Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Examination of Inclusivity and Support for Diversity in STEM Fields

  • Research Brief
  • Published:
Journal for STEM Education Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lack of diversity in STEM professions is an ongoing concern for the US both in terms of social justice and in having a globally competitive workforce. This study provides information for campus leaders to be proactive in considering a wide array of identities to meet the needs of students beyond attending to structural forms of diversity. Data from a large-scale, multi-institution study of students’ perceptions of inclusive coursework and institutional commitment to diversity in STEM fields furthers what we know about diversity in these majors. Results encourage campus leaders to additionally consider sexual orientation and disability status in conversations about diversity and to think about how culturally engaging and inclusive courses go beyond the content of the course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A., & Finley, B. (2009). Statistical methods for the social sciences. Prentice Hall Inc..

  • Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: a synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). Diversity and multiculturalism on the campus. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 25(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1993.9940617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, G. M., Manly, C. A., Kimball, E., & Wells, R. S. (2020). STEM degree completion and first-generation college students: a cumulative disadvantage approach to the outcomes gap. The Review of Higher Education, 43(3), 753–779. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. (2006). The educational benefits of diversity: the unfinished journey from “mandate” in Brown to “choice” in Grutter and Comfort. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760600968390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. (2007). Do interracial interactions matter? An examination of student-faculty contact and intellectual self-concept. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 249–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11772316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D., & Espinoza, A. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) Majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., et al. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038.

  • Foltz, L. G., Gannon, S., & Kirschmann, S. L. (2014). Factors that contribute to the persistence of minority students in STEM fields. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 4(4), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., Galvez, G., Landa, I., Buonora, P., & Thoman, D. B. (2016). Science that matters: the importance of a cultural connection in underrepresented students’ science pursuit. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. R., & McEwen, M. K. (2000). A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). “Yes, but how do we do it?” Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. In J. G. Landsman & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: Creating inclusive schools, building on students’ diversity, and providing true educational equity (pp. 33–46). Stylus.

  • Marquez Kiyama, J., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2017). Funds of knowledge in higher education: honoring students’ cultural experiences and resources as strengths (1st ed.). Routledge. Retrieved December 29, 2020, from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781315447315.

  • Mayhew, M. J., & Simonoff, J. S. (2015). Non-White, no more: effect coding as an alternative to dummy coding with implications for higher education researchers. Journal of College Student Development, 56(2), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2015.0019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. J., Grunwald, H. E., & Dey, E. L. (2005). Curriculum matters: creating a positive climate for diversity from the student perspective. Research in Higher Education, 46(4), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-2967-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milem, J. F., Chang, M. J., & Antonio, A. L. (2005). Making diversity work on campus: a research-based perspective. Association of American Colleges and Universities.

  • Moradi, B. (2017). (Re)focusing intersectionality: from social identities back to systems of oppression and privilege. In K. A. DeBord, A. R. Fischer, K. J. Bieschke, & R. M. Perez (Eds.), Handbook of sexual orientation and gender diversity in counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 105–127). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/15959-005.

  • Museus, S. D. (2014). The Culturally Engaging Campus Environments (CECE) model: a new theory of college success among racially diverse student populations. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Springer.

  • Museus, S. D., & Smith, E. J. (2016). The Culturally Engaging Campus Environments model and survey. NASPA. Retrieved March 26, 2021, from https://naspa.org/report/the-culturally-engaging-campus-environments-model-and-survey.

  • National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America's science and technology talent at the crossroads. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12984.

  • Nelson Laird, T. F. (2014). Reconsidering the inclusion of diversity in the curriculum. Diversity and Democracy, 17(4).

  • Okahana, H., & Zhou, E. (2018). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2007 to 2017 (p. 82). Council of Graduate Schools. Retrieved December 29, 2020, from https://cgsnet.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/CGS_GED17_Report.pdf.

  • Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2006). Relationships among structural diversity, informal peer interactions and perceptions of the campus environment. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (ED541511). ERIC. Retrived December 29, 2020, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541511.

  • Rocconi, L., & Gonyea, R. (2018). Contextualizing effect sizes in the National Survey of Student Engagement: an empirical analysis. Research and Practice in Assessment, 13, 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roksa, J., & Kinsley, P. (2018). The role of family support in facilitating academic success of low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 60, 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossmann, P. D., & Trolian, T. L. (2020). Working with others: student employment and interactions with diversity in college. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 57(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2019.1643356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: what next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2190/4YNU-4TMB-22DJ-AN4W.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: the role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison BrckaLorenz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

BrckaLorenz, A., Haeger, H. & Priddie, C. An Examination of Inclusivity and Support for Diversity in STEM Fields. Journal for STEM Educ Res 4, 363–379 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00055-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00055-1

Keywords

Navigation