Skip to main content
Log in

Peridynamic Models for Random Media Found by Coarse Graining

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using coarse graining, the upscaled mechanical properties of a solid with small scale heterogeneities are derived. The method maps internal forces at the small scale onto peridynamic bond forces in the coarse grained mesh. These upscaled bond forces are used to calibrate a peridynamic material model with position-dependent parameters. These parameters incorporate mesoscale variations in the statistics of the small scale system. The upscaled peridynamic model can have a much coarser discretization than the original small scale model, allowing larger scale simulations to be performed efficiently. The convergence properties of the method are investigated for representative random microstructures. A bond breakage criterion for the upscaled peridynamic material model is also demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

References

  1. Peerlings R, Fleck N (2004) Computational evaluation of strain gradient elasticity constants. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 2(4):599–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Willis JR (1983) The overall elastic response of composite materials. J Appl Mech 50(4b):1202–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Torquato S (2005) Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buryachenko V (2007) Micromechanics of heterogeneous materials. Springer Science & Business Media

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Milton GW (2022) The theory of composites. SIAM

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1962) On some variational principles in anisotropic and nonhomogeneous elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 10(4):335–342

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1963) A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J Mech Phys Solids 11(2):127–140

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Drugan WJ, Willis JR (1996) A micromechanics-based nonlocal constitutive equation and estimates of representative volume element size for elastic composites. J Mech Phys Solids 44(4):497–524

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silling SA (2014) Origin and effect of nonlocality in a composite. J Mech Mater Struct 9(2):245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alali B, Lipton R (2012) Multiscale dynamics of heterogeneous media in the peridynamic formulation. J Elast 106:71–103

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehrmashhadi J, Chen Z, Zhao J, Bobaru F (2019) A stochastically homogenized peridynamic model for intraply fracture in fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 182:107770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Z, Niazi S, Bobaru F (2019) A peridynamic model for brittle damage and fracture in porous materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 122:104059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu P, Zhao J, Chen Z, Bobaru F (2020) Validation of a stochastically homogenized peridynamic model for quasi-static fracture in concrete. Eng Fract Mech 237:107293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu P, Yang F, Chen Z, Bobaru F (2021) Stochastically homogenized peridynamic model for dynamic fracture analysis of concrete. Eng Fract Mech 253:107863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Madenci E, Barut A, Phan ND (2017) Peridynamic unit cell homogenization. In: 58th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, number AIAA 2017-1138

  16. Madenci E, Barut A, Phan N (2018) Peridynamic unit cell homogenization for thermoelastic properties of heterogenous microstructures with defects. Compos Struct 188:104–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu Y, Wang J, Madenci E, Mu Z, Yu Y (2022) Peridynamic micromechanical model for damage mechanisms in composites. Compos Struct 301:116182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia W, Oterkus E, Oterkus S (2021) Ordinary state-based peridynamic homogenization of periodic micro-structured materials. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 113:102960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Buryachenko VA (2014) Some general representations in thermoperistatics of random structure composites. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 12(4):331–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buryachenko VA (2017) Effective properties of thermoperistatic random structure composites: some background principles. Math Mech Solids 22(6):1366–1386

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Buryachenko VA (2020) Variational principles and generalized Hill’s bounds in micromechanics of linear peridynamic random structure composites. Math Mech Solids 25(3):682–704

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Buryachenko VA (2020) Effective deformation of peridynamic random structure bar subjected to inhomogeneous body-force. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 18(5):569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Buryachenko VA (2020) Generalized effective fields method in peridynamic micromechanics of random structure composites. Int J Solids Struct 202:765–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Buryachenko VA (2023) Effective displacments of peridynamic heterogeneous bar loaded by body force with compact support. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 21(1):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buryachenko VA (2023) Estimations of effective energy-based criteria in nonlinear phenomena in peridynamic micromechanics of random structure composites. J Peridynamics Nonlocal Model. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-023-00096-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Buryachenko VA (2023) Linearized ordinary state-based peridynamic micromechanics of composites. J Mech Mater Struct 18(4):445–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Buryachenko VA (2023) Effective nonlocal behavior of peridynamic random structure composites subjected to body forces with compact support and related prospective problems. Math Mech Solids 28(6):1401–1436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Silling SA (2011) A coarsening method for linear peridynamics. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 9(6):609–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. You H, Yu Y, Silling S, D’Elia M (2022) A data-driven peridynamic continuum model for upscaling molecular dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 389:114400

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. You H, Xu X, Yu Y, Silling S, D’Elia M, Foster J (2023) Towards a unified nonlocal, peridynamics framework for the coarse-graining of molecular dynamics data with fractures. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04540

  31. Xu X, D’Elia M, Foster JT (2021) A machine-learning framework for peridynamic material models with physical constraints. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 386:114062

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. You H, Yu Y, Silling S, D’Elia M (2020) Data-driven learning of nonlocal models: from high-fidelity simulations to constitutive laws. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04157

  33. Fan Y, D’Elia M, Yu Y, Najm HN, Silling S (2023) Bayesian nonlocal operator regression: a data-driven learning framework of nonlocal models with uncertainty quantification. J Eng Mech 149(8):04023049

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fan Y, Tian X, Yang X, Li X, Webster C, Yu Y (2022) An asymptotically compatible probabilistic collocation method for randomly heterogeneous nonlocal problems. J Comput Phys 465:111376

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Fan Y, You H, Tian X, Yang X, Li X, Prakash N, Yu Y (2022) A meshfree peridynamic model for brittle fracture in randomly heterogeneous materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 399:115340

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Madenci E, Oterkus E (2013) Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88:151–184

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Silling S, Littlewood D, Seleson P (2015) Variable horizon in a peridynamic medium. J Mech Mater Struct 10(5):591–612

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Silling SA, Adams DP, Branch BA (2023) Mesoscale model for spall in additively manufactured 304L stainless steel. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 21(3):49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article has been authored by an employee of National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC under Contract No. DE-NA0003525 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The employee owns all right, title and interest in and to the article and is solely responsible for its contents. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this article or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan https://www.energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan.

