Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Artifacts to Cultures: Technology, Society, and Knowledge in the Upper Paleolithic

  • Letter to the Editor (by invitation)
  • Published:
Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The creation of cultural taxonomies has been a common feature of European Paleolithic archaeology since its inception nearly two centuries ago. Endeavoring to establish a scientific basis for the fledgling discipline, early prehistorians adopted the practices of paleontologists and biological systematists for artifacts recovered from Paleolithic sites. However, the absence of robust conceptual frameworks for cultural evolution and lack of common analytical protocols led to inconsistent terminology, idiosyncratic classifications, and weak links between the archaeological record, human behavior, and culture. This history continues to plague Paleolithic archaeology, hindering sophisticated research on human ecology, obscuring the processes that drove cultural and technological evolution, and making regional-scale syntheses nearly impossible. Pleistocene prehistory can certainly benefit from more consistent and transparent classification practices, common and well-defined terminology, and more replicable quantification. However, there are also fundamental conceptual issues underlying Paleolithic cultural taxonomies and their meaning that cannot be resolved by better analytical practices alone. We discuss the cultural, social, and technological processes responsible for pattern in the archaeological record. We focus on the typological systematics commonly used to measure variation within and among lithic assemblages, the socio-ecological-technological processes that generated that variation, and the complex relationships between assemblage characteristics and the nature of cultural knowledge transmission in social contexts. We conclude with a discussion of the usefulness of cultural taxonomies for the research objectives of twenty-first century Paleolithic archaeology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2006.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamforth, D. B. (1986). Technological efficiency and tool curation. American Antiquity, 51, 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M. (1990a). Beyond style and function: A view from the Middle Paleolithic. American Anthropologist, 92, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M. (1990b). Stone tools and Paleolithic settlement in the Iberian peninsula. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 56, 15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M. (1991). Retouched tools: Fact or fiction? Paradigms for interpreting chipped stone. In G. A. Clark (Ed.), Perspectives in prehistory: Paradigmatic biases in circum-Mediterranean hunter-gatherer research. (pp. 143–163). University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M. (1997). Stone tools, style, and social identity: An evolutionary perspective on the archaeological record. In C. M. Barton & G. A. Clark (Eds.), Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary theory in archaeological explanation. (pp. 141–156). American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., & Clark, G. A. (1993). Cultural and natural formation processes in Late Quaternary cave and rockshelter sites of western Europe and the Near East. In P. Goldberg, D. T. Nash, & M. D. Petraglia (Eds.), Formation processes in archaeological context. (pp. 33–52). Prehistory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., & Neeley, M. P. (1996). Phantom cultures of the Levantine Epipaleolithic. Antiquity, 70, 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., & Riel-Salvatore, J. (2014). The formation of lithic assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science, 46, 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., & Riel-Salvatore, J. (2016). A lithic perspective on ecological dynamics in the Upper Pleistocene of western Eurasia. In A. P. Sullivan & D. I. Olszewski (Eds.), Archaeological variability and interpretation in global perspective. (pp. 25–51). University of Colorado Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., Olszewski, D. I., & Coinman, N. R. (1996). Beyond the graver: Reconsidering burin function. Journal of Field Archaeology, 23, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., Riel-Salvatore, J., Anderies, J. M., & Popescu, G. (2011). Modeling human ecodynamics and biocultural interactions in the Late Pleistocene of western Eurasia. Human Ecology, 39, 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-011-9433-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, C. M., Aura Tortosa, J. E., Garcia-Puchol, O., et al. (2018). Risk and resilience in the late glacial: A case study from the western Mediterranean. Quaternary Science Reviews, 184, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.09.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1997). Style, function, and cultural evolutionary processes. In H. D. G. Maschner (Ed.), Darwinian archaeologies. (pp. 133–164). Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L., & Eerkens, J. (1999). Point typologies, cultural transmission, and the spread of bow- and-arrow technology in the prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity, 64, 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1977). For theory building in archaeology: Essays on faunal remains, aquatic resources, spatial analysis, and systemic modeling. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1973). Interassemblage variability–the Mousterian and the “functional” argument. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change models in prehistory. (pp. 227–254). Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (1980). Willow smoke and dogs’ tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity, 45, 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois facies. American Anthropologist, 68, 238–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, S. R., & Binford, L. R. (1969). Stone tools and human behavior. Scientific American, 220, 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R., & Sabloff, J. A. (1982). Paradigms, systematics, and archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, M. S. (2000). Nineteenth century tools for twenty-first century archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic typology of François Bordes must be replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009578011590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleed, P. (2001). Trees or chains, links or branches: Conceptual alternative for consideration of stone tool production and other sequential activities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 8, 101–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Geneste, J.-M., & Meignen, L. (1990). Identification de chaînes opératoires lithiques du Paléolithique ancien et moyen. Paléo, Revue d’Archéologie Préhistorique, 2, 43–80. https://doi.org/10.3406/pal.1990.988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boëda, E., Dibble, H. L., & Bar Yosef, O. (1995). Levallois: A volumetric construction, methods, a technique The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. (pp. 41–65). Prehistory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, C., Kalan, A. K., Mundry, R., et al. (2020). Chimpanzee ethnography reveals unexpected cultural diversity. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 910–916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0890-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1961). Typologie du Paléolithique, Ancien et Moyen. Publ. de l’Institut de Préhistoire de l’Université de Bordeaux, Memoire 1.

