Abstract
The consideration of wind loads in the development of lateral load-resisting systems for tall buildings is of utmost importance, given their vulnerability to such loads. Hence, in the design of tall buildings, a meticulous evaluation of wind loads is imperative. To tackle this issue, aerodynamic modifications can be deployed as effective techniques to mitigate wind loads. Building shape and size are also significant parameters that influence wind loads on tall buildings, which can be experimentally measured in wind tunnels and computationally analyzed using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). In this study, the average surface pressure coefficient is computed for various polygonal building models under different Angle of Attack (AOA) conditions. The average surface pressure coefficient varies among the different faces of the building models. One variable is the position of the building surfaces from the centreline of the frontal face, expressed as a percentage, while the other variables are the side number of the polygon (N) and AOA. The average surface pressure coefficient is measured for different scenarios and positions, and the results are utilized to train an Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The ANN training demonstrates a commendable conformity between the predicted models and the input data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alshihri, M. M., Azmy, A. M., & El-Bisy, M. S. (2009). Neural networks for predicting compressive strength of structural lightweight concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 23(6), 2214–2219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.012
Amin, J. A., & Ahuja, A. K. (2013). Effects of Side Ratio on Wind-Induced Pressure Distribution on Rectangular Buildings. Journal of Structures, 2013, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/176739
Amin, J. A., & Ahuja, A. K. (2014). Characteristics of wind forces and responses of rectangular tall buildings. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 6(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-014-0066-1
AS/NZS:1170.2(2011). (2011). Structural Design Actions - Part 2: Wind actions. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, Sydney
ASCE: 7–16(2017). (2017). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineering, Reston. In AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS,Reston. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780872629042
Assainar, N., & Dalui, S. K. (2021). Aerodynamic analysis of pentagon-shaped tall buildings. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00296-2
Bhattacharyya, B., & Dalui, S. K. (2018). Investigation of mean wind pressures on ‘E’ plan shaped tall building. Wind and Structures, An International Journal, 26(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2018.26.2.099
Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T., & Carmeliet, J. (2007). CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: Wall function problems. Atmospheric Environment, 41(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.019
GB 50009–2001. (2002). NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.
Ghosh, S. K., & Fanella, D. A. (1 C.E.). Seismic and Wind Design of Concrete Buildings: (2000 IBC, ASCE 7–98, ACI 318–99) (p. 504). p. 504.
Goyal, P. K., Kumari, S., Singh, S., Saroj, R. K., Meena, R. K., & Raj, R. (2022). Numerical Study of Wind Loads on Y Plan-Shaped Tall Building Using CFD. Civil Engineering Journal, 8(02), 263–277.
Hansen, S. O. (2013). Wind Loading Design Codes. In Fifty Years of Wind Engineering.
IS: 875 (2015). (2015). Indian Standard design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures-code of practice,part 3(wind loads). In BIS, New Delhi.
Kaveh, A., Bakhshpoori, T., & Hamze-Ziabari, S. M. (2018). GMDH-based prediction of shear strength of FRP-RC beams with and without stirrups. Computers and Concrete, 22(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.2.197
Kaveh, A., Gholipour, Y., & Rahami, H. (2008). Optimal design of transmission towers using genetic algorithm and neural networks. International Journal of Space Structures, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1260/0266-3511.23.1.1
Kaveh, A., & Iranmanesh, A. (1998). Comparative study of backpropagation and improved counterpropagation neural nets in structural analysis and optimization. International Journal of Space Structures, 13, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1260/0266351981493355
Kaveh, A., & Khalegi, H. A. (2000). Prediction of strength for concrete specimens using artificial neural network. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(2), 1–13.
