Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computational Issues in Sparse and Dense Formulations of Integrated Guidance and Control with Constraints

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An integrated guidance and control problem under state constraints is considered for terminal homing of missile engagement. The problem is formulated as a moderate-size convex optimization problem, which can be efficiently solved via existing techniques such as interior point methods or alternating direction method of multipliers. Two different formulations are presented, and their computation time is investigated. We address computational issues that arise in implementing the optimization solvers on-board, and discuss several problem-specific hands-on techniques that help reducing the computational complexity and accelerating the convergence of the optimization algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siouris G (2004) Missile guidance and control systems. Springer, New York, pp 102–112

    Google Scholar 

  2. Park BG, Kim TH, Tahk MJ (2013) Optimal impact angle control guidance law considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 227(8):1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park BG, Kim TH, Tahk MJ (2016) Range-to-go weighted optimal guidance with impact angle constraint and seeker’s look angle limits. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 52(3):1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim TH, Park BG, Tahk MJ (2013) Bias-shaping method for biased proportional navigation with terminal-angle constraint. J Guid Control Dyn 36(6):1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tekin R, Erer K (2015) Switched-gain guidance for impact angle control under physical constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 38(2):205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratnoo A (2016) Analysis of two-stage proportional navigation with heading constraints. J Guid Control Dyn 39(1):156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Park BG, Kwon HH, Kim YH, Kim TH (2016) Composite guidance scheme for impact angle control against a non-maneuvering moving target. J Guid Control Dyn 39(5):1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Menon P, Ohlmeyer E (2001) Integrated design of agile missile guidance and autopilot systems. Control Eng Pract 9(10):1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shima T, Idan M, Golan OM (2006) Sliding-mode control for integrated missile autopilot guidance. J Guid Control Dyn 29(2):250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Idan M, Shima T, Golan O (2007) Integrated sliding mode autopilot-guidance for dual-control missiles. J Guid Control Dyn 30(4):1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shtessel YB, Tournes CH (2009) Integrated higher-order sliding mode guidance and autopilot for dual-control missiles. J Guid Control Dyn 32(1):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xin M, Balakrishnan SN, Ohlmeyer EJ (2006) Integrated guidance and control of missiles with \(\theta \)-\(D\) method. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 14(6):981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaddi SS, Menon PK, Ohlmeyer EJ (2009) Numerical state-dependent riccati equation approach for missile integrated guidance control. J Guid Control Dyn 32(2):699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao Y, Chen J, Sheng Y (2014) Terminal impact angle constrained guidance laws using state-dependent Riccati equation approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 229(9):1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JH, Whang I, Kim B (2016) Finite horizon integrated guidance and control for terminal homing in vertical plane. J Guid Control Dyn 39(5):1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zarchan P (2012) Tactical and strategic missile guidance, 6th edn. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, Reston, pp 473–527

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson RC (1998) Flight stability and automatic control, 2nd edn. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 152–161

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 324–615

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Grant M, Boyd S(2014) CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1. http://cvxr.com/cvx

  20. Grant M, Boyd S (2008) Recent advances in learning and control. In: Blondel V, Boyd S, Kimura H (eds) Lecture notes in control and information sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 95–110

    Google Scholar 

  21. The MathWorks (2016) Matlab optimization toolbox. The MathWorks, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davis TA, Hu Y (2011) The university of florida sparse matrix collection. ACM Trans Math Softw 38(1):1

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2019R1C1C1011579) and by a grant from Kyung Hee University in 2019 (KHU-20192291).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agency for Defense Development, 160, Bugyuseong-daero 488 beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Taejon, 34060, Republic of Korea

    Tae-Hun Kim

  2. Department of Military Digital Convergence, Ajou University, Yeongtong-gu, 206, World cup-ro, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea

    Jongho Park

  3. Department of Electronic Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 1732, Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin, 17104, Republic of Korea

    Jong-Han Kim

Authors
  1. Tae-Hun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jongho Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jong-Han Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jong-Han Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, TH., Park, J. & Kim, JH. Computational Issues in Sparse and Dense Formulations of Integrated Guidance and Control with Constraints. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 21, 826–835 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00299-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-020-00299-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation