Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of Erector Spinae Plane Block in a Cognitively Disabled Scoliosis Adolescent Patient: a Case Report

  • Surgery
  • Published:
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analgesic requirement for the patients undergoing posterior stabilization and instrumentation surgery is important during preoperative and postoperative periods. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block has come into question in recent years for opioid-free anesthesia and also for postoperative analgesia. In this paper, we present a bilateral bi-level ESP blocks practice for a 15-year-old phenylketonuric and cognitively disabled scoliosis adolescent boy, which is the first study in the open literature to the best of our knowledge. We planned a bilateral bi-level ESP block practice for the adolescent patient scheduled to undergo the posterior instrumentation surgery involving 12 vertebral level (T3-L2). Bilateral single-injection ESP block was performed at two levels (T5 and T7) prior to incision. Intraoperatively, patient received intravenous propofol and remifentanyl infusions which were administered as total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) agents. FLACC (face, legs, activity, cry, consolability) scale was used to follow analgesic requirement postoperatively. The analgesic need was extremely low during postoperative 24-h follow-up, and a safe postoperative analgesia was provided for the opioid side effect-free patient. Bilateral bi-level ESP block is an easily applicable and a safe technique which could be chosen for cognitively disabled scoliosis adolescent patients as a part of multimodal analgesic regimen to avoid side effects of opioids and other invasive techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Katzer AM. Factors predicting postoperative pain in children and adolescents following spine fusion. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2000;23:83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgeat A, Blumenthal S. Postoperative pain management following scoliosis surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:313–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gall O, Aubineau J, Bernière J, et al. Analgesic effect of low-dose intrathecal morphine after spinal fusion in children. Anesthesiology. 2001;94:447–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taenzer AH, Clark C. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia in adolescent scoliosis surgery: a meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20:135–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:621–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT, et al. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine. 1997;22:1892–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perera AP, Chari A, Kostusiak M, Khan AA, Luoma AM, Casey ATH. Intramuscular local anesthetic infltration at closure for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine. 2017;42:1088–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chin KJ, Dinsmore MJ, Lewis S, Chan V. Opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia with bilateral bi-level erector spinae plane blocks in scoliosis surgery: a case report of two patients. Eur Spine J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06133-8.

  9. Melvin JP, Schrot RJ, Chu GM, Chin KJ. Low thoracic erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in lumbosacral spine surgery: a case series. Can J Anaesth. 2018;65:1057–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Diwan SM, Altinpulluk EY, Khurjekar K, Nair A, Dongre H, Turan A. Bilateral erector spinae plane block for scoliosis surgery: case series. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2020;67(3):153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A cadaveric study investigating the mechanism of action of erector spinae blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:567–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang HM, Choi YJ, Kwon HJ, Cho TH, Kim SH. Comparison of injectate spread and nerve involvement between retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks in the thoracic region: a cadaveric study. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:1244–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block: a magnetic resonance imaging and anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:756–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caruso TM, Lin C, O’Connell C, et al. Systemic absorption of Lidocaine from continuous erector spinae plane catheters after congenital cardiac surgery: a retrospective study. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.05.040.

  15. Walter JH. Vitamin B12 deficiency and phenylketonuria. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;104:52–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serpil Sehirlioglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sehirlioglu, S., Soylu, S. Application of Erector Spinae Plane Block in a Cognitively Disabled Scoliosis Adolescent Patient: a Case Report. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 3, 394–398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00693-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00693-3

Keywords

Navigation