Kaveh, A., & Khavaninzadeh, N. (2023). Efficient training of two ANNs using four meta-heuristic algorithms for predicting the FRP strength. Structures, 52(June), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.040
Kaveh, A., & Servati, H. (2001). Design of double layer grids using back-propagation neural networks. Computers and Structures, 79, 1561–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00079-7
Kim, Y. C., Xu, X., Yang, Q., & Tamura, Y. (2019). Shape effects on aerodynamic and pedestrian-levelwind characteristics and optimization for tall and super-tall building design. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 8(4), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2019.8.4.235
Kopp, G. A. (2018). Full-Scale Methods for Examining Wind Effects on Buildings. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88945-510-2
Kumar, R., Aggarwal, R. K., & Sharma, J. D. (2013). Energy analysis of a building using artificial neural network: A review. Energy and Buildings, 65, 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.06.033
Kwok, K. C. S., Wilhelm, P. A., & Wilkie, B. G. (1988). Effect of edge configuration on wind-induced response of tall buildings. Engineering Structures, 10(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(88)90039-9
Leitl, B. M., Kastner-Klein, P., Rau, M., & Meroney, R. N. (1997). Concentration and flow distributions in the vicinity of U-shaped buildings: Wind-tunnel and computational data. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 67–68, 745–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00115-3
Malaysia, D. of S. (2007). Malaysian Standard Code of Practice for Building Structure. 95.
Mallick, M., Mohanta, A., Kumar, A., & Raj, V. (2018). Modelling of Wind Pressure Coefficients on C-Shaped Building Models. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6524945
Meena, R. K., Raj, R., & Anbukumar, S. (2022). Effect of wind load on irregular shape tall buildings having different corner configuration. Sadhana - Academy Proceedings in Engineering Sciences, 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-01895-2
Ministerio de Fomento. (2009). Documento básico SE-AE Seguridad Estructural. Acciones en la Edificación. Codigo Técnico de La Edificación, 1–42.
Mukherjee, S., Chakraborty, S., Dalui, S. K., & Ahuja, A. K. (2014). Wind induced pressure on “Y” plan shape tall building. Wind and Structures, An International Journal, 19(5), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.19.5.523
Öztaş, A., Pala, M., Özbay, E., Kanca, E., Çagˇlar, N., & Bhatti, M. A. (2006). Predicting the compressive strength and slump of high strength concrete using neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 20(9), 769–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.03.008
Sanyal, P., & Dalui, S. K. (2020). Effect of corner modifications on Y’ plan shaped tall building under wind load. Wind and Structures, An International Journal, 30(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2020.30.3.245
Sanyal, P., & Dalui, S. K. (2021). Effects of side ratio for ‘Y’ plan shaped tall building under wind load. Building Simulation, (November). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0731-1
Sanyal, P., & Dalui, S. K. (2022). Forecasting of aerodynamic coefficients of tri-axially symmetrical Y plan shaped tall building based on CFD data trained ANN. Journal of Building Engineering, 47(November 2021), 103889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103889
Sanyal, P. (2023). AELH-, CFD-, and ANN-based wind interference zone prediction of regular tall buildings. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00683-5
Sanyal, P., Banerjee, S., & Dalui, S. K. (2022). Prognosis of aerodynamic coefficients of butterfly plan shaped tall building by surrogate modelling. Wind and Structures, 34(4), 321–334.
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1929–1958.
Stathopoulos, T. (1985). Wind environmental conditions around tall buildings with chamfered corners. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 21(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(85)90034-0
Tamura, Y., & Kareem, A. (2013). Advanced structural wind engineering. In Advanced Structural Wind Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54337-4
T. Stathopoulos, C. C. Baniotopoulos (2007). Wind Effects on Buildings and Design of Wind-Sensitive Structures.
Verma, A., Meena, R. K., Dubey, H., Raj, R., & Anbukumar, S. (2022). Wind Effects on Rectangular and Triaxial Symmetrical Tall Building Having Equal Area and Height. Complexity, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4815623
Yi, J., & Li, Q. S. (2015). Wind tunnel and full-scale study of wind effects on a super-tall building. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 58, 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.08.005
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India for providing funding to conduct the research work. First authors would like to express thanks to Punjab Engineering College, Chandigarh, India for providing facilities used to complete writeup for the research work. Second author would like to thanks to the Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, Kolkata, India to complete the manuscript on the time.
Funding
Authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India for providing funding to conduct the research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.K.M. analysis, CFD, Writing original draft P.S. ANN, writing original draft A.P.S. Editing English R.R. Supervison
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability statement
All data and models used during the study appear in the submitted article.
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Meena, R.K., Sanyal, P., Paswan, A.P. et al. Forecasting of average surface pressure coefficient of polygonal building models. Asian J Civ Eng 24, 3907–3918 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00716-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00716-z