integration of the Happiness Index for Turkey. Int. Journal of Com. WB 3, 223–240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00057-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00057-8

Keywords

Navigation