Skip to main content
Log in

Determining origins of satellite breakup events in LEO region

  • Engineering Note
  • Published:
Astrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, a surge in the number of spacecraft and fragments is observed, leading to more frequent breakup events in low Earth orbits (LEOs). The causes of these events are being identified, and specific triggers, such as collisions or explosions, are being examined for their importance to space traffic management. Backward propagation methods were employed to trace the origins of these types of breakup events. Simulations were conducted using the NASA standard breakup model, and satellite Hitomi’s breakup was analyzed. Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergences, Euclidean 2-norms, and Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergences were computed to deduce potential types of breakups and the associated fragmentation masses. In the simulated case, a discrepancy of 22.12 s between the estimated and actual time was noted. Additionally, the breakup of the Hitomi satellite was estimated to have occurred around UTC 1:49:26.4 on March 26, 2016. This contrasts with the epoch provided by the Joint Space Operation Center, which was estimated to be at 1:42 UTC ± 11 min. From the findings, it was suggested that the techniques introduced in the study can be effectively used to trace the origins of short-term breakup events and to deduce the types of collisions and fragmentation masses under certain conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muciaccia, A., Facchini, L., Montaruli, M. F., Purpura, G., Colombo, C., Di Lizia, P., Bianchi, G. Observation and analysis of Cosmos 1408 fragmentation. In: Proceedings of the 73rd International Astronautical Congress, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Southworth, R. B., Hawkins, G. Statistics of meteor streams. Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics, 1963, 7(2): 261–285.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lindblad, B. A. A computer search for asteroid families. Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, 1992: 363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Novaković, B., Vokrouhlický, D., Spoto, F., Nesvorný, D. Asteroid families: Properties, recent advances, and future opportunities. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2022, 134: 34.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Rożek, A., Breiter, S., Jopek, T. J. Orbital similarity functions—Application to asteroid pairs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2011, 412(2): 987–994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dimare, L., Cicalò, S., Rossi, A., Alessi, E. M., Valsecchi, G. B. In-orbit fragmentation characterization and parent bodies identification by means of orbital distances. In: Proceedings of the International Orbital Debris Conference, Sugar Land, Texas, USA, 2019, 2109: 6007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Celletti, A., Pucacco, G., Vartolomei, T. Proper elements for space debris. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2022, 134: 11.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Celletti, A., Pucacco, G., Vartolomei, T. Reconnecting groups of space debris to their parent body through proper elements. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11: 22676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossi, C., Cordelli, A., Pardini, C., Anselmo, L., Farinella, P. Modelling the space debris evolution: Two new computer codes. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, 1995, 89: 1217.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, H. G., Swinerd, G., Williams, N., Gittins, G. DAMAGE: A dedicated GEO debris model framework. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Space Debris, 2001, 473: 373–378.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, N. L., Krisko, P. H., Liou, J. C., Anz-Meador, P. D. NASA’s new breakup model of EVOLVE 4.0. Advances in Space Research, 2001, 28(9): 1377–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frey, S., Colombo, C. Transformation of satellite breakup distribution for probabilistic orbital collision hazard analysis. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2021, 44(1): 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alfano, S., Negron, D. Jr. Determining satellite close approaches. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 1993, 41(2): 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hoots, F. R., Roehrich, R. L. Spacetrack report No. 3: Models for propagation of NORAD element sets. Department of Defense, Technical Report, 1988. Information on https://celestrak.org/NORAD/documentation/spacetrk.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vallado, D., Crawford, P. SGP4 orbit determination. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2008: AIAA 2008-6770.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sang, J. Z., Bennett, J. C., Smith, C. H. Estimation of ballistic coefficients of low altitude debris objects from historical two line elements. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 52(1): 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Skilling, J., Sibisi, S. Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Gogoi, B. B., Rajarajan, D., Kumari, A., Chandrasekhar, M. V., Nirmala, S., Kartik, A. Fragmentation analysis of a break-up event in low Earth orbit. Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 2022, 9(1): 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flegel, S., Bennett, J., Lachut, M., Möckel, M., Smith, C. An analysis of the 2016 Hitomi breakup event. Earth, Planets and Space, 2017, 69: 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. JAXA. Hitomi experience report: Investigation of anomalies affecting the X-ray astronomy satellite “Hitomi” (ASTRO-H). Press release, JAXA, 2016. Information on https://global.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/astroh/files/topics20160531.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  21. Information on https://www.space-track.org/ (cited 18 December 2022)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022ZD0117301) for funding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Jiang.

Additional information

Declaration of competing interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. The author Hengnian Li is the Associate Editor of this journal and the author Yu Jiang is the Secretariat of this journal.

Yongjie Liu is an engineer of State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics, Xi’an Satellite Control Center, China. He received his master degree from the School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, China. His main interests are orbital mechanics and aerospace engineering. E-mail: liuyongjie_xian@163.com

Yu Jiang is a researcher of State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics, Xi’an Satellite Control Center. He received his bachelor degree from Peking University, China, and he holds his master degree, doctorate, and postdoctoral fellow of Tsinghua University, China. His main research interests include spacecraft dynamics and control, aerospace technology, space debris, dust ejecta, mega constellations, etc. He discovered the conserved quantity theorem for all equilibrium points of irregular bodies in celestial mechanics, and solved several key technical problems in Chinese aerospace engineering applications. He has published more than 60 papers and formulated 5 national standards. He won the 2021 China Space Foundation Space Contribution Award. Furthermore, in 2022, he was commended by the Central Ministries and Commissions for outstanding professional and technical talents, and he served as the leader of a top innovation team in the field of aerospace. E-mail: jiangyu_xian_china@163.com

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Jiang, Y., Li, H. et al. Determining origins of satellite breakup events in LEO region. Astrodyn 7, 465–476 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-023-0182-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-023-0182-4

Keywords

Navigation