Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantification and parametric investigation for plan asymmetric low-rise steel frame structure considering soil-structure interaction under vertical ground motion

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the seismic codes suggest that the near-fault vertical ground motion component must be considered for certain special cases. There are no specific recommendations made for modelling the asymmetric structure with soil-structure interaction. This research studies low-rise asymmetric steel frame structures with soil-structure interaction using far-field infinite soil elements under horizontal earthquake alone (H case) and simultaneous horizontal and vertical earthquake (H + V case). Initially, soil structure is quantified using four near-fault without pulse ground accelerations on a symmetric single-storey and G + 2 storey steel frame. The nonlinear dynamic implicit analysis examines structural parameters and earthquake data to determine structure behaviour. Critical earthquake-related parameters include the ratio of peak ground vertical to horizontal acceleration (V/H), peak ground horizontal acceleration (PGHA), peak ground vertical acceleration (PGVA), and critical structure-related parameters include horizontal acceleration at the top node, horizontal displacement at the top node, and axial force in the bottom column. A parametric analysis of 40% and 60% plan asymmetric single and G + 2 storey steel frames with SSI was also performed. According to the parametric analysis, the H + V case has a greater influence on single-storey and G + 2 storey frame structures as plan irregularity increases. Hence, plan asymmetric low-rise steel frame with SSI should be designed for vertical ground motions with V/H ratios greater than one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated during the current investigation are available to the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Abaqus (2014) Abaqus/Standard User’s Manual, Version 6.14; Dassault Systems Simulia Corporation: Providence, RI, USA, 2014.

  • Abdollahiparsa, H., Homami, P., & Khoshnoudian, F. (2016). Effect of vertical component of an earthquake on steel frames considering soil-structure interaction. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(7), 2790–2801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0687-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahiwale, D., Shaha, P., Palaniyandi, K., Nayak, C., Khartode, R., & Morkhade, S. (2021). Quantification study for roof truss subjected to near-fault ground motions. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00478-0

  • Ahiwale, D. D., & Khartode, R. R. (2021). Parametric study for long-span roof truss subjected to vertical ground motion. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00320-5

  • Ahiwale, D. D., Kontoni, DP. N., & Darekar, P. L. (2023). Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames with different bracing systems. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01071-3

  • Ambraseys, N. N., & Simpson, K. A. (1996). Prediction of vertical response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25(4), 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ATC 63. (2007). Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters - 75% interim draft report. Redwood: Applied Technology Council.

  • Bayraktar, A., Hökelekli, E., Halifeoğlu, F. M., Mosallam, A., & Karadeniz, H. (2018). Vertical strong ground motion effects on seismic damage propagations of historical masonry rectangular minarets. Engineering Failure Analysis, 91, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrouz, A., Anahita, N., Pejman, A., & Masoud, M. (2012). Evaluation of seismic performance of moment resisting frames considering vertical component of ground motion. Advances in Structural Engineering, 15(8), 1439–1453. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.15.8.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovo, M., & Savoia, M. (2019). Evaluation of force fluctuations induced by vertical seismic component on reinforced concrete precast structures. Engineering Structures, 19, 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgnia, Y., & Campbell, K. (2004). The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedure for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2), 175–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. W. (1985). Strong motion attenuation relations: a ten-year perspective. Earthquake Spectra, 1(4), 759–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal, A., & He, L. (2004). Vertical earthquake ground motion records: An overview. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(5), 663–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golafshani, S., Akhtarpour, A., Rad, H. G., & Khosravi, S. (2023). A study on the near and far-field earthquake response of a low and mid-rise building resting on soft soil considering soil–structure interaction (SSI). Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24, 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00548-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, B., Zdravkovic, L., & Kontoe, S. (2018). Analytical and numerical investigation of site response due to vertical ground motion. Geotechnique, 68(6), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 800. (2007). Code of practice for general construction in steel. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

  • IS 1893-Part 1. (2016). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Part 1 general provision and buildings. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

  • Karabulut, M., & Kartal, M. E. (2020). Seismic analysis of Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) dams considering effect of viscous boundary conditions. Computers and Concrete. 25(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.25.3.255

  • Kaveh, A. (2006). Optimal Structural Analysis. John Wiley (Research Studies Press) Chichester, U.K.

  • Kaveh, A., Kalateh-Ahani, M., & Fahimi-Farzam, M. (2014d). Life-cycle cost optimization of steel moment-frame structures: performance-based seismic design approach. Earthquakes and Structures, 7(3), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.3.271

  • Kaveh, A., Mohammadi, S., Khadem Hosseini, O., Keyhani, A., & Kalatjari, V. R. (2015). Optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications using charged system search. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology. Transactions of Civil Engineering, 39(C1), 21–40.