  • Bordes, F. (1969). Reflections on typology and techniques in the paleolithic. Arctic Anthropology, 6, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1972). A Tale of Two Caves. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1973). On the chronology and contemporaneity of different paleolithic cultures in France. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change models in prehistory. (pp. 217–226). Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, F. (1981). Vingt-cinq ans après: le complexe moustérien revisité. Bulletin de la Société Préhistoire Française, 78, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosselin, B., & Djindjian, F. (1999). Une révision de la séquence de la Riera (Asturies) et la question du Badegoulien cantabrique. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 96, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors? Science, 324, 1293–1298. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: Cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 65, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2003.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2013). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.

  • Boyd, R. (2017). A different kind of animal: How culture transformed our species. Princeton University Press.

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1982). Cultural transmission and the evolution of cooperative behavior. Human Ecology, 10, 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531189.

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). An evolutionary model of social learning: The effects of spatial and temporal variation. In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives. (pp. 29–48). Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3281–3288. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0134.

  • Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., & Henrich, J. (2011). Rapid cultural adaptation can facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1100-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. R., Aldeias, V., Archer, W., et al. (2019). Earliest known Oldowan artifacts at >2.58 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Ethiopia, highlight early technological diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 201820177. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820177116.

  • Burke, A., Riel-Salvatore, J., & Barton, C. M. (2018). Human response to habitat suitability during the Last Glacial Maximum in western Europe. Journal of Quaternary Science, 33, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buscot, F., & de Sonneville-Bordes, D. (1970). The significance of variability in Paleolithic assemblages. World Archaeology, 2, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahen, D., & Keeley, L. H. (1980). Not less than two, not more than three. World Archaeology, 12, 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A. (1993). Paradigms in science and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research, 1, 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A. (1994). Origine de l’homme: le dialogue de sourds. La Recherche 316–321.

  • Clark, G. A. (2002). Neandertal archaeology — implications for our origins. American Anthropologist, 104, 50–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A. (2006). Research traditions in paleoanthropology: An archaeological perspective. In J. L. Hantman & R. Most (Eds.), Managing archaeological data: Essays in honor of Sylvia W. Gaines (pp. 3–16). Anthropological Research Papers No. 57, Arizona State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A. (2011). Historical connection and formal convergence in the Lower Paleolithic of Eurasia. In S. Yi (Ed.), Handaxes in the Imjin Basin: Diversity and Variability in the East Asian Paleolithic. (pp. 37–82). Seoul National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., & Barton, C. M. (2017). Lithics, landscapes and la longue-durée – Curation & expediency as expressions of forager mobility. Quaternary International, 450, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., & Lindly, J. M. (2015). On paradigmatic biases and Paleolithic research traditions. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/204002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., & Riel-Salvatore. J. (2005). The compositional integrity of the Aurignacian. Munibe 107–118.

