Abstract
This paper presents the comparative study of seismic performances of X-shaped metallic damper (XMD) and fluid viscous damper (FVD) under eight different earthquake ground motions and how the damper placement influences the seismic response of the building. For this purpose five, eight and ten storey reinforced concrete buildings were used and each of the dampers were installed in different locations of the building that is the dampers were placed at bottom floors, alternative floors and all floors of the building and subjected to nonlinear time history analysis under eight different earthquake ground motions. This paper focuses on effect of these dampers on the seismic response of the structure like lateral displacement, base shear, storey drift and energy dissipation. The results show that fluid viscous damper performed slightly better than X-shaped metallic damper in reducing the roof displacement, storey drift and the results are vice versa in reducing the base shear. For earthquakes with low ‘g’ value (PGA = 0.29 g), fluid viscous damper dissipated more amount of input energy when compared to X-shaped metallic damper whereas for earthquakes with high ‘g’ value (PGA = 0.44 g), X-shaped metallic damper dissipated more amount of input energy. It is observed that fluid viscous damper is more suitable for earthquakes with low ‘g’ value and X-shaped metallic damper is more suitable for earthquakes with high ‘g’ value. Dampers placed in all floors of the building performed well in dissipating the input energy and reducing the roof displacement, storey drift. Dampers placed in the bottom floors performed well in reducing the base shear.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, I. D., Nims, D. K., & Kelly, J. M. (1992). Comparative study of four passive energy dissipation systems. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 25(3), 175–192.
Aiken, I. D., Nims, D. K., Whittaker, A. S., & Kelly, J. M. (1993). Testing of passive energy dissipation systems. Earthquake Spectra, 9(3), 335–370.
ASCE 41-06. (2007). Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA.
Bagheri, S., Barghian, M., Saieri, F., & Farzinfar, A. (2015). U-shaped metallic-yielding damper in building structures: seismic behavior and comparison with a friction damper. Structures, 3, 163–171.
Bakre, S. V., Jangid, R. S., & Reddy, G. R. (2006). Optimum X-plate dampers for seismic response control of piping systems. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 83(9), 672–685.
Banazadeh, M., & Ghanbari, A. (2017). Seismic performance assessment of steel moment-resisting frames equipped with linear and nonlinear fluid viscous dampers with the same damping ratio. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 136, 215–228.
Constantinou, M. C., & Symans, M. D. (1993). Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2(2), 93–132.
Dicleli, M., & Mehta, A. (2007). Seismic performance of chevron braced steel frames with and without viscous fluid dampers as a function of ground motion and damper characteristics. Journal of Construction Steel Research, 63(8), 1102–1115.
Fu, Y., & Kasai, K. (1998). Comparative study of frames using viscoelastic and viscous dampers. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(5), 513–522.
Hwang, J. S., Huang, Y. N., Yi, S. L., & Ho, S. Y. (2008). Design formulations for supplemental viscous dampers to building structures. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 134(1), 22–31.
IS: 13920. (1993). Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces: code of practice. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi.
IS: 1893 part I. (2016). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
IS: 875 part II. (1987). Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquakes) for buildings and structures, part 2: imposed loads. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi.
Kelly, J. M., Skinner, R. I., & Heine, A. J. (1972). Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), 63–88.
Li, H. N., & Li, G. (2007). Experimental study of structure with dual function metallic dampers. Engineering Structures, 29(8), 1917–1928.
Lu, Y. X., Cai, Y. Q., Qu, Q. F., & Zhan, Q. H. (2012). Study on the effect of supporting stiffness on energy dissipation efficiency of viscous dampers. Applied Mechanics and Material, 105–107, 96–101.
Mansoori, M. R., & Moghadam, A. S. (2009). Using viscous damper distribution to reduce multiple seismic responses of asymmetric structures. Journal of Construction Steel Research, 65(12), 2176–2185.
Marko, J., Thambiratnam, D., & Perera, N. (2004). Influence of damping systems on building structures subject to seismic effects. Engineering Structures, 26(13), 1939–1956.
Mukherjee, S., & Gupta, V. K. (2002). Wavelet-based generation of spectrum-compatible time histories. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(9), 799–804.
Narkhede, D. I., & Sinha, R. (2014). Behavior of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers for control of shock vibrations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 333(1), 80–98.
Sahoo, D. R., Singhal, T., Taraithia, S. S., & Saini, A. (2015). Cyclic behavior of shear and flexural yielding metallic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 114, 247–257.
SAP 2000. (2009). Static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures. Berkeley, California: Computers and Structures, Inc.
Seo, C. Y., Karavasilis, T. L., Ricles, J. M., & Sause, R. (2014). Seismic performance and probabilistic collapse resistance assessment of steel moment resisting frames with fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 43(14), 2135–2154.
Skinner, R. I., Kelly, J. M., & Heine, A. J. (1974). Hysteretic dampers for earthquake-resistant structures. Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 3(3), 287–296.
Whittaker, A. S., Bertero, V. V., Thompson, C. L., & Alonso, L. J. (1991). Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices. Earthquake Spectra, 7(4), 563–604.
Xia, C., & Hanson, R. D. (1992). Influence of ADAS element parameters on building seismic response. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 118(7), 1903–1918.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chukka, N.D.K.R., Krishnamurthy, M. Comparison of X-shaped metallic dampers with fluid viscous dampers and influence of their placement on seismic response of the building. Asian J Civ Eng 20, 869–882 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00151-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00151-z