Skip to main content
Log in

Mitigating the seismic pounding between adjacent buildings by the use of link beams between them and investigating the best location of these links

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A seismic pounding occurs if there is not enough distance between nearby buildings to allow their relative movements during earthquakes. The most simple and effective method to reduce pounding and prevent damage from pounding is to establish a suitable separation distance, but it can be difficult to achieve because of the expensive land cost. The solution to eliminating the pounding between buildings is to use stiffeners to reduce the impact of pounding by reducing lateral displacements like R.C. walls and bracings or enhancing the behavior of the structure by utilizing seismic energy dissipation techniques. Previous techniques have some difficulties when applied especially in existing buildings, therefore, this research aims to study the use of a new technique that proposes to link the two adjacent buildings by link beams and to investigate the best location of these links. Three cases were selected to study pounding mitigation techniques between two nearby buildings. For each case, three main locations were selected to link the two nearby buildings on the first, middle, and last floors of the short building. The results of the study indicate that pounding force decreases when two buildings are connected on the first and middle floors in all cases studied. The percentage of decrease in pounding force ranges between 40–50 and 70–80%, respectively. While pounding eliminates when two buildings are connected on the last floor of the shorter building in all cases studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Abdeddaim, M., Ounis, A., Djedoui, N., & Shrimali, M. (2016). Reduction of pounding between buildings using fuzzy controller. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(7), 985–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdel, R., & Shehata, E. (2006). Seismic Pounding between Adjacent Building Structures. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 6(1), 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdel Raheem, R. (2014). Mitigation measures for earthquake induced pounding effects on seismic performance of adjacent buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(4), 1705–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alama, M. S., & Masmoum, M. S. (2020). Tying Devices to Mitigate Pounding of Adjacent Building Blocks. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 10(3), 5643–5647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos, S. A. (1988). Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 16(3), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, R. C., Naderpour, H., Khatami, S. M., & Jankowski, R. (2016). Numerical study on pounding between two adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation. Shock and Vibration, 2016(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1504783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskararao, A.V. and Jangid, R.S. (2004). Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with dampers. In: 13th World conference on earthquake engineering. Canada: Vancouver, B.C., Paper No. 3143.

  • Cole, G. L., Dhakal, R. P., & Tuner, F. M. (2012). Building pounding damages observed in the Chrischurch earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(5), 893–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. G., & Bertero, V. V. (1973). Investigation of the failure of the Olive View stair towers during the San Fernando earthquake and their implications on seismic design, EERC Report No. 73–26. Berkeley: University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eren, U. Z., & Muhammad, N. S. (2009). Dynamic analysis of adjacent buildings connected by fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures, WIT Transaction on the Built Environment, 104, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favvata, M. J. (2017). Minimum required separation gap for adjacent RC frames with potential inter-story seismic pounding. Engineering Structures, 152(1), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favvata, M. J., & Karayannis, C. G. (2005). Earthquake-induced interaction between adjacent reinforced concrete structures with non-equal heights. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 34(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geetopriyo, R., & Pallab, D. (2018). Noble methods to Prevent pounding between Adjacent Buildings. Journal of mechanics of continua and mathematical sciences, 13(4), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2018.10.00012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutub, S., & Mahmoud, S. (2013). Earthquake induced pounding-involved response of base-isolated buildings incorporating soil flexibility. Advances in Structural Engineering, 16(12), 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hytham, E., Robert, J., & Ayman, S. (2021). Mitigating the seismic pounding of multi-story buildings in series by linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 21(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-021-00249-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R. (2007). Theoretical and experimental assessment of parameters for the non-linear viscoelastic model of structural pounding. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 931–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R., & Mahmoud, S. (2011). Modified linear viscoelastic model of earthquake-induced structural pounding. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, 35(1), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R., & Mahmoud, S. (2016). Linking of adjacent three-story buildings for mitigation of structural pounding during earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(11), 3075–3097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9946-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R., & Sołtysik, B. (2013). Non-linear strain rate analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between steel buildings. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 6(3), 429–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamel, T. K. (2023). Estimating the Seismic Pounding Force between Adjacent Buildings and Study the Effect of Gap Distance on Seismic Pounding. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(1), 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabork, T., & Aydin, E. (2019). Optimum design of viscous dampers to prevent pounding of adjacent structures. Earthquakes and Structures, 16(4), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.4.437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamaneas, C. E., & Anagnostopoulos, S. A. (2008). Use of collision shear walls to minimize seismic separation and to protect adjacent buildings from collapse due to earthquake-induced pounding. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 37(12), 1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasai, K., Jeng, V., & Maison, B. F. (1992b). A spectral difference method to estimate building separations to avoid pounding. Earthquake Spectra, 8(2), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasai, K., Jeng, V., Patel, P. C., Munshi, J. A., & Maison, B. F. (1992). Seismic pounding effects-survey and analysis. Proceedings of the 10th world conference on Earthquake engineering, 7, 3893–3898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasai, K., & Maison, B. F. (1997). Building pounding damage during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Engineering Structures, 19(3), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komodromos, P. (2008). Simulation of the earthquake-induced pounding of seismically isolated buildings. Computers and Structures, 86(7), 618–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komodromos, P., & Polycarpou, P. C. (2010). Earthquake-induced poundings of a seismically isolated building with adjacent structures. Engineering Structures, 32(7), 1937–1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, G.L. (2004). Separation between adjacent nonlinear structures for prevention of seismic pounding. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada.