  • Clark, G. A., & Riel-Salvatore, J. (2006). Observations on systematics in Paleolithic archaeology. In E. Hovers & S. L. Kuhn (Eds.), Transitions before the transition: Evolution and stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age. (pp. 29–56). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., Lindly, J. M., Donaldson, M., et al. (1987). Paleolithic archaeology in the southern Levant: A preliminary report of excavations at Middle, Upper and Epipaleolithic sites in Wadi el-Hasa, west-central Jordan. Annual of the Department of Antiquities of Jordan, 31, 19–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A., Barton, C. M., & Straus, L. G. (2019). Landscapes, climate change and forager mobility in the Upper Paleolithic of northern Spain. Quaternary International, 515, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.04.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, C. (2005). Tenuous types: Scraper reduction continuums in the Eastern Victoria River Region, Northern Territory. In C. Clarkson & L. Lamb (Eds.), Lithics’ down under’: Australian perspectives on lithic reduction, use and classification. (pp. 21–33). Archaeopress.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Sonneville-Bordes, D., & Perrot, J. (1953). Essai d’adaptation des méthodes statistiques au Paléolithique supérieur. Premiers résultats. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, 50, 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L. (1984). Interpreting typological variation of Middle Paleolithic scrapers: Function, style, or sequence of reduction? Journal of Field Archaeology, 11, 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L. (1987). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 52, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L. (1995). Middle Paleolithic scraper reduction: Background, clarification, and review of the evidence to date. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 299–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L., Chase, P. G., McPherron, S. P., & Tuffreau, A. (1997). Testing the reality of a “living floor” with archaeological data. American Antiquity, 62, 629–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibble, H. L., Holdaway, S. J., Lin, S. C., et al. (2017). Major fallacies surrounding stone artifacts and assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 813–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9297-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. (2009). Are all Oldowan sites palimpsests? If so, what can they tell us about Hominid Carnivory? In E. Hovers & D. R. Braun (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to the Oldowan. (pp. 129–147). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. J., Holdaway, S. J., Fanning, P. C., & Shiner, J. I. (2008). An assessment and archaeological application of cortex measurement in lithic assemblages. American antiquity, 73, 513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C. (1978). Style and function: A fundamental dichotomy. American Antiquity, 43, 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-López de Pablo, J., Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Gómez-Puche, M., et al. (2019). Palaeodemographic modelling supports a population bottleneck during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition in Iberia. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09833-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flenniken, J. J., & Raymond, A. W. (1986). Morphological projectile point typology: Replication, experimentation, and technological analysis. American Antiquity, 51, 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. (1987). Another unique species: Patterns in human evolutionary ecology. Longman Scientific & Technological Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. G. (1994). Kaleidoscope or tarnished mirror? Thirty years of Muusterian investigations in Cantabria. In J. Lasheras (Ed.), Homenaje al Dr. Joaquín González Echegaray (pp. 37–54). Museo y Centro de Investigaciones de Altamira, Dirección General de Bellas Artes y Archivos, Madrid.

  • Frison, G. C. (1968). A functional analysis of certain chipped stone tools. American Antiquity, 33, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/278516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, A. C. (1974). The brand site: A techno-functional study of a Dalton site in northeast Arkansas Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No 7. Research Manuscript Series, 156, 382–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. A. K., Koster, D. A., & Sontz, A. H. L. (1971). The lithic assemblage of the Western Desert Aborigines of Australia. American Antiquity, 36, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, M. (2016). Population density, mobility, and cultural transmission. Journal of Archaeological Science, 74, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, B. L., Bolus, M., & Conard, N. J. (2008). Hammer or crescent wrench? Stone-tool form and function in the Aurignacian of southwest Germany. Journal of Human Evolution, 54, 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmand, S., Lewis, J. E., Feibel, C. S., et al. (2015). 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana. Kenya. Nature, 521, 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., Barton, C. M., & Hurtado, A. M. (2009). The emergence of human uniqueness: Characters underlying behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. B., Peeples, M. A., Huntley, D. L., & Carmack, H. J. (2015). Spatializing social network analysis in the Late Precontact U.S. Southwest. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.7183/2326-3768.3.1.63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, P. (2004). Slippery and Billy: Intention, selection and equifinality in lithic artefacts. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 14, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774304230050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, P. (2007). Looking the other way: A materialist/technological approach to classifying tools and implements, cores and retouched flakes. In S. P. McPherron (Ed.), Tools versus cores. (pp. 198–222). Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S., & Douglass, M. (2011). A twenty-first century archaeology of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-011-9103-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2007). Evolutionary context of human development: The cooperative breeding model. In C. A. Salmon & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Family relationships: An evolutionary perspective. (pp. 39–68). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2016). Development plus social selection in the emergence of ‘emotionally modern’humans. In C. L. Meehan & A. N. Crittenden (Eds.), Childhood: origins, evolution, and implications. (pp. 11–44). University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, G. L. (1977). Olorgesailie. Archeological studies of a Middle Pleistocene Lake Basin in Kenya. University of Chicago Press.

  • Jelbert, S. A., Hosking, R. J., Taylor, A. H., & Gray, R. D. (2018). Mental template matching is a potential cultural transmission mechanism for New Caledonian crow tool manufacturing traditions. Scientific Reports, 8, 8956. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27405-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, A. J. (2013). Neandertal Lithic Industries at La Quina. University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, S., Weed, J., & Evans, D. (2018). Semi-supervised machine learning approaches for predicting the chronology of archaeological sites: A case study of temples from medieval Angkor. Cambodia. PLOS ONE, 13, e0205649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (1991). Unpacking reduction: Lithic raw-material economy in the Mousterian of West-Central Italy. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 10, 76–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (1994). A formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits. American Antiquity, 59, 426–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. L. (1995). Mousterian lithic technology: An ecological perspective. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, M. (1971). Olduvai Gorge, vol. 3. Excavations in Bed I and II, 1960–63. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lyman, R. L., & O’Brien, M. J. (1997). The concept of evolution in early Twentieth-Century Americanist archaeology. In C. M. Barton & G. A. Clark (Eds.), Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary theory in archaeological explanation. (pp. 21–65). American Anthropological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, A. E. (1983). The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in the Levant. Advances in world archaeology, 2, 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L., & Gilbert, B. (1978). Excavations at natural trap cave. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies.

  • Marwick, B. (2008). Beyond typologies: The reduction thesis and its implications for lithic assemblages in Southeast Asia. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, 28, 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, B. (2017). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 424–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, B., d’Alpoim Guedes, J., Barton, C. M., et al. (2017). Open science in archaeology. The SAA Archaeological Record, 17, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6XX.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManamon, F. P., Kintigh, K. W., Ellison, L. A., & Brin, A. (2017). tDAR: a cultural heritage archive for twenty-first-century public outreach, research, and resource management. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 5, 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2017.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherron, S. P. (2000). Handaxes as a measure of the mental capabilities of early hominids. Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1999.0467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, B. J., Clark, J. J., Peeples, M. A., et al. (2013). Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219966110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neeley, M. P. (1989) The Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene Prehistory in the Southern Ghor and Northeast Araba, Jordan. MA Thesis, Arizona State University.

  • Neeley, M. P., & Barton, C. M. (1994). A new approach to interpreting Late Pleistocene microlith industries in southwest Asia. Antiquity, 68, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, F. D. (1995). Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: Inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois Woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity, 60, 7–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. J., & Holland, T. D. (1990). Variation, selection, and the archaeological record. Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 31–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, C. (2019). The quality of the archaeological record. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, C., & Brantingham, P. J. (2011). Mobility-driven cultural transmission along the forager–collector continuum. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 30, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2010.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., Shennan, S., & Thomas, M. G. (2009). Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science, 324, 1298–1301. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premo, L. S., & Hublin, J.-J. (2009). Culture, population structure, and low genetic diversity in Pleistocene hominins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809194105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N., & Riede, F. (2019). House of cards: Cultural taxonomy and the study of the European Upper Palaeolithic. Antiquity, 93, 1350–1358. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, J. (2001). Une analyse standarisée des chaines opératoires sur les pièces foliacées du Paléolithique moyen tardif. In L. Bourgignon, I. Ortega, & M.-C. Frère-Sautot (Eds.), Préhistoire et Approche Expérimentale. (pp. 77–87). Universität zu Köln Institut für Ur-und Frühgeschichte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riede, F., Hoggard, C., & Shennan, S. (2019). Reconciling material cultures in archaeology with genetic data requires robust cultural evolutionary taxonomies. Palgrave Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0260-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riede, F., Araujo, A. G. M., Barton, M. C., et al. (2020). Cultural taxonomies in the Paleolithic—old questions, novel perspectives. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 29, 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riel-Salvatore, J. (2010). A niche construction perspective on the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition in Italy. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 17, 323–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9093-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riel-Salvatore, J., & Barton, C. M. (2004). Late Pleistocene technology, economic behavior, and land-use dynamics in southern Italy. American Antiquity, 69, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolland, N. (1981). The interpretation of Middle Paleolithic variability. Man, 16, 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1973). Style, function, and artifact variability in palaeolithic assemblages. In C. Renfrew (Ed.), The explanation of culture change models in prehistory. (pp. 317–325). Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1988). The Mousterian and its aftermath. In H. L. Dibble & A. Montet-White (Eds.), Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia. (pp. 413–426). University of Pennsylvania Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, J. R. (1990). Style and ethnicity in archaeology: The case for isochrestism. In M. W. C. Hastorf & C. A. Hastorf (Eds.), The uses of style in archaeology. (pp. 32–43). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1976). Behavioral archaeology. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M. B. (1987). Formation processes of the archaeological record. University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, D. P., McGrew, W. C., Takahashi, A., & Hirata, S. (2018). Cumulative culture in nonhumans: Overlooked findings from Japanese monkeys? Primates, 59, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-017-0642-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2014). Sink the Mousterian? Named stone tool industries (NASTIES) as obstacles to investigating hominin evolutionary relationships in the Later Middle Paleolithic Levant. Quaternary International, 350, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.01.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. J. (2019). European Upper Palaeolithic cultural taxa: Better off without them? Antiquity, 93, 1359–1361. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (2002). Genes, memes, and human history: Darwinian archaeology and human evolution. Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (2020). Style, function and cultural transmission. In H. S. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 291–298). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S., Downey, S. S., Timpson, A., et al. (2013). Regional population collapse followed initial agriculture booms in mid-Holocene Europe. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1989). On tool-class use lives and the formation of archaeological assemblages. American Antiquity, 54, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/281329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1996a). Innovation and selection in prehistory: a case study from the American Bottom. In G. H. Odell (Ed.), Stone tools theoretical insights into human prehistory. (pp. 279–309). Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (1996b). An exegesis of the curation concept. Journal of Anthropological Research, 52, 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J. (2003). Chaıne opératoire and reduction sequence. Lithic Technology, 28, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shott, M. J., & Ballenger, J. A. M. (2007). Biface reduction and the measurement of Dalton curation: A Southeastern United States case study. American Antiquity, 72, 153–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/40035302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, L., Fuller, D., Boivin, N., et al. (2019). Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use. Science, 365, 897–902. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, L. G. (1990). Underground archaeology: Perspectives on caves and rockshelters. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 255–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, L. G., & Clark, G. A. (2000). La grotte de la Riera (Asturies) et la question du Solutréen Cantabrique (et Ibérique). Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française, 97, 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomáŝková, S. (2005). What is a Burin? Typology, technology, and interregional comparison. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12, 79–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-005-5666-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tostevin, G. B. (2011). Levels of theory and social practice in the reduction sequence and Chaîne Opératoire methods of lithic analysis. PaleoAnthropology, 2011, 351–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tostevin, G. B. (2012). Seeing lithics: A middle-range theory for testing for cultural transmission in the Pleistocene. American School of Prehistoric Research Monograph Series, Peabody Museum, Harvard University; and Oxbow Books.

