Skip to main content
Log in

Sport, Power and Politics: Exploring Sport and Social Control within the Changing Context of Modernity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The focus of this paper charts sports role within the broader framework of exercising power and enforcing social control. From the start, I undertake a socio-historical analysis that seeks to explore the changing methods of implementing power and how they have evolved from industrial times to service a postindustrial setting. Through this prism, I examine sport, both as a central part of culture and as a policy area within post-war Britain. The contours of which, help the paper articulate the different roles sports policy has played within production and consumer-based societies, by exploring its metamorphosis from an area of social policy designed to instil discipline and set behaviours through a panoptic approach to governing. To now, becoming a central area of a modernised policy framework, built around the seductive workings of synopticism. Here, it is examined how elite sporting role models and the international success they acrue, are now used as sites of inspiration to motivate ordinary members of the public to be physically active. The contours of which, conform to a very different method of controlling populations and enforcing power from what was seen previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The exact date reffering to the start of ‘The Enlightenment’ is debated, however, there is a general consensus that it took place within the mid-eighteenth century.

References

  • Adorno, T. (1998). Critical models: Interventions and catchwords. Colombia: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (2001). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. London: Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1988). Modernity and the holocaust. Itacha: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Itacha: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1999). Culture as Praxis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2011). Collateral damage: Social inequalities in a global age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2012). This is not a diary. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Haugaard, M. (2008). Liquid modernity and power: A dialogue with Zygmunt Bauman. Journal of Power, 1(2), 111–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Tester, K. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2005). Power in the global age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2007). Beyond class and nation: Reframing social inequalities in a globalizing world. The British Journal of Sociology, 58(4), 679–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloyce, D., & Smith, A. (2009). Sport policy and development: An introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdaner, V., & Skidelsky, R. (1970). The age of affluence, 1951–1964. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramham, P. (2008) Sports policy. In: K. Hylton and P. Bramham, Eds. Sport Development: policy, process and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Bramham, P., & Wagg, S. (2017). The British Labour Party, Social Justice and the Politics of Leisure 1945-2015. In J. Long, T. Fletcher, & B. Watson (Eds.), Sport, leisure and social justice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannagan, P. M., & Giulianotti, R. (2015). Soft power and soft disempowerment: Qatar, global sport and Football’s 2022 world cup finals. Leisure Studies, 34(6), 703–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmicheal, F., Grix, J., & Marques, D. (2013). The Olympic legacy and participation in sport: An interim assessment of sport England’s active people survey for sports studies research. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(2), 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, B. (2010). Race, sport and politics: The sporting black diaspora. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society: The information age. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Critcher, C. (1985). The devil makes work: Leisure in capitalist Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (2007). A wider role for sport: Who’s keeping the score? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F., Long, J., & Duffield, B. (1988). Recreational welfare: The rationale for public sector investment leisure. Aldershot: Gower/Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. (2008). Public policies on sport development: Can mass and elite sport hold together? In V. Girginov (Ed.), Management of Sport Development. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. (2016). Social exclusion from sport and leisure: A decade of Progress or regress. In B. Houlihan & D. Malcolm (Eds.), Sport and society (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2000). A sporting future for all. London: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2008). Playing to win: A new era for sport. London: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). (2015). Sporting future – A new strategy for an active nation. London: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport/Strategy Unit (DCMS). (2002). Game plan: A strategy for delivering governments sport and physical activity objectives. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliassen, K. A., & Sitter, N. (2008). Understanding public management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, T. (2011). “The making of English cricket cultures”: Empire, globalisation and [anti] colonialism. Sport in Society, 14(1), 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flintoff, A., & Scraton, S. (2001). Stepping into active leisure? Young Women’s perceptions of active leisure and their experiences of physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 6(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, N. (2012). Public Sector Management. 6th Edition. London: Sage.

