Skip to main content
Log in

Hydraulic Characteristics of Liquid Film Generated by Slit Injector

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liquid film generated by a jet slit injector on a wall was analyzed experimentally. Liquid film characteristics were investigated by measuring the liquid film thickness distribution for various experimental conditions. At first, the distributions were qualitatively analyzed using backlight imaging. Furthermore, quantitative measurements were performed using a liquid film thickness sensor based on the electric conductance method, which was applied to the high-speed wire-mesh method. The injection angle (15, 30, 45 °), jet velocity (7, 10.5, 13.5 m/s), and injection distance (45, 55, 65 mm) were varied, and the responses of the liquid film were observed. Having increased the injection angle, the main stream thickness decreased and the position of the maximum film thickness moved upstream. A faster jet velocity corresponded to a wider liquid film area and larger perturbation of the liquid film. The injection distance did not affect the characteristics of the liquid film considerably. A hydraulic jump effect was also observed, and a large hydraulic jump affected the film thickness distribution of the main stream. The results of this study can be applied to the development of liquid rocket engines or thrusters using the film-cooling method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

L l :

Liquid cooling film length

η :

Stability effectiveness factor

\( \dot{m}_{{\text{film}}}\) :

Mass flow rate of liquid film

D ch :

Diameter of cylindrical part of combustion chamber

C pl :

Specific heat at constant pressure of liquid coolant

T s :

Boiling point of coolant

T int :

Initial temperature of coolant

α :

Convective heat transfer coefficient

T gd :

Average temperature of combustion product

T g.ad :

Average value of temperature in the section where the liquid coolant exists

Q s :

Relative evaporation heat of liquid film

θ :

Injection angle

v :

Jet velocity

L :

Injection distance

References

  1. Dieter KH, David HH (1992) Modern engineering for design of liquid-propellant rocket engines. Am Inst Aeronaut Astron 10(2514/4):866197

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kim MS, Lee DM (2017) An experimental study of film cooling characteristics at supersonic free stream conditions. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 45(4):342–348. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2017.45.4.342

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim SM (2016) Numerical study on the effect of injection nozzle shape on the cooling performance in supersonic film cooling. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 44(8):641–648. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2016.44.8.641

    Google Scholar 

  4. Son CH, Park IS, Moon YW, Kim HJ, Huh HI (2006) Effects of finite-rate chemistry and film cooling on linear combustion-stability limit in liquid rocket engine. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 34(2):75–81

    Google Scholar 

  5. Park SJ, Choi SM, Sohn HS, Cho HH (2013) Effect of secondary flow direction on film cooling effectiveness. Trans KSME (B) 37(7):655–663. https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2013.37.7.655

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vorobyov AG (2010) Experimental theoretical model of thermal condition of bi-propellant small liquid rocket engine combustion chamber working on continuous mode. Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI)

  7. Bogacheva DY Modeling of small rocket engine internal film cooling by gas-phased eological clean propellant components. Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI)

  8. Portalski S (1963) Studies of falling liquid film flow film thickness on a smooth vertical plate. Chem Eng Sci 18(12):787–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(63)85046-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold R, Suslov D, Haidn O (2009) Experimental investigation of film cooling with tangential slot injection in a LOX/CH4 subscale rocket combustion chamber. Trans Japan Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 7:81–86. https://doi.org/10.2322/tstj.7.Pa_81

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vasilev AP, Kudryavtsev VM, Kuznetsov VA, Kurpatenkov VD, Obelnitskii AM (1969) Fundamentals of the theory and calculation of liquid rocket engines. Mach Trans Mono 2:285–588

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chudina Y (2014) Work processes in a small size GOx/GCH4 liquid rocket engine. Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI), 2014

  12. Lee HW, Lee HC, Kim TS, Ahn KB, Yoon YB (2018) Optimum design of a liquid film thickness measurement device using electric conductance for impingement liquid film. J Sens Sci Technol 27(6):386–391. https://doi.org/10.5369/JSST.2018.27.6.386

    Google Scholar 

  13. NASA (1977) Liquid rocket engine self-cooled combustion chambers. NASA-SP-8124, 1977

  14. Inamura T, Yanaoka H, Tomoda T (2004) Prediction of mean droplet size of sprays issued from wall impingement injector. Am Inst Aeronaut Astron 42(3):614–621. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lightfoot MDA, Schumaker SA, Narayanan V, Eilers B (2011) Injector-wall interactions in gas-centered swirl coaxial injectors. Joint Army Navy NASA Air Force Joint Subcommittee Meeting

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youngbin Yoon.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Jeong, G., Lee, H. et al. Hydraulic Characteristics of Liquid Film Generated by Slit Injector. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 20, 433–441 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-019-00167-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-019-00167-4

Keywords

Navigation