Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of ship maneuvering simulation with different propeller models

  • Special Column on the 5th CMHL Symposium 2022 (Guest Editor De-Cheng Wan)
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the assessment of ship maneuvering simulation using different propeller models with the focus on a simplified propeller model that represents the action of the propeller by body force and uses propeller performance curve to determine propeller loading during ship maneuvering. Simulations are also performed with an actual propeller approach with which the propeller rotation is simulated directly with the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equation (RANSE) solver. Both time accurate simulations using sliding grid and rotating frame approximations have been performed for comparison. The zigzag and turning circle maneuvers in calm water have been simulated for two different ship models, namely the ONR tumblehome (ONRT) test case and the KRISO (Korea Research Institute of Ship and Ocean) Container Ship (KCS) test case. Predicted ship motion is compared with measurement data to assess the accuracy of the numerical prediction using RANSE computations with different propeller models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guilmineau E., Deng G., Queutey P. et al. URANS simulations of planar motion mechanism for two hulls [C]. Workshop on Verification and Validation of Ship Manoeuvering Simulation Methods (SIMMAN-2014), Lyngby, Denmark, 2014.

  2. Deng G., Leroyer A., Guilmineau E. et al. Verification and validation of resistance and propulsion computation [C]. Proceedings of Tokyo 2015-A Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Tokyo, Japan, 2015.

  3. Guilmineau E., Deng G., Leroyer A. et al. Numerical simulations for the wake prediction of a marine propeller in straight-ahead flow and oblique flow [J]. Journal of Fluid Engineering, 2018, 140(2): 021111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhushan S., Yoon H., Stern F. et al. Assessment of CFD for surface combatant 5415 at straight ahead and static drift β = 20° [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2019, 141(5): 051101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Queutey P., Visonneau M. An interface capturing method for free-surface hydrodynamic flows [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2007, 36(9): 1482–1510,.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wackers J., Koren B., Raven H. C. et al. Free-surface viscous flow solution methods for ship hydrodynamics [J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2011, 18(1): 1–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hay A., Leroyer A., Visonneau M. H-adaptative Navier-Stokes simulations of free-surface flows around moving bodies [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2006, 11(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Queutey P., Wackers J., Leroyer A. Dynamic behaviour of the loads of podded propellers in waves: experimental and numerical simulations [C]. The 33nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 2014.

  9. Gao X., Deng G. To evaluate the influence of DOF on maneuvering predictions by direct CFD zig simulations [C]. VIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, Göteborg, Sweden, 2019.

  10. Wackers J., Deng G. B., Leroyer A. et al. Adaptive grid refinement for hydrodynamic flows [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2012, 55: 85–100.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wackers J., Deng G., Guilmineau E. et al. Combined refinement criteria for anisotropic grid refinement in free-surface flow simulation [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2014, 92: 209–222.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Araki M., Sadat-Hosseini H., Sanada Y. et al. Estimating maneuvering coefficients using system identification methods with experimental, system-based, and CFD free-running trial data [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 51: 64–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elshiekh H. A. Maneuvering characteristics in calm water and regular waves for ONR Tumblehome [D]. Master Thesis, Iowa, USA: The University of Iowa, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Deng G., Leroyer A., Guilmineau E. et al. Effect of turbulence modelization in hull-rudder interaction simulation [C]. Proceedings of the 30th National Conference on Hydrodynamics and15th National Congress on Hydrodynamics, Hefei, China, 2019.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was made possible thanks to granted access to the HPC resources of CINES and IDRIS computing centers under the allocation A0072A01308 made by Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif (GENCI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganbo Deng.

Additional information

Biography: Ganbo Deng, Male, Ph. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, G., Queutey, P., Wackers, J. et al. Assessment of ship maneuvering simulation with different propeller models. J Hydrodyn 34, 422–433 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0039-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0039-y

Key words

Navigation