  • Kaveh, A. (2013). Optimal Analysis of Structures by Concepts of Symmetry and Regularity. Springer Verlag.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Abbasgholiha, H. (2011). Optimum design of steel sway frames using Big Bangbig crunch algorithm. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(3), 293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Bakhshpoori, T., & Azimi, M. (2012). An efficient optimization procedure based on cuckoo search algorithm for practical design of steel structures. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 2(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Bakhshpoori, T., & Azimi, M. (2014c). Seismic optimal design of 3D steel frames using cuckoo search algorithm. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 24(3), 210-227. 10. 1002 / ta

  • Kaveh, A., & Boland Gerami, A. (2017). Optimal design of large-scale space steel frames using cascade enhanced colliding body optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 55(1), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1494-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Farahmand Azar, B., Hadidi, A., Rezazadeh Sorochi, F., & Talatahari, S. (2010). Performance-based seismic design of steel frames using ant colony optimization. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(4), 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Fazli, H. (2011). Approximate eigen solution of locally modified regular structures using a substructuring technique. Computers & Structures, 89(5–6), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Nasrollahi, A. (2014). Performance-based seismic design of steel frames utilizing charged system search optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Zakian, P. (2014). Optimal seismic design of reinforced concrete shear wall-frame structures. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(7), 2181–2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0640-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, K., Aizawa, K., & Takahashi, K. (1985). Attenuation of peak ground motion and absolute acceleration response spectra of vertical ground motion. Proceedings of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 169–176.

  • Kim, S. J., Holub, C. J., & Elnashai, A. S. (2011). Analytical assessment of the effect of vertical earthquake motion on RC bridge piers. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(2), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landge, M. V., & Ingle, R. K. (2021). Comparative study of floor response spectra for regular and irregular buildings subjected to earthquake. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00297-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malekizadeh, M., Fanaie, N., & Pirasteh, A. K. (2022). Vertical component effects of earthquake and soil-structure interaction on steel gabled frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 196, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoukas, G. E. (2021). Structural modelling of reinforced concrete planar frames under vertical ground motion. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22, 1563–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00397-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazza, F. (2018). Seismic demand of base-isolated irregular structures subjected to pulse-type earthquakes. Earthquakes and Structures, 108, 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadioun, G., & Mohammadioun, B. (1996). Vertical / horizontal ratio for strong ground motion in the near-field and soil non-linearity. Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, México.

  • Mohammadzadeh, B., & Kang, J. (2021). Seismic analysis of high-rise steel frame building considering irregularities in plan and elevation. Steel and Composite Structures, 39(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.39.1.065

  • Newmark, N. M. (1973). A study of vertical and horizontal spectra. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezamabadi, M. F., & Vayeghan, F. Y. (2015). Development of seismic criteria for seismic responses of regular and irregular structures in plan considering vertical component of the near-field records. Journal of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, 5(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. (2005). PEER Ground Motion https://peer.berkeley.edu/nga. Accessed 15 August 2021.

  • Papazoglou, A. J., & Elnashai, A. S. (1996). Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25(10), 1109–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radkia, S., Rahnavard, R., Tuwair, H., Gandomkar, F. A., & Napolitano, R. (2020). Investigating the effects of seismic isolators on steel asymmetric structures considering soil-structure interaction. Structures, 27, 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahnavard, R., & Siahpolo, N. (2017). Function comparison between moment frame and moment frame with centrically braces in high-rise steel structure under the effect of progressive collapse. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 4(4):42–57. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2017.77865.1084

  • SAP2000® Version 17 (2015), Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design; Computers and Structures, Inc. (CSI), Walnut Creek, CA and New York, NY, USA https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000

  • Scarfone, R., Morigi, M., & Conti, R. (2020). Assessment of dynamic soil-structure interaction effects for tall buildings: A 3D numerical approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 128(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105864

  • SeismoMatch. (2021). A computer program for spectrum matching of earthquake records

  • Shrestha, B. (2009). Vertical ground motions and its effect on engineering structures: a state-of-the-art-review. International Seminar on Hazard Management for Sustainable Development, Kathmandu, Nepal. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2863.6165

  • Singh, J. P. (1995). Seismic loading: code versus site specific. Portland Regional Seminar on Seismic Engineering Issues, Portland, USA. http://nisee.berkeley.edu/lessons/singh.html

  • Tidke, A. R., Adhikary, S., & Farsangi, E. N. (2022a). Influence of earthquake excitations on concrete gravity dams founded on homogeneous and layered foundation. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 338, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00940-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidke, A. R., Adhikary, S., & Farsangi, E. N. (2022b). On the seismic performance evaluation of dam-foundation-reservoir system for the effect of frequency content and foundation flexibility. Ocean Engineering, 247, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzimas, A. S., Skalomenos, K. A., & Beskos, D. E. (2020). A hybrid seismic design method for steel irregular space moment resisting frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(4), 1657–1692. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1733140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UBC 1997-Volume 2. (1997). Uniform building code. Volume 2 Structural engineering design provisions. International council of building officials.

  • Valdes, J. G., Adrian-David, G., & Miguel, A. J. (2021). Impact of the vertical component of earthquake ground motion in the performance level of steel buildings. Applied Sciences, 11(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041925

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This manuscript was not supported by any external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors wrote the main manuscript text and figure and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhiraj D. Ahiwale.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each author states that they have no other conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahiwale, D.D., Patil, A.N. Quantification and parametric investigation for plan asymmetric low-rise steel frame structure considering soil-structure interaction under vertical ground motion. Asian J Civ Eng 24, 2337–2353 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00644-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00644-y

Keywords

Navigation