Abstract
Background
Frailty is a geriatric syndrome that is generally represented as a universal issue in the aging population and may lead to adverse health-related events. The most widely used definition of frailty was proposed by Fried et al., wherein frailty is characterized by low physical activity, involuntary weight loss, exhaustion, poor muscle strength, and slow gait speed. The concept of “cognitive frailty” (simultaneous occurrence of both cognitive impairment and physical frailty) has recently been proposed. The Alzheimer’s Disease 8 (AD8) is a brief questionnaire used to differentiate normal aging from dementia. We hypothesized a positive correlation between frailty and AD8 scores in community-dwelling older adults.
Methods
Individuals over 65 years who visited a medical center in Taipei city during May, 2012 to April, 2013 for an annual check-up were eligible. The final sample comprised 205 older adults (average age = 75.5 ± 7.6 years). Frailty status was determined according to the Fried frailty criteria. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the odds of frailty among individuals with AD8 scores of 2 or more.
Results
After adjusting for age, gender and health-related behaviors, the odds ratio of frailty for individuals with AD8 scores ≥ 2 was 5.3 (p = 0.008). This positive relationship remained even after adjustment for additional correlates.
Conclusion
The findings have important implications for the early identification of frailty risk, provided that longitudinal studies can identify the directionality of the relationship between AD8 scores and frailty.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klein BE, Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE (2005) Frailty, morbidity and survival. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 41(2):141–149
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(3):M146–M156
Auyeung TW, Lee JSW, Kwok T, Woo J (2011) Physical frailty predicts future cognitive decline—a four-year prospective study in 2737 cognitively normal older adults. J Nutr Health Aging 15(8):690–694
Boyle PA, Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA (2010) Physical frailty is associated with incident mild cognitive impairment in community-based older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(2):248–255
Morley J (2015) Cognitive frailty: a new geriatric syndrome? Eur Geriatr Med 6(5):408–411
Kulmala J, Nykanen I, Manty M, Hartikainen S (2014) Association between frailty and dementia: a population-based study. Gerontology 60(1):16–21
Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, van Kan GA, Ousset PJ, Gillette-Guyonnet S et al (2013) Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) international consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging 17(9):726–734
Holsinger T, Deveau J, Boustani M, Williams JW (2007) Does this patient have dementia? JAMA 297(21):2391–2404
Folstein MFFS, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198
Teng EL, Hasegawa K, Homma A, Imai Y, Larson E, Graves A et al (1994) The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI): a practical test for cross-cultural epidemiological studies of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 6(1):45–58 (discussion 62)
Brodaty H, Pond D, Kemp NM, Luscombe G, Harding L, Berman K et al (2002) The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice. J Am Geriatr Soc 50(3):530–534
Fujii D, Hishinuma E, Masaki K, Petrovich H, Ross GW, White L (2003) Dementia screening: can a second administration reduce the number of false positives? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 11(4):462–465
Galvin JE, Roe CM, Powlishta KK, Coats MA, Muich SJ, Grant E et al (2005) The AD8: a brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology 65(4):559–564
Galvin JE, Roe CM, Xiong C, Morris JC (2006) Validity and reliability of the AD8 informant interview in dementia. Neurology 67(11):1942–1948
Galvin JE, Roe CM, Coats MA, Morris JC (2007) Patient’s rating of cognitive ability: using the AD8, a brief informant interview, as a self-rating tool to detect dementia. Arch Neurol 64(5):725–730
Galvin JE, Roe CM, Morris JC (2007) Evaluation of cognitive impairment in older adults: combining brief informant and performance measures. Arch Neurol 64(5):718–724
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2):142–148
Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401
Bauman A, Bull F, Chey T, Craig CL, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF et al (2009) The international prevalence study on physical activity: results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6(1):21
Liou YM, Jwo CJ, Yao KG, Chiang LC, Huang LH (2008) Selection of appropriate Chinese terms to represent intensity and types of physical activity terms for use in the Taiwan version of IPAQ. J Nurs Res JNR 16(4):252–263
Lee MB, Liao SC, Lee YJ, Wu CH, Tseng MC, Gau SF et al (2003) Development and verification of validity and reliability of a short screening instrument to identify psychiatric morbidity. J Formos Med Assoc 102(10):687–694
Gobbens RJ, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM (2010) Toward a conceptual definition of frail community dwelling older people. Nurs Outlook 58(2):76–86
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest for any of the authors related to the study.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted in the Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH), Taipei, and was approved by the TSGH Ethics Committee in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (TSGHIRB 100-05-257).
Informed consent
All participants provided written informed consent.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsueh, JT., Peng, TC., Chen, WL. et al. Association between frailty and a measure of cognition: a cross-sectional study on community-dwelling older adults. Eur Geriatr Med 9, 39–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-017-0012-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-017-0012-4