Funding

Funding was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Advanced Certification and Qualification program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS wrote the main manuscript. SJ and YY discussed technical ideas and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stewart A. Silling.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Derivation of the NOSB Influence Function

Appendix: Derivation of the NOSB Influence Function

In this Appendix it is shown that the form of the influence function \(\omega\) can be obtained from the form of the CG smoothing function \(\Omega\). It is convenient to use the continuum expression for the CG bond forces:

$$\begin{aligned} \textbf{f}(\textbf{q},\textbf{x})=\int \int \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{x})\Omega (\textbf{Q},\textbf{q})\textbf{F}(\textbf{Q},\textbf{X})\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{Q}\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{X} \end{aligned}$$
(104)

where the integrals are over the entire body. Assume that the lattice forces are short-range, that is, \(d\ll R\). Also let \(\Omega\) be radially symmetric, that is, \(\Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{x})\) depends only on \(|\textbf{X}-\textbf{x}|\). Further assume that \(\textbf{X}\) is in the interior of the body, that there are no external forces, and that the body and the deformation are both homogeneous. Define \(\textbf{P}=\textbf{Q}-\textbf{X}\). Then (104) becomes

$$\begin{aligned} \textbf{f}(\textbf{q},\textbf{x})=\int \int \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{x})\Omega (\textbf{X}+\textbf{P},\textbf{q})\textbf{F}_0(\textbf{P})\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{P}\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{X} \end{aligned}$$
(105)

where \(\textbf{F}_0\) is a function independent of \(\textbf{X}\). Since the body is in equilibrium,

$$\begin{aligned} \int \textbf{F}_0(\textbf{P})\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{P}=\mathbf{{0}}. \end{aligned}$$
(106)

Since d is small, terms in a Taylor expansion for \(\Omega\) near \(\textbf{X}\) higher than first order can be neglected for present purposes. From (105),

$$\begin{aligned} \textbf{f}(\textbf{q},\textbf{x})=\int \int \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{x})\Big [ \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{q})+\textbf{P}\cdot \nabla \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{q}) \Big ] \textbf{F}_0(\textbf{P})\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{P}\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{X}. \end{aligned}$$
(107)

In view of (106),

$$\begin{aligned} \textbf{f}(\textbf{q},\textbf{x})=\varvec{\sigma }_0\int \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{x})\nabla \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{q})\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{X} \end{aligned}$$
(108)

where the stress tensor is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \varvec{\sigma }_0=\int \textbf{F}_0(\textbf{P})\otimes \textbf{P}\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{P}. \end{aligned}$$
(109)

Now recall the peridynamic bond stress for a corrospondence material with influence function \(\omega\):

$$\begin{aligned} \textbf{f}(\textbf{q},\textbf{x})=\frac{1}{K_0}\varvec{\sigma }_0\omega (| {\varvec{\xi }} |) {\varvec{\xi }} , \qquad {\varvec{\xi }} =\textbf{q}-\textbf{x}. \end{aligned}$$
(110)

in which, under the present assumptions, the shape tensor is isotropic, that is \(\textbf{K}=K_0\textbf{1}\) for some scalar \(K_0\). Comparing (108) and (110), the conclusion is that

$$\begin{aligned} \omega (\textbf{q},\textbf{x})=\frac{1}{|\textbf{q}-\textbf{x}|}\left| \int \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{x})\nabla \Omega (\textbf{X},\textbf{q})\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{X}\right| \end{aligned}$$
(111)

where \(K_0\) is omitted, since the normalization of \(\omega\) is handled within the correspondence model. Under the present assumptions, \(\omega\) depends only on \(|\textbf{q}-\textbf{x}|\), and (111) therefore simplifies to

$$\begin{aligned} \omega (\xi )=\frac{1}{\xi }\left| \int _{{\mathcal {B}}}\Omega (\textbf{X},\mathbf{{0}})\nabla \Omega (\textbf{X},\xi \textbf{e})\;{ {\text {d}} }\textbf{X}\right| \end{aligned}$$
(112)

where \(\textbf{e}\) is any fixed unit vector and, taking liberties with the notation, \(\omega (|\textbf{q}-\textbf{x}|)\) replaces \(\omega (\textbf{q},\textbf{x})\). \({\mathcal {B}}\) is a neighborhood of \(\mathbf{{0}}\) with radius R. A typical curve for \(\omega\) is shown in Fig. 20, in which tent-shaped smoothing functions are assumed.

Equation (112) provides the expression for the influence function in an NOSB peridynamic material model derived from the underlying smoothing functions that are used for coarse graining.

Fig. 20
figure 20

Influence function for an NOSB material model as determined from the smoothing functions

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silling, S.A., Jafarzadeh, S. & Yu, Y. Peridynamic Models for Random Media Found by Coarse Graining. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-024-00118-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-024-00118-y

Keywords

Navigation