Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role of Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Spine Surgery: a Review Article

  • Surgery
  • Published:
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last 20 years, there have been remarkable advances in the field of spine surgery. Ultrasonic bone scalpel is one of the most impactful advances. It is a unique surgical device which offers a controlled osteotomy which slices the hard bone while the soft tissues remain largely unaffected. The major benefits of using this modern instrument are the soft tissue sparing, controlled cutting, reduced bleeding, and thereby increasing the effectiveness. There are widespread studies in the literature propagating its use in various surgeries like thoracoplasties, osteotomies, vertebral column resections, laminectomies, corpectomies, laminotomy, facetectomy and scoliotic surgeries. It is one of the precise and finest instruments available for bone cutting which can be of great value while working near the vicinity of spinal cord, dura and nerve roots. Although not 100%, it can significantly minimise the risk of ripping the tissues as compared with osteotomes, Kerrison and the high-speed rotating burrs. It also has a distinct advantage of minimizing the thermal damage due to its attached irrigation component. Various studies have proven its efficiency in decreasing the operating time, increased fusion rates and decreasing the blood loss. Although it is a relatively easy technique to master on, a very basic training is required initially. So, we can safely say that ultrasonic bone scalpel is indispensable in the armamentarium of today’s spine surgeon where minimally invasive surgeries are swiping in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grochulla F, Vieweg U. Surgical motor systems in spinal surgery. In: Vieweg U, Grochulla F, editors. Manual of Spine Surgery [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 69–74. [cited 2019 Oct 14] Available from. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22682-3_11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bydon M, Macki M, Xu R, Ain MC, Ahn ES, Jallo GI. Spinal decompression in achondroplastic patients using high-speed drill versus ultrasonic bone curette: technical note and outcomes in 30 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014;34(8):780–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nasser R, Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Harrop JS, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, et al. Complications in spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(2):144–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ratliff JK, Lebude B, Albert T, Anene-Maidoh T, Anderson G, Dagostino P, et al. Complications in spinal surgery: comparative survey of spine surgeons and patients who underwent spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10(6):578–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakase H, Matsuda R, Shin Y, Park Y-S, Sakaki T. The use of ultrasonic bone curettes in spinal surgery. Acta Neurochir. 2006;148(2):207–12 discussion 212-213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakagawa H, Kim S-D, Mizuno J, Ohara Y, Ito K. Technical advantages of an ultrasonic bone curette in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(4):431–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vercellotti T. Technological characteristics and clinical indications of piezoelectric bone surgery. Minerva Stomatol. 2004;53(5):207–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Mahfoudh R, Mitchell PS, Wilby M, Crooks D, Barrett C, Pillay R, et al. Management of giant calcified thoracic disks and description of the trench vertebrectomy technique. Glob Spine J. 2016;6(6):584–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamburger C. T-laminoplasty--a surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Technical note. Acta Neurochir. 1995;132(1–3):131–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herman JM, Sonntag VK. Cervical corpectomy and plate fixation for postlaminectomy kyphosis. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(6):963–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1983;8(7):693–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ito K, Ishizaka S, Sasaki T, Miyahara T, Horiuchi T, Sakai K, et al. Safe and minimally invasive laminoplastic laminotomy using an ultrasonic bone curette for spinal surgery: technical note. Surg Neurol. 2009;72(5):470–5 discussion 475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park AE, Heller JG. Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion--surgical technique. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(4):265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuoka H, Itoh Y, Numazawa S, Tomii M, Watanabe K, Hirano Y, et al. Recapping hemilaminoplasty for spinal surgical disorders using ultrasonic bone curette. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3 [Internet] [cited 2019 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3385071/.

  15. Parker SL, Kretzer RM, Recinos PF, et al. Ultrasonic BoneScalpel for osteoplastic laminoplasty in the resection of intradural spinal pathology: case series and technical note. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(1 Suppl Operative):ons61–ons66. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e318283c98b.

  16. Onen MR, Yuvruk E, Akay S, Naderi S. The reliability of the ultrasonic bone scalpel in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study of 46 patients. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(6):1962–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shousha M, El-Saghir H, Boehm H. Corpectomy of the fifth lumbar vertebra, a challenging procedure. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27(6):347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu SS. Blood loss in adult spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dave BR, Degulmadi D, Dahibhate S, Krishnan A, Patel D. Ultrasonic bone scalpel: utility in cervical corpectomy. A technical note. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(2):380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barbanera A, Serchi E, Fiorenza V, Nina P, Andreoli A. Giant calcified thoracic herniated disc: considerations aiming a proper surgical strategy. J Neurosurg Sci. 2009;53(1):19–25 discussion 25-26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okada Y, Shimizu K, Ido K, Kotani S. Multiple thoracic disc herniations: case report and review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(3):183–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cornips EMJ, Janssen MLF, Beuls EAM. Thoracic disc herniation and acute myelopathy: clinical presentation, neuroimaging findings, surgical considerations, and outcome. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(4):520–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hott JS, Feiz-Erfan I, Kenny K, Dickman CA. Surgical management of giant herniated thoracic discs: analysis of 20 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(3):191–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine. 2000;25(3):389–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Morimoto D, Isu T, Kim K, Sugawara A, Matsumoto R, Isobe M. Microsurgical medial fenestration with an ultrasonic bone curette for lumbar foraminal stenosis. J Nippon Med Sch. 2012;79(5):327–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen H-T, Hsu C-C, Lu M-L, Chen S-H, Chen J-M, Wu R-W. Effects of combined use of ultrasonic bone scalpel and hemostatic matrix on perioperative blood loss and surgical duration in degenerative thoracolumbar spine surgery [Internet]. Biomed Res Int. 2019; [cited 2019 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2019/6286258/.

  27. Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Use of an ultrasonic osteotome device in spine surgery: experience from the first 128 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(12):2845–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brooks AT, Nelson CL, Stewart CL, Skinner RA, Siems ML. Effect of an ultrasonic device on temperatures generated in bone and on bone-cement structure. J Arthroplast. 1993;8(4):413–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hazer DB, Yaşar B, Rosberg H-E, Akbaş A. Technical aspects on the use of ultrasonic bone shaver in spine surgery: experience in 307 patients [Internet]. Biomed Res Int. 2016; [cited 2019 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/8428530/ref/.

  30. Kim K, Isu T, Matsumoto R, Isobe M, Kogure K. Surgical pitfalls of an ultrasonic bone curette (Sonopet) in spinal surgery. Oper Neurosurg. 2006;59(suppl_4):ONS-390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gleizal A, Bera J-C, Lavandier B, Beziat J-L. Piezoelectric osteotomy: a new technique for bone surgery-advantages in craniofacial surgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23(5):509–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bydon M, Xu R, Papademetriou K, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky J-P, Witham TF, et al. Safety of spinal decompression using an ultrasonic bone curette compared with a high-speed drill: outcomes in 337 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(6):627–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India

    Vishal Kumar, Deepak Neradi, Amit Kumar Salaria, Ashish Dagar, Sarvdeep Singh Dhatt & Karan Jindal

Authors
  1. Vishal Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deepak Neradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amit Kumar Salaria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashish Dagar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sarvdeep Singh Dhatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Karan Jindal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Neradi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This is a review article; no human or animal participants are involved in this study, so we did not need an ethical approval.

Informed Consent

Our study does not involve any human participants; hence, we did not need any informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Neradi, D., Salaria, A.K. et al. Role of Ultrasonic Bone Scalpel in Spine Surgery: a Review Article. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2, 1883–1889 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00466-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00466-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation