Skip to main content
Log in

Design of the strength frame of the aerodynamic rudder using the topological optimization method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Aerospace Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An algorithm for designing a structural and technological solution of the aerodynamic rudder of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is proposed. The purpose of the work is to form the strength frame of the rudder with subsequent refinement taking into account technological limitations. The algorithm is based on the application of the topological optimization method for case of maximizing the static rigidity of the rudder structure with a volume restriction. For optimization, a rudder structure finite element model is created, boundary conditions and load are determined for two calculated cases. As a result of topological optimization, a constructive strength scheme of the rudder is obtained. To verify the study, calculations of the stress–strain state and natural vibration frequencies of the rudder structure are completed. Calculations of the stress–strain state, modal analysis and topological optimization are performed in the environment of the ANSYS Workbench 19.2 software package. Based on the optimization results, a rudder structure is designed that meets technological constraints and strength requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. The authors also confirm that all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang WH, Zhou L (2018) Topology optimization of self-supporting structures with polygon features for additive manufacturing. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 334:56–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.037

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang KQ, Cheng GD, Xu L (2019) Topology optimization considering overhang constraint in additive manufacturing. Comput Struct 212:86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meng L, Zhang WH, Quan DL et al (2020) From topology optimization design to additive manufacturing: today’s success and tomorrow’s roadmap. Arch Comput Methods Eng 27:805–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11831-019-09331-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xiong Y, Yao S, Zhao Z-L, Xie YM (2020) A new approach to eliminating enclosed voids in topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 32:101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.101006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Locatelli D, Mulani SB, Kapania RK (2011) Wing-box weight optimization using curvilinear spars and ribs (SpaRibs). J Aircr 48(5):1671–1684. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Q, Lu Z, Zhou C (2011) New topology optimization method for wing leading-edge ribs. J Aircr 48(5):1741–1748. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walker D, Liu D, Jennings A (2015) Topology optimization of an aircraft wing. AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct Struct Dyn Mater Conf. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rinku A, Ananthasuresh GK (2015) Topology and size optimization of modular ribs in aircraft wings. In: 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimisation, pp 1–6

  10. Zhao Y, Guo W, Duan S, Xing L (2017) A novel substructure-based topology optimization method for the design of wing structure. Int J Simul Multisci Des Optim 8:A5. https://doi.org/10.1051/smdo/2016013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bontoft EK, Toropov VV (2018) Topology optimisation of multi-element wingtip devices. ASC Struct Struct Dyn Mater Conf. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-1390.c1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stanford B (2018) Aeroelastic wingbox stiffener topology optimization. J Aircr 55:1244–1251. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Townsend S, Stanford B, Picelli R, Kim HA (2018) Structural optimization of plate-like aircraft wings under flutter and divergence constraints. AIAA J 56(8):1–13. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang X, Zhang S, Wan Z, Wang Z (2022) Aeroelastic topology optimization of wing structure based on moving boundary meshfree method. Symmetry 14(6):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das GK, Ranjan P, James KA (2022) 3D topology optimization of aircraft wings with conventional and non-conventional layouts: a comparative study. AIAA Aviat. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-3725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gomes P, Palacios R (2022) Aerostructural topology optimization using high fidelity modeling. Struct Multidiscip Optim 65:137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03234-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kambayashi K, Kogiso N, Yamada T, Izui K, Nishiwaki S, Tamayama M (2020) Multiobjective topology optimization for a multi-layered morphing flap considering multiple flight conditions. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 63(3):90–100. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.63.90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen PDL, Wang F, Dimino I, Sigmund O (2021) Topology optimization of large-scale 3D morphing wing structures. Actuators 10(9):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10090217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gu X, Yang K, Wu M, Zhang Y, Zhu J, Zhang W (2021) Integrated optimization design of smart morphing wing for accurate shape control. Chin J Aeronaut 34(1):135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Winyangkul S, Wansaseub K, Sleesongsom S, Panagant N, Kumar S, Bureerat S, Pholdee N (2021) Ground structures-based topology optimization of a morphing wing using a metaheuristic algorithm. Metals 11(8):1311. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11081311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Song L, Gao T, Tang L, Du X, Zhu J, Lin Y, Shi G, Liu H, Zhou G, Zhang W (2021) An all-movable rudder designed by thermo-elastic topology optimization and manufactured by additive manufacturing. Comput Struct 243:106405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bashin KA, Torsunov RA, Semenov SV (2017) Topology optimization methods in aerospace industry. PNRPU Aerosp Eng Bull 51:51–61. https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9982/2017.51.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Kupriyanova Yanina Alekseevna and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanina A. Kupriyanova or Sergey G. Parafes’.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kupriyanova, Y.A., Parafes’, S.G. Design of the strength frame of the aerodynamic rudder using the topological optimization method. AS 7, 123–130 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00233-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42401-023-00233-6

Keywords

Navigation