Abstract
Peer victimization is prevalent among college-aged students, yet no study to our knowledge has examined various strategies of defending peers from victimization among this population. This study investigated the associations between multiple defending strategies (i.e., direct, indirect, including prosocial and aggressive defending), how moral disengagement and perception of harm were associated with multiple defending strategies, and gender differences in these associations. Participants were 372 ethnically diverse college students (18–53 years old, M = 21.24, SD = 4.13; 76% women) from a medium-sized university who watched two short videos depicting events of peer victimization and answered questions about how they would respond. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the associations between key variables, and multi-group modeling was used to assess gender differences in defending responses predicted by moral disengagement and perception of harm. Results showed that college students used both prosocial and aggressive defending strategies. Moral disengagement and perception of harm were associated in generally expected ways with defending strategies, but the associations differed across victimization scenarios and participant gender. Interventions to encourage college students to defend should stress the use of prosocial rather than aggressive strategies and be tailored to differences in defending responses based on form of victimization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeida, A., Correia, I., & Marinho, S. (2009). Moral disengagement, normative beliefs of peer group, and attitudes regarding roles in bullying. Journal of School Violence, 9, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220903185639B.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364.
Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: empathy and social cognitive factors. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410396746.
Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., & Hyde, C. T. (2013). Children’s physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Development, 84, 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01839.x.
Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2014). Cyberbullying on social network sites. An experimental study into bystanders’ behavioural intentions to help the victim or reinforce the bully. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.036.
Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.817.
Bellmore, A., Ma, T.-L., You, J.-I., & Hughes, M. (2012). A two-method investigation of early adolescents’ responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1265–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.012.
Brody, N., & Vangelisti, A. L. (2016). Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. Communication Monographs, 83, 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1044256.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.45.
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.
Chapell, M., Casey, D., De la Cruz, C., Ferrell, J., Forman, J., Lipkin, R., Newsham, M., Sterling, M., & Whittaker, S. (2004). Bullying in college by students and teachers. Adolescence, 39, 53–64.
Delprato, M., Akyeampong, K., & Dunne, M. (2017). The impact of bullying on students’ learning in Latin America: a matching approach for 15 countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.002.
Espelage, D., Green, H., & Polanin, J. (2012). Willingness to intervene in bullying episodes among middle school students individual and peer-group influences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 776–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431611423017.
Ferreira, P. C., Simão, A. V., Ferreira, A., Souza, S., & Francisco, S. (2016). Student bystander behavior and cultural issues in cyberbullying: when actions speak louder than words. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.059.
Forrest, S., Eatough, V., & Shevlin, M. (2005). Measuring adult indirect aggression: the development and psychometric assessment of the indirect aggression scales. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20074.
Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/14679507.00178.
Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Turner, H. A. (2015). Victim reports of bystander reactions to in-person and online peer harassment: a national survey of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2308–2320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0342-9.
Ladd, G. W., Ettekal, I., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school: differential pathways for children’s school engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000177.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026570.
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
Ma, T., & Bellmore, A. (2016). Early adolescents' responses upon witnessing peer victimization: a cross-culture comparison between students in Taiwan and the United States. International Journal of Developmental Science, 10, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-150176
Ma, T., & Chen, W. (2017). The benefits of being defended: perceived bystander participant roles and victims’ emotional and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of School Violence, 40, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2017.1387132.
McCreary, G. R. (2012). The impact of moral judgment and moral disengagement on hazing attitudes and bystander behavior in college males. Tuscaloosa, AL: Unpublished doctoral dissertation The University of Alabama.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Meter, D. J. (2015). Aggressive, assertive and non-confrontational forms of defending: Differentiation of forms and consequences of defending. Tucson, AZ: Unpublished doctoral dissertation The University of Arizona.
Meter, D. J., & Card, N. A. (2015). Defenders of victims of peer aggression: Interdependence theory and an exploration of individual, interpersonal, and contextual effects on the defender participant role. Developmental Review, 38, 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.08.001.
Nakamoto, J., & Schwartz, D. (2010). Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta-analytic review. Social Development, 19, 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00539.x.
Obermann, M.-L. (2011). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10, 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2011.578276.
Oh, I., & Hazler, R. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders' reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309106499.
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79, 1288–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01189.x.
Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salmivalli, C. (2012). Standing up for the victim, siding with the bully or standing by? Bystander responses in bullying situations. Social Development, 21, 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2012.00662.x.
Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: a multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83, 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x.
Pronk, J., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., De Mey, L., & Willemen, A. M. (2013). Children's intervention strategies in situations of victimization by bullying: social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.002.
Pronk, J., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2014). Factors influencing interventions on behalf of victims of bullying: a counterfactual approach to the social cognitions of outsiders and defenders. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 36, 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614562836.
Reid, G. M., Holt, M. K., Bowman, C. E., Espelage, D. L., & Green, J. G. (2016). Perceived social support and mental health among first-year college students with histories of bullying victimization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 3331–3341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0477-7.
Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Aleva, L., & van der Meulen, M. (2016). Defending victimized peers: opposing the bully, supporting the victim, or both? Aggressive Behavior, 42, 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21653.
Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342047.
Rospenda, K. M., Richman, J. A., Wolff, J. M., & Burke, L. A. (2013). Bullying victimization among college students: negative consequences for alcohol use. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 32, 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2013.849971.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AIDAB1>3.0.CO;2-T.
Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: a two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)24:3<205::AID-AB5>3.0.CO;2-J.
Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Victims and their defenders: a dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410378068.
Thornberg, R., Pozzoli, T., Gianluca, G., & Jungert, T. (2015). Unique and interactive effects of moral emotions and moral disengagement on bullying and defending among school children. The Elementary School Journal, 116, 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/683985.
Verona, E., Sadeh, N., Case, S. M., Reed, A., II, & Bhattacharjee, A. (2008). Self-reported use of different forms of aggression in late adolescence and emerging adulthood. Assessment, 15, 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191108318250.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meter, D.J., Ma, TL. & Ehrenreich, S.E. Telling, Comforting, and Retaliating: the Roles of Moral Disengagement and Perception of Harm in Defending College-Aged Victims of Peer Victimization. Int Journal of Bullying Prevention 1, 124–135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-018-0006-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-018-0006-x