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Disciplines and sciences of the individual. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1992). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (2001). The fear of freedom. London: Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., & Cassell, P. (1993). The Giddens reader. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, P. (2002). There Ain’t no black in the union Jack: The cultural politics of race and nation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giulianotti, R., Armstrong, G., Hales, G., & Hobbs, D. (2015). Sport mega-events and public opposition: A sociological study of the London 2012 Olympics. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 39(2), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glyptis, S. (1989). Leisure and unemployment. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. (2004). Changing policy priorities for sport in England: The emergence of elite sport development as a key policy concern. Leisure Studies, 8(1), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. (2007). Olympic glory or grassroots development? Sports policy priorities in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom 1960-2006. International Journal of the History of Sport, 24(7), 921–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. (2009). Podium or participation? Analysing policy priorities under changing modes of sports governance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 1(2), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grix, J. (2009). The impact of UK sport policy on the governance of athletics. International Journal of Sport Policy, 1(1), 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grix, J., & Carmicheal, F. (2012). Why do governments invest in elite sport? A polemic. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 4(1), 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1985). The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, J. (1986). Sport, power and culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, J. (2002). The Victorian cult of the family and the early years of female sport. In S. Scraton & A. Flintoff (Eds.), Gender and Sport: A Reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, I. (2001). The politics of leisure policy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public Management for all Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J., & Manzenreiter, W. (2006). An introduction to the sociology of sports mega-events. The Sociology Review, 52(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, B. (1997). Sport, policy and politics: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, B., & Green, M. (2009). Modernisation and sport: The reform of sport England and UK sport. Public Administration, 83(3), 678–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, B., & Lindsey, I. (2013). Sport policy in Britain. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, B., & White, A. (2002). The politics of sports development: Development of sport or development through sport? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, K. (2009). Race and sport: Critical race theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, K. and Totten, M. (2013) Developing ‘sport for all’. In: K. Hylton. Eds. Sport Development: Policy, Process and Practice. London: Routledge.

  • Jackson, D. (2008) Developing sports practice. In: K. Hylton and P. Bramham. Eds. Sport Development: Policy, Process and Practice. London: Routledge.

  • Kirk, D. (1998). Schooling bodies: School practice and public discourse 1880–1950. London: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M. (2010). Surveillance and conformity in competitive youth swimming. Sport, Education and Society, 15(1), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J., & Spracklen, K. (2011). Positioning anti-racism in sport and sport in anti-racism. In J. Long & K. Spracklen (Eds.), Sport and Challenges to Racism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwark, E. (2000). Turbo-capitalism: Winners and losers in the global economy. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (2003). The prince. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s Panopticon revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, J. (2002). The new public management, modernisation and industrial change: Disruptions, Disjunctures and dilemmas. In K. McLaughlin, S. P. Osbourne, & E. Ferlie (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 77–91). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, B., & Green, M. (2001). Still playing the game at Arm’s length? The selective re-investment in British sport. Managing Sport and Leisure, 6(2), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratna, A. (2015). Sport and south Asian diasporas: Playing through time and space. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(6), 747–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D. and Smith, M. J, 2004. The ‘hybrid’ state: Labour’s response to the challenge of governance. In: S. Ludlam and M.J. Smith, Eds. Governing as new labour. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 106–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, D. (2012). The bid, the lead-up, the event, and the legacy: Global cultural politics and hosting the Olympics. British Journal of Sociology, 63(2), 285–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. (2013). The making of modern leisure: The British experience c.1850 to c.1960. In T. Blackshaw (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Leisure Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, S. (1992). Shaping up to womanhood: Gender and girls’ physical education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, S. (1994). The changing world of women and leisure: Feminism, ‘post-feminism’ and leisure. Leisure Studies, 13(4), 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spracklen, K. (2009). The purpose and meaning of leisure: Habermas and leisure at the end of modernity. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spracklen, K. (2011). Constructing leisure: Historical and philosophical debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, S. (2017). Leisure in the current interregnum: Exploring the social theories of Anthony Giddens and Zygmunt Bauman. In K. Spracklen, B. Lashua, E. Sharpe, & S. Swain (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of leisure theory (pp. 799–816). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, S. (2018). Grime music and dark leisure: Exploring grime, morality and synoptic control. Annals of Leisure Research, 21(4), 480–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whigham, S., & May, A. (2017). ‘Sport for yes’? The role of sporting issues in pro-Independence political discourse during the Scottish Independence referendum campaign. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(3), 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spencer Swain.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swain, S. Sport, Power and Politics: Exploring Sport and Social Control within the Changing Context of Modernity. Int J Sociol Leis 2, 385–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-019-00040-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41978-019-00040-4

Keywords

Navigation