Skip to main content
Log in

Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological model: a theoretical framework to explore the forest school approach?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing number of empirical research studies outline the benefits of the forest school approach in educational settings through the documentation of the progression of the social, emotional and physical well-being of participating children. However, recent publications claim that earlier studies lack robust research approaches. It is argued that forest school is currently under-theorised in outdoor education and there is a need to deepen the research-based understanding of this approach. This paper explores the Bio-Ecological (Bronfenbrenner 1979; Bronfenbrenner and Morris 1998, 2006) model as a framework that may be applied to research regarding the forest school approach to ensure that it is rigorous and robust in its approach to the collection and analysis of the empirical data. This paper outlines how future research may record the child’s voice through the consideration of their cultural context for future forest school practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktepe, V. (2015). Implementation of a performance task for developing the value of love of nature. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(3), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.3.2395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F. (2017). Bringing outdoor play indoors in United Arab Emirates: mud as a powerful binding element. Childhood Education, 93(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2017.1275245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrable, A., & Arvanitis, A. (2018). Flourishing in the forest: looking at forest school through a self-determination theory Lens. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 22, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-018-0018-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, H. (2003). Outdoor play in the early years: Management and innovation. London: Fulton.

  • Bridgewater and Taunton College (n.d.) Forest School, Retrieved from: www.bridgwater.ac.uk/forestschool. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak & K. Fischer (Eds.), Scientific environments (pp. 3–44). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). ‘Developmental Ecology through Space and Time: A Future Perspective’, in P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., and K. Lüscher, eds., Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development. American Psychological Association, Retrieved From: https://doi.org/10.1037/10176-018, 619–647.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human, bioecological perspectives on human development. London: Sage.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1993). Heredity, environment and the question “how?” a new theoretical perspective for the 1990s. In R. Plomin & G. E. McClearn (Eds.), Nature, nurture and psychology (pp. 313–324). Washington DC: American Psychological Society.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized: a bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology Vol 1, theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner & W. E. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol 1, theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J. K., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2019). Learning while playing: children’s school experiences in the UK. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/berg.3491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, F., & Nash, M. (2015). An Australian perspective of a forest school: shaping a sense of place to support learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(4), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2015.1010071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, G. (2012). Pedagogical documentation: A practice for negotiation and democracy. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children (3rd ed., pp. 225–233). Oxford: England.

  • Dowdell, K., Gray, T., & Malone, K. (2011). Nature and its influence on children’s outdoor play. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 15(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400925.

  • Edwards, C. (2012). Teacher and learner, partner and guide: The role of the teacher. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, and G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children (3rd ed., pp. 147-172). Oxford: England.

  • Elliott, H. (2015). Forest school in an inner city? Making the impossible possible. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 3–13, 43(6), 722–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2013.872159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ephgrave, A. (2018). Planning in the moment with young children: A practical guide for early years practitioners and parents. London: Routledge.

  • Faarlund, N. (2007). Defining Friluftsliv. In B. Henderson and N. Vikander (Eds.) Nature first: Outdoor life the Friluftsliv way (pp. 56-61). Ontario: Natural Heritage Books.

  • Forest School Association (n.d.) History of forest school. Retrieved from http://https://www.forestschoolassociation.org/history-of-forest-school/. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • Frankel, S. (2018). Giving children a voice. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Howe: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R. (2017). Playful learning in natural outdoor environments. In G. Walsh, D. McMillan and C. McGuinness (Eds.), Playful teaching and learning. London: Sage, 116–132.

  • Haas, C., & Ashman, G. (2014). Kindergarten children’s introduction to sustainability through transformative, experiential nature play. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911403900204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2008). Outdoor play and the pedagogic garden. In J. Moyles (Ed.), The excellence of play (2nd ed., pp. 138–153). Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F. (2017). The nature of learning at forest school practitioners’ perspectives. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 3–13, 45(2), 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1078833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N., O’Toole, L., & Halpenny, A. M. (2017). Introducing Bronfenbrenner. Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, V., & Wickett, K. (2017). Very young children learning outdoors: Its place in the schooling system. In S. Waite (Ed.), Children learning outside the classroom: From birth to eleven (2nd ed., pp. 69–82). London: Sage.

  • Irish Forest School Association (2019). Key features of forest school. Retrieved from https://irishforestschoolassociation.ie/key-features-of-forest-school/. Accessed 15 Nov 2019.