  • Maison, B. F., & Kasai, K. (1992). Dynamics of pounding when two buildings collide. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 21(9), 771–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meli, R., & Rosenblueth, E. (1986). The 1985 earthquake: Causes and effects in Mexico City, Concrete International Magazine. American Concrete Institute (ACI), 8(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miari, M., Choong, K. K., & Jankowski, R. (2019). Seismic pounding between adjacent buildings: Identification of parameters, soil interaction issues and mitigation measures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 121, 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miari, M., Choong, K. K., & Jankowski, R. (2021). Seismic pounding between bridge segments: A state-of-the-art review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28, 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naderpour, H., Naji, N., Burkacki, D., & Jankowski, R. (2019). Seismic response of high-rise buildings equipped with base isolation and non-traditional tuned mass dampers. Applied Sciences, 9(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, C. C., & Jangid, R. S. (2014). Dynamic response of identical adjacent structures connected by viscous damper. Structural Control Health Monitoring, 21(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penzien, J. (1997). Evaluation of building separation distance required to prevent pounding during strong earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 26(8), 849–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratesi, F., Sorace, S., & Terenzi, G. (2014). Analysis and mitigation of seismic pounding of a slender R/C bell tower. Engineering Structures, 71(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiang, X., Jianyun, C., & Jing, L. (1999). Dynamic Response of Damper-Connected Adjacent Buildings under Earthquake Excitation. Engineering Structures, 21(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00154-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R., Said, E., & Simon, O. (2020). Shared Tuned Mass Dampers for Mitigation of Seismic Pounding. Applied Sciences, 10(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10061918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravindranatha, P., & K., Shivananda S.M. and Suresh, H.L. (2016). A Study of Seismic Pounding Effect between Adjacent Buildings and its Mitigation by using Different Type of Bracing Systems. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(4), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A., Walsh, K. K., & Abdullah, M. M. (2013). Closed-form equations for coupling linear structures using stiffness and damping elements. Structural Control Health Monitoring, 20(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshan, A. M., Taleshian, H. A., & Eliasi, A. (2017). Seismic Pounding Mitigation by Using Viscous and Viscoelastic Dampers. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleem, M., Hameed, A., Qazi, A. U., Saeed, S., & Bashir, M. A. (2012). Mitigation of seismic pounding between adjacent buildings. Pakistan Journal of Science, 64(4), 326–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorace, S., & Terenzi, G. (2013). Damped interconnection-based mitigation of seismic pounding between adjacent R/C buildings. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(1), 406–412. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2013.V5.585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng, C. C., & Lin, J. H. (2001). Probability analysis of seismic pounding of adjacent buildings. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 30(10), 1539–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. P., & Skrikerud, P. E. (1980). Mutual pounding of adjacent structures during earthquakes. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 57(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(80)90106-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying, Z. G., Ni, Y. Q., & Ko, J. M. (2001). Random seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings coupled with non-linear hysteretic dampers. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 246(3), 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The funder has played no role in the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KT wrote the main manuscript text and prepared all figures and tables.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamel T. Kamel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Conflict of interest the authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamel, K.T. Mitigating the seismic pounding between adjacent buildings by the use of link beams between them and investigating the best location of these links. Asian J Civ Eng 24, 1769–1781 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00602-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00602-8

Keywords

Navigation