Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of X-shaped metallic dampers with fluid viscous dampers and influence of their placement on seismic response of the building

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the comparative study of seismic performances of X-shaped metallic damper (XMD) and fluid viscous damper (FVD) under eight different earthquake ground motions and how the damper placement influences the seismic response of the building. For this purpose five, eight and ten storey reinforced concrete buildings were used and each of the dampers were installed in different locations of the building that is the dampers were placed at bottom floors, alternative floors and all floors of the building and subjected to nonlinear time history analysis under eight different earthquake ground motions. This paper focuses on effect of these dampers on the seismic response of the structure like lateral displacement, base shear, storey drift and energy dissipation. The results show that fluid viscous damper performed slightly better than X-shaped metallic damper in reducing the roof displacement, storey drift and the results are vice versa in reducing the base shear. For earthquakes with low ‘g’ value (PGA = 0.29 g), fluid viscous damper dissipated more amount of input energy when compared to X-shaped metallic damper whereas for earthquakes with high ‘g’ value (PGA = 0.44 g), X-shaped metallic damper dissipated more amount of input energy. It is observed that fluid viscous damper is more suitable for earthquakes with low ‘g’ value and X-shaped metallic damper is more suitable for earthquakes with high ‘g’ value. Dampers placed in all floors of the building performed well in dissipating the input energy and reducing the roof displacement, storey drift. Dampers placed in the bottom floors performed well in reducing the base shear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, I. D., Nims, D. K., & Kelly, J. M. (1992). Comparative study of four passive energy dissipation systems. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 25(3), 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, I. D., Nims, D. K., Whittaker, A. S., & Kelly, J. M. (1993). Testing of passive energy dissipation systems. Earthquake Spectra, 9(3), 335–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE 41-06. (2007). Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA.

  • Bagheri, S., Barghian, M., Saieri, F., & Farzinfar, A. (2015). U-shaped metallic-yielding damper in building structures: seismic behavior and comparison with a friction damper. Structures, 3, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakre, S. V., Jangid, R. S., & Reddy, G. R. (2006). Optimum X-plate dampers for seismic response control of piping systems. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 83(9), 672–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banazadeh, M., & Ghanbari, A. (2017). Seismic performance assessment of steel moment-resisting frames equipped with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers with the same damping ratio. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 136, 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, M. C., & Symans, M. D. (1993). Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2(2), 93–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dicleli, M., & Mehta, A. (2007). Seismic performance of chevron braced steel frames with and without viscous fluid dampers as a function of ground motion and damper characteristics. Journal of Construction Steel Research, 63(8), 1102–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y., & Kasai, K. (1998). Comparative study of frames using viscoelastic and viscous dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(5), 513–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J. S., Huang, Y. N., Yi, S. L., & Ho, S. Y. (2008). Design formulations for supplemental viscous dampers to building structures. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 134(1), 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS: 13920. (1993). Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces: code of practice. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi.

  • IS: 1893 part I. (2016). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

  • IS: 875 part II. (1987). Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquakes) for buildings and structures, part 2: imposed loads. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi.

  • Kelly, J. M., Skinner, R. I., & Heine, A. J. (1972). Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. N., & Li, G. (2007). Experimental study of structure with dual function metallic dampers. Engineering Structures, 29(8), 1917–1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. X., Cai, Y. Q., Qu, Q. F., & Zhan, Q. H. (2012). Study on the effect of supporting stiffness on energy dissipation efficiency of viscous dampers. Applied Mechanics and Material, 105–107, 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansoori, M. R., & Moghadam, A. S. (2009). Using viscous damper distribution to reduce multiple seismic responses of asymmetric structures. Journal of Construction Steel Research, 65(12), 2176–2185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marko, J., Thambiratnam, D., & Perera, N. (2004). Influence of damping systems on building structures subject to seismic effects. Engineering Structures, 26(13), 1939–1956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, S., & Gupta, V. K. (2002). Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time histories. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9), 799–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narkhede, D. I., & Sinha, R. (2014). Behavior of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers for control of shock vibrations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333(1), 80–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, D. R., Singhal, T., Taraithia, S. S., & Saini, A. (2015). Cyclic behavior of shear and flexural yielding metallic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 114, 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAP 2000. (2009). Static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures. Berkeley, California: Computers and Structures, Inc.

  • Seo, C. Y., Karavasilis, T. L., Ricles, J. M., & Sause, R. (2014). Seismic performance and probabilistic collapse resistance assessment of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 43(14), 2135–2154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, R. I., Kelly, J. M., & Heine, A. J. (1974). Hysteretic dampers for earthquake-resistant structures. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 3(3), 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, A. S., Bertero, V. V., Thompson, C. L., & Alonso, L. J. (1991). Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices. Earthquake Spectra, 7(4), 563–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, C., & Hanson, R. D. (1992). Influence of ADAS element parameters on building seismic response. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 118(7), 1903–1918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naga Dheeraj Kumar Reddy Chukka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chukka, N.D.K.R., Krishnamurthy, M. Comparison of X-shaped metallic dampers with fluid viscous dampers and influence of their placement on seismic response of the building. Asian J Civ Eng 20, 869–882 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00151-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00151-z

Keywords

Navigation