  • Kernan, M., & Devine, D. (2010). Being confined within? Constructions of the good childhood and outdoor play in early childhood education and care settings in Ireland. Children & Society, 24, 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00249.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (2011). Forest school and outdoor learning in the early years. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S. (2013). Forest school and outdoor learning in the early years (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

  • Knight, S. (2018). Translating forest school: A response to leather. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0010-5.

  • Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305.

  • Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500450144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leather, M. (2013). Lost in translation: A critique of ‘forest school’ in the UK. In M. Brown and M. Boyes (Eds.), Future faces: Outdoor education research innovations and visions, conference proceedings, (pp. 93-97), Retrieved from https://www.otago.ac.nz/cs/groups/public/@outdooreducation/documents/contributorpdf/otago075564.pdf.

  • Leather, M. (2018). A critique of "Forest School" or something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0006-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Hammond, L., & Jackson-Barrett, E. (2013). Aboriginal children’s participation and engagement in bush school. In S. Knight (Ed.), International perspectives on forest school: Natural spaces to play and learn (pp. 131–145). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A., Truong, S., & Gray, T. (2018). ‘Place-based outdoor learning: more than a drag and drop approach’, Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21, 45–60, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-017-0002-5.

  • Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. New York: Workman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder, M. (2017). Footprints in the woods, tracking a nursery child through a forest school session. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 3–13, 45(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1069368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, T. (2007). Encounters with forest school and foucault: A risky business? Education, 35(4), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270701602640.

  • Maynard, T., & Waters, J. (2007). Learning in the outdoor environment: a missed opportunity? Early Years, an International Research Journal, 27(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140701594400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCree, M. (2019). When forest school isn’t forest school. In M. Sackville-Ford & H. Davenport (Eds.), Critical issues in forest schools (pp. 3–21). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, A. (2013). Calm, active and focused: Children's responses to an organic outdoor learning environment. Learning Environment Research, 16, 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. C. (2018). Exploring the ‘construction’ strand in the Irish primary school visual arts curriculum through the forest school approach. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1443481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. (2009). Learning outdoors: the forest school approach. Education, 37(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, L. (2016). A bio-ecological perspective on educational Transition: Experiences of Children, Parents and Teachers. Doctoral Thesis, Technological University Dublin, Available: 10.21427/D7GP4Z.

  • Owens, P. (2005). Children’s environmental values in the early schools years. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14(4), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040508668366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research, bridging the conceptual, theoretical and methodological. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgers, N., Knowles, Z., & Sayers, J. (2012). Encouraging play in the natural environment: A child-focused case study of forest school. Children’s Geographies, 10(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.638176.

  • Rinaldi, C. (2012). The pedagogy of listening: The listening perspective from Reggio Emilia. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children (3rd ed., pp. 233–247). Oxford: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2011). The restorative outcomes of forest school and conventional school in young people with good and poor behaviour. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozsahegyi, T. (2018). Bronfenbrenner’s ‘bio-ecological’ model and its application to understanding children’s development. In Z. Brown & S. Ward (Eds.), Contemporary issues in childhood, a bio-ecological approach (pp. 3–14). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M., Lowery, C., & Bland, K. (2013). Evaluating the impact of forest schools: A collaboration between a university and a primary school. British Journal of Learning Support, 28(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12020.

  • Swarbrick, N., Eastwood, G., & Tutton, K. (2004). Self-esteem and successful interaction as part of the forest school project. Support for Learning, 19(3), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0268-2141.2004.00337.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2013). Reconfiguring the natures of childhood. Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turtle, C., Convery, I., & Convery, K. (2015). Forest schools and environmental attitudes: A case study of children aged 8–11 years. Congent Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1100103.

  • Waite, S., & Pratt, N. (2017). Theoretical perspectives on learning outside the classroom: Relationships between learning and place. In S. Waite (Ed.), Children learning outside the classroom: From birth to eleven (2nd ed., pp. 7–22). London: Sage.

  • Waite, S., Bolling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2015). Comparing apples and pears a conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of english forest schools and Danish Udeskole. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 868–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1075193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. D. (2017). Teach like Finland: 33 simple strategies for joyful classrooms. New York: W.W. Morton and Company.

  • Wattchow, B., & Brown, M. (2011). A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world. Clayton: Monash University.

  • Wilson, R. (2007). Nature and young children: Encouraging creative play and learning in natural environments. London: Routledge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Claire Murphy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murphy, M.C. Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological model: a theoretical framework to explore the forest school approach?. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 23, 191–205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00056-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00056-5

Keywords

Navigation