Skip to main content
Log in

Derivations of Knockdown Factors for Cylindrical Structures Considering Different Initial Imperfection Models and Thickness Ratios

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work conducts postbuckling analyses of axial-loaded cylinders and derives shell knockdown factors for the buckling design of space launch vehicle structures. Simple isotropic cylinders without stiffeners are considered as analysis models, and a commercial nonlinear finite element analysis code, ABAQUS, is used for the present postbuckling analyses. Two different methods, single perturbation load approach (SPLA) and multiple perturbation load approach (MPLA), are used for modeling the geometrically initial imperfection of a cylinder. In addition, various shell-thickness ratios (ratio of radius to thickness) are considered to derive knockdown factors using SPLA. In the postbuckling analyses, local and global bucklings are investigated and, using the obtained analysis results, the shell knockdown factors are derived for the buckling design of launch vehicle structures. The MPLA, with more perturbation loads, provides lower knockdown factors. Furthermore, for the three different thickness ratios, the knockdown factors derived using the SPLA all are higher than the values using NASA’s buckling design criteria, and they are nearly constant with respect to shell-thickness ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weingarten VI, Seide P, Peterson JP (1968) Buckling of thin-walled circular cylinders. In: NASA SP-8007

  2. Arbocz J, Starnes JH Jr (2002) Future directions and challenges in shell stability analysis. Thin Walled Struct 40(9):729–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hilburger M (2012) Developing the next generation shell buckling design factors and technologies. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference

  4. DESICOS Project (2018) http://www.desicos.eu. Accessed 12 Mar 2018

  5. Casado VM, Hinsch S, Gómez J, Castro GP (2014) Effect of initial geometrical imperfections on the buckling load of cylindrical sandwich shells under axial compression. In: 13th European conference on spacecraft structures, materials and environmental testing

  6. Arbelo MA, Degenhardt R, Castro SG, Zimmermann R (2014) Numerical characterization of imperfection sensitive composite structures. Compos Struct 108:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kriegesmann B, Jansen EL, Rolfes R (2016) Design of cylindrical shells by using the single perturbation load approach—potentials and application limits. Thin Walled Struct 108:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hühne C, Rolfes R, Breitbach E, Teßmer J (2008) Robust design of composite cylindrical shells under axial compression—simulation and validation. Thin Walled Struct 46:947–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haynie W, Hilburger M (2010) Comparison of methods to predict lower bound buckling loads of cylinders under axial compression. In: 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference

  10. Haynie W, Hilburger M, Bogge M, Maspoli M, Kriegesmann B (2012) Validation of lower-bound estimates for compression-loaded cylindrical shells. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference

  11. Hao P, Wang B, Li G, Meng Z, Tian K, Zeng D, Tang X (2014) Worst multiple perturbation load approach of stiffened shells with and without cutouts for improved knockdown factor. Thin Walled Struct 82:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White SC, Weaver PM, Wu KC (2015) Post-buckling analyses of variable-stiffness composite cylinders in axial compression. Compos Struct 123:190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by research on the preceding technologies for geostationary satellite launch vehicle of the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Sang Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sim, CH., Kim, HI., Lee, YL. et al. Derivations of Knockdown Factors for Cylindrical Structures Considering Different Initial Imperfection Models and Thickness Ratios. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 19, 626–635 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0069-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0069-4

Keywords

Navigation