Skip to main content
Log in

The management and financial implications of variable responses to grapevine leafroll disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 (GLRaV-3) is a worldwide pathogen of Vitis negatively affecting wine production. In red berry cultivars grown in New Zealand, the foliar changes to GLRaV-3-infected vines inform decisions on vine removal (roguing). However, roguing does not always contain GLRaV-3 spread in the presence of an insect vector like the mealybug, Pseudococcus calceolariae. Virus incidence and mealybug abundance data collected annually over 7 years were modelled under differing scenarios to ascertain support for roguing. In a simulated 1 ha vineyard planted in 2500 mature Merlot vines, simulations over 20 years evaluated the effectiveness of roguing, ‘rogue 1 + 2’ (concurrent roguing of symptomatic plus both within-row neighbouring vines), inefficient roguing (50% of symptomatic vines rogued), and ‘no-action’. The model used variable initial GLRaV-3 incidence (0.4, 5, 10, 15 and 20%), and low, median and high vector densities (6, 26 and 75 mealybugs per 100 vine leaves, respectively). Roguing was the optimal response to GLRaV-3, independent of the initial incidence, but results were vector density dependent. At a low vector density, roguing relative to the other responses tested, sustained the lowest annual GLRaV-3 incidence, the least need to plant replacement vines and the lowest estimated average annual costs plus loss of income. At median and high vector densities, roguing remained the most favourable response but virus control was less effective and the costs incurred were higher. Thus, for vineyards affected by GLRaV-3, achieving economic sustainability relies on integrating efficient roguing with effective vector management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida RPP, Daane KM, Bell VA, Blaisdell GK, Cooper ML, Herrbach E, Pietersen G (2013) Ecology and management of grapevine leafroll disease. Front Microbiol 4(94):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew R, Bell V, Hoskins N, Pietersen G, Thompson C (eds) (2015) Leafroll 3 virus and how to manage it. New Zealand Winegrowers. Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Atallah SS, Gomez MI, Fuchs MF, Martinson TE (2012) Economic impact of Grapevine leafroll disease on Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet franc in Finger Lakes vineyards of New York. Am J Enol Vitic 63:73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell VA, Chooi KM, Blouin AG, Cohen D, Pietersen G, MacDiarmid R (2015) GLRaV-3 in New Zealand: biological impact and timing of the symptoms influences on the management strategies. 18th Congress of the International Council for the Study of Virus and Virus-like Diseases of the Grapevine (ICVG), Ankara, Turkey, 7–11 September 2015

  • Bell VA, Blouin AG, Cohen D, Hedderley DI, Oosthuisen T, Spreeth N, Lester PJ, Pietersen G (2017) Visual symptom identification of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 in red berry cultivars supports virus management by roguing. J Plant Pathol 99(2):477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell VA, Hedderley DI, Pietersen G, Lester PJ (2018) Vineyard-wide control of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3 requires an integrated response. J Plant Pathol 100(3):399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golino D, Sim ST, Gill R, Rowhani A (2002) California mealybugs can spread grapevine leafroll disease. Calif Agric 56:196–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maree HJ, Almeida RPP, Bester R, Chooi K, Cohen D, Dolja VV, Fuchs MF, Golino DA, Jooste AEC, Martelli GP, Naidu RA, Rowhani A, Saldarelli P, Burger JT (2013) Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3. Front Microbiol 4:82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo-Bell & Company Limited (2006) The Economic effects and financial impacts of GLRaV3. Report for New Zealand Winegrowers, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Petersen CL, Charles JG (1997) Transmission of grapevine leafroll-associated virus closteroviruses by Pseudococcus longispinus and P. calceolariae. Plant Pathol 46:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietersen G, Spreeth N, Oosthuizen T, van Rensberg A, van Rensberg M, Lottering D, Rossouw N, Tooth D (2013) Control of grapevine leafroll disease spread at a commercial wine estate in South Africa: a case study. Am J Enol Vitic 64:296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietersen G, Bell VA, Krüger K (2017) Management of Grapevine Leafroll Disease and Associated Vectors in Vineyards. In: Meng B, Martelli GP (eds) Grapevine Viruses: Molecular Biology, Diagnostics and Management. Fuchs M. Springer International Publishing, Golino DA, pp 531–560

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts KD, Gomez MI, Atallah SS, Fuchs MF, Martinson TE, Battany MC, Bettinga LJ, Cooper ML, Verdegaal PS, Smith RJ (2015) Reducing the economic impact of grapevine leafroll disease in California: identifying optimal disease management strategies. Am J Enol Vitic 66:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisterson MS, Stenger DC (2013) Roguing with replacement in perennial crops: conditions for successful disease management. Phytopathology 103:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge joint funding for this research from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and New Zealand Winegrowers Research Centre Limited (NZWRC), Blenheim, New Zealand. We would like to acknowledge the support of Simon Hooker, Will Kerner, and Nick Hoskins (all of NZWRC). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments, and Duncan Hedderley and Andrew McLachlan (both of Plant and Food Research) for reviewing an earlier version of this manuscript. Finally, we are grateful for the support of the vineyard owners and viticulture personnel who allowed us to access their properties over multiple years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vaughn A. Bell.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors are unaware of any conflicts of interest or competing interests likely to affect publication of this research; Data availability – the data presented in this paper are owned by New Zealand Winegrowers Research Centre Limited.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 12.8 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bell, V.A., Lester, P.J., Pietersen, G. et al. The management and financial implications of variable responses to grapevine leafroll disease. J Plant Pathol 103, 5–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-020-00736-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-020-00736-7

Keywords

Navigation