  • Tostevin, G. B. (2019). Content matters: The materiality of cultural transmission and the intersection of Paleolithic archaeology with cultural evolutionary theory. In A. C. Love & W. Wimsatt (Eds.), Beyond the meme: Development and structure in cultural evolution. (pp. 311–364). University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wandsnider, L. (1992). The spatial dimension of time. In J. Rossignol & L. Wandsnider (Eds.), Space, time, and archaeological landscapes. (pp. 257–282). Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. J. (1995). Archaeology, anthropology, and the culture concept. American Anthropologist, 97, 683–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weedman, K. J. (2002). On the spur of the moment: Effects of age and experience on hafted stone scraper morphology. American Antiquity, 67, 731–744. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M., Otcherednoy, A., & Wiśniewski, A. (2017). Using multivariate techniques to assess the effects of raw material, flaking behavior and tool manufacture on assemblage variability: An example from the late Middle Paleolithic of the European Plain. Journal of Archaeological Science, 87, 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.09.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiessner, P. (1985). Style or isochrestic variation? A reply to Sackett. American Antiquity, 50, 160–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, P. J., & Flenniken, J. J. (1991). Missing the point: rebuttal to Bettinger, O’Connell, and Thomas. American Anthropologist, 93, 172–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will, M., & Mackay, A. (2020). A matter of space and time: How frequent is convergence in lithic technology in the African archaeological record over the last 300 kyr? In H. S. Groucutt (Ed.), Culture history and convergent evolution: Can we detect populations in prehistory? (pp. 103–125). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zilhão, J. (2001). Neandertal/modern human interaction in Europe. In M. Hays & P. T. Thacker (Eds.), Questioning the answers: Re-solving fundamental problems of the Early Upper Paleolithic. (pp. 13–20). BAR International Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilhão, J., & d’Errico, F. (1999). The chronology and taphonomy of the earliest Aurignacian and its implications for the understanding of Neandertal extinction. Journal of World Prehistory, 13, 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022348410845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Much of the content of this paper was inspired by the stimulating presentations and discussions at the conference All These Fantastic Cultures? Cultural Taxonomies in the Palaeolithic – Old Questions, Novel Perspectives, sponsored by Åarhus University and the European Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA

    C. Michael Barton & Geoffrey A. Clark

Authors
  1. C. Michael Barton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geoffrey A. Clark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Michael Barton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection: Cultural taxonomies in the Palaeolithic—old questions, novel perspectives

Guest Editors: Felix Riede and Shumon T. Hussain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barton, C.M., Clark, G.A. From Artifacts to Cultures: Technology, Society, and Knowledge in the Upper Paleolithic. J Paleo Arch 4, 16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-021-00091-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-021-00091-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation