Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-fidelity prediction model for vertical bending moment and total longitudinal stress of a ship based on composite neural network

  • Special Column on the 33rd NCHD-Second Part (Guest Editor Zheng Ma)
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In ship engineering, the prediction of vertical bending moment (VBM) and total longitudinal stress (TLS) during ship navigation is of utmost importance. In this work, we propose a new prediction paradigm, the multi-fidelity regression model based on multi-fidelity data and artificial neural network (MF-ANN). Specifically, an ANN is used to learn the fundamental physical laws from low-fidelity data and construct an initial input-output model. The predicted values of this initial model are of low accuracy, and then the high-fidelity data are utilized to establish a correction model that can correct the low-fidelity prediction values. Hence, the overall accuracy of prediction can be improved significantly. The feasibility of the multi-fidelity regression model is demonstrated by predicting the VBM, and the robustness of the model is evaluated at the same time. The prediction of TLS on the deck indicates that just a small amount of high-fidelity data can make the prediction accuracy reach a high level, which further illustrates the validity of the proposed MF-ANN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eliopoulou E., Papanikolaou A., Voulgarellis M. Statistical analysis of ship accidents and review of safety level [J]. Safety Science, 2016, 85: 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weng J., Yang D. Investigation of shipping accident injury severity and mortality [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2015, 76: 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zanic V. Methods and concepts for the multi-criteria synthesis of ship structures [J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2013, 8(3–4): 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paik J. K., Frieze P. A. Ship structural safety and reliability [J]. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2001, 3(2): 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou L., Zong Z., Li J. A numerical study of hydrodynamic influence on collision of brash ice with a structural plate [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2022, 34(1): 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lakshmynarayanana P. A., Temarel P. Fully coupled CFD/FEA investigations to predict the wave loads on a flexible containership [C]. 8th International Conference on Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology, Seoul, Korea, 2018.

  7. Takami T., Komoriyama Y., Ando T. et al. Efficient FORM-based extreme value prediction of nonlinear ship loads with an application of reduced-order model for coupled CFD and FEA [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2020, 25(2): 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iijima K., Ueda R., Fujikubo M. Numerical investigation into uncertainty of wave-induced vibration of large container ships due to ship operation [C]. 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Trondheim, Norway, 2017.

  9. Yang B., Pei Z., Wu W. Stress-distribution characteristics of cruise ship based on multiple-beam method [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 112646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huynh V. V. Prediction the ultimate longitudinal strength of intact ship by finite element method [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications, 2015, 3(1–3): 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fonseca N., Guedes Soares C. Experimental investigation of the nonlinear effects on the vertical motions and loads of a containership in regular waves [J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2004, 48(2): 118–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X., Hu J., Gu X. et al. Wave loads investigation of a VLCC by experimental and theoretical methods [C]. 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 2014.

  13. Yang S., Shi L., Chen D. et al. Development of ship structure health monitoring system based on IOT technology [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, 69: 012178.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fang P., Zecong W., Zhang X. Vehicle automatic driving system based on embedded and machine learning [C]. 2020 International Conference on Computer Vision, Image and Deep Learning (CVIDL), Chongqing, China, 2020, 281–284.

  15. Ghazal T. M., Hasan M. K., Alshurideh M. T. et al. LOT for smart cities: Machine learning approaches in smart healthcare—A review [J]. Future Internet, 2021, 13(8): 218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaihar J., Lingayat N., Vijaybhai P. S. et al. Smart home automation using machine learning algorithms [C]. 2020 International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), Belgaum, India, 2020, 1–4.

  17. Huang L., Pena B., Liu Y. et al. Machine learning in sustainable ship design and operation: A review [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 112907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rawson A., Brito M., Sabeur Z. et al. A machine learning approach for monitoring ship safety in extreme weather events [J]. Safety Science, 2021, 141: 105336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim Y. R., Jung M., Park J. B. Development of a fuel consumption prediction model based on machine learning using ship in-service data [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021, 9(2): 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kukreja H., Bharath N., Siddesh C. S. et al. An introduction to artificial neural network [J]. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 2016, 1(5): 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun S., Chen W., Wang L. et al. On the depth of deep neural networks: a theoretical view [C]. 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Phoenix, USA, 2016.

  22. Forrester A. I. J., Sóbester A., Keane A. J. Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modeling [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2007, 463(2088): 3251–3269.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Raissi M., Perdikaris P., Karniadakis G. E. Inferring solutions of differential equations using noisy multi-fidelity data [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2017, 335: 736–746.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernández-Godino M. G., Park C., Kim N. H. et al. Review of multi-fidelity models [J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(5): 2039–2054.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meng X., Karniadakis G. E. A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 401: 109020.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research received other funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Gao.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Project supported by the National Key Research amd Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFA0405700).

Biography: Cai-xia Jiang (1983-), Female, Master

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Cx., Liu, Yb., Wang, Zy. et al. A multi-fidelity prediction model for vertical bending moment and total longitudinal stress of a ship based on composite neural network. J Hydrodyn 35, 27–35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0008-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0008-0

Key words

Navigation